nach oben

Prevention Science

Erschienen in:

08.08.2019

Addressing the Adherence-Adaptation Debate: Lessons from the Replication of an Evidence-Based Sexual Health Program in School Settings

verfasst von: Jenita Parekh, Elizabeth Stuart, Robert Blum, Valerie Caldas, Brooke Whitfield, Jacky M. Jennings

Erschienen in: Prevention Science | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Whether high adherence to programs is necessary to achieve program outcomes is an area of great debate. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency, type, and rationale of adaptations made in the implementation of an evidence-based program and to determine program outcomes for intervention program participants, as compared to comparison participants, by the level of adaptations. A total of 1608 participants in 45 classrooms participated. Percent adaptations was calculated by classroom. Thematic qualitative analysis was used to categorize types and rationales for adaptations. Program outcomes by level of adaptations were determined using logistic regression analyses and mean differences. Propensity score matching methods were used to create comparability between adaptation subgroup participants and comparison participants. Adaptations ranged from 2 to 97% across classrooms, with mean adaptations of 63%. Thematic analysis revealed that the adaptations made were related to delivery of content, rather than to the content itself and in response to participant needs and setting constraints. Program outcomes did not appear to be reduced for the high-adaptation subgroup. Understanding both rationale (intent) and type of adaptation made is crucial to understanding the complexity of adaptations. These finding support the argument for allowing facilitators some flexibility and autonomy to adapt the delivery of prescribed content to participant needs and setting constraints.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

ATLASti. Version 1.0.24. (1999). Berlin, Germany: Scientific Sofware Development. Retrieved from: https://atlasti.com/.

Barrera, M., Berkel, C., & Castro, F. G. (2017). Directions for the advancement of culturally adapted preventive interventions: local adaptations, engagement, and sustainability. Prevention Science, 18, 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0705-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bell, S. G., Newcomer, S. F., Bachrach, C., Borawski, E., Jemmott III, J. B., Morrison, D., … Zimmerman, R. (2007). Challenges in replicating interventions. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 514–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.09.005.

Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011a). Putting the pieces together: an integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0186-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011b). Putting the pieces together: an integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0186-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. VIII: Implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, R-1589/8-HEW, 1978. Retrieved from: https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R1589z8.html.

Blake, S. M., Simkin, L., Ledsky, R., Perkins, C., & Calabrese, J. M. (2001). Effects of a parent-child communications intervention on young adolescents’ risk for early onset of sexual intercourse. Family Planning Perspectives, 33, 52–61.CrossRefPubMed

Blakely, C. H., Mayer, J. P., Gottschalk, R. G., Schmitt, N., Davidson, W. S., Roitman, D. B., & Emshoff, J. G. (1987). The fidelity-adaptation debate: Implications for the implementation of public sector social programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922697.CrossRef

Bumbarger, B., & Perkins, D. (2008). After randomised trials: issues related to dissemination of evidence-based interventions. Journal of Children’s Services, 3, 55–64.CrossRef

Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007a). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007b). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Castro, F. G., Barrera, M., Jr., & Martinez, C. R., Jr. (2004). The cultural adaptation of prevention interventions: resolving tensions between fidelity and fit. Prevention Science, 5, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000013980.12412.cd.CrossRefPubMed

Century, J., Freeman, C., & Rudnick, M. (2008). Measuring and accumulating knowledge about fidelity of implementation (FOI) of science instructional materials. Retrieved from: http://cemsesite.cemseprojects.org/research-and-evaluation/research/foi/narst-framework.pdf.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.CrossRef

Cross, W., & West, J. (2011). Examining implementer fidelity: conceptualising and measuring adherence and competence. Journal of Children’s Services, 6, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.5042/jcs.2011.0123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–45.CrossRefPubMed

Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.CrossRefPubMed

Dusenbury, L. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/18.2.237.CrossRefPubMed

Ebbole, T. (2007). Evidence-based programs and practices: what does it all mean? Retrieved from: https://www.childhelp.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Research-Review-Evidence-Based-Programs-and-Practices-What-Does-It-All-Mean-Childrens-Services-Council.pdf.

Elliott, D. S., & Mihalic, S. (2004). Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 5, 47–53.CrossRef

Ennett, S. T., Haws, S., Ringwalt, C. L., Vincus, A. A., Hanley, S., Bowling, J. M., Rohrbach, L. A. (2011). Evidence-based practice in school substance use prevention: Fidelity of implementation under real-world conditions. Health Education Research, 26, 361–371.

Feldman Farb, A., Margolis, A. L. (2016). The teen pregnancy prevention program (2010-2015): Synthesis of impact findings. American Journal of Public Health, 106, S9–S15.

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Firpo-Triplett, R., & Fuller T.. (2012). General adaptation guidance: a guide to adapting evidence-based sexual health curricula. ETR Associates and CDC Division of Reproductive Health. Retrieved from: http://recapp.etr.org/recapp/documents/programs/GeneralAdaptationGuidanceFINAL.pdf.

Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de La Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231). Retrieved from: http://centerforchildwelfare2.fmhi.usf.edu/kb/Implementation/Implementation%20Research%20-%20A%20Synthesis%20of%20Literature%20%20-%202005.pdf.

Gottfredson, D. C., Gottfredson, G. D., & Hybl, L. G. (1993). Managing adolescent behavior a multiyear, multischool study. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 179–215. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312030001179.CrossRef

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefPubMed

Kam, C.-M., Greenberg, M. T., & Walls, C. T. (2003). Examining the role of implementation quality in school-based prevention using the PATHS curriculum. Promoting alternative THinking skills curriculum. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 4, 55–63.CrossRef

Kelsey, M., & Layzer, J. (2014a). Implementing three evidence-based program models: early lessons from the teen pregnancy prevention replication study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54, S45–S52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.024.CrossRef

Kelsey, M., & Layzer, J. (2014b). Implementing three evidence-based program models: early lessons from the teen pregnancy prevention replication study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54, S45–S52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.024.CrossRef

Kershner, S., Flynn, S., Prince, M., Potter, S. C., Craft, L., & Alton, F. (2014). Using data to improve fidelity when implementing evidence-based programs. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54, S29–S36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.027.CrossRef

Margolis, A. L., & Roper, A. Y. (2014). Practical experience from the office of adolescent health’s large scale implementation of an evidence-based teen pregnancy prevention program. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54, S10–S14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.026.CrossRef

McGraw, S. A., Sellers, D. E., Johnson, C. C., Stone, E. J., Bachman, K. J., Bebchuk, J., … Edmundson, E. W. (1996). Using process data to explain outcomes an illustration from the child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health (CATCH). Evaluation Review, 20, 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9602000304.

McHugh, R. K., Murray, H. W., & Barlow, D. H. (2009). Balancing fidelity and adaptation in the dissemination of empirically-supported treatments: the promise of transdiagnostic interventions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Metz, A., Naoom, S. F., Halle, T., & Bartley, L. (2015). An integrated stage-based framework for implementation of early childhood programs and systems (OPRE Research Brief OPRE 201548). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Mmari, K. N., Blum, R. W., Organization, W. H., et al. (2005). Risk and protective factors affecting adolescent reproductive health in developing countries. Retrieved from: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43341.

Moore, J. E., Bumbarger, B. K., & Cooper, B. R. (2013). Examining adaptations of evidence-based programs in natural contexts. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 34, 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-013-0303-6.CrossRefPubMed

Nelson, M. C., Cordray, D. S., Hulleman, C. S., Darrow, C. L., & Sommer, E. C. (2012). A procedure for assessing intervention fidelity in experiments testing educational and behavioral interventions. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 39, 374–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-012-9295-x.CrossRef

Philliber, S. (2015). Evaluating teen pregnancy prevention programs: decades of evolving strategies and practices. Societies, 5, 631–645. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5030631.CrossRef

Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.CrossRef

Schoenfelder, E. N., Sandler, I. N., Millsap, R. E., Wolchik, S. A., Berkel, C., & Ayers, T. S. (2013). Caregiver responsiveness to the family bereavement program: what predicts responsiveness? What does responsiveness predict? Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 14, 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0337-7.CrossRef

Spoth, R., Guyll, M., Trudeau, L., & Goldberg-Lillehoj, C. (2002). Two studies of proximal outcomes and implementation quality of universal preventive interventions in a community-university collaboration context. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.10021.CrossRef

State personal responsibility education program fact sheet | Family and Youth Services Bureau | Administration for Children and Families. (n.d.). Retrieved September 16, 2015, from: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/fysb/resource/prep-fact-sheet.

Sterne, J. A. C., White, I. R., Carlin, J. B., Spratt, M., Royston, P., Kenward, M. G., et al. (2009). Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ, 338, b2393–b2393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2393.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Stirman, S., Miller, C. J., Toder, K., & Calloway, A. (2013). Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implementation Science, 8, 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Stuart, E. A., & Green, K. M. (2008). Using full matching to estimate causal effects in nonexperimental studies: examining the relationship between adolescent marijuana use and adult outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 44, 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.395.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wamoyi, J., & Wight, D. (2014). ‘Mum never loved me.’ How structural factors influence adolescent sexual and reproductive health through parent–child connectedness: a qualitative study in rural Tanzania. African Journal of AIDS Research, 13, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2014.945387.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wang, B., Deveaux, L., Knowles, V., Koci, V., Rolle, G., Lunn, S., Li, X., Stanton, B. (2015). Fidelity of Implementation of an Evidence-Based HIV Prevention Program among Bahamian Sixth Grade Students. Prevention Science, 16, 110–121.

Titel: Addressing the Adherence-Adaptation Debate: Lessons from the Replication of an Evidence-Based Sexual Health Program in School Settings
verfasst von: Jenita Parekh
Elizabeth Stuart
Robert Blum
Valerie Caldas
Brooke Whitfield
Jacky M. Jennings
Publikationsdatum: 08.08.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Prevention Science / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01032-2

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Addressing the Adherence-Adaptation Debate: Lessons from the Replication of an Evidence-Based Sexual Health Program in School Settings

Abstract

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Effects of Social Development Intervention in Childhood on Adult Life at Ages 30 to 39

Predictive Association of Smoking with Depressive Symptoms: a Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Twins

Effectiveness of Potential Interventions to Change Gendered Social Norms on Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in Uganda: a Causal Inference Approach

Integrating Community-Engagement and a Multiphase Optimization Strategy Framework: Adapting Substance Use Prevention for American Indian Families

Patterns of Family, School, and Community Promotive Factors and Health Disparities Among Youth: Implications for Prevention Science

Longitudinal Patterns of Multiple Tobacco and Nicotine Product Use Among Texas College Students: a Latent Transition Analysis