Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2021

30.04.2020 | Original Research

A pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic real-time display may change anesthesiologists’ behavior

verfasst von: Shinju Obara, Noah Syroid, Takahiro Ogura, Nathan L. Pace, Ken B. Johnson, Rob Albert, Jim Agutter, Ami R. Stuart, Talmage D. Egan

Erschienen in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

We have developed a real-time graphical display that presents anesthetic pharmacology data (drug effect site concentrations (Ce) and probability of anesthetic effects including hypnosis, loss of response to tracheal intubation), improving a previous prototype. We hypothesized that the use of the display alters (1) clinical behavior of anesthesiologists (i.e., Ce of isoflurane and fentanyl at the end of anesthesia), (2) fentanyl dose during the first 30 min of recovery in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), and that the response of clinicians to the display in terms of workload and utility is favorable. The display was evaluated in a two-group, non-randomized prospective observational study of 30 patients undergoing general anesthesia using isoflurane and fentanyl. The isoflurane-predicted Ce was lower in the display group (without-display: 0.64% ± 0.06%; with-display: 0.42 ± 0.04%; t23.9 = 3.17, P = 0.004 < adjusted alpha 0.05/2). The difference in fentanyl-predicted Ce did not achieve statistical significance (without-display: 1.5 ± 0.1 ng/ml; with-display: 2.0 ± 0.2 ng/ml; t25.5 = 2.26, P = 0.03 > adjusted alpha 0.05/2) (means ± standard error). A joint test of isoflurane and fentanyl Ce with respect to the display condition rejected the null hypothesis of no differences (Hotelling T2, P = 0.01), supporting our primary hypothesis. The total fentanyl per patient during the first 30 min in the PACU with the display was 75.0 ± 62.7 µg and that without the display was 83.0 ± 74.7 µg. There was no significant difference between the groups (means ± standard deviation, P = 0.75). There were no differences in perceived workload. Use of the display does not appear to be cognitively burdensome and may change the anesthesiologist’s dosing regimen.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Drews FA, Syroid N, Agutter J, Strayer DL, Westenskow DR. Drug delivery as control task: improving performance in a common anesthetic task. Hum Factors. 2006;48:85–94.CrossRef Drews FA, Syroid N, Agutter J, Strayer DL, Westenskow DR. Drug delivery as control task: improving performance in a common anesthetic task. Hum Factors. 2006;48:85–94.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Struys MM, De Smet T, Mortier EP. Simulated drug administration: an emerging tool for teaching clinical pharmacology during anesthesiology training. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84:170–4.CrossRef Struys MM, De Smet T, Mortier EP. Simulated drug administration: an emerging tool for teaching clinical pharmacology during anesthesiology training. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84:170–4.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Syroid ND, Agutter J, Drews FA, Westenskow DR, Albert RW, Bermudez JC, Strayer DL, Prenzel H, Loeb RG, Weinger MB. Development and evaluation of a graphical anesthesia drug display. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:565–75.CrossRef Syroid ND, Agutter J, Drews FA, Westenskow DR, Albert RW, Bermudez JC, Strayer DL, Prenzel H, Loeb RG, Weinger MB. Development and evaluation of a graphical anesthesia drug display. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:565–75.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mai S, Ami S, Takayuki K. Complementary use of effect site-target controlled infusion and smartpilot view for anesthetic management in semi-awake craniotomy near BIS 85. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2018;30:78–9.CrossRef Mai S, Ami S, Takayuki K. Complementary use of effect site-target controlled infusion and smartpilot view for anesthetic management in semi-awake craniotomy near BIS 85. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2018;30:78–9.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cirillo V, Zito Marinosci G, De Robertis E, Iacono C, Romano GM, Desantis O, Piazza O, Servillo G, Tufano R. Navigator(R) and SmartPilot(R) View are helpful in guiding anesthesia and reducing anesthetic drug dosing. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81:1163–9.PubMed Cirillo V, Zito Marinosci G, De Robertis E, Iacono C, Romano GM, Desantis O, Piazza O, Servillo G, Tufano R. Navigator(R) and SmartPilot(R) View are helpful in guiding anesthesia and reducing anesthetic drug dosing. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81:1163–9.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Leblanc D, Conte M, Masson G, Richard F, Jeanneteau A, Bouhours G, Chretien JM, Rony L, Rineau E, Lasocki S. SmartPilot(R) view-guided anaesthesia improves postoperative outcomes in hip fracture surgery: a randomized blinded controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:1022–9.CrossRef Leblanc D, Conte M, Masson G, Richard F, Jeanneteau A, Bouhours G, Chretien JM, Rony L, Rineau E, Lasocki S. SmartPilot(R) view-guided anaesthesia improves postoperative outcomes in hip fracture surgery: a randomized blinded controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:1022–9.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gin T. Clinical pharmacology on display. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:256–8.CrossRef Gin T. Clinical pharmacology on display. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:256–8.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Syroid ND, Johnson KB, Pace NL, Westenskow DR, Tyler D, Bruhschwein F, Albert RW, Roalstad S, Costy-Bennett S, Egan TD. Response surface model predictions of emergence and response to pain in the recovery room: an evaluation of patients emerging from an isoflurane and fentanyl anesthetic. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:380–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Syroid ND, Johnson KB, Pace NL, Westenskow DR, Tyler D, Bruhschwein F, Albert RW, Roalstad S, Costy-Bennett S, Egan TD. Response surface model predictions of emergence and response to pain in the recovery room: an evaluation of patients emerging from an isoflurane and fentanyl anesthetic. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:380–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson KB, Syroid ND, Gupta DK, Manyam SC, Pace NL, LaPierre CD, Egan TD, White JL, Tyler D, Westenskow DR. An evaluation of remifentanil-sevoflurane response surface models in patients emerging from anesthesia: model improvement using effect-site sevoflurane concentrations. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:387–94.CrossRef Johnson KB, Syroid ND, Gupta DK, Manyam SC, Pace NL, LaPierre CD, Egan TD, White JL, Tyler D, Westenskow DR. An evaluation of remifentanil-sevoflurane response surface models in patients emerging from anesthesia: model improvement using effect-site sevoflurane concentrations. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:387–94.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kern SE, Xie G, White JL, Egan TD. A response surface analysis of propofol-remifentanil pharmacodynamic interaction in volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1373–81.CrossRef Kern SE, Xie G, White JL, Egan TD. A response surface analysis of propofol-remifentanil pharmacodynamic interaction in volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1373–81.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson KB, Syroid ND, Gupta DK, Manyam SC, Egan TD, Huntington J, White JL, Tyler D, Westenskow DR. An evaluation of remifentanil propofol response surfaces for loss of responsiveness, loss of response to surrogates of painful stimuli and laryngoscopy in patients undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:471–9.CrossRef Johnson KB, Syroid ND, Gupta DK, Manyam SC, Egan TD, Huntington J, White JL, Tyler D, Westenskow DR. An evaluation of remifentanil propofol response surfaces for loss of responsiveness, loss of response to surrogates of painful stimuli and laryngoscopy in patients undergoing elective surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:471–9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shafer SL, Gregg KM. Algorithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992;20:147–69.CrossRef Shafer SL, Gregg KM. Algorithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992;20:147–69.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Youngs EJ. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1502–16.CrossRef Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Youngs EJ. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1502–16.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnider TW, Minto CF, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Shafer SL, Youngs EJ. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1170–82.CrossRef Schnider TW, Minto CF, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Shafer SL, Youngs EJ. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1170–82.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Albrecht S, Ihmsen H, Hering W, Geisslinger G, Dingemanse J, Schwilden H, Schuttler J. The effect of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;65:630–9.CrossRef Albrecht S, Ihmsen H, Hering W, Geisslinger G, Dingemanse J, Schwilden H, Schuttler J. The effect of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;65:630–9.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:24–33.CrossRef Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:24–33.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott JC, Cooke JE, Stanski DR. Electroencephalographic quantitation of opioid effect: comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and sufentanil. Anesthesiology. 1991;74:34–42.CrossRef Scott JC, Cooke JE, Stanski DR. Electroencephalographic quantitation of opioid effect: comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and sufentanil. Anesthesiology. 1991;74:34–42.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shafer SL, Varvel JR, Aziz N, Scott JC. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump. Anesthesiology. 1990;73:1091–102.CrossRef Shafer SL, Varvel JR, Aziz N, Scott JC. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl administered by computer-controlled infusion pump. Anesthesiology. 1990;73:1091–102.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gepts E, Shafer SL, Camu F, Stanski DR, Woestenborghs R, Van Peer A, Heykants JJ. Linearity of pharmacokinetics and model estimation of sufentanil. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:1194–204.CrossRef Gepts E, Shafer SL, Camu F, Stanski DR, Woestenborghs R, Van Peer A, Heykants JJ. Linearity of pharmacokinetics and model estimation of sufentanil. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:1194–204.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerou JG, Booij LH. Model-based administration of inhalation anaesthesia. 1. Developing a system model. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86:12–28.CrossRef Lerou JG, Booij LH. Model-based administration of inhalation anaesthesia. 1. Developing a system model. Br J Anaesth. 2001;86:12–28.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerou JG, Dirksen R, Beneken Kolmer HH, Booij LH. A system model for closed-circuit inhalation anesthesia. I Comput Study Anesthesiol. 1991;75:345–55.CrossRef Lerou JG, Dirksen R, Beneken Kolmer HH, Booij LH. A system model for closed-circuit inhalation anesthesia. I Comput Study Anesthesiol. 1991;75:345–55.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lang E, Kapila A, Shlugman D, Hoke JF, Sebel PS, Glass PS. Reduction of isoflurane minimal alveolar concentration by remifentanil. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:721–8.CrossRef Lang E, Kapila A, Shlugman D, Hoke JF, Sebel PS, Glass PS. Reduction of isoflurane minimal alveolar concentration by remifentanil. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:721–8.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Manyam SC, Gupta DK, Johnson KB, White JL, Pace NL, Westenskow DR, Egan TD. Opioid-volatile anesthetic synergy: a response surface model with remifentanil and sevoflurane as prototypes. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:267–78.CrossRef Manyam SC, Gupta DK, Johnson KB, White JL, Pace NL, Westenskow DR, Egan TD. Opioid-volatile anesthetic synergy: a response surface model with remifentanil and sevoflurane as prototypes. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:267–78.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, Schwam EM, Siegel JL. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;10:244–51.CrossRef Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, Schwam EM, Siegel JL. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990;10:244–51.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart S, Staveland L. Development of NASATLX (Task. Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock P, Meshkati M, editors. Human mental workload. Amsterdam: New Hollan; 1988. p. 139–183.CrossRef Hart S, Staveland L. Development of NASATLX (Task. Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock P, Meshkati M, editors. Human mental workload. Amsterdam: New Hollan; 1988. p. 139–183.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic real-time display may change anesthesiologists’ behavior
verfasst von
Shinju Obara
Noah Syroid
Takahiro Ogura
Nathan L. Pace
Ken B. Johnson
Rob Albert
Jim Agutter
Ami R. Stuart
Talmage D. Egan
Publikationsdatum
30.04.2020
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00510-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.