Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Neurology 5/2012

01.05.2012 | Original Communication

Additional efficacy endpoints from pivotal natalizumab trials in relapsing-remitting MS

verfasst von: Bianca Weinstock-Guttman, Steven L. Galetta, Gavin Giovannoni, Eva Havrdova, Michael Hutchinson, Ludwig Kappos, Paul W. O’Connor, J. Theodore Phillips, Chris Polman, William H. Stuart, Frances Lynn, Christophe Hotermans

Erschienen in: Journal of Neurology | Ausgabe 5/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Standard clinical endpoints in multiple sclerosis (MS) studies, such as disability progression defined by the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and annualized relapse rate, may not fully reflect all aspects of therapeutic benefit experienced by patients. Pivotal studies showed that natalizumab is effective both as monotherapy (AFFIRM study) and in combination with interferon beta-1a (IFNβ-1a) (SENTINEL study) in patients with relapsing MS. We present AFFIRM and SENTINEL data demonstrating the efficacy of natalizumab on prespecified tertiary endpoints, including extent of confirmed change in EDSS score from baseline, time to sustained progression to EDSS milestone scores, hospitalizations, corticosteroid use, and time to confirmed progression of cognitive deficits. Natalizumab significantly reduced changes in EDSS scores (P < 0.001) and proportion of patients progressing to an EDSS score ≥4.0 (P < 0.001) and ≥6.0 (P = 0.002) compared with placebo. Natalizumab + IFNβ-1a significantly reduced changes in EDSS scores compared with placebo + IFNβ-1a (P = 0.011). Based on 0.5 standard deviation change in paced auditory serial addition test-3 score, natalizumab treatment reduced the risk of confirmed progression of cognitive deficits by 43% compared with placebo (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.37, 0.89], P = 0.013); however, no significant difference between groups was seen in SENTINEL. Natalizumab, both as monotherapy and in combination with IFNβ-1a, significantly reduced the annualized rate of MS-related hospitalizations (by 64 and 61%, respectively) and the annualized rate of relapses severe enough to require steroid treatment (by 69 and 61%, respectively) compared with placebo and placebo + IFNβ-1a (P < 0.001). These analyses underline beneficial effects of natalizumab therapy in relapsing MS patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Naci H, Fleurence R, Birt J, Duhig A (2010) Economic burden of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 28:363–379PubMedCrossRef Naci H, Fleurence R, Birt J, Duhig A (2010) Economic burden of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 28:363–379PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tremlett H, Zhao Y, Rieckmann P, Hutchinson M (2010) New perspectives in the natural history of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 74:2004–2015PubMedCrossRef Tremlett H, Zhao Y, Rieckmann P, Hutchinson M (2010) New perspectives in the natural history of multiple sclerosis. Neurology 74:2004–2015PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutchinson M (2007) Natalizumab: a new treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 3:259–269PubMedCrossRef Hutchinson M (2007) Natalizumab: a new treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 3:259–269PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E et al (2006) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:899–910PubMedCrossRef Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E et al (2006) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:899–910PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Calabresi PA et al (2006) Natalizumab plus interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:911–923PubMedCrossRef Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Calabresi PA et al (2006) Natalizumab plus interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:911–923PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer JS, Rudick RA, Cutter GR et al (1999) The multiple sclerosis functional composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. Mult Scler 5:244–250PubMed Fischer JS, Rudick RA, Cutter GR et al (1999) The multiple sclerosis functional composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment. Mult Scler 5:244–250PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoogervorst ELJ, Kalkers NF, van Winsen LML, MJ Uitdehaag B, Polman CH (2001) Differential treatment effect on measures of neurologic exam, functional impairment and patient self-report in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 7:335–339PubMed Hoogervorst ELJ, Kalkers NF, van Winsen LML, MJ Uitdehaag B, Polman CH (2001) Differential treatment effect on measures of neurologic exam, functional impairment and patient self-report in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 7:335–339PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F (1991) Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology 41:685–691PubMedCrossRef Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F (1991) Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology 41:685–691PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rovaris M, Riccitelli G, Judica E et al (2008) Cognitive impairment and structural brain damage in benign multiple sclerosis. Neurology 71:1521–1526PubMedCrossRef Rovaris M, Riccitelli G, Judica E et al (2008) Cognitive impairment and structural brain damage in benign multiple sclerosis. Neurology 71:1521–1526PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller D, Rudick RA, Hutchinson M (2010) Patient-centered outcomes: translating clinical efficacy into benefits on health-related quality of life. Neurology 74(Suppl 3):S24–S35PubMed Miller D, Rudick RA, Hutchinson M (2010) Patient-centered outcomes: translating clinical efficacy into benefits on health-related quality of life. Neurology 74(Suppl 3):S24–S35PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutliff MH (2010) Contribution of impaired mobility to patient burden in multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 26:109–119PubMedCrossRef Sutliff MH (2010) Contribution of impaired mobility to patient burden in multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 26:109–119PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Salter AR, Cutter GR, Tyry T, Marrie RA, Vollmer T (2010) Impact of loss of mobility on instrumental activities of daily living and socioeconomic status in patients with MS. Curr Med Res Opin 26:493–500PubMedCrossRef Salter AR, Cutter GR, Tyry T, Marrie RA, Vollmer T (2010) Impact of loss of mobility on instrumental activities of daily living and socioeconomic status in patients with MS. Curr Med Res Opin 26:493–500PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer JS, Priore RL, Jacobs LD et al (2000) Neuropsychological effects of interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group. Ann Neurol 48:885–892PubMedCrossRef Fischer JS, Priore RL, Jacobs LD et al (2000) Neuropsychological effects of interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group. Ann Neurol 48:885–892PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Halper J (2007) The psychosocial effect of multiple sclerosis: the impact of relapses. J Neurol Sci 256(Suppl 1):S34–S38PubMedCrossRef Halper J (2007) The psychosocial effect of multiple sclerosis: the impact of relapses. J Neurol Sci 256(Suppl 1):S34–S38PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sellebjerg F, Barnes D, Filippini G et al (2005) EFNS guideline on treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses: report of an EFNS task force on treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses. Eur J Neurol 12:939–946PubMedCrossRef Sellebjerg F, Barnes D, Filippini G et al (2005) EFNS guideline on treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses: report of an EFNS task force on treatment of multiple sclerosis relapses. Eur J Neurol 12:939–946PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chataway J, Porter B, Riazi A et al (2006) Home versus outpatient administration of intravenous steroids for multiple-sclerosis relapses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 5:565–571PubMedCrossRef Chataway J, Porter B, Riazi A et al (2006) Home versus outpatient administration of intravenous steroids for multiple-sclerosis relapses: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 5:565–571PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyas D, Kerrigan J, Russell N, Nixon R (2007) The distribution of the cost of multiple sclerosis in the UK: how do costs vary by illness severity? Value Health 10:386–389PubMedCrossRef Tyas D, Kerrigan J, Russell N, Nixon R (2007) The distribution of the cost of multiple sclerosis in the UK: how do costs vary by illness severity? Value Health 10:386–389PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourdette DN, Prochazka AV, Mitchell W, Licari P, Burks J (1993) Health care costs of veterans with multiple sclerosis: implications for the rehabilitation of MS. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:26–31PubMed Bourdette DN, Prochazka AV, Mitchell W, Licari P, Burks J (1993) Health care costs of veterans with multiple sclerosis: implications for the rehabilitation of MS. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:26–31PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien JA, Ward AJ, Patrick AR, Caro J (2003) Cost of managing an episode of relapse in multiple sclerosis in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res 3:17PubMedCrossRef O’Brien JA, Ward AJ, Patrick AR, Caro J (2003) Cost of managing an episode of relapse in multiple sclerosis in the United States. BMC Health Serv Res 3:17PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodin DS, Cohen BA, O’Connor P, Kappos L, Stevens JC (2008) Assessment: the use of natalizumab (Tysabri) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (an evidence-based review). Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 71:766–773PubMedCrossRef Goodin DS, Cohen BA, O’Connor P, Kappos L, Stevens JC (2008) Assessment: the use of natalizumab (Tysabri) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (an evidence-based review). Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 71:766–773PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Additional efficacy endpoints from pivotal natalizumab trials in relapsing-remitting MS
verfasst von
Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
Steven L. Galetta
Gavin Giovannoni
Eva Havrdova
Michael Hutchinson
Ludwig Kappos
Paul W. O’Connor
J. Theodore Phillips
Chris Polman
William H. Stuart
Frances Lynn
Christophe Hotermans
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Neurology / Ausgabe 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-011-6275-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2012

Journal of Neurology 5/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.