Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2013

01.02.2013 | Refractive Surgery

A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy

verfasst von: Afshin Lotfi Sadigh, Rohollah F. Fouladi, Hassan Hashemi, Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The intraocular pressure (IOP) could be measured by both Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). Although these two methods have been discussed widely after laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASIK), there is little data in the cases undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). We aimed to compare the changes of IOP measurements obtained by GAT and DCT after PRK for myopia/myopic astigmatism.

Methods

This prospective study enrolled 77 candidates (154 eyes) for PRK to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism and 30 matched patients (30 eyes) with myopia or myopic astigmatism who served as controls. Changes of the IOP measurements (ΔIOP) obtained by GAT and DCT before and at 6 months after PRK in the operated eyes, and at baseline and 6 months later in the controls, were documented. Changes of the central corneal thickness (ΔCCT) were determined in the same fashion.

Results

The mean IOP readings obtained by DCT were comparable before and at 6 months after procedure (18.34 ± 3.03 mmHg and 17.87 ± 2.61 mmHg respectively, p = 0.41); whereas the mean IOP reading obtained by GAT decreased significantly 6 months postoperatively (17.92 ± 3.63 mmHg and 16.25 ± 2.66 mmHg, p < 0.001). A significant correlation was present between the ΔIOP obtained by GAT and ΔCCT (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). Similar correlation was not significant between the DCT-obtained ΔIOP and the ΔCCT (r = 0.07, p = 0.44). The mean ΔIOP obtained by GAT was significantly higher in the operated eyes than in the controls (−1.54 ± 1.45 vs 0.07 ± 0.44 mmHg, p = 0.02). The mean DCT-obtained ΔIOP was just marginally insignificant between the operated and nonoperated eyes (−0.63 ± 0.59 vs 0.02 ± 0.38 mmHg respectively; p = 0.09).

Conclusions

The authors recommend DCT after PRK in the cases with myopia or myopic astigmatism
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Allingham RR, Damji KF, Freedman S, Moroi SE, Shafranov G (2004) Shields’ textbook of glaucoma. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Allingham RR, Damji KF, Freedman S, Moroi SE, Shafranov G (2004) Shields’ textbook of glaucoma. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, Hamilton R, Dave D, Dua HS (2002) Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1389–1392PubMed Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, Hamilton R, Dave D, Dua HS (2002) Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1389–1392PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rashad KM, Bahnassy AA (2001) Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 17:420–427PubMed Rashad KM, Bahnassy AA (2001) Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 17:420–427PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Park HJ, Uhm KB, Hong C (2001) Reduction in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:303–309PubMedCrossRef Park HJ, Uhm KB, Hong C (2001) Reduction in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:303–309PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Montés-Micó R, Charman WN (2001) Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 21:228–235PubMedCrossRef Montés-Micó R, Charman WN (2001) Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 21:228–235PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Reinhard T, Sundmacher R (1999) Determining real IOP values. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:157–158PubMedCrossRef Reinhard T, Sundmacher R (1999) Determining real IOP values. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:157–158PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider E, Grehn F (2006) Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 15:2–6PubMedCrossRef Schneider E, Grehn F (2006) Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 15:2–6PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Agudelo LM, Molina CA, Alvarez DL (2002) Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. J Refract Surg 18:472–474PubMed Agudelo LM, Molina CA, Alvarez DL (2002) Changes in intraocular pressure after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. J Refract Surg 18:472–474PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Munger R, Hodge WG, Mintsioulis G, Agapitos PJ, Jackson WB, Damji KF (1998) Correction of intraocular pressure for changes in central corneal thickness following photorefractive keratectomy. Can J Ophthalmol 33:159–165PubMed Munger R, Hodge WG, Mintsioulis G, Agapitos PJ, Jackson WB, Damji KF (1998) Correction of intraocular pressure for changes in central corneal thickness following photorefractive keratectomy. Can J Ophthalmol 33:159–165PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Lee CH, Choi J, Yoon SY, Sung KR, Park SB, Kook MS (2009) Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Korean J Ophthalmol 23:27–31PubMedCrossRef Lee J, Lee CH, Choi J, Yoon SY, Sung KR, Park SB, Kook MS (2009) Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Korean J Ophthalmol 23:27–31PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Erickson DH, Goodwin D, Rollins M, Belaustegui A, Anderson C (2009) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude. Optometry 80:169–174PubMedCrossRef Erickson DH, Goodwin D, Rollins M, Belaustegui A, Anderson C (2009) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude. Optometry 80:169–174PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2003) Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3790–3794PubMedCrossRef Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2003) Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3790–3794PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang DH, Stulting RD (2005) Change in intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK the effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap. Ophthalmology 112:1009–1016PubMedCrossRef Chang DH, Stulting RD (2005) Change in intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK the effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap. Ophthalmology 112:1009–1016PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gimeno JA, Muñoz LA, Valenzuela LA, Moltó FJ, Rahhal MS (2000) Influence of refraction on tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 19:512–516PubMedCrossRef Gimeno JA, Muñoz LA, Valenzuela LA, Moltó FJ, Rahhal MS (2000) Influence of refraction on tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 19:512–516PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kass MA (1996) Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology 103:183–185PubMed Kass MA (1996) Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology 103:183–185PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1–30PubMedCrossRef Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1–30PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Duch S, Serra A, Castanera J, Abos R, Quintana M (2001) Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment. J Glaucoma 10:261–265PubMedCrossRef Duch S, Serra A, Castanera J, Abos R, Quintana M (2001) Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment. J Glaucoma 10:261–265PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahl J, Vold S (2000) Effect of corneal thickness on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement in rabbits after excimer laser photoablation. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:736–743PubMedCrossRef Stahl J, Vold S (2000) Effect of corneal thickness on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement in rabbits after excimer laser photoablation. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:736–743PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel S, Aslanides IM (1996) Main causes of reduced intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 12:673–674PubMed Patel S, Aslanides IM (1996) Main causes of reduced intraocular pressure after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 12:673–674PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fournier AV, Podtetenev M, Lemire J, Thompson P, Duchesne R, Perreault C, Chehade N, Blondeau P (1998) Intraocular pressure change measured by Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:905–910PubMed Fournier AV, Podtetenev M, Lemire J, Thompson P, Duchesne R, Perreault C, Chehade N, Blondeau P (1998) Intraocular pressure change measured by Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:905–910PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ (2007) Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 143:39–47PubMedCrossRef Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Roberts CJ (2007) Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol 143:39–47PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1957) Friedenwald’s rigidity coefficient. Ophthalmologica 133:330–335PubMedCrossRef Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1957) Friedenwald’s rigidity coefficient. Ophthalmologica 133:330–335PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cennamo G, Rosa N, La Rana A, Bianco S, Sebastiani A (1997) Non-contact tonometry in patients that underwent photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmologica 211:341–343PubMedCrossRef Cennamo G, Rosa N, La Rana A, Bianco S, Sebastiani A (1997) Non-contact tonometry in patients that underwent photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmologica 211:341–343PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lleó A, Marcos A, Calatayud M, Alonso L, Rahhal SM, Sanchis-Gimeno JA (2003) The relationship between central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin Exp Optom 86:104–108PubMedCrossRef Lleó A, Marcos A, Calatayud M, Alonso L, Rahhal SM, Sanchis-Gimeno JA (2003) The relationship between central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin Exp Optom 86:104–108PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Realini T, Weinreb RN, Hobbs G (2009) Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma 18:119–123PubMedCrossRef Realini T, Weinreb RN, Hobbs G (2009) Correlation of intraocular pressure measured with goldmann and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma 18:119–123PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2007) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects. Ophthalmology 114:658–665PubMedCrossRef Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN (2007) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects. Ophthalmology 114:658–665PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualls C (2007) Clinical comparison of Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 16:694–699PubMedCrossRef Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualls C (2007) Clinical comparison of Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 16:694–699PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Doyle A, Lachkar Y (2005) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 14:288–292PubMedCrossRef Doyle A, Lachkar Y (2005) Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 14:288–292PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G (2009) Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Eye 23:262–269PubMedCrossRef Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G (2009) Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Eye 23:262–269PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Aristeidou AP, Labiris G, Katsanos A, Fanariotis M, Foudoulakis NC, Kozobolis VP (2011) Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249(5):767–773PubMedCrossRef Aristeidou AP, Labiris G, Katsanos A, Fanariotis M, Foudoulakis NC, Kozobolis VP (2011) Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249(5):767–773PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy
verfasst von
Afshin Lotfi Sadigh
Rohollah F. Fouladi
Hassan Hashemi
Amir Houshang Beheshtnejad
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2142-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Die Verwendung von Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit stellt immer eine Off-label-Anwendung dar. Ein Einsatz von Arzneimitteln muss daher besonders sorgfältig auf sein Risiko-Nutzen-Verhältnis bewertet werden. In der vorliegenden …

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Vitrektomie Originalie

Die endogene Endophthalmitis ist eine hämatogen fortgeleitete, bakterielle oder fungale Infektion, die über choroidale oder retinale Gefäße in den Augapfel eingeschwemmt wird [ 1 – 3 ]. Von dort infiltrieren die Keime in die Netzhaut, den …

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

Vitrektomie Leitthema

Eine endogene Endophthalmitis stellt einen ophthalmologischen Notfall dar, der umgehender Diagnostik und Therapie bedarf. Es sollte mit geeigneten Methoden, wie beispielsweise dem Freiburger Endophthalmitis-Set, ein Keimnachweis erfolgen. Bei der …

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Die bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea, insbesondere ohne die Ausbildung von lichtstreuenden Narben, ist oberstes Gebot, um einer dauerhaften Schädigung der Hornhaut frühzeitig entgegenzuwirken und die Funktion des Auges zu erhalten.   

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.