nach oben

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Erschienen in:

01.02.2009 | Letter to the Editor

A Meta-Analysis of Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer Patients Gone Awry

verfasst von: James C. Coyne, Ph.D., Brett D. Thombs, Ph.D., Mariet Hagedoorn, Ph.D.

Erschienen in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

In their meta-analysis, Zimmermann and colleagues [1] evaluated moderators that might explain variability in the efficacy of interventions for breast cancer (BC) patients. They concluded

“...psychoeducation is a treatment of choice for BC patients, preferably prior to surgery and led by individuals with a medical expertise. Other psychosocial interventions appear most effective when administered individually and led by a psychologist” (p. 225).

…

Zimmermann T, Heinrichs N, Baucom DH. “Does One Size Fit All?” Moderators in psychosocial interventions for breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Annals Behav Med. 2007; 34: 225–239.CrossRef

Gaston-Johansson F, Fall-Dickson JM, Nanda J, et al. The effectiveness of the comprehensive coping strategy program on clinical outcomes in breast cancer autologous bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Nurs. 2000; 23: 277–285.PubMedCrossRef

Heiney SP, McWayne J, Hurley TG, et al. Efficacy of therapeutic group by telephone for women with breast cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2003; 26: 439–447.PubMedCrossRef

McQuellon RP, Wells M, Hoffman S, et al. Reducing distress in cancer patients with an orientation program. Psychooncology. 1998; 7: 207–217.PubMedCrossRef

Manne SL, Girasek D, Ambrosino J. An evaluation of the impact of a cosmetics class on breast cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1994; 12: 83–99.CrossRef

Helgeson VS, Cohen S, Schulz R, Yasko J. Education and peer discussion group interventions and adjustment to breast cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999; 56: 340–347.PubMedCrossRef

Sheard T, Maguire P. The effect of psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in cancer patients: Results of two meta-analyses. Brit J Cancer. 1999; 80: 1770–1780.PubMedCrossRef

Newell SA, Sanson-Fisher RW, Savolainen NJ. Systematic review of psychological therapies for cancer patients: Overview and recommendations for future research. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 558–584.PubMed

Lepore SJ, Coyne JC. Psychological interventions for distress in cancer patients: A review of reviews. Annals Behav Med. 2006; 32: 85–92.CrossRef

10.

Classen C, Butler LD, Koopman C, et al. Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer - A randomized clinical intervention trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001; 58: 494–501.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Giese-Davis J, Koopman C, Butler LD, et al. Change in emotion-regulation strategy for women with metastatic breast cancer following supportive-expressive group therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002; 70: 916–925.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Maguire P, Tait A, Brooke M, Thomas C, Sellwood R. Effect of counseling on the psychiatric morbidity associated with mastectomy. BMJ. 1980; 281: 1454–1456.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Maguire P, Brooke M, Tait A, Thomas C, Sellwood R. The effect of counseling on physical disability and social recovery after mastectomy. Clin Oncol. 1983; 9: 319–324.PubMed

14.

Bordeleau L, Szalai JP, Ennis M, et al. Quality of life in a randomized trial of group psychosocial support in metastatic breast cancer: Overall effects of the intervention and an exploration of missing data. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 1944–1951.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Goodwin PJ, Leszcz M, Ennis M, et al. The effect of group psychosocial support on survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1719–1726.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Goodwin PJ, Leszcz M, Koopmans J, et al. Randomized trial of group psychosocial support in metastatic breast cancer: The BEST study. Cancer Treat Rev. 1996; 22: 91–96.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Nezu AM, Nezu CM, Felgoise SH, McClure KS, Houts PS. Project genesis: Assessing the efficacy of problem-solving therapy for distressed adult cancer patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71: 1036–1048.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: A Meta-Analysis of Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer Patients Gone Awry
verfasst von: James C. Coyne, Ph.D.
Brett D. Thombs, Ph.D.
Mariet Hagedoorn, Ph.D.
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2009
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9075-2

Springer Medizin

A Meta-Analysis of Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer Patients Gone Awry

Excerpt

Neu in den Fachgebieten Neurologie und Psychiatrie

Typ-2-Diabetes und Depression folgen oft aufeinander

Schützt Olivenöl vor dem Tod durch Demenz?

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

Social Isolation and Stress-related Cardiovascular, Lipid, and Cortisol Responses

Commercial Facilities, Social Cognitive Variables, and Physical Activity of 12th Grade Girls

Overcommitment but not Effort–Reward Imbalance Relates to Stress-Induced Coagulation Changes in Teachers

Perceived Diabetes Task Competence Mediates the Relationship of both Negative and Positive Affect with Blood Glucose in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

Coping Style and Sleep Quality in Men with Cancer

Is a Meta-Analysis Following Common Meta-Analytical Procedures Going Awry? A Response to Coyne, Thombs, and Hagedoorn

Neu in den Fachgebieten Neurologie und Psychiatrie

Typ-2-Diabetes und Depression folgen oft aufeinander

Schützt Olivenöl vor dem Tod durch Demenz?

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet