Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2011

01.04.2011

Analysis of standard multiport versus single-site access for laparoscopic skills training

verfasst von: Daniel R. Cox, Wenjing Zeng, Margaret M. Frisella, L. Michael Brunt

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Single-site-access (SSA) laparoscopy is more challenging to perform than multiport (MP) laparoscopy. This study examined the effect of MP versus SSA skills training on laparoscopic performance using surgically naive medical students.

Methods

For the study, 40 medical students at the end of their first year were randomized into two groups. Both groups were trained in four basic laparoscopic drills (peg, rope, bean drop, pattern cutting) using a standard MP setup (group 1) and an SSA approach (group 2). The time and number of repetitions required to attain proficiency were recorded. Each group then crossed over to the alternate approach and repeated the sequence. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, and statistical analysis was performed using the two-tailed, unpaired t test.

Results

The total times required to attain proficiency for the SSA and MP approaches were not significantly different between the MP-trained group (234.0 ± 114.9 min) and the SSA-trained group (216.4 ± 106.5 min) (p = 0.67). The MP-trained group required less time to reach proficiency on the standard MP setup than the group using the SSA approach (119.1 ± 69.7 vs. 178.0 ± 93.4 min; p = 0.058) and significantly fewer repetitions (77.6 ± 42.6 vs. 118.8 ± 54.3; p = 0.027). The SSA-trained group required significantly less time to reach proficiency on the MP setup than the standard MP-trained group (38.4 ± 29.4 vs. 119.1 ± 69.7 min; p = 0.0013) and needed only a mean of 26.9 repetitions. When the standard MP trainees crossed over to the SSA setup, they required significantly less time to reach proficiency with the SSA approach than the SSA-trained group (114.8 ± 50.5 vs. 178.0 ± 93.4 min; p = 0.026) but required more repetitions than with the MP approach (86.2 ± 35.2 vs. 77.6 ± 42.6; nonsignificant difference).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic SSA skills training results in longer times and more repetitions to achieve proficiency than MP training, but the skills acquired transfer well to the MP approach.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginestà C, Martí J, Espert JJ, Benarroch G, García-Valdecasas JC (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy. Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print 19 August] Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginestà C, Martí J, Espert JJ, Benarroch G, García-Valdecasas JC (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy. Surg Endosc [Epub ahead of print 19 August]
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeong BC, Park YH, Han DH, Kim HH (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a matched case–control study. J Endourol 23:1957–1960PubMedCrossRef Jeong BC, Park YH, Han DH, Kim HH (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a matched case–control study. J Endourol 23:1957–1960PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Slone J, Reavis K (2009) Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single site gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Epub ahead of print 10 November] Nguyen NT, Slone J, Reavis K (2009) Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single site gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis [Epub ahead of print 10 November]
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, Brandina R, Goldfarb DA, Shoskes D, Desai MM, Gill IS (2009) Laparo endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol [Epub ahead of print 28 July] Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, Brandina R, Goldfarb DA, Shoskes D, Desai MM, Gill IS (2009) Laparo endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol [Epub ahead of print 28 July]
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott DJ (2006) Patient safety, competency, and the future of surgical stimulation. Simul Healthcare 1:164–170CrossRef Scott DJ (2006) Patient safety, competency, and the future of surgical stimulation. Simul Healthcare 1:164–170CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) program. Retrieved 7 March 2010, http://flsprogram.org Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) program. Retrieved 7 March 2010, http://​flsprogram.​org
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132:200–204PubMed Rosser JC, Rosser LE, Savalgi RS (1997) Skill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132:200–204PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mac Donald E, Pringle K, Ahmed I (2009) Single port laparoscopic repair of incarcerated ventral hernia. Hernia [Epub ahead of print] Mac Donald E, Pringle K, Ahmed I (2009) Single port laparoscopic repair of incarcerated ventral hernia. Hernia [Epub ahead of print]
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacob BP, Tong W, Reiner M, Vine A, Katz LB (2009) Single-incision total extraperitoneal (one-site) laparoscopic inguinal hernia. Hernia 13:571–572 Jacob BP, Tong W, Reiner M, Vine A, Katz LB (2009) Single-incision total extraperitoneal (one-site) laparoscopic inguinal hernia. Hernia 13:571–572
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbaros U, Dinccag A (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy: the first two cases. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1520–1523PubMedCrossRef Barbaros U, Dinccag A (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy: the first two cases. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1520–1523PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawlings A, Hodgett SE, Matthews BD, Strasberg SM, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography. JACS Rawlings A, Hodgett SE, Matthews BD, Strasberg SM, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience with critical view of safety dissection and routine intraoperative cholangiography. JACS
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518–528PubMedCrossRef Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518–528PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott DJ, Dunnington GL (2008) The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 12:213–221PubMedCrossRef Scott DJ, Dunnington GL (2008) The new ACS/APDS skills curriculum: moving the learning curve out of the operating room. J Gastrointest Surg 12:213–221PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kavena PA, Fayez R, Fried G (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199:115–120PubMedCrossRef Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kavena PA, Fayez R, Fried G (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199:115–120PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Analysis of standard multiport versus single-site access for laparoscopic skills training
verfasst von
Daniel R. Cox
Wenjing Zeng
Margaret M. Frisella
L. Michael Brunt
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1349-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.