nach oben

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Erschienen in:

01.09.2015 | Original Article

A prognostic analysis of 895 cases of stage III colon cancer in different colon subsites

verfasst von: Yan Zhang, Junli Ma, Sai Zhang, Ganlu Deng, Xiaoling Wu, Jingxuan He, Haiping Pei, Hong Shen, Shan Zeng

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 9/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Stage III colon cancer is currently treated as an entity with a unified therapeutic principle. The aim of the retrospective study is to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of site-specific stage III colon cancers and the influences of tumor location on prognosis.

Methods

Eight hundred ninety-five patients with stage III colon cancer treated with radical operation and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin) were divided into seven groups according to colon segment (cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, transverse colon, splenic flexure, descending colon, and sigmoid colon). Expression of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) and thymidylate synthase (TS) was examined by immunohistochemistry. We assessed if differences exist in patient characteristics and clinic outcomes between the seven groups.

Results

There were significant differences in tumor differentiation (P < 0.001), T stage (P < 0.001), N stage (P < 0.001), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) stage (P < 0.001), metachronous liver metastasis (P < 0.001), metachronous lung metastasis (P < 0.001), and ERCCI expression (P < 0.001) between the seven groups. Both 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) exhibited significant differences (both P < 0.001) with survival gradually decreasing from cecum to sigmoid colon. Cox regression analyses identified that tumor location was an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS.

Conclusions

Stage III colon cancer located proximally carried a poorer survival than that located distally. Different efficacies of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy may be an important factor affecting survival of site-specific stage III colon cancers.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Bufill JA (1990) Colorectal cancer: evidence for distinct genetic categories based on proximal or distal tumor location. Ann Intern Med 113(10):779–788CrossRefPubMed

Iacopetta B (2002) Are there two sides to colorectal cancer? Int J Cancer 101(5):403–408CrossRefPubMed

Yamauchi M, Lochhead P, Morikawa T, Huttenhower C, Chan AT, Giovannucci E et al (2012) Colorectal cancer: a tale of two sides or a continuum? Gut 61(6):794–797PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Pocard M, Salmon RJ, Muleris M, Remvikos Y, Bara J, Dutrillaux B et al (1995) Two colons—two cancers? Proximal or distal adenocarcinoma: arguments for a different carcinogenesis. Bull Cancer 82(1):10–21PubMed

Gervaz P, Bucher P, Morel P (2004) Two colons—two cancers: paradigm shift and clinical implications. J Surg Oncol 88(4):261–266CrossRefPubMed

Meguid RA, Slidell MB, Wolfgang CL, Chang DC, Ahuja N (2008) Is there a difference in survival between right- versus left-sided colon cancers? Ann Surg Oncol 15(9):2388–2394PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Shen H, Huang J, Pei H, Zeng S, Tao Y, Shen L et al (2013) Comparative proteomic study for profiling differentially expressed proteins between Chinese left- and right-sided colon cancers. Cancer Sci 104(1):135–141CrossRefPubMed

Samowitz WS, Albertsen H, Herrick J, Levin TR, Sweeney C, Murtaugh MA et al (2005) Evaluation of a large, population-based sample supports a CpG island methylator phenotype in colon cancer. Gastroenterology 129(3):837–845CrossRefPubMed

Nosho K, Irahara N, Shima K, Kure S, Kirkner GJ, Schernhammer ES et al (2008) Comprehensive biostatistical analysis of CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer using a large population-based sample. PLoS One 3(11), e3698PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

10.

Ogino S, Chan AT, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E (2011) Molecular pathological epidemiology of colorectal neoplasia: an emerging transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary field. Gut 60(3):397–411PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

11.

Jess P, Hansen IO, Gamborg M, Jess T (2013) A nationwide Danish cohort study challenging the categorisation into right-sided and left-sided colon cancer. BMJ Open 3(5)

12.

Kim HS (2013) Site-specific colorectal cancer; how is it different? Korean J Gastroenterol 61(2):63–70CrossRefPubMed

13.

Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Olesen SH, Sorensen FB, Laurberg S, Laiho P, Aaltonen LA et al (2005) Differential gene expression in colon cancer of the caecum versus the sigmoid and rectosigmoid. Gut 54(3):374–384PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

14.

Benedix F, Meyer F, Kube R, Kropf S, Kuester D, Lippert H et al (2012) Influence of anatomical subsite on the incidence of microsatellite instability, and KRAS and BRAF mutation rates in patients with colon carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 208(10):592–597CrossRefPubMed

15.

Yamauchi M, Morikawa T, Kuchiba A, Imamura Y, Qian ZR, Nishihara R et al (2012) Assessment of colorectal cancer molecular features along bowel subsites challenges the conception of distinct dichotomy of proximal versus distal colorectum. Gut 61(6):847–854PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

16.

Bhangu A, Kiran RP, Slesser A, Fitzgerald JE, Brown G, Tekkis P (2013) Survival after resection of colorectal cancer based on anatomical segment of involvement. Ann Surg Oncol 20(13):4161–4168CrossRefPubMed

17.

Andre T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L, Navarro M, Tabernero J, Hickish T et al (2004) Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(23):2343–2351CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kosmider S, Lipton L (2007) Adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 13(28):3799–3805PubMed

19.

Sharif S, O‘Connell MJ, Yothers G, Lopa S, Wolmark N (2008) FOLFOX and FLOX regimens for the adjuvant treatment of resected stage II and III colon cancer. Cancer Investig 26(9):956–963CrossRef

20.

Haller DG, Tabernero J, Maroun J, de Braud F, Price T, Van Cutsem E et al (2011) Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil and folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 29(11):1465–1471CrossRefPubMed

21.

Raymond E, Faivre S, Chaney S, Woynarowski J, Cvitkovic E (2002) Cellular and molecular pharmacology of oxaliplatin. Mol Cancer Ther 1(3):227–235PubMed

22.

Martin LP, Hamilton TC, Schilder RJ (2008) Platinum resistance: the role of DNA repair pathways. Clin Cancer Res 14(5):1291–1295CrossRefPubMed

23.

Reed E (1998) Nucleotide excision repair and anti-cancer chemotherapy. Cytotechnology 27(1-3):187–201PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

24.

Rabik CA, Dolan ME (2007) Molecular mechanisms of resistance and toxicity associated with platinating agents. Cancer Treat Rev 33(1):9–23PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

25.

Park DJ, Lenz HJ (2006) Determinants of chemosensitivity in gastric cancer. Curr Opin Pharmacol 6(4):337–344CrossRefPubMed

26.

Papadaki C, Sfakianaki M, Ioannidis G, Lagoudaki E, Trypaki M, Tryfonidis K et al (2012) ERCC1 and BRAC1 mRNA expression levels in the primary tumor could predict the effectiveness of the second-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy in pretreated patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 7(4):663–671CrossRefPubMed

27.

Han JJ, Baek SK, Lee JJ, Kim GY, Kim SY, Lee SH (2014) Combination of TRAP1 and ERCC1 expression predicts clinical outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil. Cancer Res Treat 46(1):55–64PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

28.

Kuwabara K, Kumamoto K, Ishibashi K, Okada N, Ishiguro T, Ohsawa T et al (2011) The relationship between the efficacy of mFOLFOX6 treatment and the expression of TS, DPD, TP, and ERCC-1 in unresectable colorectal cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 38(12):2224–2227PubMed

29.

Li P, Fang YJ, Li F, Ou QJ, Chen G, Ma G (2013) ERCC1, defective mismatch repair status as predictive biomarkers of survival for stage III colon cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 108(6):1238–1244PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

30.

Huang MY, Tsai HL, Lin CH, Huang CW, Ma CJ, Huang CM et al (2013) Predictive value of ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC1 overexpression for stage III colorectal cancer patients receiving FOLFOX-4 adjuvant chemotherapy. J Surg Oncol 108(7):457–464CrossRefPubMed

31.

Danenberg PV (1977) Thymidylate synthetase—a target enzyme in cancer chemotherapy. Biochim Biophys Acta 473(2):73–92PubMed

32.

Aschele C, Debernardis D, Tunesi G, Maley F, Sobrero A (2000) Thymidylate synthase protein expression in primary colorectal cancer compared with the corresponding distant metastases and relationship with the clinical response to 5-fluorouracil. Clin Cancer Res 6(12):4797–4802PubMed

33.

Edler D, Glimelius B, Hallstrom M, Jakobsen A, Johnston PG, Magnusson I et al (2002) Thymidylate synthase expression in colorectal cancer: a prognostic and predictive marker of benefit from adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1721–1728CrossRefPubMed

34.

Ciaparrone M, Quirino M, Schinzari G, Zannoni G, Corsi DC, Vecchio FM et al (2006) Predictive role of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase expression in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil. Oncology 70(5):366–377CrossRefPubMed

35.

Tanaka K, Saigusa S, Toiyama Y, Koike Y, Okugawa Y, Yokoe T et al (2012) TS and DPD mRNA levels on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens as predictors for distant recurrence of rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. J Surg Oncol 105(6):529–534CrossRefPubMed

36.

Sasako M, Terashima M, Ichikawa W, Ochiai A, Kitada K, Kurahashi I, et al (2014) Impact of the expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genes on survival in stage II/III gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer

37.

Dahl O, Fluge O, Carlsen E, Wiig JN, Myrvold HE, Vonen B et al (2009) Final results of a randomised phase III study on adjuvant chemotherapy with 5 FU and levamisol in colon and rectum cancer stage II and III by the Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group. Acta Oncol 48(3):368–376CrossRefPubMed

38.

Fluge O, Gravdal K, Carlsen E, Vonen B, Kjellevold K, Refsum S et al (2009) Expression of EZH2 and Ki-67 in colorectal cancer and associations with treatment response and prognosis. Br J Cancer 101(8):1282–1289PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

39.

Olaussen KA, Dunant A, Fouret P, Brambilla E, Andre F, Haddad V et al (2006) DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 355(10):983–991CrossRefPubMed

40.

Wray CM, Ziogas A, Hinojosa MW, Le H, Stamos MJ, Zell JA (2009) Tumor subsite location within the colon is prognostic for survival after colon cancer diagnosis. Dis Colon Rectum 52(8):1359–1366CrossRefPubMed

41.

Bilimoria KY, Palis B, Stewart AK, Bentrem DJ, Freel AC, Sigurdson ER et al (2008) Impact of tumor location on nodal evaluation for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 51(2):154–161CrossRefPubMed

42.

Benedix F, Kube R, Meyer F, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2010) 17,641 patients: differences in epidemiology, perioperative course, histology, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 53(1):57–64CrossRefPubMed

43.

Ishihara S, Nishikawa T, Tanaka T, Tanaka J, Kiyomatsu T, Kawai K et al (2014) Prognostic impact of tumor location in stage IV colon cancer: a propensity score analysis in a multicenter study. Int J Surg 12(9):925–930CrossRefPubMed

44.

Roncucci L, Fante R, Losi L, Di Gregorio C, Micheli A, Benatti P et al (1996) Survival for colon and rectal cancer in a population-based cancer registry. Eur J Cancer 32A(2):295–302CrossRefPubMed

45.

Kornmann M, Schwabe W, Sander S, Kron M, Strater J, Polat S et al (2003) Thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase mRNA expression levels: predictors for survival in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil. Clin Cancer Res 9(11):4116–4124PubMed

46.

Johnston PG, Fisher ER, Rockette HE, Fisher B, Wolmark N, Drake JC et al (1994) The role of thymidylate synthase expression in prognosis and outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 12(12):2640–2647PubMed

47.

Li S, Zhu L, Yao L, Xia L, Pan L (2014) Association between ERCC1 and TS mRNA levels and disease free survival in colorectal cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin and fluorouracil (5-FU) adjuvant chemotherapy. BMC Gastroenterol 14:154PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

48.

Findlay MP, Cunningham D, Morgan G, Clinton S, Hardcastle A, Aherne GW (1997) Lack of correlation between thymidylate synthase levels in primary colorectal tumours and subsequent response to chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 75(6):903–909PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

49.

Berglund A, Edler D, Molin D, Nordlinder H, Graf W, Glimelius B (2002) Thymidylate synthase and p53 expression in primary tumor do not predict chemotherapy outcome in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Anticancer Res 22(6B):3653–3659PubMed

50.

Nawa T, Kato J, Kawamoto H, Okada H, Yamamoto H, Kohno H et al (2008) Differences between right- and left-sided colon cancer in patient characteristics, cancer morphology and histology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(3):418–423CrossRefPubMed

51.

Azzoni C, Bottarelli L, Campanini N, Di Cola G, Bader G, Mazzeo A et al (2007) Distinct molecular patterns based on proximal and distal sporadic colorectal cancer: arguments for different mechanisms in the tumorigenesis. Int J Color Dis 22(2):115–126CrossRef

52.

Glebov OK, Rodriguez LM, Nakahara K, Jenkins J, Cliatt J, Humbyrd CJ et al (2003) Distinguishing right from left colon by the pattern of gene expression. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12(8):755–762PubMed

53.

Tran B, Kopetz S, Tie J, Gibbs P, Jiang ZQ, Lieu CH et al (2011) Impact of BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability on the pattern of metastatic spread and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer 117(20):4623–4632PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

54.

Pai RK, Jayachandran P, Koong AC, Chang DT, Kwok S, Ma L et al (2012) BRAF-mutated, microsatellite-stable adenocarcinoma of the proximal colon: an aggressive adenocarcinoma with poor survival, mucinous differentiation, and adverse morphologic features. Am J Surg Pathol 36(5):744–752CrossRefPubMed

55.

Kalady MF, Dejulius KL, Sanchez JA, Jarrar A, Liu X, Manilich E et al (2012) BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with distinct clinical characteristics and worse prognosis. Dis Colon Rectum 55(2):128–133CrossRefPubMed

56.

Cui X, Shirai Y, Wakai T, Yokoyama N, Hirano S, Hatakeyama K (2004) Aberrant expression of pRb and p16(INK4), alone or in combination, indicates poor outcome after resection in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Hum Pathol 35(10):1189–1195CrossRefPubMed

57.

Kucherlapati MH, Yang K, Fan K, Kuraguchi M, Sonkin D, Rosulek A et al (2008) Loss of Rb1 in the gastrointestinal tract of Apc1638N mice promotes tumors of the cecum and proximal colon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(40):15493–15498PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Titel: A prognostic analysis of 895 cases of stage III colon cancer in different colon subsites
verfasst von: Yan Zhang
Junli Ma
Sai Zhang
Ganlu Deng
Xiaoling Wu
Jingxuan He
Haiping Pei
Hong Shen
Shan Zeng
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 9/2015
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2273-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2015

Factors affecting timing of closure and non-reversal of temporary ileostomies

Diffuse cavernous hemangioma of the rectum: case report and literature review

Surgical diverticulitis is not associated with defects in the expression of wound healing genes

The impact of perianal disease in young patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Emergency resection versus bridge to surgery with stenting in patients with acute right-sided colonic obstruction: a systematic review focusing on mortality and morbidity rates

A rare cause of constipation: obstructing small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the anal canal

Update Chirurgie