Skip to main content

01.05.2014 | Research | Sonderheft 1/2014 Open Access

Human Resources for Health 1/2014

Which incentive package will retain regionalized health personnel in Burkina Faso: a discrete choice experiment

Human Resources for Health > Sonderheft 1/2014
Fadima Yaya Bocoum, Eddine Koné, Seni Kouanda, W Maurice E Yaméogo, Aristide Romaric Bado
Wichtige Hinweise

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

FYB, EK, and SK collaborated in the writing of the manuscript. FYB, EK, MWEY, ARB, and SK were involved in the design of the survey. FYB, EK, and MWEY were involved in the conducting of the survey. EK and ARB performed the statistical analyses. All authors revised the manuscript before submission.



The lack of motivation of health workers to practice in rural areas remains a crucial problem for decision-makers, as it deprives the majority of access to health care. To solve the problem, many countries have implemented health worker retention strategies. However, the development of such strategies requires an understanding of the preferences of health workers. The objective of the study was to identify a package for attracting and retaining health workers in underserved areas.


A cross sectional study was conducted in three health regions of Burkina Faso in 2012. A discrete choice experiment was used to investigate preferences for incentive packages among health workers recruited under the regionalized policy. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions with health workers currently working in the East and Sahel regions and policy makers, and a literature review on attraction and retention in low income countries, were performed to identify the attributes and levels. These attributes were: the regionalized recruitment policy, health insurance, work equipment, housing, and specific incentive compensation. The final design resulted in 16 choice sets. A multinomial logistic regression was used to determine the influence of socio-demographic characteristics on choice of a given option. A probit logistic regression model was then used to analyze the effect of these difference variables on choice, to identify the incentive package best suited to health workers. In total, questionnaires were administered to 315 regional health workers.


For all participants, choice of package was strongly influenced by length of commitment under the policy and provision of housing. Sex, number of years in profession, and location also influenced the choice of package. Women are twice more likely to choose a package with free housing and the cancellation of the policy.


It is important that governments consider health worker preferences in crafting policies to address attraction and retention in underserved areas. In addition, the methodology of discrete choice experiment has been particularly useful, not only for better understanding the factors explaining the reluctance of health workers to work in underserved areas, but also to provide practical advice to the government, to improve its retention policy.
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2014

Human Resources for Health 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe