Skip to main content
main-content

20.05.2016 | Surgical Symposium Contribution | Ausgabe 9/2016

World Journal of Surgery 9/2016

A Positive Node on Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Predicts Higher Nodal Burden Than a Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Carcinoma

Zeitschrift:
World Journal of Surgery > Ausgabe 9/2016
Autoren:
M. R. Boland, R. Ni Cearbhaill, K. Fitzpatrick, S. M. Walsh, D. Evoy, J. Geraghty, J. Rothwell, S. McNally, A. O’Doherty, C. M. Quinn, E. W. McDermott, R. S. Prichard
Wichtige Hinweise
This research was the first prize winner of the Breast Surgery International Free Paper at the BSI Annual Meeting/World Congress of Surgery, Bangkok in 2015.

Abstract

Introduction

Axillary status remains an important prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Certain patients with a positive sentinel node (SLNB) may not benefit from axillary clearance (AC). Uncertainty remains if this approach could be applied to patients diagnosed with axillary metastases on ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (USFNAC). The aim of this study was to compare nodal burden in patients with positive USFNAC and a positive SLNB.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed involving all BC patients between 2007 and 2014 who had either pre-operative USFNAC or a SLNB. Patient/tumour characteristics and nodal burden were examined in all patients proceeding to AC.

Results

974 patients were eligible for analysis. 439 patients (45 %) had positive USFNAC and 535 (55 %) had a positive SLNB. USFNAC-positive patients were more likely to undergo mastectomy (Chi-square test; p < 0.001), have extra-nodal extension (p < 0.001), be oestrogen receptor negative (p < 0.001) and be HER2 positive (p < 0.001). The median total number of lymph nodes (LNs) excised during AC was higher in the USFNAC group (Mann–Whitney test; 23 vs. 21; p < 0.001). The median total number of involved LNs was 3 (range 1–47) in FNAC-positive patients versus 1 (range 1–37) in SLNB-positive patients (p < 0.001). The median number of involved LNs in level 1 was 3 in FNAC-positive patients versus 1 in SLNB-positive patients (p < 0.001). Within the SLN-positive group, 49 % of the patients had only one involved LN, 28 % had two nodes involved and 23 % had ≥3. In comparison, within the FNAC-positive group only 13 % of the patients had one involved LN, 12 % had two nodes involved and 74 % had ≥3.

Conclusion

Patients with positive USFNAC have more aggressive clinico-pathological characteristics and higher nodal burden compared to SLNB-positive patients. Currently, the authors advocate that patients not receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with a positive USFNAC, should proceed directly to an axillary ALND.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Bis zum 22.10. bestellen und 100 € sparen!

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

World Journal of Surgery 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Das kostenlose Testabonnement läuft nach 14 Tagen automatisch und formlos aus. Dieses Abonnement kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

 

 

 
 

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Chirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise