Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2011

01.02.2011 | Preclinical Study

Tumor–stroma ratio in the primary tumor is a prognostic factor in early breast cancer patients, especially in triple-negative carcinoma patients

verfasst von: Esther M. de Kruijf, Johanna G. H. van Nes, Cornelis J. H. van de Velde, Hein Putter, Vincent T. H. B. M. Smit, Gerrit Jan Liefers, Peter J. K. Kuppen, Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar, Wilma E. Mesker

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Stroma tissue surrounding cancer cells plays an important role in tumor development and behavior. In colorectal cancer, it has been found that the amount of stroma within the primary tumor is of prognostic value. We therefore have evaluated the prognostic value of this tumor–stroma ratio for breast cancer. A cohort of 574 early breast cancer patients, primarily treated with surgery between 1985 and 1994 was analyzed for the tumor–stroma ratio. The percentage of stroma was visually estimated on Haematoxylin-Eosin (H&E) stained histological sections. Patients with more than 50% intra-tumor stroma were quantified as stroma rich and patients with less than 50% as stroma poor. For the total group of patients, stroma-rich tumors had a shorter relapse-free period (RFP) (P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.025) compared to stroma-poor tumors. Tumor–stroma ratio was an independent prognostic parameter for the total group of patients (P < 0.001) and also in stratified analysis based on systemic treatment. Importantly, in the triple-negative cancer subpopulation, patients with stroma-rich tumors had a 2.92 times higher risk of relapse (P = 0.006) compared to those with stroma-poor tumors, independently of other clinico-pathological parameters. Five-year RFP-rates for triple-negative cancer patients with stroma-rich compared to stroma-poor tumors were 56 and 81%, respectively. Tumor–stroma ratio has proven to be an independent prognostic factor for RFP in breast cancer patients and especially in the triple-negative cancer subpopulation. Tumor–stroma ratio could be easily implemented in routine daily pathology diagnostics, as it is simple to determine, reproducible, and performed in quick time.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J 360:790–800CrossRef Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J 360:790–800CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752CrossRefPubMed Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K et al (2004) Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 10:5367–5374CrossRefPubMed Nielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K et al (2004) Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 10:5367–5374CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V (2007) Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer registry. Cancer 109:1721–1728CrossRefPubMed Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V (2007) Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer registry. Cancer 109:1721–1728CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Reis-Filho JS, Tutt AN (2008) Triple negative tumours: a critical review. Histopathology 52:108–118CrossRefPubMed Reis-Filho JS, Tutt AN (2008) Triple negative tumours: a critical review. Histopathology 52:108–118CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fan C, Oh DS, Wessels L et al (2006) Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355:560–569CrossRefPubMed Fan C, Oh DS, Wessels L et al (2006) Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 355:560–569CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fulford LG, Reis-Filho JS, Ryder K et al (2007) Basal-like grade III invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: patterns of metastasis and long-term survival. Breast Cancer Res 9:R4CrossRefPubMed Fulford LG, Reis-Filho JS, Ryder K et al (2007) Basal-like grade III invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: patterns of metastasis and long-term survival. Breast Cancer Res 9:R4CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kryj M, Maciejewski B, Withers HR, Taylor JM (1997) Incidence and kinetics of distant metastases in patients with operable breast cancer. Neoplasma 44:3–11PubMed Kryj M, Maciejewski B, Withers HR, Taylor JM (1997) Incidence and kinetics of distant metastases in patients with operable breast cancer. Neoplasma 44:3–11PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang HY, Nuyten DS, Sneddon JB et al (2005) Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:3738–3743CrossRefPubMed Chang HY, Nuyten DS, Sneddon JB et al (2005) Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:3738–3743CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Dvorak HF (1986) Tumors: wounds that do not heal, similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N Engl J Med 315:1650–1659CrossRefPubMed Dvorak HF (1986) Tumors: wounds that do not heal, similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N Engl J Med 315:1650–1659CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Beck AH, Espinosa I, Gilks CB, van de Rijn M, West RB (2008) The fibromatosis signature defines a robust stromal response in breast carcinoma. Lab Invest 88:591–601CrossRefPubMed Beck AH, Espinosa I, Gilks CB, van de Rijn M, West RB (2008) The fibromatosis signature defines a robust stromal response in breast carcinoma. Lab Invest 88:591–601CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Finak G, Bertos N, Pepin F et al (2008) Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nat Med 14:518–527CrossRefPubMed Finak G, Bertos N, Pepin F et al (2008) Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nat Med 14:518–527CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mesker WE, Junggeburt JM, Szuhai K et al (2007) The carcinoma-stromal ratio of colon carcinoma is an independent factor for survival compared to lymph node status and tumor stage. Cell Oncol 29:387–398PubMed Mesker WE, Junggeburt JM, Szuhai K et al (2007) The carcinoma-stromal ratio of colon carcinoma is an independent factor for survival compared to lymph node status and tumor stage. Cell Oncol 29:387–398PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mesker WE, Liefers G, Junggeburt JMC et al (2009) Presence of a high amount of stroma and downregulation of smad-4 predict a worse survival for stage I-II colon cancer patients. Cell Oncol 31:169–178PubMed Mesker WE, Liefers G, Junggeburt JMC et al (2009) Presence of a high amount of stroma and downregulation of smad-4 predict a worse survival for stage I-II colon cancer patients. Cell Oncol 31:169–178PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM (2006) REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:229–235CrossRefPubMed McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM (2006) REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:229–235CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus RB (2007) Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models. Stat Med 26:2389–2430CrossRefPubMed Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus RB (2007) Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models. Stat Med 26:2389–2430CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Courrech Staal EF, Wouters MW, van Sandick JW, et al (2010) The stromal part of adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus: does it conceal targets for therapy? Eur J Cancer 46:720–728CrossRefPubMed Courrech Staal EF, Wouters MW, van Sandick JW, et al (2010) The stromal part of adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus: does it conceal targets for therapy? Eur J Cancer 46:720–728CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R et al (2007) American society of clinical oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:5287–5312CrossRefPubMed Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R et al (2007) American society of clinical oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:5287–5312CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas J, Hanby A, Pinder S et al (2008) Implications of inconsistent measurement of ER status in non-invasive breast cancer: a study of 1, 684 cases from the Sloane project. Breast J 14:33–38CrossRefPubMed Thomas J, Hanby A, Pinder S et al (2008) Implications of inconsistent measurement of ER status in non-invasive breast cancer: a study of 1, 684 cases from the Sloane project. Breast J 14:33–38CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunes CB, Rocha RM, Reis-Filho JS et al (2008) Comparative analysis of six different antibodies against Her2 including the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody (SP3) and chromogenic in situ hybridisation in breast carcinomas. J Clin Pathol 61:934–938CrossRefPubMed Nunes CB, Rocha RM, Reis-Filho JS et al (2008) Comparative analysis of six different antibodies against Her2 including the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody (SP3) and chromogenic in situ hybridisation in breast carcinomas. J Clin Pathol 61:934–938CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Annecke K, Schmitt M, Euler U et al (2008) uPA and PAI-1 in breast cancer: review of their clinical utility and current validation in the prospective NNBC-3 trial. Adv Clin Chem 45:31–45CrossRefPubMed Annecke K, Schmitt M, Euler U et al (2008) uPA and PAI-1 in breast cancer: review of their clinical utility and current validation in the prospective NNBC-3 trial. Adv Clin Chem 45:31–45CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1999–2009CrossRefPubMed van de Vijver MJ, He YD, van’t Veer LJ et al (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1999–2009CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ein-Dor L, Kela I, Getz G, Givol D, Domany E (2005) Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set? Bioinformatics 21:171–178CrossRefPubMed Ein-Dor L, Kela I, Getz G, Givol D, Domany E (2005) Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set? Bioinformatics 21:171–178CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Michiels S, Koscielny S, Hill C (2005) Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy. Lancet 365:488–492CrossRefPubMed Michiels S, Koscielny S, Hill C (2005) Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy. Lancet 365:488–492CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Sotiriou C, Bontempi G (2008) A comparative study of survival models for breast cancer prognostication based on microarray data: does a single gene beat them all? Bioinformatics 24:2200–2208CrossRefPubMed Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Sotiriou C, Bontempi G (2008) A comparative study of survival models for breast cancer prognostication based on microarray data: does a single gene beat them all? Bioinformatics 24:2200–2208CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sotiriou C, Piccart MJ (2007) Taking gene-expression profiling to the clinic: when will molecular signatures become relevant to patient care? Nat Rev Cancer 7:545–553CrossRefPubMed Sotiriou C, Piccart MJ (2007) Taking gene-expression profiling to the clinic: when will molecular signatures become relevant to patient care? Nat Rev Cancer 7:545–553CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Piette F et al (2008) Comparison of prognostic gene expression signatures for breast cancer. BMC Genomics 9:394CrossRefPubMed Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Piette F et al (2008) Comparison of prognostic gene expression signatures for breast cancer. BMC Genomics 9:394CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomassen M, Tan Q, Eiriksdottir F, Bak M, Cold S, Kruse TA (2007) Comparison of gene sets for expression profiling: prediction of metastasis from low-malignant breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:5355–5360CrossRefPubMed Thomassen M, Tan Q, Eiriksdottir F, Bak M, Cold S, Kruse TA (2007) Comparison of gene sets for expression profiling: prediction of metastasis from low-malignant breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:5355–5360CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S et al (2008) Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 10:R65CrossRefPubMed Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S et al (2008) Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 10:R65CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Buyse M, Loi S, Van’t Veer L et al (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1183–1192CrossRefPubMed Buyse M, Loi S, Van’t Veer L et al (2006) Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1183–1192CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Polyak K, Weinberg RA (2009) Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits. Nat Rev Cancer 9:265–273CrossRefPubMed Polyak K, Weinberg RA (2009) Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits. Nat Rev Cancer 9:265–273CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Egeblad M, Werb Z (2002) New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2:161–174CrossRefPubMed Egeblad M, Werb Z (2002) New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2:161–174CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Olumi AF, Grossfeld GD, Hayward SW, Carroll PR, Tlsty TD, Cunha GR (1999) Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts direct tumor progression of initiated human prostatic epithelium. Cancer Res 59:5002–5011PubMed Olumi AF, Grossfeld GD, Hayward SW, Carroll PR, Tlsty TD, Cunha GR (1999) Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts direct tumor progression of initiated human prostatic epithelium. Cancer Res 59:5002–5011PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Orimo A, Gupta PB, Sgroi DC et al (2005) Stromal fibroblasts present in invasive human breast carcinomas promote tumor growth and angiogenesis through elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 secretion. Cell 121:335–348CrossRefPubMed Orimo A, Gupta PB, Sgroi DC et al (2005) Stromal fibroblasts present in invasive human breast carcinomas promote tumor growth and angiogenesis through elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 secretion. Cell 121:335–348CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Tumor–stroma ratio in the primary tumor is a prognostic factor in early breast cancer patients, especially in triple-negative carcinoma patients
verfasst von
Esther M. de Kruijf
Johanna G. H. van Nes
Cornelis J. H. van de Velde
Hein Putter
Vincent T. H. B. M. Smit
Gerrit Jan Liefers
Peter J. K. Kuppen
Rob A. E. M. Tollenaar
Wilma E. Mesker
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2011
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0855-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

30.04.2024 Künstliche Intelligenz Nachrichten

Krebserkrankungen unbekannten Ursprungs (CUP) sind eine diagnostische Herausforderung. KI-Systeme können Pathologen dabei unterstützen, zytologische Bilder zu interpretieren, um den Primärtumor zu lokalisieren.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.