Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016

14.06.2016 | Original Article

Admission Cardiotocography: A Predictor of Neonatal Outcome

verfasst von: Vishnu Bhartiya, Richa Sharma, Anand Kumar, Himsweta Srivastava

Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Sonderheft 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Screening for fetal distress is a big challenge for obstetricians. Labor admission test by cardiotocography (CTG) can be utilized to differentiate between mothers, in whom continuous fetal monitoring is needed and those who can be managed by intermittent auscultation. Admission CTG is commonly used screening test which aims to identify on admission to the delivery unit the fetus at increased risk of intrapartum hypoxia. We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of CTG in low- and high-risk women.

Methods

A prospective longitudinal study was conducted on 200 low-risk and high-risk antenatal women, beyond 32-week gestation with live pregnancy in labor and admitted in labor ward.

Results

Correlation of labor admission test with meconium in low risk and high risk was found statistically significant (p = 0.0010 and p = 0.000046, respectively). Correlation of labor admission test with low Apgar score, NICU admission and mortality was found statistically insignificant in low-risk and high-risk groups.

Conclusion

Admission CTG does not benefit the neonatal outcome in normal- or low-risk women and rather results in increased obstetric intervention. Thus, it is not beneficial as a screening test to detect intrapartum fetal distress in normal- or low-risk women.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat NICE. Inherited clinical guideline C. The use of electronic fetal monitoring. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence; 2001. NICE. Inherited clinical guideline C. The use of electronic fetal monitoring. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence; 2001.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith JH. Obstetrics in the 1990s; Current controversies. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1992. p. 192–201. Smith JH. Obstetrics in the 1990s; Current controversies. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1992. p. 192–201.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schifrin BS, Amsel J, Burdof G. The accuracy of auscultation detection of fetal cardiac deceleration: a computer simulation. Am J Obstet Gnaecol. 1992;166:566–76.CrossRef Schifrin BS, Amsel J, Burdof G. The accuracy of auscultation detection of fetal cardiac deceleration: a computer simulation. Am J Obstet Gnaecol. 1992;166:566–76.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaudhari KR, Pai SS. Admission test for screening labor. Hyderabad in: A comparative study by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories; 2009. Chaudhari KR, Pai SS. Admission test for screening labor. Hyderabad in: A comparative study by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories; 2009.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mires G, Williams F, Howie P. Randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labor in low risk obstetric population. BMJ. 2001;322:1457–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mires G, Williams F, Howie P. Randomized controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labor in low risk obstetric population. BMJ. 2001;322:1457–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Impey L, Reynolds M, MacQuillan K, et al. Admission cardiotocography: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9356):465.CrossRefPubMed Impey L, Reynolds M, MacQuillan K, et al. Admission cardiotocography: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9356):465.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahomed K, Nyoni M, Lambo T, et al. Intra-partum fetal heart rate monitoring continuous electronic versus intermittent Doppler: a randomized controlled trial. Cent Afr J Med. 1992;38(12):458.PubMed Mahomed K, Nyoni M, Lambo T, et al. Intra-partum fetal heart rate monitoring continuous electronic versus intermittent Doppler: a randomized controlled trial. Cent Afr J Med. 1992;38(12):458.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Haverkamp AD, Thompson HE, McFee JG, et al. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;125(3):310–20.CrossRefPubMed Haverkamp AD, Thompson HE, McFee JG, et al. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;125(3):310–20.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cruzen P, Bekir JS, McLintock DG, et al. Reliability of cardiotocography in predicting baby’s condition at birth. Br Med J. 1984;289(6455):1345–7.CrossRef Cruzen P, Bekir JS, McLintock DG, et al. Reliability of cardiotocography in predicting baby’s condition at birth. Br Med J. 1984;289(6455):1345–7.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ingemarsson I, Arulkumuran S, Ingemarsson E, et al. A screening test for fetal distress in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:800–6. Ingemarsson I, Arulkumuran S, Ingemarsson E, et al. A screening test for fetal distress in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:800–6.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ducey J, Guzman E, Schulman H, et al. Value of screening fetal heart rate tracing in the latent phase of labor. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:899–900.PubMed Ducey J, Guzman E, Schulman H, et al. Value of screening fetal heart rate tracing in the latent phase of labor. J Reprod Med. 1990;35:899–900.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Capt GP, Sandhu GS, Raju R, et al. Admission cardiotocography screening of high risk obstetric patients. Med J Armed Forces India. 2004;64(1):43–5. Capt GP, Sandhu GS, Raju R, et al. Admission cardiotocography screening of high risk obstetric patients. Med J Armed Forces India. 2004;64(1):43–5.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandhu GS, Raju R, Bhattacharyya TK, et al. Admission cardiotocography screening of high risk obstetric patients. Med J Armed Forces India. 2008;64(1):43–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sandhu GS, Raju R, Bhattacharyya TK, et al. Admission cardiotocography screening of high risk obstetric patients. Med J Armed Forces India. 2008;64(1):43–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kansal R, Goel G, Mangala D, et al. Correlation of admission test with neonatal outcome. People’s J Sci Res. 2014;7:27–31. Kansal R, Goel G, Mangala D, et al. Correlation of admission test with neonatal outcome. People’s J Sci Res. 2014;7:27–31.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhangdiya S, Dadhe K, Khatod L. Labor admission test (cardiotocography) as intrapartum risk screening test and its efficacy to predict fetal outcome. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2015;16(2):459–62. Bhangdiya S, Dadhe K, Khatod L. Labor admission test (cardiotocography) as intrapartum risk screening test and its efficacy to predict fetal outcome. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2015;16(2):459–62.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajalekshmi M, Jayakrishnan C, Nithya R, et al. Admission cardiotocography as a screening test to predict foetal outcome and mode of delivery. Indian J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;3(1):43–50.CrossRef Rajalekshmi M, Jayakrishnan C, Nithya R, et al. Admission cardiotocography as a screening test to predict foetal outcome and mode of delivery. Indian J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;3(1):43–50.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Admission Cardiotocography: A Predictor of Neonatal Outcome
verfasst von
Vishnu Bhartiya
Richa Sharma
Anand Kumar
Himsweta Srivastava
Publikationsdatum
14.06.2016
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Elektronische ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-016-0912-0

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2016

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.