Background
Methods
Study design and participants
Measurements
Statistical analyses
Abduction
Results
Variables (Statements on VAS 10 cm: 0=strongly disagree, 10=strongly agree) | Mean | SD | Median | Min | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1. “I spend a lot of time and effort on referrals” | 5.3 | 2.0 | 5.2 | 0.5 | 9.8 |
A2. “I often feel that I don’t know enough about what is expected to make a good referral” | 3.2 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 10.0 |
A3. “I am often afraid to have the referral rejected from hospital” | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 |
A4. “I am often afraid that the referral gives an impression of me not knowing enough about the actual medical problem” | 2.9 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 9.5 |
A5. “It is easy to get in contact with a hospital specialist for advice” | 4.9 | 2.3 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 9.0 |
A6. “Some referrals could have been avoided if I had got in contact with a hospital consultant when referring” | 5.8 | 3.0 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 10.0 |
A7. “I usually complete the referral during the consultation” | 4.6 | 3.3 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 10.0 |
A8. “The patient’s participation and opinion is important to me when I refer” | 6.2 | 1.9 | 6.3 | 2.0 | 9.5 |
A9. “The patient should see the referral or have a copy before it is sent” | 5.0 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 0.3 | 10.0 |
A10 “Giving the patient a copy of the referral will improve the quality” | 4.4 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 10.0 |
B1. Difficult referral to make (Likert scale 1–10) | 2.6 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 5.6 |
B2. Pressure from patient to be referred (Likert scale 1–10) | 2.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.7 |
B3. Suggesting a priority for the patient to be admitted to hospital (%) | 39.9 | 39.3 | 26.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 |
B4. Suggesting a wait for the patient to be admitted to hospital (%) | 28.2 | 33.6 | 17.6 | 0.0 | 100.0 |
B5. Telephone contact with hospital specialist when referring (%) | 9.1 | 16.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 |
B6. The time used for making the referral (minutes) | 8.2 | 3.5 | 7.5 | 2.0 | 17.1 |
Principal component analysis
Initial eigenvalues | |||
---|---|---|---|
Component | Total | % of variance | Cumulative % |
1 | 2.3 | 14.4 | 14.4 |
2 | 1.9 | 12.0 | 26.5 |
3 | 1.7 | 10.9 | 37.3 |
4 | 1.6 | 10.0 | 47.3 |
5 | 1.4 | 8.5 | 55.8 |
6 | 1.3 | 8.3 | 64.1 |
7 | 1.1 | 7.0 | 71.1 |
8 | 1.0a | 6.0 | 77.1 |
9 | 0.9 | 5.3 | 82.4 |
10 | 0.8 | 5.1 | 87.5 |
Components | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
A3: Afraid of rejection of referral |
.872
| .052 | –.056 | .031 | –.051 | .124 | .038 | –.040 |
A4: Not being good enough |
.864
| –.131 | –.114 | –.066 | –.055 | .021 | –.176 | .020 |
A2: Unknown expectations |
.661
| –.050 | .246 | .015 | .060 | –.130 | 383 | –.044 |
B4: Suggested waiting | –.029 |
.826
| 252 | .150 | –.264 | –.066 | –.074 | –.071 |
B3: Priority in referral | –.159 |
.760
| –.152 | .028 | .370 | .157 | .056 | .030 |
A1: Using much time to refer | .043 | –.148 |
–.910
| .110 | .108 | .021 | –.039 | –.123 |
A7: Referral in consultation | –.013 | –.138 |
.690
| .062 |
.407
| .111 | –.068 | –.187 |
B5: Conferred with consultant | .026 | –.127 | .103 |
–.950
| .056 | .097 | –.078 | .147 |
A8: Patient opinion important | –.068 | .002 | .085 | –.040 |
.841
| –.037 | –.108 | –.196 |
A5: Contact with consultant | –.023 | .021 | –.139 | .080 |
.431
| .041 |
.431
| .373 |
B6: Time used to refer | .043 | .027 | –.025 | –.346 | .027 |
.848
| .124 | –.095 |
B1: Difficult referral | .152 | .091 | .083 | .351 | .006 |
.713
| –.287 | .279 |
A6: Referral avoided if contact | .308 | .373 | –.100 | –.048 | .333 |
–.426
| –.240 | .145 |
A10: Copy gives better quality | –.020 | .020 | –.009 | –.027 | .118 | –.017 |
–.873
| .038 |
A9: Referral copy to patient | .033 | –.060 | .036 | .247 | .213 | –.022 | –.007 |
–.795
|
B2: Patient pressure | –.004 | –.343 | .198 | .356 | .084 | .004 | –.095 |
.601
|
Multivariate multiple linear regression analysis
Dependent variables: Typological components | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Multivariate p-value |
b (p-value) | b (p-value) | b (p-value) | b (p-value) | b (p-value) | b (p-value) | b (p-value) | b (p-value) | ||
GP age | −0.01 (0.469) | 0.01 (0.780) | 0.01 (0.727) | 0.01 (0.904) | 0.01 (0.594) | 0.01 (0.580) | 0.02 (0.235) | –0.01 (0.791) | .965 |
Gender: male | –0.23 (0.412) |
–0.63 (0.038)
| 0.54 (0.068) | –0.22 (0.463) | 0.07 (0.815) | 0.57 (0.069) | 0.34 (0.254) |
0.69 (0.012)
|
.019
|
Specialty: no |
1.32 (0.015)
| –0.13 (0.822) | 0.79 (0.148) | 0.16 (0.770) | 0.08 (0.892) | 0.84 (0.146) | 0.83 (0.145) |
1.52 (0.003)
|
.002
|
Location: urban | –0.39 (0.214) | –0.12 (0.714) | –0.16 (0.624) | 0.48 (0.157) | –0.51 (0.138) | –0.45 (0.189) | –0.06 (0.860) | –0.12 (0.684) | .269 |
N referrals | –0.01 (0.893) | 0.02 (0.346) | 0.04 (0.090) | 0.05 (0.049) | 0.01 (0.575) | 0.02 (0.519) | –0.03 (0.258) | 0.05 (0.020) | .056 |