nach oben

International Urogynecology Journal

Erschienen in:

26.04.2019 | Review Article

A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the cross-cultural adaptations and translations of the Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire

verfasst von: Tadesse Belayneh, Abebaw Gebeyehu, Mulat Adefris, Guri Rortveit

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 12/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Due to linguistic and cultural differences, there is a need to test the psychometrics of the translated versions of any patient-reported outcome measures. We investigated the psychometric properties of the Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire for non-English-speaking populations by conducting a systematic review of studies that examined the psychometric properties of non-English versions.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information Center (LILACS), and Science Direct databases for articles published in English up to February 2018. Methodological quality and quality of psychometric properties were assessed by two independent reviewers using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist and validated quality assessment criteria. The two assessments were combined to produce the best level of evidence per language/translation.

Results

Sixteen articles in 13 languages were retrieved. Most (n = 9; 56.3%) were not rigorously translated or reported, and there was poor evidence for structural validity. Internal consistency was reported in all studies, and all studies had good methodological quality. There was fair evidence for construct and good to fair for criterion validity. Evidence for responsiveness was good, although this was evaluated only in three studies.

Conclusions

There is limited evidence supporting the psychometric robustness of the original validation and translated versions of P-QoL. Cross-cultural adaptations are insufficient. Given this variability, the individual psychometrics of a translation must be considered prior to use. Responsiveness, measurement error, and cutoff values should also be assessed to increase the clinical utility and psychometric robustness of the translated versions.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, Camargo S, Dandolu V, Digesu A, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:137–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22922.CrossRefPubMed

Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163–96.CrossRef

Walker GJ, Gunasekera P. Pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in developing countries: review of prevalence and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:127–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1215-0.CrossRefPubMed

Machin SE, Mukhopadhyay S. Pelvic organ prolapse: review of the aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and management. Menopause Int. 2011;17(4):132–6. https://doi.org/10.1258/mi.2011.011108.CrossRefPubMed

Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, Glazener CM. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1445–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1542-9.CrossRefPubMed

Chaudhary A. Health related quality of life of women suffering from Uterine Prolapse before and after six months of surgery. Health. 2014;6:350–5. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2014.65051.CrossRef

Speight J, Barendse SM. FDA guidance on patient reported outcomes. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online). 2010;340:c2921.CrossRef

Sprangers MA. Disregarding clinical trial-based patient-reported outcomes is unwarranted: five advances to substantiate the scientific stringency of quality-of-life measurement. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(2):155–63.CrossRef

Doaee M, Moradi-Lakeh M, Nourmohammadi A, Razavi-Ratki SK, Nojomi M. Management of pelvic organ prolapse and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:153–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2141-8.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Reid F. Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: a practical guide to the pelvic organ prolapse quantification. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2014;24:170–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2014.04.011.CrossRef

11.

Al-Badr A. Quality of Life Questionnaires for the Assessment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Use in Clinical Practice. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. 2013;5(3):121–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.12006.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL 2nd, Schaffer J, Chen Z, et al. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(3):600–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b2b1ae.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Lee U, Raz S. Words of wisdom. Re: defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Eur Urol. 2010;58(4):633–4.CrossRef

14.

Toozs-Hobson P, Freeman R, Barber M, Maher C, Haylen B, Athanasiou S, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31(4):415–21.CrossRef

15.

Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(6):1388–95. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.118659.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S. P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16:176–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1225-x.CrossRef

17.

Jones G, Radley S, Lumb J, Farkas A. Responsiveness of the electronic personal assessment questionnaire-pelvic floor (ePAQ-PF). Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20(5):557–64.CrossRef

18.

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91.CrossRef

19.

Brandt C, Van Rooyen C, Cronje H. Validation of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (PQOL): an Afrikaans version in a South African population. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;22(2):38.

20.

Flores-Espinoza C, Araya AX, Pizarro-Berdichevsky J, Santos V, Ferrer M, Garin O, et al. Validation of the Spanish-language version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire in Chilean women. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(1):123–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2484-9.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Rzepka J, Zalewski K, Stefanowicz A, Khullar V, Swift S, Digesu GA. Validation of the Polish version of P-QoL questionnaire. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87:477–83.CrossRef

22.

Veit-Rubin N, Digesu A, Swift S, Khullar V, Kaelin Gambirasio I, Dallenbach P, et al. Validation of the French version of the P-QoL questionnaire. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;192:10–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.05.028.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Belayneh T, Gebeyehu A, Adefris M, Rortveit G, Genet T. Translation, transcultural adaptation, reliability and validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quality of life (P-QoL) in Amharic. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):12.CrossRef

24.

Keszei AP, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68(4):319–23.CrossRef

25.

Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–45.CrossRef

27.

Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(8):1115–23.CrossRef

28.

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–49.CrossRef

29.

Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Gibbons E, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):82.CrossRef

30.

Prinsen C, Mokkink L, Bouter L, Alonso J, Patrick D, de Vet H, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–57.CrossRef

31.

Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.CrossRef

32.

Digesu GA, Santamato S, Khullar V, Santillo V, Digesu A, Cormio G, et al. Validation of an Italian version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;106(2):184–92.CrossRef

33.

Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Aran T, Cam M, Karateke A. Validation of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Turkish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135(1):132–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.06.009.CrossRefPubMed

34.

de Oliveira MS, Tamanini JT, de Aguiar Cavalcanti G. Validation of the prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QoL) in Portuguese version in Brazilian women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(10):1191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0934-6.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Lenz F, Stammer H, Brocker K, Rak M, Scherg H, Sohn C. Validation of a German version of the P-QOL questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(6):641–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0809-x.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Claerhout F, Moons P, Ghesquiere S, Verguts J, De Ridder D, Deprest J. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of the prolapse quality-of-life (P-QoL) questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):569–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1081-9.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Manchana T, Bunyavejchevin S. Validation of the prolapse quality of life (P-QOL) questionnaire in Thai version. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(8):985–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1107-3.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Svihrova V, Digesu GA, Svihra J, Hudeckova H, Kliment J, Swift S. Validation of the Slovakian version of the P-QOL questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(1):53–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0989-4.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Scarlato A, Souza CC, Fonseca ES, Sartori MG, Girao MJ, Castro RA. Validation, reliability, and responsiveness of prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Brazilian population. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(6):751–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1354-3.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Nojomi M, Digesu GA, Khullar V, Morovatdar N, Haghighi L, Alirezaei M, et al. Validation of Persian version of the prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QOL). Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:229–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-011-1529-6.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Morovatdar N, Hghighi L, Najmi Z, Hashemi A, Nojomi M. Response validity of Persian version of P-QOL questionnaire in patients with prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;193:88–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.07.013.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Chuang FC, Chu LC, Kung FT, Huang KH. Validation of the traditional Chinese version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Mandarin-speaking Taiwanese population. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55(5):680–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2016.02.018.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Acquadro C, Conway K, Hareendran A, Aaronson N. Literature review of methods to translate health-related quality of life questionnaires for use in multinational clinical trials. Value Health. 2008;11:509–21.CrossRef

44.

Cano SJ, Hobart JC. The problem with health measurement. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:279–90. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S14399.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Drost EA (2011) Validity and reliability in social science research. Educ Res Perspect 38 (1):105. Availability: https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=491551710186460;res=IELHSS ISSN:0311-2543. [cited 20 Apr 2019].

46.

Suhr DD. Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis? doi:[Internet]. Stat. Data Anal. 2006 [cited 2018 Sep 9]. p. 1–17. 2006. Available from: http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi31/200-31.pdf.

47.

Prudon P. Confirmatory factor analysis: a brief introduction and critique. Tilgængelig på. doi:[Internet]. 2011 [cited 2018 Sep 9]. p. 1–18. 2014. Available from: https://pdfssemanticscholar.org/80cc/e29fc22d99c4273bee96ebaa6447c64e268d.pdf.

48.

Schellingerhout JM, Heymans MW, Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, Koes BW, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of translated versions of neck-specific questionnaires: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):87.CrossRef

Titel: A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the cross-cultural adaptations and translations of the Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire
verfasst von: Tadesse Belayneh
Abebaw Gebeyehu
Mulat Adefris
Guri Rortveit
Publikationsdatum: 26.04.2019
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03920-1

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

23.04.2024 | Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the cross-cultural adaptations and translations of the Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2019

Pelvic organ prolapse patients’ attitudes and preferences regarding their uterus: comparing German- and Russian-speaking women

Turkish translation of the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire: validity and reliability

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy posthysterectomy: intraoperative feasibility and safety in obese women compared with women of normal weight

Development and validity of a questionnaire for coital urinary incontinence: clinical and urodynamic analysis

Turkish validation of the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) and evaluation of mirabegron treatment response

Can wearing high heels influence anal canal pressure and the severity of fecal incontinence?

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie