Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2019

14.06.2019

Validity of the Multidimensional Task Ability Profile

verfasst von: Joe L. Verna, Leonard N. Matheson, Sharon Scherer, John M. Mayer

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background The Multidimensional Task Ability Profile (MTAP) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure that provides a global score linked to the physical demand characteristics of work, but needs to be validated against established measures. Purpose To assess the concurrent validity of the MTAP compared with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), and Short Form 12 Health-Related Quality of Life (SF-12) questionnaires. Methods An observational study was conducted in 157 patients undergoing musculoskeletal rehabilitation. At baseline and after 30 days of treatment, patients completed the MTAP, ODI, NDI, DASH, LEFS, and SF-12 and provided self-reported work status. Results At baseline and after 30 days, convergent validity between the MTAP and DASH, LEFS, NDI, and ODI was good to excellent. Concurrent validity between the MTAP and SF-12 physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) was moderate or fair, respectively. Sensitivity to change over the 30-day treatment interval was established for the MTAP, SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS, and LEFS. Fair to moderate predictive validity for work status was found for the MTAP, ODI, NDI, DASH, and SF-12 PCS. Conclusions The MTAP demonstrated adequate concurrent validity, predictive validity, and sensitivity to change compared to other PROs. For patients with various impairment types, the MTAP may be a useful omnibus measure to supplement specialty instruments such as the DASH, NDI, ODI, or LEFS.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose M, et al. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(1):17–33.PubMedCrossRef Rose M, et al. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(1):17–33.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Matheson LN, Kaskutas VK, Mada D. Development and construct validation of the Hand Function Sort. J Occup Rehabil. 2001;11(2):75–86.PubMedCrossRef Matheson LN, Kaskutas VK, Mada D. Development and construct validation of the Hand Function Sort. J Occup Rehabil. 2001;11(2):75–86.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayer J, et al. The reliability and validity of a new computerized pictorial activity and task sort. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(2):185–195.CrossRef Mayer J, et al. The reliability and validity of a new computerized pictorial activity and task sort. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(2):185–195.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kramer A, Holthaus D. Uniform patient assessment for post-acute care. Final report. Aurora, CO: Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center; 2006. Kramer A, Holthaus D. Uniform patient assessment for post-acute care. Final report. Aurora, CO: Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center; 2006.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 6th ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2008. p. 613. American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 6th ed. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2008. p. 613.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Khorsan R, et al. Measures in chiropractic research: choosing patient-based outcome assessments. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(5):355–375.PubMedCrossRef Khorsan R, et al. Measures in chiropractic research: choosing patient-based outcome assessments. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(5):355–375.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Author. Official disability guidelines. Austin, TX: MCG Health; 2019. Author. Official disability guidelines. Austin, TX: MCG Health; 2019.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cella D, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cella D, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–1194.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) incentive under the physician fee schedule, and criteria for physician-focused payment models. Final rule with comment period. Fed Reg. 2016;81(214):77008–77831. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS. Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) incentive under the physician fee schedule, and criteria for physician-focused payment models. Final rule with comment period. Fed Reg. 2016;81(214):77008–77831.
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409–415.PubMed Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409–415.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602–608.PubMedCrossRef Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602–608.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Binkley JM, et al. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. Phys Therapy. 1999;79(4):371–383. Binkley JM, et al. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. Phys Therapy. 1999;79(4):371–383.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JJ, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-item Short-Form Health Survey, construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–233.PubMedCrossRef Ware JJ, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-item Short-Form Health Survey, construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–233.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Matheson L. History, design characteristics, and uses of the pictorial activity and task sorts. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14(3):175–195.PubMedCrossRef Matheson L. History, design characteristics, and uses of the pictorial activity and task sorts. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14(3):175–195.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Matheson L, Matheson M, Grant J. Development of a measure of perceived functional ability. J Occup Rehabil. 1993;3(1):15–30.PubMedCrossRef Matheson L, Matheson M, Grant J. Development of a measure of perceived functional ability. J Occup Rehabil. 1993;3(1):15–30.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Verna JL, et al. Development and reliability testing of Spanish language and English language versions of the multidimensional task ability profile. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):220–227.PubMedCrossRef Verna JL, et al. Development and reliability testing of Spanish language and English language versions of the multidimensional task ability profile. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):220–227.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Matheson L, et al. A method to provide a more efficient and reliable measure of self-report physical work capacity for patients with spinal pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):46–57.PubMedCrossRef Matheson L, et al. A method to provide a more efficient and reliable measure of self-report physical work capacity for patients with spinal pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):46–57.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mooney V, et al. Performance-integrated self-report measurement of physical ability. Spine J. 2010;10(1):433–440.PubMedCrossRef Mooney V, et al. Performance-integrated self-report measurement of physical ability. Spine J. 2010;10(1):433–440.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrich D. Rasch models of measurement. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Newbury Park: Sage; 1988.CrossRef Andrich D. Rasch models of measurement. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Newbury Park: Sage; 1988.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and the attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institute; 1960. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and the attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institute; 1960.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat U.S. Department of Labor. Dictionary of Occupational Titles, vol. 1. 4th ed. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1991. U.S. Department of Labor. Dictionary of Occupational Titles, vol. 1. 4th ed. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office; 1991.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kemp B, Adams B. The older adult health and mood questionnaire: a measure of geriatric depressive disorder. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1995;8(July):162–167.PubMedCrossRef Kemp B, Adams B. The older adult health and mood questionnaire: a measure of geriatric depressive disorder. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1995;8(July):162–167.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Matheson L. Multidimensional Task Ability Profile professional manual. St. Charles, MO: EpicRehab LLC.; 2011. Matheson L. Multidimensional Task Ability Profile professional manual. St. Charles, MO: EpicRehab LLC.; 2011.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergbom S, et al. Relationship among pain catastrophizing, depressed mood, and outcomes across physical therapy treatments. Phys Therapy. 2011;91(5):754–764.CrossRef Bergbom S, et al. Relationship among pain catastrophizing, depressed mood, and outcomes across physical therapy treatments. Phys Therapy. 2011;91(5):754–764.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno R, et al. Functional restoration for chronic low back pain: changes in depression, cognitive distortion, and disability. J Occup Rehabil. 1991;1(3):207–216.PubMedCrossRef Moreno R, et al. Functional restoration for chronic low back pain: changes in depression, cognitive distortion, and disability. J Occup Rehabil. 1991;1(3):207–216.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG, Theodore BR. The pain disability questionnaire: relationship to one-year functional and psychosocial rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(1):72–91.CrossRef Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG, Theodore BR. The pain disability questionnaire: relationship to one-year functional and psychosocial rehabilitation outcomes. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(1):72–91.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams H, et al. The relation between catastrophizing and occupational disability in individuals with major depression: concurrent and prospective associations. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):405–412.PubMedCrossRef Adams H, et al. The relation between catastrophizing and occupational disability in individuals with major depression: concurrent and prospective associations. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):405–412.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika. 1978;43(4):357–374.CrossRef Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika. 1978;43(4):357–374.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117–126.PubMedCrossRef Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117–126.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo X, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain. Spine. 2003;28(15):1739–1745.PubMed Luo X, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) in patients with back pain. Spine. 2003;28(15):1739–1745.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 2000. p. 742. Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 2000. p. 742.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Baldwin ML, et al. Self-reported severity measures as predictors of return-to-work outcomes in occupational back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(4):683–700.PubMedCrossRef Baldwin ML, et al. Self-reported severity measures as predictors of return-to-work outcomes in occupational back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(4):683–700.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Armijo-Olivo S, et al. Predictive value of the DASH tool for predicting return to work of injured workers with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73(12):807–815.PubMed Armijo-Olivo S, et al. Predictive value of the DASH tool for predicting return to work of injured workers with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73(12):807–815.PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchand GH, et al. Change in pain, disability and influence of fear-avoidance in a work-focused intervention on neck and back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16(1):94–104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Marchand GH, et al. Change in pain, disability and influence of fear-avoidance in a work-focused intervention on neck and back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16(1):94–104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat McGirt MJ, et al. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(6):E13.PubMedCrossRef McGirt MJ, et al. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(6):E13.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wind H, et al. Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(2):253–272.PubMedCrossRef Wind H, et al. Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(2):253–272.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Gopinath B, et al. Prognostic indicators of social outcomes in persons who sustained an injury in a road traffic crash. Injury. 2015;46(5):909–917.PubMedCrossRef Gopinath B, et al. Prognostic indicators of social outcomes in persons who sustained an injury in a road traffic crash. Injury. 2015;46(5):909–917.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Tschernetzki-Neilson PJ, et al. Changing to an outcome-focused program improves return to work outcomes. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):473–486.PubMedCrossRef Tschernetzki-Neilson PJ, et al. Changing to an outcome-focused program improves return to work outcomes. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):473–486.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.CrossRef World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Validity of the Multidimensional Task Ability Profile
verfasst von
Joe L. Verna
Leonard N. Matheson
Sharon Scherer
John M. Mayer
Publikationsdatum
14.06.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-019-09842-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe