nach oben

Erschienen in:

23.01.2018 | General Gynecology

A prospective randomized experimental study to investigate the peritoneal adhesion formation after waterjet injection and argon plasma coagulation (HybridAPC) in a rat model

verfasst von: Bernhard Kraemer, Marcus Scharpf, Simon Keckstein, Julia Dippon, Christos Tsaousidis, Kristin Brunecker, Markus Dominik Enderle, Alexander Neugebauer, Daniela Nuessle, Falko Fend, Sara Brucker, Florin-Andrei Taran, Stefan Kommoss, Ralf Rothmund

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded study investigates the peritoneal adhesion formation of HybridAPC (waterjet elevation of the peritoneum with subsequent argon plasma coagulation) versus only waterjet (elevation with the same instrument, but without subsequent argon plasma coagulation) in a rat model (24 female Wistar rats).

Materials and methods

Bilateral lesions were created on the abdominal wall with HybridAPC on one sidewall and waterjet elevation on the other sidewall of the peritoneum in a standard fashion. After 10 days, the rats were euthanized to evaluate the peritoneal trauma sites.

Main outcome measure(s)

Adhesion incidence, quantity, and quality were scored 10 days postoperatively and studied histopathologically.

Result(s)

Incidence of adhesion formation was 2.3% for HybridAPC; no adhesions occurred for peritoneal elevation with saline (p = 1.00). Histologic evaluation revealed no acute inflammation in both groups. An overall moderate degree of granulation tissue formation and myonecrosis was observed in the HybridAPC group, whereas no chronic inflammation and myonecrosis occurred after elevation without thermal ablation (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion(s)

This study investigates the effect of waterjet elevation of the peritoneum with and without subsequent thermal ablation on adhesion formation in a rat model for the first time. Peritoneal waterjet elevation with saline does not provide any risk of adhesion formation. Thermal coagulation with APC after waterjet elevation of the peritoneum creates advantageous peritoneal conditions due to a permanent moist tissue surface and the cooling effect of the injected solution, resulting in no significant difference in adhesion formation compared to peritoneal elevation without thermal ablation. HybridAPC can thus be regarded as a beneficial coagulation method with only minor adhesion formation due to positive tissue effects of the combined waterjet.

Rajab TK, Wallwiener M, Talukdar S et al (2009) Adhesion-related complications are common, but rarely discussed in preoperative consent: a multicenter study. World J Surg 33(4):748–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9917-x CrossRefPubMed

Boland GM, Weigel RJ (2006) Formation and prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res 132(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.12.002 CrossRefPubMed

Wallwiener CW, Kraemer B, Wallwiener M et al (2010) The extent of adhesion induction through electrocoagulation and suturing in an experimental rat study. Fertil Steril 93(4):1040–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.002 CrossRefPubMed

Kraemer B, Rothmund R, Fischer K et al (2011) A prospective, randomized, experimental study to investigate the peritoneal adhesion formation of noncontact argon plasma coagulation in a rat model. Fertil Steril 95(4):1328–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.138 CrossRefPubMed

Kraemer B, Scharpf M, Planck C et al (2014) Randomized experimental study to investigate the peritoneal adhesion formation of conventional monopolar contact coagulation versus noncontact argon plasma coagulation in a rat model. Fertil Steril 102(4):1197–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.007 CrossRefPubMed

Vetere PF, Lazarou G, Apostol R et al (2015) Postoperative adhesion formation in a rabbit model: monopolar electrosurgery versus ultrasonic scalpel. JSLS 19(2):e2015. https://doi.org/10.4293/jsls.2015.00018 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kraemer B, Rothmund R, Fischer K et al (2014) A prospective experimental study to investigate the peritoneal adhesion formation of argon plasma coagulation (APC) versus a novel aerosol plasma in a rat model. Surg Innov 21(4):389–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350613506300 CrossRefPubMed

Kashin SV, Kuvaev R, Nadezhin AS et al (2016) Mo2016 the new hybrid argon plasma coagulation (HybridAPC) for endoscopic ablation of Barrett’s esophagus (BE): the results of the pilot trial. Gastrointest Endosc 83(5):AB495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.708 CrossRef

Manner H, Neugebauer A, Scharpf M et al (2014) The tissue effect of argon-plasma coagulation with prior submucosal injection (Hybrid-APC) versus standard APC: a randomized ex vivo study. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2(5):383–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640614544315 CrossRef

10.

Sharjeel Arshad HM, Ahsan N, Aldridge T et al (2017) Tu1161 safety and efficacy of endoscopic HybridAPC for management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 85(5):AB562–AB563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1298 CrossRef

11.

Manner H, May A, Kouti I et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of Hybrid-APC for the ablation of Barrett’s esophagus. Surg Endosc 30(4):1364–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4336-1 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Rösch T, Manner H, May A et al (2017) 1151 multicenter feasibility study of combined injection and argon plasma coagulation (Hybrid-APC) in the ablation therapy of neoplastic Barrett esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 85(5):AB154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.331 CrossRef

13.

Wallwiener M, Brucker S, Hierlemann H et al (2006) Innovative barriers for peritoneal adhesion prevention: liquid or solid? A rat uterine horn model. Fertil Steril 86(4 Suppl):1266–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.023 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Han ES, Scheib SA, Patzkowsky KE et al (2017) The sticky business of adhesion prevention in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 29(4):266–275. https://doi.org/10.1097/gco.0000000000000372 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Cwalinski J, Staniszewski R, Baum E et al (2015) Normal saline may promote formation of peritoneal adhesions. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(6):8828–8834PubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Polubinska A, Breborowicz A, Staniszewski R et al (2008) Normal saline induces oxidative stress in peritoneal mesothelial cells. J Pediatr Surg 43(10):1821–1826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.010 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Lindor LJ, Loegering DA, Wassom DL et al (1981) Recovery of eosinophils from the peritoneal cavity of the guinea pig. J Immunol Methods 41(1):125–134CrossRefPubMed

18.

Hellman C, Lundahl J, Hylander B et al (2000) Phenotypic alterations of recruited eosinophils in peritoneal fluid eosinophilia. Perit Dial Int 20(3):295–300PubMed

19.

Edelstam G, Fredens K, Venge P (1994) Role of eosinophilic granulocytes in women with infertility and pelvic adhesions. Inflammation 18(4):361–371CrossRefPubMed

20.

Ott DE (2008) Laparoscopy and adhesion formation, adhesions and laparoscopy. Semin Reprod Med 26(4):322–330. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082390 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Gomel V, Koninckx PR (2016) Microsurgical principles and postoperative adhesions: lessons from the past. Fertil Steril 106(5):1025–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.040 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Breborowicz A, Oreopoulos DG (2005) Is normal saline harmful to the peritoneum? Perit Dial Int 25(Suppl 4):S67–S70PubMed

23.

Tarhan OR, Barut I, Sezik M (2008) An evaluation of normal saline and taurolidine on intra-abdominal adhesion formation and peritoneal fibrinolysis. J Surg Res 144(1):151–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.09.006 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Rajab TK, Smaxwil L, Wallwiener M (2013) Animal model for local pharmacotherapy in adhesion prophylaxis—a proof of concept. J Investig Surg 26(4):200–203. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2012.741657 CrossRef

25.

Rajab TK, Kraemer B, Petri N et al (2012) Intra-operative locally injected pharmacotherapy as a novel strategy for adhesion prophylaxis. Int J Surg 10(9):489–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.07.003 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Norton ID, Wang L, Levine SA et al (2002) In vivo characterization of colonic thermal injury caused by argon plasma coagulation. Gastrointest Endosc 55(6):631–636CrossRefPubMed

27.

Al-Alem I, Pillai K, Akhter J et al (2014) Heat sink phenomenon of bipolar and monopolar radiofrequency ablation observed using polypropylene tubes for vessel simulation. Surg Innov 21(3):269–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350613505713 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Zorbas G, Samaras T (2015) A study of the sink effect by blood vessels in radiofrequency ablation. Comput Biol Med 57:182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.12.014 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: A prospective randomized experimental study to investigate the peritoneal adhesion formation after waterjet injection and argon plasma coagulation (HybridAPC) in a rat model
verfasst von: Bernhard Kraemer
Marcus Scharpf
Simon Keckstein
Julia Dippon
Christos Tsaousidis
Kristin Brunecker
Markus Dominik Enderle
Alexander Neugebauer
Daniela Nuessle
Falko Fend
Sara Brucker
Florin-Andrei Taran
Stefan Kommoss
Ralf Rothmund
Publikationsdatum: 23.01.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4661-4

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

A prospective randomized experimental study to investigate the peritoneal adhesion formation after waterjet injection and argon plasma coagulation (HybridAPC) in a rat model