nach oben

Erschienen in:

09.08.2022 | Original Paper

Analysis of antibiotic resistance and genetic profile of conjunctival bacteria flora before and after cataract surgery

verfasst von: Margarita Samudio, Sonia Abente, Norma Fariña, Yolanda López, Carolina Duré, Florentina Laspina, Rosa Guillén, Claudia de los Ángeles Salinas, Verónica Castillo, Jesús Palacios, Iris Santacruz, Martin Nentwich

Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze antibiotic resistance and genetic profile of conjunctival bacteria flora before and after cataract surgery with the focus on coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) during cataract surgery and discuss the implications of this colonization as a potential risk of acquiring endophthalmitis.

Methods

After approval of the institutional review board and informed consent from patients had been obtained, conjunctival swabs for culture from 59 patients undergoing cataract surgery were taken of the fellow eye at baseline (C0) and from the eye to be operated before (T0) and after (T1) irrigation with povine-iodine 5%, and at the end of surgery (T2). Genes responsible for virulence (mecA, ica and atlE) and antibiotic profile were determined; strain clonality of persistent colonizing Staphylococcus epidermidis strains was established by the Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST).

Results

The frequency of CNS was significantly reduced in T1 (13.6%) from 81.4% in T0 and 86.4% in C0. The frequency of mecA, ica and atlE genes was 34.4%, 37.5% and 61.4%, respectively; and methicillin phenotypic resistance was 35.4%. S. epidermidis was the most frequent species isolated in every time point. MLST revealed in 7 patients 100% coincidence of the seven alleles of the S. epidermidis isolated previous to povine-iodine 5% disinfection and at the end of the surgery. CNS isolates from T1 or T2 corresponded to the same species, antibiotic and virulence profile as those isolates from C0 or T0.

Conclusion

Povidone-iodine 5% prophylaxis before surgery significantly reduced conjunctival contamination; in those that persisted, the source of contamination was mostly the patient's microbiota confirmed by the MLST system.

Durand ML (2017) Bacterial and fungal endophthalmitis. Clin Microbiol Rev 30(3):597–613. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00113-16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Shao EH, Yates WB, Van HI, Chang AA, Simunovic MP (2021) Endophthalmitis: changes in presentation, management and the role of early vitrectomy. Ophthalmol Ther 10(4):877–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00406-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wade CI, Whitescarver TD, Ashcroft CR, Hobbs SD, Purt B, Reddy AK, Colyer MH, Justin GA (2021) Endophthalmitis: a bibliographic review. Int Ophthalmol 41(12):4151–4161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01967-yCrossRefPubMed

Speaker MG, Milch FA, Shah MK, Eisner W, Kreiswirth BN (1991) Role of external bacterial flora in the pathogenesis of acute postoperative endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 98(5):639–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32239-5CrossRefPubMed

Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study Group (1995) Results of the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study: a randomized trial of immediate vitrectomy and of intravenous antibiotics for the treatment of postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 113(12):1479–1496. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1995.01100120009001CrossRef

Mamalis N, Kearsley L, Brinton E (2002) Postoperative endophthalmitis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 13(1):14–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/00055735-200202000-00004CrossRefPubMed

Callegan MC, Engelbert M, Ii DWP, Jett BD, Gilmore MS (2002) Bacterial endophthalmitis: epidemiology, therapeutics, and bacterium-host interactions. Clin Microbiol Rev 15(1):111–124. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.15.1.111-124.2002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ariyasu RG, Nakamura T, Trousdale MD, Smith RE (1993) Intraoperative bacterial contamination of the aqueous humor. Ophthalmic Surg 24(6):367–373PubMed

Dickey JB, Thompson KDJW (1991) Anterior chamber aspirate cultures after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 112(3):278–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76728-5CrossRefPubMed

10.

Cibils D, Samudio M, Laspina F, Fariña N, Sanabria R, Mino de Kaspar H (2006). Contaminación del humor acuoso en pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cataratas. Mem Inst Investig Cienc Salud 4(2):19–27. http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1812-95282006000200005&lng=en

11.

Ciulla T, Starr MBMS (2002) Bacterial endophthalmitis prophylaxis for cataract surgery: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology 109(1):13–24CrossRefPubMed

12.

Schmitz S, Dick HB, Krummenauer FPN (1999) Endophthalmitis in cataract surgery: results of a German survey. Ophthalmology 106(10):1869–1877. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90395-0CrossRefPubMed

13.

Speaker MGMJ (1991) Prophylaxis of endophthalmitis with topical povidone-iodine. Ophthalmology 98(12):1769–1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(91)32052-9CrossRefPubMed

14.

Miño de Kaspar H, Chang RT, Singh K, Egbert PR, Blumenkranz MS, Ta CN (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of 2 different methods of 5% povidone-iodine applications for anterior segment intraocular surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 123(2):161–165. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.123.2.161CrossRefPubMed

15.

Carron A, Samudio M, Laspina F, Fariña N, Sanabria RR, Cibils D, Ramirez L, Carron J, Mino de Kaspar H (2013) Eficacia de la aplicación tópica de 0,3% ciprofloxacina en la reducción de la biota conjuntival de pacientes operados de cataratas. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2013.01.001

16.

Quiroga LP, Lansingh V, Laspina F, Samudio M, Stanley J, Kaspar HM, Cibils D, Cibils P (2010) A prospective study demonstrating the effect of 5% povidone-iodine application for anterior segment intraocular surgery in Paraguay. Arq Bras Oftalmo l73(2):125–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492010000200005

17.

López Y, Samudio M, Fariña N, Castillo V, Abente S, Nentwich MM, González-Britez N, Laspina F, Carron A, Cibils D, de Kaspar HM (2017) Effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on coagulase-negative Staphylococcus virulence factor profiles in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol 37(4):929–937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0355-8CrossRefPubMed

18.

Fariña N, Samudio M, Carpinelli L, Nentwich MM, de Kaspar HM (2017) Methicillin resistance and biofilm production of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from infectious and normal flora conjunctiva. Int Ophthalmol 37(4):819–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0339-8CrossRefPubMed

19.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2016) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, twenty fourth informational supplement 34(1):M100-S21

20.

Zhang K, Sparling J, Chow BL, Elsayed S, Hussain Z, Church DL, Gregson DB, Louie T, Conly JM (2004) New quadriplex PCR assay for detection of methicillin and mupirocin resistance and simultaneous discrimination of Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 42(11):4947–4955. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.11.4947-4955.2004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Sharma P, Lahiri KK, Kapila K (2011) Conventional and molecular characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococcus in hospital isolates. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 54(1):85–89. https://doi.org/10.4103/0377-4929.77331CrossRefPubMed

22.

Thomas JC, Vargas MR, Miragaia M, Peacock SJ, Archer GL, Enright MC (2007) Improved multilocus sequence typing scheme for S. epidermidis. Improved multilocus sequence typing scheme for Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Clin Microbiol 45(2):616–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01934-06

23.

Holden MT, Feil EJ, Lindsay JA, Peacock SJ, Day NP, Enright MC et al (2004) Complete genomes of two clinical Staphylococcus aureus strains: evidence for the rapid evolution of virulence and drug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(26):9786–9791. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402521101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Xu Z, Misra R, Jamrozy D, Paterson GK, Cutler RR, Holmes MA, Gharbia S, Mkrtchyan HV (2018) Whole genome sequence and comparative genomics analysis of multi-drug resistant environmental Staphylococcus epidermidis ST59. G3 (Bethesda) 8(7):2225–30. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.200314

25.

Xu Z, Cave R, Chen L, Yangkyi T, Liu Y, Li K, Meng G, Niu K, Zhang W, Tang N, Shen J, Mkrtchyan HV (2020) Antibiotic resistance and molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis recovered from hospital personnel in China. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 22:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.02.013CrossRefPubMed

26.

Bispo PJ, Hofling-Lima AL, Pignatari AC (2014) Characterization of ocular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates belonging predominantly to clonal complex 2 subcluster II. J Clin Microbiol 52(5):1412–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.02.013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Li B, Nentwich MM, Hoffmann LE, Haritoglou C, Kook D, Kampik A, Sheng M, Miño de Kaspar H (2013) Comparison of the efficacy of povidone-iodine 1.0%, 5.0%, and 10.0% irrigation combined with topical levofloxacin 0.3% as preoperative prophylaxis in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 39(7):994–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.02.039

28.

Li B, Miño de Kaspar H, Haritoglou C, Kook D, Kampik A, Sheng M, Nentwich MM (2015) Comparison of 1-day versus 1-hour application of topical neomycin/polymyxin-B before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(4):724–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.042CrossRefPubMed

29.

Nentwich MM, Rajab M, Ta CN, He L, Grueterich M, Haritoglou C, Gandorfer A, Kampik A, Mino De Kaspar H (2012) Application of 10% povidone iodine reduces conjunctival bacterial contamination rate in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 22(4):541–546. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000093CrossRefPubMed

30.

Nentwich MM, Ta CN, Kreutzer TC, Li B, Schwarzbach F, Yactayo-Miranda YM, Kampik A, Miño de Kaspar H (2015) Incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis from 1990 to 2009 using povidone-iodine but no intracameral antibiotics at a single academic institution. J Cataract Refract Surg 41(1):58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.040CrossRefPubMed

31.

Ishak MA, Gröschel DH, Mandell GL, Wenzel RP (1985) Association of slime with pathogenicity of coagulase-negative staphylococci causing nosocomial septicemia. J Clin Microbiol 22(6):1025–9. Available from https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.22.6.1025-1029.1985

32.

Galdbart JO, Allignet J, Tung HS, Rydèn C, El Solh N (2000) Screening for Staphylococcus epidermidis markers discriminating between skin-flora strains and those responsible for infections of joint prostheses. J Infect Dis 182(1):351–355. https://doi.org/10.1086/315660CrossRefPubMed

33.

de Araujo GL, Coelho LR, de Carvalho CB, Maciel RM, Coronado AZ, Rozenbaum R, Ferreira-Carvalho BT, Figueiredo AM, Teixeira LA (2006) Commensal isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis are also well equipped to produce biofilm on polystyrene surfaces. Antimicrob Chemother 57(5):855–864. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl071CrossRef

34.

Fernández-Rubio ME, Urcelay-Segura JL, Bellón-Cano JM, Cuesta-Rodríguez T (2021) Association between the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients undergoing cataract surgery and their prevalence of conjunctival bacteria. J Cataract Refract Surg 47(8):1019–1027. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000563CrossRefPubMed

35.

Hoshi S, Hashida M, Urabe K (2016) Risk factors for aerobic bacterial conjunctival flora in preoperative cataract patients. Eye 30(11):1439–1446. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.143

Titel: Analysis of antibiotic resistance and genetic profile of conjunctival bacteria flora before and after cataract surgery
verfasst von: Margarita Samudio
Sonia Abente
Norma Fariña
Yolanda López
Carolina Duré
Florentina Laspina
Rosa Guillén
Claudia de los Ángeles Salinas
Verónica Castillo
Jesús Palacios
Iris Santacruz
Martin Nentwich
Publikationsdatum: 09.08.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02450-y

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Analysis of antibiotic resistance and genetic profile of conjunctival bacteria flora before and after cataract surgery

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Update Augenheilkunde

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Clinical characteristics and the treatment modalities of Graves’ orbitopathy in a tertiary referral center in Turkey: changes over two decades

Clinical features, etiological reasons, and treatment results in patients who developed acute acquired nonaccomodative esotropia

Clinicopathological profile, management and clinical outcomes in recurrent cases of ocular surface squamous neoplasia at a tertiary care centre

Comparing the accuracy of the new-generation intraocular lens power calculation formulae in axial myopic eyes: a meta-analysis

Pars plana vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification versus pars plana vitrectomy only for treatment of phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Case–control study of corneal topography and specular microscopy parameters in JIA patients with and without ocular involvement

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Update Augenheilkunde