Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Surgery Today
Erschienen in: Surgery Today 5/2021

17.09.2020 | Review Article

Troubleshooting in thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection for lung cancer

verfasst von: Atsushi Watanabe

Erschienen in: Surgery Today | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) anatomical lung resection (ALR) has been gaining popularity in the treatment of lung cancer in line with remarkable advances in both equipment and technique. The development and refinement of its technique have allowed thoracic surgeons to perform a wide variety of challenging and complex procedures in a minimally invasive fashion. Careful and meticulous preparation may shift in the future with the increasing sophistication and capabilities of VATS ALR. Moreover, constant awareness and a structured plan of the procedure are imperative to reducing or preventing complications. Intraoperative major complications during VATS ALR are infrequent, but can have catastrophic consequences. The decision to continue with VATS should take into consideration the surgeon’s skill level and ease with the approach and the relative potential benefit against the risk to the patient. We conducted this study to investigate the possible problems during VATS ALR and identify how to solve them based on the previous literature and our institutional data sampling.
Literatur
1.
Ettinger DS, Akerley W, Borghaei H, Chang AC, Cheney RT, Chirieac LR, et al (2013) Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2 . 2013 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines 11:645–53.
2.
Gopaldas RR, Bakaeen FG, Dao TK, Walsh GL, Swisher SG, Chu D. Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy in a cohort of 13,619 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:1563–70.PubMed
3.
Flores RM, Ihekweazu U, Dycoco J, Rizk NP, Rusch VW, Bains MS, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy: catastrophic intraoperative complications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:1412–7.PubMed
4.
Reed MF, Lucia MW, Starnes SL, Merrill WH, Howington JA. Thoracoscopic lobectomy: introduction of a new technique into a thoracic surgery training program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:376–82.PubMed
5.
Ferguson J, Walker W. Developing a VATS lobectomy programme—can VATS lobectomy be taught? Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2006;29:806–9.
6.
Kocher GJ, Schmid RA, Melfi FMA. Robotic lobectomy: tips, pitfalls and troubleshooting. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2014;46:e136–e138138.
7.
Yan TD, Cao C, D’amico TA, Demmy TL, He J, Hansen H, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy at 20 years: a consensus statement. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2014;45:633–9.
8.
Rocco G, Internullo E, Cassivi SD, Van Raemdonck D, Ferguson MK. The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008;18:235–47.PubMed
9.
Lewis RJ, Caccavale RJ, Bocage JP, Widmann MD. Video-assisted thoracic surgical non-rib spreading simultaneously stapled lobectomy: a more patient-friendly oncologic resection. Chest. 1999;116:1119–24.PubMed
10.
Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Mendez L, Garcia J. Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy and right upper lobectomy. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2012;42:169–71.
11.
Lee LS, Daniel J. Highlights from the 11th annual scientific meeting of the international society for minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:1107–9.PubMed
12.
Mahieu J, Rinieri P, Bubenheim M, Calenda E, Melki J, Peillon C, et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung lobectomy: can a robotic approach improve short-term outcomes and operative safety? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:354–62.PubMed
13.
Detterbeck FC, Lewis SZ, Diekemper R, Addrizzo-Harris D, Alberts WM. Executive summary. Chest. 2013;143:7S–37S.PubMed
14.
15.
Pischik VG. Technical difficulties and extending the indications for VATS lobectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:S623–S630630.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Bertolaccini L, Batirel H, Brunelli A, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Ismail M, Ucar AM, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: a consensus report from the uniportal VATS interest group (UVIG) of the European society of thoracic surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2019;56:224–9.
17.
Decaluwe H, Petersen RH, Hansen H, Piwkowski C, Augustin F, Brunelli A, et al. Major intraoperative complications during video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lung resections: an intention-to-treat analysis. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2015;48:588–99.
18.
Wilson WLL, Verhagen AFTM. Erroneous transection of bronchovascular structures during video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical lung resections: is there a critical view of safety? Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2016;50:190–1.
19.
Mitchell JD. Techniques of VATS lobectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5:177–81.
20.
Yao F, Wang J, Yao J, Hang F, Cao S, Cao Y. Video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy for lung cancer: description of a learning curve. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2017;27:696–703.
21.
22.
23.
Demmy TL, James TA, Swanson SJ, McKenna RJ, D’Amico TA. Troubleshooting video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1744–52.PubMed
24.
25.
Varela G, Jiménez MF, Novoa N, Aranda JL. Estimating hospital costs attributable to prolonged air leak in pulmonary lobectomy. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2005;27:329–33.
26.
Lang G, Csekeö A, Stamatis G, Lampl L, Hagman L, Marta GM, et al. Efficacy and safety of topical application of human fibrinogen/thrombin- coated collagen patch (TachoComb) for treatment of air leakage after standard lobectomy. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2004;25:160–6.
27.
Okereke I, Murthy SC, Alster JM, Blackstone EH, Rice TW. Characterization and importance of air leak after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1167–73.PubMed
28.
Rivera C, Bernard A, Falcoz PE, Thomas P, Schmidt A, Bénard S, et al. Characterization and prediction of prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection: a nationwide study setting up the index of prolonged air leak. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1062–8.PubMed
29.
Zhao K, Mei J, Xia C, Hu B, Li H, Li W, et al. Prolonged air leak after video-assisted thoracic surgery lung cancer resection: risk factors and its effect on postoperative clinical recovery. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:1219–25.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Belda-Sanchís J, Serra-Mitjans M, Iglesias Sentis M. Rami R (2010) Surgical sealant for preventing air leaks after pulmonary resections in patients with lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD003051.
31.
D’Andrilli A, Andreetti C, Ibrahim M, Ciccone AM, Venuta F, Mansmann U, et al. A prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy of a surgical sealant to treat air leaks in lung surgery. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2009;35:817–21.
32.
Vaccarili M, Dolci G, Perkmann R, Zaccagna G, Crisci R, Zaraca F, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sealant impact in management of moderate intraoperative alveolar air leaks during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9:5230–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Kawai H, Harada K, Ohta H, Tokushima T, Oka S. Prevention of alveolar air leakage after video-assisted thoracic surgery: comparison of the efficacy of methods involving the use of fibrin glue. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;60:351–5.PubMed
34.
Droghetti A, Schiavini A, Muriana P, Folloni A, Picarone M, Bonadiman C, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing completion technique of fissures for lobectomy: stapler versus precision dissection and sealant. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:383–91.PubMed
35.
Ueda K, Tanaka T, Jinbo M, Yagi T, Li TS, Hamano K. Sutureless pneumostasis using polyglycolic acid mesh as artificial pleura during video-assisted major pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1858–61.PubMed
36.
Kawai N, Kawaguchi T, Suzuki S, Yasukawa M, Tojo T, Taniguchi S. Low-voltage coagulation, polyglycolic acid sheets, and fibrin glue to control air leaks in lung surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;65:705–9.PubMed
37.
Shintani Y, Inoue M, Funaki S, Kawamura T, Minami M, Okumura M. Clinical usefulness of free subcutaneous fat pad for reduction of intraoperative air leakage during thoracoscopic pulmonary resection in lung cancer cases. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2910–3.PubMed
38.
Matsumoto I, Ohta Y, Oda M, Tsunezuka Y, Tamura M, Kawakami K, et al. Free pericardial fat pads can act as sealant for preventing alveolar air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:2321–4.PubMed
39.
Ikeda T, Sasaki M, Yamada N, Takamori A, Tanabe S, Okada A, et al. Controlling air leaks using free pericardial fat pads as surgical sealant in pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:1170–5.PubMed
40.
Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S. Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:236–44.PubMed
41.
Louie BE. Catastrophes and complicated intraoperative events during robotic lung resection. J Vis Surg. 2017;3:52–52.PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Brown SL, Woo EK. Surgical stapler-associated fatalities and adverse events reported to the food and drug administration. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:374–81.PubMed
43.
Craig SR, Walker WS. Potential complications of vascular stapling in thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:736–8.PubMed
44.
Yim APC, Ho JKS. Malfunctioning of vascular staple cutter during thoracoscopic lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:1252.PubMed
45.
Mei J, Pu Q, Liao H, Ma L, Zhu Y, Liu L. A novel method for troubleshooting vascular injury during anatomic thoracoscopic pulmonary resection without conversion to thoracotomy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:530–7.PubMed
46.
Augustin F, Maier HT, Weissenbacher A, Ng C, Lucciarini P, Öfner D, et al. Causes, predictors and consequences of conversion from VATS to open lung lobectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:2415–21.PubMed
47.
Safdie FM, Sanchez MV, Sarkaria IS. Prevention and management of intraoperative crisis in VATS and open chest surgery: how to avoid emergency conversion. J Vis Surg. 2017;3:87–87.PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Watanabe A, Koyanagi T, Nakashima S, Higami T. How to clamp the main pulmonary artery during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2007;31:129–31.
49.
Kohno T. Management of complications in thoracoscopic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:1620–3.
50.
Yang CFJ, Sun Z, Speicher PJ, Saud SM, Gulack BC, Hartwig MG, et al. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive lobectomy for stage i non-small cell lung cancer in the national cancer data base. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1037–42.PubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Allen MS, Darling GE, Pechet TTV, Mitchell JD, Herndon JE, Landreneau RJ, et al. Morbidity and mortality of major pulmonary resections in patients with early-stage lung cancer: initial results of the randomized, prospective ACOSOG Z0030 trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1013–20.PubMed
52.
Sudarshan M, Cassivi SD. Management of traumatic esophageal injuries. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11:172–6.
53.
Sedlackova Z, Ctvrtlik F, Herman M. Prevalence of incomplete interlobar fissures of the lung. Biomed Pap. 2016;160:491–4.
54.
Pu J, Wang Z, Gu S, Fuhrman C, Leader JK, Meng X, et al. Pulmonary fissure integrity and collateral ventilation in COPD patients. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:1–6.
55.
Igai H, Kamiyoshihara M, Yoshikawa R, Osawa F, Kawatani N, Ibe T, et al. The efficacy of thoracoscopic fissureless lobectomy in patients with dense fissures. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:3691–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Nomori H, Ohtsuka T, Horio H, Naruke T, Suemasu K. Thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer with a largely fused fissure. Chest. 2003;123:619–22.PubMed
57.
Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Christensen M. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy using a standardized anterior approach. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1263–9.PubMed
58.
Balsara KR, Balderson SS, D’Amico TA. Surgical techniques to avoid parenchymal injury during lung resection (fissureless lobectomy). Thorac Surg Clin. 2010;20:365–9.PubMed
59.
Decaluwe H, Sokolow Y, Deryck F, Stanzi A, Depypere L, Moons J, et al. Thoracoscopic tunnel technique for anatomical lung resections: a “fissure first, hilum last” approach with staplers in the fissureless patient. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21:2–7.PubMed
60.
61.
Hanna JM, Berry MF, D’Amico TA. Contraindications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lobectomy and determinants of conversion to open. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5:S182–S189189.PubMedPubMedCentral
62.
Lucciarini P, Augustin F, Maier HT, Zaraca F, Schmid T. Intraoperative complications during VATS lobectomies from conversion to minimally-invasive “trouble-shooting”. J Vis Surg. 2018;4:28–28.PubMedPubMedCentral
63.
Puri V, Patel A, Majumder K, Bell JM, Crabtree TD, Krupnick AS, et al. Intraoperative conversion from video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy to open thoracotomy: a study of causes and implications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149(55–62):e1.
64.
Sawada S, Komori E, Yamashita M. Evaluation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy requiring emergency conversion to thoracotomy. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2009;36:487–90.
65.
Li Y, Wang J, Yang F, Liu J, Li J, Jiang G, et al. Indications for conversion of thoracoscopic to open thoracotomy in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2012;82:245–50.PubMed
66.
Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, Lee PC, Harpole DH, Onaitis MW, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:366–78.PubMed
67.
Gazala S, Bedard ER, Stewart K, Hunt I, Valji A. A method of assessing reasons for conversion during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:962–4.PubMed
68.
Smith DE, Dietrich A, Nicolas M, Da Lozzo A, Beveraggi E. Conversion during thoracoscopic lobectomy: related factors and learning curve impact. Updates Surg. 2015;67:427–32.PubMed
69.
Jones RO, Casali G, Walker WS. Does failed video-assisted lobectomy for lung cancer prejudice immediate and long-term outcomes? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:235–9.PubMed
70.
Park JS, Kim HK, Choi YS, Kim J, Shim YM, Kim K. Unplanned conversion to thoracotomy during video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy does not compromise the surgical outcome. World J Surg. 2011;35:590–5.PubMed
71.
Samson P, Guitron J, Reed MF, Hanseman DJ, Starnes SL. Predictors of conversion to thoracotomy for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a retrospective analysis and the influence of computed tomography-based calcification assessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:1512–8.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Troubleshooting in thoracoscopic anatomical lung resection for lung cancer
verfasst von
Atsushi Watanabe
Publikationsdatum
17.09.2020
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Surgery Today / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02136-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Surgery Today 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Relationship between the tumor location and clinicopathological features in left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Review Article

Surgeon fatigue does not affect surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Original Article

Standard versus eversion-modified double-staple technique for low colorectal anastomoses after resection of rectal cancer

Original Article

Bowel obstruction as a serious complication of patients with femoral hernia

Original Article

A method to identify pulmonary intersegmental planes with intravenous vitamin B2 injection

Original Article

Short-term outcomes of gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage III gastric cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a multi-institutional database

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.
Bildnachweise