Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 10/2014

01.12.2014 | Original Article

Using 18F-FLT PET to distinguish between malignant and benign breast lesions with suspicious findings in mammography and breast ultrasound

verfasst von: Jane Wang, Wen-Hung Kuo, Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih, Ruoh-Fang Yen

Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Ausgabe 10/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the diagnostic performance of 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET in women with suspicious breast findings on conventional imaging (mammography and breast ultrasound).

Methods

Twenty-eight women with suspicious findings on conventional imaging were enrolled. A whole-body PET/CT in the supine position (first PET) was performed 60 min after intravenous injection of 0.07 mCi/kg 18F-FLT, followed by a regional PET of the breast in the prone position (second PET). For each lesion, the SUVmax of the first PET (SUV1) and second PET (SUV2) were measured. For the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the diagnostic parameters, of the cutoff points with sensitivities >90 %, we chose the one with highest specificity as the optimal cutoff point to obtain the corresponding sensitivity and specificity.

Results

A total of 34 breast lesions (21 benign, 13 malignant) were analyzed. The SUV1 and SUV2 of the malignant lesions (median values 4.6 vs. 4.4, respectively) were higher than those of the benign lesions that had medians of 1.2 and 1.0, respectively (P = 0.0001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of SUV1 (0.905) showed no significant difference from that of SUV2 (0.912) (P = 0.77). The sensitivity and specificity using SUV1 = 1.24 as cutoff were 92.3 and 52.4 %, and those using SUV2 = 1.5 as cutoff were 92.3 and 66.7 %, respectively.

Conclusion

18F-FLT PET showed acceptable diagnostic performance for suspicious breast findings on conventional imaging, and SUV2 showed higher specificity than SUV1.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Irwig L, Simpson JM, McKessar M, Blome S, Noakes J. Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:935–40.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Irwig L, Simpson JM, McKessar M, Blome S, Noakes J. Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:935–40.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:427–37.PubMedCrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, Besnard PE, Zonderland HM, Obdeijn IM, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:427–37.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, Morakkabati-Spitz N, Wardelmann E, Fimmers R, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8469–76.PubMedCrossRef Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, Morakkabati-Spitz N, Wardelmann E, Fimmers R, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8469–76.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH, Yen AM, Cohen A, Tot T, et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology. 2011;260:658–63.PubMedCrossRef Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH, Yen AM, Cohen A, Tot T, et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology. 2011;260:658–63.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Newell MS, Mahoney MC. Imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy. In: Bassett LW, Mahoney MC, Apple SK, et al., editors. Breast Imaging. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2011. p. 563–96.CrossRef Newell MS, Mahoney MC. Imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy. In: Bassett LW, Mahoney MC, Apple SK, et al., editors. Breast Imaging. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2011. p. 563–96.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Böhm-Vélez M, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008;299:2151–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Böhm-Vélez M, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008;299:2151–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Garami Z, Hascsi Z, Varga J, Dinya T, Tanyi M, Garai I, et al. The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:31–7.PubMedCrossRef Garami Z, Hascsi Z, Varga J, Dinya T, Tanyi M, Garai I, et al. The value of 18-FDG PET/CT in early-stage breast cancer compared to traditional diagnostic modalities with an emphasis on changes in disease stage designation and treatment plan. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:31–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, Tartar M, Pisano ED, Larsen LH, et al. Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:219–32.PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, Tartar M, Pisano ED, Larsen LH, et al. Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:219–32.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Moy L, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Melsaether A, Deans AE, Murphy-Walcott AD, et al. Role of fusion of prone FDG-PET and magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts in the evaluation of breast cancer. Breast J. 2010;16:369–76.PubMed Moy L, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Melsaether A, Deans AE, Murphy-Walcott AD, et al. Role of fusion of prone FDG-PET and magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts in the evaluation of breast cancer. Breast J. 2010;16:369–76.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Escalona S, Blasco JA, Reza M, Andradas E, Gómez N. A systematic review of FDG-PET in breast cancer. Med Oncol. 2010;27:114–29.PubMedCrossRef Escalona S, Blasco JA, Reza M, Andradas E, Gómez N. A systematic review of FDG-PET in breast cancer. Med Oncol. 2010;27:114–29.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Caprio MG, Cangiano A, Imbriaco M, Soscia F, Di Martino G, Farina A, et al. Dual-time-point [18F]-FDG PET/CT in the diagnostic evaluation of suspicious breast lesions. Radiol Med. 2010;115:215–24.PubMedCrossRef Caprio MG, Cangiano A, Imbriaco M, Soscia F, Di Martino G, Farina A, et al. Dual-time-point [18F]-FDG PET/CT in the diagnostic evaluation of suspicious breast lesions. Radiol Med. 2010;115:215–24.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Contractor K, Aboagye EO, Jacob J, Challapalli A, Coombes RC, Stebbing J. Monitoring early response to taxane therapy in advanced breast cancer with circulating tumor cells and [18F] 3′-deoxy-3′-fluorothymidine PET: a pilot study. Biomarkers Med. 2012;6:231–3.CrossRef Contractor K, Aboagye EO, Jacob J, Challapalli A, Coombes RC, Stebbing J. Monitoring early response to taxane therapy in advanced breast cancer with circulating tumor cells and [18F] 3′-deoxy-3′-fluorothymidine PET: a pilot study. Biomarkers Med. 2012;6:231–3.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper KL, Harnan S, Meng Y, Ward SE, Fitzgerald P, Papaioannou D, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:187–98.PubMedCrossRef Cooper KL, Harnan S, Meng Y, Ward SE, Fitzgerald P, Papaioannou D, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) for assessment of axillary lymph node status in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:187–98.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi WH, Yoo IR, O JH, Kim SH, Chung SK. The value of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Br J Radiol. 2011;84:593–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Choi WH, Yoo IR, O JH, Kim SH, Chung SK. The value of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Br J Radiol. 2011;84:593–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Peare R, Staff R, Heys S. The use of FDG-PET in assessing axillary lymph node status in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123:281–90.PubMedCrossRef Peare R, Staff R, Heys S. The use of FDG-PET in assessing axillary lymph node status in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123:281–90.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimoda W, Hayashi M, Murakami K, Oyama T, Sunagawa M. The relationship between FDG uptake in PET scans and biological behavior in breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2007;14:260–8.PubMedCrossRef Shimoda W, Hayashi M, Murakami K, Oyama T, Sunagawa M. The relationship between FDG uptake in PET scans and biological behavior in breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2007;14:260–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavi A, Urhan M, Yu JQ, Zhuang H, Houseni M, Cermik TF, et al. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging detects breast cancer with high sensitivity and correlates well with histologic subtypes. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1440–6.PubMed Mavi A, Urhan M, Yu JQ, Zhuang H, Houseni M, Cermik TF, et al. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging detects breast cancer with high sensitivity and correlates well with histologic subtypes. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1440–6.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Adejolu M, Huo L, Rohren E, Santiago L, Yang WT. False-positive lesions mimicking breast cancer on FDG PET and PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W304–14.PubMedCrossRef Adejolu M, Huo L, Rohren E, Santiago L, Yang WT. False-positive lesions mimicking breast cancer on FDG PET and PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W304–14.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Smyczek-Gargya B, Fersis N, Dittmann H, Vogel U, Reischl G, Machulla HJ, et al. PET with [18F]fluorothymidine for imaging of primary breast cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:720–4.PubMedCrossRef Smyczek-Gargya B, Fersis N, Dittmann H, Vogel U, Reischl G, Machulla HJ, et al. PET with [18F]fluorothymidine for imaging of primary breast cancer: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:720–4.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pio B, Park C, Pietras R, Hsueh WA, Satyamurthy N, Pegram MD, et al. Usefulness of 3′-[F-18]Fluoro-3′-deoxythymidine with positron emission tomography in predicting breast cancer response to therapy. Mol Imaging Biol. 2006;8:36–42.PubMedCrossRef Pio B, Park C, Pietras R, Hsueh WA, Satyamurthy N, Pegram MD, et al. Usefulness of 3′-[F-18]Fluoro-3′-deoxythymidine with positron emission tomography in predicting breast cancer response to therapy. Mol Imaging Biol. 2006;8:36–42.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lubberink M, Direcks W, Emmering J, van Tinteren H, Hoekstra OS, van der Hoeven JJ, et al. Validity of simplified 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]Fluorothymidine uptake measures for monitoring response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012;14:777–82.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lubberink M, Direcks W, Emmering J, van Tinteren H, Hoekstra OS, van der Hoeven JJ, et al. Validity of simplified 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]Fluorothymidine uptake measures for monitoring response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012;14:777–82.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Been LB, Elsinga PH, de Vries J, Cobben DC, Jager PL, Hoekstra HJ, et al. Positron emission tomography in patients with breast cancer using 18F-3′-deoxy-3′-fluoro-l-thymidine (18F-FLT)-a pilot study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:39–43.PubMedCrossRef Been LB, Elsinga PH, de Vries J, Cobben DC, Jager PL, Hoekstra HJ, et al. Positron emission tomography in patients with breast cancer using 18F-3′-deoxy-3′-fluoro-l-thymidine (18F-FLT)-a pilot study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:39–43.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. ACR BI-RADS®—mammography. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003. D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. ACR BI-RADS®—mammography. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, Tartar M, Pisano ED, Larsen LH, et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology. 2011;258:59–72.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, Tartar M, Pisano ED, Larsen LH, et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology. 2011;258:59–72.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Brem RF, Floerke AC, Rapelyea JA, Teal C, Kelly T, Mathur V. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 2008;247:651–7.PubMedCrossRef Brem RF, Floerke AC, Rapelyea JA, Teal C, Kelly T, Mathur V. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 2008;247:651–7.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Brem RF, Shahan C, Rapleyea JA, Donnelly CA, Rechtman LR, Kidwell AB, et al. Detection of occult foci of breast cancer using breast-specific gamma imaging in women with one mammographic or clinically suspicious breast lesion. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:735–43.PubMedCrossRef Brem RF, Shahan C, Rapleyea JA, Donnelly CA, Rechtman LR, Kidwell AB, et al. Detection of occult foci of breast cancer using breast-specific gamma imaging in women with one mammographic or clinically suspicious breast lesion. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:735–43.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hruska CB, Phillips SW, Whaley DH, Rhodes DJ, O’Connor MK. Molecular breast imaging: use of a dual-head dedicated gamma camera to detect small breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1805–15.PubMedCrossRef Hruska CB, Phillips SW, Whaley DH, Rhodes DJ, O’Connor MK. Molecular breast imaging: use of a dual-head dedicated gamma camera to detect small breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1805–15.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tadwalkar RV, Rapelyea JA, Torrente J, Rechtman LR, Teal CB, McSwain AP, et al. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality for the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer with correlation to tumour size and grade. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e212–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tadwalkar RV, Rapelyea JA, Torrente J, Rechtman LR, Teal CB, McSwain AP, et al. Breast-specific gamma imaging as an adjunct modality for the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer with correlation to tumour size and grade. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e212–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Schilling K, Narayanan D, Kalinyak JE, The J, Velasquez MV, Kahn S, et al. Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:23–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schilling K, Narayanan D, Kalinyak JE, The J, Velasquez MV, Kahn S, et al. Positron emission mammography in breast cancer presurgical planning: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:23–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillion DA, Guidi AJ, Schnitt SJ. Pathology of invasive breast cancer. In: Harris JR, Morrow M, Lippman ML, et al., editors. Diseases of the breast. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 374–407. Dillion DA, Guidi AJ, Schnitt SJ. Pathology of invasive breast cancer. In: Harris JR, Morrow M, Lippman ML, et al., editors. Diseases of the breast. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 374–407.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Elston CW, Ellis IO. Assessment of histologic grade. In: Elston C, Ellis I, eds. The breast. Edinburgh Churchill Livingstone. 1998; 365-84. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Assessment of histologic grade. In: Elston C, Ellis I, eds. The breast. Edinburgh Churchill Livingstone. 1998; 365-84.
Metadaten
Titel
Using 18F-FLT PET to distinguish between malignant and benign breast lesions with suspicious findings in mammography and breast ultrasound
verfasst von
Jane Wang
Wen-Hung Kuo
Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih
Ruoh-Fang Yen
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Ausgabe 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Elektronische ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-014-0889-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2014

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 10/2014 Zur Ausgabe