nach oben

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Erschienen in:

01.09.2014 | Review

An Overview of Magnetic Resonance Enterography for Crohn’s Disease

verfasst von: Suresh Pola, Cynthia Santillan, Barrett G. Levesque, Brian G. Feagan, William J. Sandborn

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 9/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is a relatively new imaging modality that has shown promise for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring Crohn’s disease (CD) and its complications while avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation. In addition to clinical implications, MRE has the potential to be used as an objective measure of disease activity for clinical trials. We provide the rationale for MRE, indications for its use, and an overview of the typical procedure and common findings for institutions who want to begin or refine the use of MRE for CD.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Grand DJ, Kampalath V, Harris A, et al. MR enterography correlates highly with colonoscopy and histology for both distal ileal and colonic Crohn’s disease in 310 patients. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:e763–e769.PubMedCrossRef

Jensen MD, Nathan T, Rafaelsen SR, Kjeldsen J. Diagnostic accuracy of capsule endoscopy for small bowel Crohn’s disease is superior to that of MR enterography or CT enterography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:124–129.PubMedCrossRef

Böcker U, Dinter D, Litterer C, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and video capsule enteroscopy in diagnosing small-bowel pathology: localization-dependent diagnostic yield. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:490–500.PubMedCrossRef

Grobner T. Gadolinium—a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:1104–1108.PubMedCrossRef

Elsayes KM, Al-Hawary MM, Jagdish J, Ganesh HS, Platt JF. CT enterography: principles, trends, and interpretation of findings. Radiographics. 2010;30:1955–1970.PubMedCrossRef

Panes J, Bouzas R, Chaparro M, et al. Systematic review: the use of ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis, assessment of activity and abdominal complications of Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:125–145.PubMedCrossRef

Desmond AN, O’Regan K, Curran C, et al. Crohn’s disease: factors associated with exposure to high levels of diagnostic radiation. Gut. 2008;57:1524–1529.PubMedCrossRef

Levi Z, Fraser E, Krongrad R, et al. Factors associated with radiation exposure in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:1128–1136.PubMedCrossRef

Kerner C, Carey K, Mills AM, et al. Use of abdominopelvic computed tomography in emergency departments and rates of urgent diagnoses in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:52–57.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

10.

Fahmy M, Pola, S, Sandborn, WJ, Patel, D. Frequency and yield of computed tomography (CT) scan imaging in the emergency department in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Gastroenterology. 2012;142:S-536–S-537.

11.

Peloquin JM, Pardi DS, Sandborn WJ, et al. Diagnostic ionizing radiation exposure in a population-based cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2015–2022.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

12.

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Br J Radiol. 2008;81:362–378.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Allen BC, Baker ME, Einstein DM, et al. Effect of altering automatic exposure control settings and quality reference mAs on radiation dose, image quality, and diagnostic efficacy in MDCT enterography of active inflammatory Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:89–100.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Kambadakone AR, Chaudhary NA, Desai GS, Nguyen DD, Kulkarni NM, Sahani DV. Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W743–W752.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Absah I, Bruining DH, Matsumoto JM, et al. MR enterography in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: retrospective assessment of patient tolerance, image quality, and initial performance estimates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:W367–W375.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Cipriano LE, Levesque BG, Zaric GS, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ. Cost-effectiveness of imaging strategies to reduce radiation-induced cancer risk in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:1240–1248.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Hafeez R, Punwani S, Boulos P, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of MR enterography in Crohn’s disease. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:1148–1158.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Leyendecker JR, Bloomfeld RS, DiSantis DJ, Waters GS, Mott R, Bechtold RE. MR enterography in the management of patients with Crohn disease. Radiographics. 2009;29:1827–1846.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Bruining DH, Huprich JE. New concepts in intestinal imaging for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1795–1806.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Tielbeek JA, Löwenberg M, Bipat S, et al. Serial magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring medical therapy effects in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19:1943–1950.PubMed

22.

Savoye-Collet C, Savoye G, Koning E, Dacher JN, Lerebours E. Fistulizing perianal Crohn’s disease: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging assessment at 1 year on maintenance anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:1751–1758.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Sailer J, Peloschek P, Reinisch W, Vogelsang H, Turetschek K, Schima W. Anastomotic recurrence of Crohn’s disease after ileocolic resection: comparison of MR enteroclysis with endoscopy. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2512–2521.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Maglinte DD, Sandrasegaran K, Chiorean M, Dewitt J, McHenry L, Lappas JC. Radiologic investigations complement and add diagnostic information to capsule endoscopy of small-bowel diseases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:306–312.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Gourtsoyiannis NC, Papanikolaou N. Magnetic resonance enteroclysis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005;26:237–246.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD. Enteroclysis or small bowel follow-through in Crohn’ s diseases? Gastroenterology. 1998;114:1349–1351.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, Gualdi G. Comparison of MR enteroclysis with MR enterography and conventional enteroclysis in patients with Crohn’s disease. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:438–447.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Umschaden HW, Gasser J. MR enteroclysis. Radiol Clin N Am. 2003;41:231–248.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Kuehle CA, Ajaj W, Ladd SC, Massing S, Barkhausen J, Lauenstein TC. Hydro-MRI of the small bowel: effect of contrast volume, timing of contrast administration, and data acquisition on bowel distention. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:W375–W385.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Masselli G, Gualdi G. MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology. 2012;264:333–348.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Rimola J, Rodriguez S, Garcia-Bosch O, et al. Magnetic resonance for assessment of disease activity and severity in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2009;58:1113–1120.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology. 2000;215:717–725.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Cronin CG, Lohan DG, Mhuircheartaigh JN, et al. MRI small-bowel follow-through: prone versus supine patient positioning for best small-bowel distention and lesion detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:502–506.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos P. MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:2651–2658.PubMed

35.

Yacoub JH, Obara P, Oto A. Evolving role of MRI in Crohn’s disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37:1277–1289.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Buisson A, Joubert A, Montoriol PF, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting and assessing ileal inflammation in Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37:537–545.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Oto A, Kayhan A, Williams JT, et al. Active Crohn’s disease in the small bowel: evaluation by diffusion weighted imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33:615–624.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Sharman A, Zealley IA, Greenhalgh R, Bassett P, Taylor SA. MRI of small bowel Crohn’s disease: determining the reproducibility of bowel wall gadolinium enhancement measurements. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1960–1967.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, et al. Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology. 2002;222:652–660.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:1325–1332.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Del Vescovo R, Sansoni I, Caviglia R, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum: differentiation of activity of Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33:417–424.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Schreyer AG, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, Herfarth H. Modern imaging using computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) AU1. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10:45–54.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Madureira AJ. The comb sign. Radiology. 2004;230:783–784.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Rousomoustakaki M, Maris T, Gourtsoyiannis N. MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. Radiographics. 2001;21:S161–S172.

45.

Gore RMG, Caroline D. Crohn’s disease of the small bowel. In: Gore RLM, ed. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008:781–806.CrossRef

46.

Lee SS, Ha HK, Yang SK, et al. CT of prominent pericolic or perienteric vasculature in patients with Crohn’s disease: correlation with clinical disease activity and findings on barium studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1029–1036.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Maccioni F, Bruni A, Viscido A, et al. MR imaging in patients with Crohn disease: value of T2- versus T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences with use of an oral superparamagnetic contrast agent. Radiology. 2006;238:517–530.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Zappa M, Stefanescu C, Cazals-Hatem D, et al. Which magnetic resonance imaging findings accurately evaluate inflammation in small bowel Crohn’s disease? A retrospective comparison with surgical pathologic analysis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:984–993.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Gourtsoyiannis NC, Grammatikakis J, Papamastorakis G, et al. Imaging of small intestinal Crohn’s disease: comparison between MR enteroclysis and conventional enteroclysis. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1915–1925.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Tolan DJ, Greenhalgh R, Zealley IA, Halligan S, Taylor SA. MR enterographic manifestations of small bowel Crohn disease. Radiographics. 2010;30:367–384.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Froehlich JM, Waldherr C, Stoupis C, Ertuk SM, Patak MA. MR motility imaging in Crohn’s disease improves lesion detection compared with standard MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:1945–1951.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Masselli G. The gastrointestinal string sign. Radiology. 2007;242:632–633.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Lawrance IC, Welman CJ, Shipman P, Murray K. Correlation of MRI-determined small bowel Crohn’s disease categories with medical response and surgical pathology. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3367–3375.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

54.

Steward MJ, Punwani S, Proctor I, et al. Non-perforating small bowel Crohn’s disease assessed by MRI enterography: derivation and histopathological validation of an MR-based activity index. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:2080–2088.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Rimola J, Ordas I, Rodriguez S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of Crohn’s disease: validation of parameters of severity and quantitative index of activity. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:1759–1768.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Ordas I, Rimola J, Rodriguez S, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance enterography in assessing response to therapy and mucosal healing in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:374–382.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Van Assche G, Herrmann KA, Louis E, et al. Effects of infliximab therapy on transmural lesions as assessed by magnetic resonance enteroclysis in patients with ileal Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:950–957.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Pariente B, Cosnes J, Danese S, et al. Development of the Crohn’s disease digestive damage score, the Lemann score. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:1415–1422.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

59.

Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Stokkers PC, Stoker J. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn’s disease: a systematic review. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:1450–1460.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Fiorino G, Bonifacio C, Peyrin-Biroulet L, et al. Prospective comparison of computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography for assessment of disease activity and complications in ileocolonic Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:1073–1080.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: An Overview of Magnetic Resonance Enterography for Crohn’s Disease
verfasst von: Suresh Pola
Cynthia Santillan
Barrett G. Levesque
Brian G. Feagan
William J. Sandborn
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3116-4

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2014

A Novel Adenosine Precursor 2′,3′-Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Inhibits Formation of Post-surgical Adhesions

Rescue Bowel Preparation: Same Day 2 L Polyethylene Glycol Addition, Not Superior to Bisacodyl Addition 7 Days Later

Preprocedural Rabeprazole Treatment Before Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms

Evaluation of Endoscopic Transpapillary Brushing Cytology for the Diagnosis of Bile Duct Cancer Based on the Histopathologic Findings

Temporal and Spatial Dependence of Inflammatory Biomarkers and Suppression by Fluvastatin in Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Induced Rat Colitis Model