nach oben

Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology

Erschienen in:

01.02.2022

Using NVivo^TM as a methodological tool for a literature review on nursing innovation: a step-by-step approach

verfasst von: Tina L. Rylee, Ph.D., Stephen J Cavanagh, Ph.D., RN, FAAN

Erschienen in: Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology | Ausgabe 4/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This paper describes a step-by-step process on how to conduct a literature review using a qualitative analysis approach in conducting a literature review using NVivo to drive the analysis and explore the state of nursing innovation.

Data synthesis

This manuscript makes a unique contribution highlighting the importance of a comprehensive literature review following conceptual and methodological guidance. Previous literature on the literature review process usually describes the process quickly and without a specific step by step process. This manuscript describes a six-step process to conduct a literature review using a qualitative analytical program. The researcher selects the scope and establishes a search strategy, determines and applies the criteria for the selection process, selects the qualitative software, imports the data, extracts and codes the data, and analyzes it.

Conclusion

Qualitative research applications, such as NVivo, support nurses’ literature review process by improving rigor and reproducibility. The tools within the applications help better organize the literature, enhance transparency to the analytical process, and provide tools to visualize the data to improve the review’s overall quality. Having the steps documented and organized allows better collaboration between various researchers.

Aromataris, E., Riitano, D.: Systematic Reviews: Constructing a Search Strategy and Searching for Evidence. AJN Am. J. Nurs. 114,(5) (2014). https://journals.lww.com/ajnonline/Fulltext/2014/05000/Systematic_Reviews__Constructing_a_Search_Strategy.27.aspx

Asurakkody, T.A., Shin, S.Y.: Innovative Behavior in Nursing Context: A Concept Analysis. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 12(4), 237–244 (2018 Dec). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2018.11.003CrossRef

Boell, S., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 32, 257–286 (2014 01/01). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03412CrossRef

Brandon, A.F., All, A.C.: Constructivism theory analysis and application to curricula. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 31(2), 89–92 (2010)PubMed

Bringer, J.D., Johnston, L.H., Brackenridge, C.H.: Maximizing Transparency in a Doctoral Thesis1: The Complexities of Writing About the Use of QSR*NVIVO Within a Grounded Theory Study. Qual. Res. 4(2), 247–265 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104044434

Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., Francis, K.: Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Med. 7, 2050312118822927 (2019, 2019/01/01). https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cronin, P., Ryan, F., Coughlan, M.: Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. Br J Nurs, 17(1), 38–43 (2008, Jan 10–23). https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059

Dess, G., Picken, J.: Changing Roles: Leadership in the 21st Century. Org. Dyn. 28, 18–34 (2012 10/11). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)88447-8CrossRef

Dosi, G.: Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Res. Policy 11(3) (1984)

Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction (2009). https://books.google.com/books?id=rtiNK68Xt08C

Hidalgo, A., Albors, J.: Innovation management techniques and tools: a review from theory and practice. R&D Management. 38(2), 113–127 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00503.xCrossRef

Kaefer, F., Roper, J., Sinha, P.: A Software-Assisted Qualitative Content Analysis of News Articles: Example and Reflections. Forum Qual. Sozialforsch. 16 (2015, 05/07)

Kay, D., Kibble, J.: Learning theories 101: application to everyday teaching and scholarship. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 40(1), 17–25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00132.2015CrossRefPubMed

Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J., Moher, D.: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62(10), e1–e34 (2009 Oct). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006CrossRefPubMed

Mackenzie, H., Dewey, A., Drahota, A., Kilburn, S., Kalra, P., Fogg, C., Zachariah, D.: Systematic reviews: what they are, why they are important, and how to get involved (2012)

Maggio, L.A., Tannery, N.H., Kanter, S.L.: Reproducibility of Literature Search Reporting in Medical Education Reviews. Acad. Med. 86(8) (2011). https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2011/08000/Reproducibility_of_Literature_Search_Reporting_in.30.aspx

Maggio, L.A., Sewell, J.L., Artino, A.R. Jr.: The Literature Review: A Foundation for High-Quality Medical Education Research. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 8(3), 297–303 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00175.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

O’Neill, M., Booth, S., Lamb, J.: Using NVivo™ for Literature Reviews: The Eight Step Pedagogy (N7+1). Qual. Report 23 (2018, 03/06)

Onwuegbuzie, A., Leech, N., Collins, K.M.: Qualitative Analysis Techniques for the Review of the Literature. Qual. Report 17, 1–28 (2012)

Schumpeter, J.A.: The Theory of Economic Development. An inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Harvard University Press (1934)

Śledzik, K.: Schumpeter’s View on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. SSRN Electron. j. (2013, 04/29). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2257783CrossRef

Steward, B.: Writing a Literature Review. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 67(11), 495–500 (2004, 2004/11/01). https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260406701105CrossRef

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P.: Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. Br. J. Manag. 14(3), 207–222 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375CrossRef

Wee, B.V., Banister, D.: How to Write a Literature Review Paper? Transp. Rev. 36(2), 278–288 (2016, 2016/03/03). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456CrossRef

Wolfswinkel, J., Furtmueller, E., Wilderom, C.: Using Grounded Theory as a Method for Rigorously Reviewing Literature. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22 (2013, 11/01). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.51CrossRef

Titel: Using NVivoTM as a methodological tool for a literature review on nursing innovation: a step-by-step approach
verfasst von: Tina L. Rylee, Ph.D.
Stephen J Cavanagh, Ph.D., RN, FAAN
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology / Ausgabe 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1387-3741
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9400
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-022-00270-2

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Using NVivo^TM as a methodological tool for a literature review on nursing innovation: a step-by-step approach

Abstract

Purpose

Data synthesis

Conclusion

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Data synthesis

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2022

Does balancing site characteristics result in balanced population characteristics in a cluster-randomized controlled trial?

Imputing race and ethnicity in healthcare claims databases

The answer depends on pragmatic norms, semantic context-sensitivity, and epistemic reflection. A linguistic and epistemological analysis of the Danish Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)

Just you wait… and fill out this survey. Discussion of the methodological aspects of waiting room surveys

A two-stage super learner for healthcare expenditures