Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Obesity Surgery
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 8/2016

17.06.2016 | Review Article

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Use of Barbed Sutures in Bariatric Surgery. Review of the Literature

verfasst von: Manuel Ferrer-Márquez, Ricardo Belda-Lozano, Alberto Soriano-Maldonado

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Performing intracorporeal anastomoses and sutures is possibly the technique that requires the greater skill in laparoscopy. The emergence of new barbed sutures seems to facilitate the practice, with bariatric surgery (mainly in mixed and malabsorptive techniques) being one of the specialties that can most benefit from them. This review aims to evaluate barbed sutures’ use and safety in bariatric surgery. Barbed sutures might facilitate the practice by improving some aspects of surgery such as reproducibility and operative time, although further research is needed.
Literatur
1.
Alcamo JH, inventor. Surgical suture. US patent 3,123,077. March 3, 1964. McKenzie AR. An experimental multiple barbed suture for the long flexor tendons of the palm and fingers. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1967;49(3):440–7.
2.
Tera H, Aberg C. Strength of knots in surgery in relation to type of knot, type of suture material and dimension of suture thread. Acta Chir Scand. 1977;143(2):75–83.PubMed
3.
4.
Tera H, Aberg C. Tensile strengths of twelve types of knot employed in surgery, using different suture materials. Acta Chir Scand. 1976;142(1):1–7.PubMed
5.
Stone IK, Von Fraunhofer JA, Masterson BJ. The biomechanical effects of tight suture closure upon fascia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986;163(5):448–52.PubMed
6.
Kadirkamanathan SS, Shelton JC, Hepworth CC, et al. A comparison of the strength of knots tied by hand and at laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;182(1):46–54.PubMed
7.
Nelson BB, Hassel DM. In vitro comparison of V-Loc™ versus Biosyn™ in a one-layer end-to-end anastomosis of equine jejunum. Vet Surg. 2014;43(1):80–4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Gözen AS, Arslan M, Schulze M, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic closure of the bladder with barbed polyglyconate versus polyglactin suture material in the pig bladder model: an experimental in vitro study. J Endourol. 2012;26(6):732–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Ontario health technology assessment series. 2010;10(27):1–118.
10.
11.
Greenberg JA, Goldman RH. Barbed suture : a review of the obstetrics and gynecology 2013;6(3):107–15.
12.
Weld KJ, Ames CD, Hruby G, et al. Evaluation of a novel knotless self-anchoring suture material for urinary tract reconstruction. Urology. 2006;67(6):1133–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Vakil JJ, O’Reilly MP, Sutter EG, et al. Knee arthrotomy repair with a continuous barbed suture: a biomechanical study. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(5):710–3.CrossRef
14.
Arbaugh M, Case JB, Monnet E. Biomechanical comparison of glycomer 631 and glycomer 631 knotless for use in canine incisional gastropexy. Vet Surg. 2013;42(2):205–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Nett M, Avelar R, Sheehan M, et al. Water-tight knee arthrotomy closure: comparison of a novel single bidirectional barbed self-retaining running suture versus conventional interrupted sutures. J Knee Surg. 2011;24(1):55–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Ehrhart NP, Kaminskaya K, Miller JA, et al. In vivo assessment of absorbable knotless barbed suture for single layer gastrotomy and enterotomy closure. Vet Surg. 2013;42(2):210–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Manoucheri E, Einarsson JI. The use of barbed suture in hysterectomy and myomectomy. Surg Technol Int. 2013;23:133–6.PubMed
18.
Bellón JM, Pérez-López P, Simón-Allue R, et al. New suture materials for midline laparotomy closure: an experimental study. BMC Surg. 2014;14:70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
20.
Aoki Y, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, et al. Long unidirectional barbed suturing technique with extracorporeal traction in laparoscopic myomectomy. BMC Surg. 2014;14:84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Song T, Lee SH. Barbed suture vs traditional suture in single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(5):825–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Liatsikos E, Knoll T, Kyriazis I, et al. Unfavorable outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty using barbed sutures: a multi-center experience. World J Urol. 2013;31(6):1441–4.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Arslan M, Tuncel A, Aslan Y, et al. Comparison of the urethrovesical anastomoses with polyglecaprone (Monocryl®) and bidirectional barbed (V-Loc 180®) running sutures in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014;86(2):90–4.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Takeda T, Miyajima A, Kaneko G, et al. Unidirectional barbed suture for vesicourethral anastomosis during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014;7(3):241–5.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Borzio RW, Pivec R, Kapadia BH, et al. Barbed sutures in total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the evidence? A Meta-Anal. Int Orthop. 2015;17.
26.
Clemente A, Bergamin F, Surace C, et al. Barbed suture vs conventional tenorrhaphy: biomechanical analysis in an animal model. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015;16(3):251–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Joyce KM, Joyce CW, Mahon N, et al. Use of a barbed suture tie-over technique for skin graft dressings: a case series. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(3):341–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Le Louarn C. Specificity of facelift surgery, including mid facelift, in case of facial palsy. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2015;60(5):454–61.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Mitchell RT, Bengtson BP. Clinical applications of barbed suture in aesthetic breast surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2015;42(4):595–604.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Nonaka K, et al. Laparoscopic technique and safety experience with barbed suture closure for pelvic cavity after abdominoperineal resection. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Wilhelm P, Storz P, Axt S, et al. Use of self-retaining barbed suture for rectal wall closure in transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(9):813–6.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Edil BH, Cooper MA, Makary MA. Laparoscopic pancreaticojejunostomy using a barbed suture: a novel technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Nov 20.
33.
Fernandez LC, Toriz A, Hernandez J et al. Knotless choledochorraphy with barbed suture, safe and feasible. Surg Endosc 2015; 5.
34.
Milone M, Di Minno MN, Galloro G, et al. Safety and efficacy of barbed suture for gastrointestinal suture: a prospective and randomized study on obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(9):756–9.CrossRefPubMed
35.
De Blasi V, Facy O, Goergen M, et al. Barbed versus usual suture for closure of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparative trial. Obes Surg. 2013;23(1):60–3.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Tyner RP, Clifton GT, Fenton SJ. Hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy using knotless unidirectional barbed absorbable suture during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(4):1360–6.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Palmisano S, Giuricin M, Makovac P, et al. Totally hand-sewn anastomosis using barbed suture device during laparoscopic gastric bypass in obese. A feasibility study and preliminary results. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1385–9.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Costantino F, Dente M, Perrin P, et al. Barbed unidirectional V-Loc 180 suture in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a study comparing unidirectional barbed monofilament and multifilament absorbable suture. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(10):3846–51.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Kassir R, Breton C, Lointier P, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy using an absorbable bidirectional monofilament barbed suture: review of the literature and illustrative case video. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(3):560–1.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Blanc P, Lointier P, Breton C, et al. The hand-sewn anastomosis with an absorbable bidirectional monofilament barbed SutureStratafix® during laparoscopic one anastomosis loop gastric bypass. Retrospective study in 50 patients. Obes Surg. 2015;25(12):2457–60.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Hauser J, et al. Intestinal obstruction following use of laparoscopic barbed suture: a new complication with new material? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2012;21(5):369–71.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Donnellan NM, Mansuria SM. Small bowel obstruction resulting from laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure with a barbed suture. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(4):528–30.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Segura-Sampedro JJ, Ashrafian H, Navarro-Sánchez A et al.. Small bowel obstruction due to laparoscopic barbed sutures: An unknown complication? Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2015; 107(11).
44.
Rubin JP, Hunstad JP, Polynice A, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing absorbable barbed sutures versus conventional absorbable sutures for dermal closure in open surgical procedures. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(2):272–83.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Williams SB, Alemozaffar M, Lei Y, et al. Randomized controlled trial of barbed polyglyconate versus polyglactin suture for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy anastomosis: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol. 2010;58(6):875–81.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Gililland JM, Anderson LA, Sun G, et al. Perioperative closure-related complication rates and cost analysis of barbed suture for closure in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):125–9.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zorn KC, Trinh QD, Jeldres C, et al. Prospective randomized trial of barbed polyglyconate suture to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: time reduction and cost benefit. BJU Int. 2012;109(10):1526–32.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Smith EL, DiSegna ST, Shukla PY, et al. Barbed versus traditional sutures: closure time, cost, and wound related outcomes in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(2):283–7.CrossRef
49.
Lin Y, Lai S, Huang J, et al. The efficacy and safety of knotless barbed suture in the surgical field: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23425.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Use of Barbed Sutures in Bariatric Surgery. Review of the Literature
verfasst von
Manuel Ferrer-Márquez
Ricardo Belda-Lozano
Alberto Soriano-Maldonado
Publikationsdatum
17.06.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2263-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Obesity Surgery 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Original Contributions

Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Absorbable Staple Line Buttressing in Sleeve Gastrectomy in High-Risk Patients

Original Contributions

Gastric Bypass in Older Patients: Complications, Weight Loss, and Resolution of Comorbidities at 2 Years in a Matched Controlled Study

Letter to the Editor

Postoperative Mortality After Bariatric Surgery: Do the Numbers Reflect the Reality?

New Concept

Fast-Track in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Feasibility and Cost Analysis Through a Matched-Cohort Study in a Single Centre

Original Contributions

A Specifically Designed Stent for Anastomotic Leaks after Bariatric Surgery: Experiences in a Tertiary Referral Hospital

Original Contributions

Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Adolescents; Reality or Hype

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.