Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Prevention Science 3/2019

15.01.2019

Advances in Statistical Methods for Causal Inference in Prevention Science: Introduction to the Special Section

verfasst von: Wolfgang Wiedermann, Nianbo Dong, Alexander von Eye

Erschienen in: Prevention Science | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The board of the Society for Prevention Research noted recently that extant methods for the analysis of causality mechanisms in prevention may still be too rudimentary for detailed and sophisticated analysis of causality hypotheses. This Special Section aims to fill some of the current voids, in particular in the domain of statistical methods of the analysis of causal inference. In the first article, Bray et al. propose a novel methodological approach in which they link propensity score techniques and Latent Class Analysis. In the second article, Kelcey et al. discuss power analysis tools for the study of causal mediation effects in cluster-randomized interventions. Wiedermann et al. present, in the third article, methods of Direction Dependence Analysis for the identification of confounders and for inference concerning the direction of causal effects in mediation models. A more general approach to the identification of causal structures in non-experimental data is presented by Shimizu in the fourth article. This approach is based on linear non-Gaussian acyclic models. Molenaar introduces vector-autoregressive methods for the optimal representation of Granger causality in time-dependent data. The Special Section concludes with a commentary by Musci and Stuart. In this commentary, the contributions of the articles in the Special Section are highlighted from the perspective of the experimental causal research tradition.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Beltz, A. M., Wright, A. G. C., Sprague, B. N., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2016). Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment, 23, 447–458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beltz, A. M., Wright, A. G. C., Sprague, B. N., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2016). Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment, 23, 447–458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York: Guilford Press. Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York: Guilford Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bray, B. C., Dziak, J. J., Patrick, M. E., & Lanza, S. T. (2018). Inverse propensity score weighting with a latent class exposure: Estimating the causal effect of reported reasons for alcohol use on problem alcohol use 16 years later. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0883-8. Bray, B. C., Dziak, J. J., Patrick, M. E., & Lanza, S. T. (2018). Inverse propensity score weighting with a latent class exposure: Estimating the causal effect of reported reasons for alcohol use on problem alcohol use 16 years later. Prevention Science. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11121-018-0883-8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyvärinen, A., & Smith, S. M. (2013). Pairwise likelihood ratios for estimation of non-Gaussian structural equation models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14, 111–152.PubMed Hyvärinen, A., & Smith, S. M. (2013). Pairwise likelihood ratios for estimation of non-Gaussian structural equation models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14, 111–152.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lanza, S. T., Schuler, M. S., & Bray, B. C. (2016). Latent class analysis with causal inference: The effect of adolescent depression on young adult substance use profile. In W. Wiedermann & A. von Eye (Eds.), Statistics and causality: Methods for applied empirical research (pp. 385–404). Hoboken: Wiley and Sons.CrossRef Lanza, S. T., Schuler, M. S., & Bray, B. C. (2016). Latent class analysis with causal inference: The effect of adolescent depression on young adult substance use profile. In W. Wiedermann & A. von Eye (Eds.), Statistics and causality: Methods for applied empirical research (pp. 385–404). Hoboken: Wiley and Sons.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Taylor & Francis. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Zurück zum Zitat Musci, R. J., & Stuart, E. (2018). Ensuring causal, not casual, inference. Prevention Science, (in press). Musci, R. J., & Stuart, E. (2018). Ensuring causal, not casual, inference. Prevention Science, (in press).
Zurück zum Zitat Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Peters, J., Janzing, D., & Schölkopf, B. (2017). Elements of causal inference: Foundations and learning algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press. Peters, J., Janzing, D., & Schölkopf, B. (2017). Elements of causal inference: Foundations and learning algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimizu, S., & Bollen, K. (2014). Bayesian estimation of causal direction in acyclic structural equation models with individual-specific confounder variables and non-Gaussian distributions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 2629–2652.PubMed Shimizu, S., & Bollen, K. (2014). Bayesian estimation of causal direction in acyclic structural equation models with individual-specific confounder variables and non-Gaussian distributions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 2629–2652.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Shimizu, S., Hoyer, P. O., Hyvärinen, A., & Kerminen, A. (2006). A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2003–2030. Shimizu, S., Hoyer, P. O., Hyvärinen, A., & Kerminen, A. (2006). A linear non-Gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2003–2030.
Zurück zum Zitat VanderWeele, T. J. (2015). Explanation in causal inference: Methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. VanderWeele, T. J. (2015). Explanation in causal inference: Methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiedermann, W., & von Eye, A. (2016). Statistics and causality: Methods for applied empirical research. Hoboken: Wiley and Sons.CrossRef Wiedermann, W., & von Eye, A. (2016). Statistics and causality: Methods for applied empirical research. Hoboken: Wiley and Sons.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Advances in Statistical Methods for Causal Inference in Prevention Science: Introduction to the Special Section
verfasst von
Wolfgang Wiedermann
Nianbo Dong
Alexander von Eye
Publikationsdatum
15.01.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Prevention Science / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-0978-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Prevention Science 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe