Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health 1/2017

08.07.2016 | Original Paper

A 15-Year Review of Trends in Representation of Female Subjects in Islamic Bioethics Research

verfasst von: Zeenat Hussain, Edyta Kuzian, Naveed Hussain

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Gender representation in Islamic bioethics research in the twenty-first century has not been studied. To study temporal trends in representation of female subjects in Islamic bioethics research, PubMed-listed publications on Islamic bioethics from years 2000 to 2014 were reviewed for gender participation in human subjects’ research. There were temporal trends of increasing publications of Islamic bioethics-related human subjects’ research (64 papers over 15 years; R 2 = 0.72; p < 0.0004). Female subjects were well represented with a trend toward increasing participation. This was true for women from Muslim-majority countries even in non-gender-focused studies over the past 15 years.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, K. A., & Han, J. (2008). An exploration of ageism and sexism in obituary photographs: 1967–1997. Omega (Westport), 58(4), 335–345.CrossRef Anderson, K. A., & Han, J. (2008). An exploration of ageism and sexism in obituary photographs: 1967–1997. Omega (Westport), 58(4), 335–345.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Annonymous. (1990). General Accounting Office, National Institute of Health. Problems in implementing policy on women in study populations. GAO/HRD-90-38. Annonymous. (1990). General Accounting Office, National Institute of Health. Problems in implementing policy on women in study populations. GAO/HRD-90-38.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous. (1985). U.S. Public Health Service. Report of the public service task force on women’s health issues. Public Health Report, 100(1), 73–106. Anonymous. (1985). U.S. Public Health Service. Report of the public service task force on women’s health issues. Public Health Report, 100(1), 73–106.
Zurück zum Zitat Anonymous. (1994). Federal Register. NIH guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. 59, 14508. Anonymous. (1994). Federal Register. NIH guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. 59, 14508.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 73–93.CrossRef Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 73–93.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Groot, C. J., van Leeuwen, T., Mol, B. W., & Waltman, L. (2015). A longitudinal analysis of publications on maternal mortality. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 29(6), 481–489.CrossRefPubMed de Groot, C. J., van Leeuwen, T., Mol, B. W., & Waltman, L. (2015). A longitudinal analysis of publications on maternal mortality. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 29(6), 481–489.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Dickenson, D. (2006). Gender and ethics committees: Where’s the ‘different voice’? Bioethics, 20(3), 115–124.CrossRefPubMed Dickenson, D. (2006). Gender and ethics committees: Where’s the ‘different voice’? Bioethics, 20(3), 115–124.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hassan, R. (1995). Women in Islam: Qur’anic ideals versus Muslim realities. Plan Parent Chall, 2, 5–9. Hassan, R. (1995). Women in Islam: Qur’anic ideals versus Muslim realities. Plan Parent Chall, 2, 5–9.
Zurück zum Zitat Horvath, K. J., Iantaffi, A., Grey, J. A., & Bockting, W. (2012). A review of the content and format of transgender-related webpages. Health Communication, 27(5), 457–466.CrossRefPubMed Horvath, K. J., Iantaffi, A., Grey, J. A., & Bockting, W. (2012). A review of the content and format of transgender-related webpages. Health Communication, 27(5), 457–466.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Im, E. O., & Chee, W. (2001). A feminist critique of research on cancer pain. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 23(7), 726–752.CrossRefPubMed Im, E. O., & Chee, W. (2001). A feminist critique of research on cancer pain. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 23(7), 726–752.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Inhorn, M. C., & Whittle, K. L. (2001). Feminism meets the “new” epidemiologies: Toward an appraisal of antifeminist biases in epidemiological research on women’s health. Social Science and Medicine, 53(5), 553–567.CrossRefPubMed Inhorn, M. C., & Whittle, K. L. (2001). Feminism meets the “new” epidemiologies: Toward an appraisal of antifeminist biases in epidemiological research on women’s health. Social Science and Medicine, 53(5), 553–567.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Marrocco, A., & Stewart, D. E. (2001). We’ve come a long way, maybe: Recruitment of women and analysis of results by sex in clinical research. Journal of Women’s Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 10(2), 175–179.CrossRefPubMed Marrocco, A., & Stewart, D. E. (2001). We’ve come a long way, maybe: Recruitment of women and analysis of results by sex in clinical research. Journal of Women’s Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 10(2), 175–179.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Mir-Hosseini, Z. (2000). Islam and gender: The religious debate in contemporary Iran. London: I.B. Tauris. Mir-Hosseini, Z. (2000). Islam and gender: The religious debate in contemporary Iran. London: I.B. Tauris.
Zurück zum Zitat Miro, O., Burillo-Putze, G., Plunkett, P. K., & Brown, A. F. (2010). Female representation on emergency medicine editorial teams. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17(2), 84–88.CrossRefPubMed Miro, O., Burillo-Putze, G., Plunkett, P. K., & Brown, A. F. (2010). Female representation on emergency medicine editorial teams. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 17(2), 84–88.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Soderstrom, M. (2001). Why researchers excluded women from their trial populations. Lakartidningen, 98(13), 1524–1528.PubMed Soderstrom, M. (2001). Why researchers excluded women from their trial populations. Lakartidningen, 98(13), 1524–1528.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Vidaver, R. M., Lafleur, B., Tong, C., Bradshaw, R., & Marts, S. A. (2000). Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: Lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex. Journal of Women’s Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 9(5), 495–504.CrossRefPubMed Vidaver, R. M., Lafleur, B., Tong, C., Bradshaw, R., & Marts, S. A. (2000). Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: Lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex. Journal of Women’s Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 9(5), 495–504.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Zucker, I., & Beery, A. K. (2010). Males still dominate animal studies. Nature, 465(7299), 690.CrossRefPubMed Zucker, I., & Beery, A. K. (2010). Males still dominate animal studies. Nature, 465(7299), 690.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A 15-Year Review of Trends in Representation of Female Subjects in Islamic Bioethics Research
verfasst von
Zeenat Hussain
Edyta Kuzian
Naveed Hussain
Publikationsdatum
08.07.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Religion and Health / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0283-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Journal of Religion and Health 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Biographical Exploration

Knees Shaking Uncontrollably