Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Die Diabetologie 5/2022

12.07.2022 | Typ-2-Diabetes | Leitthema

Update Typ-2-Diabetes

verfasst von: Prof. Dr. med. Andreas Hamann

Erschienen in: Die Diabetologie | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Wichtige neue Erkenntnisse zur Diagnostik und Therapie des Typ-2-Diabetes 2021/2022 werden im vorliegenden Beitrag aufgezeigt. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf der medikamentösen Therapie, zu der in Deutschland eine neue Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie erschienen ist. Bei Patienten mit kardiovaskulärer Vorerkrankung wird in dieser, basierend auf den Daten aus Endpunktstudien, der Einstieg in die medikamentöse Therapie mit einer Kombination von Metformin + SGLT-2-Inhibitor (SGLT-2: „sodium glucose linked transporter 2“) oder Metformin + GLP-1-Rezeptor-Agonist (GLP-1: „glucagon-like peptide 1“) mit Nachweis einer Überlegenheit in Endpunktstudien empfohlen. In verschiedenen großen Studienkohorten wurden die Effekte verschiedener Antidiabetika auch bei Menschen mit niedrigerem kardiovaskulärem Risiko untersucht, überwiegend mit Vorteilen für SGLT-2-Inhibitoren und GLP-1-Rezeptor-Agonisten gegenüber Sulfonylharnstoffen bzw. DPP-4-Hemmern (DPP-4: Dipeptidylpeptidase 4). In aktuellen Leitlinien zum Typ-2-Diabetes wird zudem eine Deeskalation der Insulintherapie, insbesondere im höheren Lebensalter, postuliert, sofern diese möglich ist. Im Hinblick auf eine Erhöhung der Therapiesicherheit und eine stabilere Stoffwechsellage gewinnt die kontinuierliche Glukosemessung auch bei Typ-2-Diabetes zunehmende Bedeutung.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang M et al (2021) Trends in diabetes treatment and control in U. S. adults, 1999–2018. N Engl J Med 384:2219–2228CrossRef Fang M et al (2021) Trends in diabetes treatment and control in U. S. adults, 1999–2018. N Engl J Med 384:2219–2228CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nazarzadeh M et al (2021) Blood pressure lowering and risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet 398:1803–1810CrossRef Nazarzadeh M et al (2021) Blood pressure lowering and risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet 398:1803–1810CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat TODAY Study Group (2021) Long-term complications in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 385:416–426CrossRef TODAY Study Group (2021) Long-term complications in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 385:416–426CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Viggers R et al (2021) Glucose-lowering therapy in patients with postpancreatitis diabetes mellitus: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Diabetes Care 44:2045–2052CrossRef Viggers R et al (2021) Glucose-lowering therapy in patients with postpancreatitis diabetes mellitus: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Diabetes Care 44:2045–2052CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CG et al (2021) Effect of metformin and lifestyle interventions on mortality in the Diabetes Prevention Program and Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Diabetes Care 44:2775–2782CrossRef Lee CG et al (2021) Effect of metformin and lifestyle interventions on mortality in the Diabetes Prevention Program and Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Diabetes Care 44:2775–2782CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lind M et al (2021) Historical HbA1c values may explain the type 2 diabetes legacy effect: UKPDS 88. Diabetes Care 44:2231–2237CrossRef Lind M et al (2021) Historical HbA1c values may explain the type 2 diabetes legacy effect: UKPDS 88. Diabetes Care 44:2231–2237CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pitt B et al (2021) Cardiovascular events with finerenone in kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 385:2252–2263CrossRef Pitt B et al (2021) Cardiovascular events with finerenone in kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 385:2252–2263CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Typ-2-Diabetes – Teilpublikation der Langfassung, 2. Auflage. Version 1. 2021. https://doi.org/10.6101/AZQ/000475. Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Typ-2-Diabetes – Teilpublikation der Langfassung, 2. Auflage. Version 1. 2021. https://​doi.​org/​10.​6101/​AZQ/​000475.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Davies MJ et al (2018) Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 61:2461–2498CrossRef Davies MJ et al (2018) Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 61:2461–2498CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Buse JB et al (2020) 2019 update to: Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 63:221–228CrossRef Buse JB et al (2020) 2019 update to: Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 63:221–228CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cosentino F et al (2020) 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J 41:255–323CrossRef Cosentino F et al (2020) 2019 ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J 41:255–323CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat De Boer IH et al (2020) Executive summary of the 2020 KDIGO diabetes management in CKD guideline: evidence-based advances in monitoring and treatment. Kidney Int 98:839–848CrossRef De Boer IH et al (2020) Executive summary of the 2020 KDIGO diabetes management in CKD guideline: evidence-based advances in monitoring and treatment. Kidney Int 98:839–848CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat American Diabetes Association (2021) Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care 44(Suppl. 1):S111–S124CrossRef American Diabetes Association (2021) Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care 44(Suppl. 1):S111–S124CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat American Diabetes Association (2022) Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care 44(Suppl. 1):S125–S143CrossRef American Diabetes Association (2022) Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care 44(Suppl. 1):S125–S143CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaccardi F et al (2021) Diabetes Care. Use of metformin and cardiovascular effects of new classes of glucose-lowering agents: a meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2. Diabetes 44:e32–e34 Zaccardi F et al (2021) Diabetes Care. Use of metformin and cardiovascular effects of new classes of glucose-lowering agents: a meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials in type 2. Diabetes 44:e32–e34
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Frias JP et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 2.0 mg versus 1.0 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN FORTE): a double-blind, randomized, phase 3B trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9:563–574CrossRef Frias JP et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 2.0 mg versus 1.0 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN FORTE): a double-blind, randomized, phase 3B trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9:563–574CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie Y et al (2021) Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors vs. sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA Intern Med 181:1043–1053CrossRef Xie Y et al (2021) Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors vs. sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA Intern Med 181:1043–1053CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkeland KI et al (2021) Lower cardiorenal risk with sodium-glucose cotransporter‑2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase‑4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular and renal diseases: A large multinational observational study. Diabetes Obes Metab 23:75–85CrossRef Birkeland KI et al (2021) Lower cardiorenal risk with sodium-glucose cotransporter‑2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase‑4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular and renal diseases: A large multinational observational study. Diabetes Obes Metab 23:75–85CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright AK et al (2022) Primary prevention of cardiovascular and heart failure events with SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP‑1 receptor agonists, and their combination in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 45:909–918CrossRef Wright AK et al (2022) Primary prevention of cardiovascular and heart failure events with SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP‑1 receptor agonists, and their combination in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 45:909–918CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenstock J et al (2020) Once-weekly insulin for type 2 diabetes without previous insulin treatment. N Engl J Med 383:2107–2116CrossRef Rosenstock J et al (2020) Once-weekly insulin for type 2 diabetes without previous insulin treatment. N Engl J Med 383:2107–2116CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bajaj HS et al (2021) Switching to once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on daily basal insulin: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 44:1586–1594CrossRef Bajaj HS et al (2021) Switching to once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on daily basal insulin: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 44:1586–1594CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lingvay I et al (2021) A randomized, open-label comparison of once-weekly insulin icodec titration strategies versus once-daily insulin glargine U100. Diabetes Care 44:1595–1603CrossRef Lingvay I et al (2021) A randomized, open-label comparison of once-weekly insulin icodec titration strategies versus once-daily insulin glargine U100. Diabetes Care 44:1595–1603CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Giugliano D et al (2021) Feasibility of simplification from a basal-bolus insulin regimen to a fixed-ratio formulation of basal insulin plus a GLP-1RA or to basal insulin plus an SGLT2 inhibitor: BEYOND, a randomized, pragmatic trial. Diabetes Care 44:1353–1360CrossRef Giugliano D et al (2021) Feasibility of simplification from a basal-bolus insulin regimen to a fixed-ratio formulation of basal insulin plus a GLP-1RA or to basal insulin plus an SGLT2 inhibitor: BEYOND, a randomized, pragmatic trial. Diabetes Care 44:1353–1360CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Boughton CK et al (2021) Fully automated closed-loop glucose control compared with standard insulin therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes requiring dialysis: an open-label, randomized crossover trial. Nat Med 27:1471–1476CrossRef Boughton CK et al (2021) Fully automated closed-loop glucose control compared with standard insulin therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes requiring dialysis: an open-label, randomized crossover trial. Nat Med 27:1471–1476CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Heller SR et al (2022) A higher non-severe hypoglycemia rate is associated with an increased risk of subsequent severe hypoglycemia and major adverse cardiovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes in the LEADER study. Diabetologia 65:55–64CrossRef Heller SR et al (2022) A higher non-severe hypoglycemia rate is associated with an increased risk of subsequent severe hypoglycemia and major adverse cardiovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes in the LEADER study. Diabetologia 65:55–64CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson TS et al (2021) Intensification of diabetes medications at hospital discharge and clinical outcomes in older adults in the Veterans Administration Health System. JAMA Netw Open 4:e2128998CrossRef Anderson TS et al (2021) Intensification of diabetes medications at hospital discharge and clinical outcomes in older adults in the Veterans Administration Health System. JAMA Netw Open 4:e2128998CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lega IC et al (2021) Potential diabetes overtreatment and risk of adverse events among older adults in Ontario: a population-based study. Diabetologia 64:1093–1102CrossRef Lega IC et al (2021) Potential diabetes overtreatment and risk of adverse events among older adults in Ontario: a population-based study. Diabetologia 64:1093–1102CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Karter AJ et al (2021) Association of real-time continuous glucose monitoring with glycemic control and acute metabolic events among patients with insulin-treated diabetes. JAMA 325:2273–2284CrossRef Karter AJ et al (2021) Association of real-time continuous glucose monitoring with glycemic control and acute metabolic events among patients with insulin-treated diabetes. JAMA 325:2273–2284CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Martens T et al (2021) Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 325:2262–2272CrossRef Martens T et al (2021) Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 325:2262–2272CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Roussel R et al (2021) Important drop rate of acute diabetes complications in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes after initiation of flash glucose monitoring in France: the RELIEF study. Diabetes Care 44:1368–1376CrossRef Roussel R et al (2021) Important drop rate of acute diabetes complications in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes after initiation of flash glucose monitoring in France: the RELIEF study. Diabetes Care 44:1368–1376CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Update Typ-2-Diabetes
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. med. Andreas Hamann
Publikationsdatum
12.07.2022
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Die Diabetologie / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 2731-7447
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7455
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11428-022-00929-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

Die Diabetologie 5/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen des BDI

Mitteilungen des BDI

Praxisempfehlungen der Deutschen Diabetes Gesellschaft

Kurz, prägnant und aktuell: Die Praxisempfehlungen der Deutschen Diabetes Gesellschaft.