nach oben

Brain Structure and Function

Erschienen in:

30.01.2019 | Original Article

Anodal tDCS affects neuromodulatory effects of the norepinephrine system on superior frontal theta activity during response inhibition

verfasst von: Nico Adelhöfer, Moritz Mückschel, Benjamin Teufert, Tjalf Ziemssen, Christian Beste

Erschienen in: Brain Structure and Function | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Medial and superior frontal theta oscillations are important for response inhibition. The norepinephrine (NE) system has been shown to modulate these oscillations possibly via gain control mechanisms, which depend on the modulation of neuron membrane potentials. Because the latter are also modulated by tDCS, the interrelation of tDCS and NE effects on superior frontal theta band activity needs investigation. We test the hypothesis that anodal tDCS affects modulatory effects of the NE system on theta band activity during inhibitory control in superior frontal regions. Using EEG beamforming, theta band activity in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) was integrated (correlated) with the pupil diameter data as an indirect index of NE activity. In a within-subject design, healthy participants completed a response inhibition task in two sessions in which they received 2 mA anodal tDCS over the vertex, or sham stimulation. There were no behavioral effects of anodal tDCS. Yet, tDCS affected correlations between SFG theta band activity time course and the pupil diameter time course. Correlations were evident after sham stimulation (r = .701; p < .004), but absent after anodal tDCS. The observed power of this dissociation was above 95%. The data suggest that anodal tDCS may eliminate neuromodulatory effects, likely of the NE system, on theta band activity during response inhibition in a structure of the response inhibition network. The NE system and tDCS seem to target similar mechanisms important for cognitive control in the prefrontal cortex. The results provide a hint why tDCS often fails to induce overt behavioral effects and shows that neurobiological systems, which may exert similar effects as tDCS on neural processes should closely be monitored in tDCS experiments.

Adelhöfer N, Gohil K, Passow S et al (2018) The system-neurophysiological basis for how methylphenidate modulates perceptual-attentional conflicts during auditory processing. Hum Brain Mapp 39:5050–5061. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24344 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Antal A, Kincses TZ, Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2003) Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man. Exp Brain Res 150:375–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1459-8 CrossRefPubMed

Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA (2014) Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cogn Sci 18:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003 CrossRefPubMed

Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD (2005) An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu Rev Neurosci 28:403–450. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 CrossRefPubMed

Bari A, Robbins TW (2013) Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control. Prog Neurobiol 108:44–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005 CrossRefPubMed

Bensmann W, Roessner V, Stock A-K, Beste C (2018) Catecholaminergic modulation of conflict control depends on the source of conflicts. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 21:901–909. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyy063 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Beste C, Ness V, Falkenstein M, Saft C (2011) On the role of fronto-striatal neural synchronization processes for response inhibition–evidence from ERP phase-synchronization analyses in pre-manifest Huntington’s disease gene mutation carriers. Neuropsychologia 49:3484–3493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.024 CrossRefPubMed

Beste C, Steenbergen L, Sellaro R et al (2016) Effects of concomitant stimulation of the GABAergic and norepinephrine system on inhibitory control—a study using transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. Brain Stimulat 9:811–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.07.004 CrossRef

Beste C, Mückschel M, Rosales R et al (2017) Striosomal dysfunction affects behavioral adaptation but not impulsivity—evidence from X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism. Mov Disord Off J Mov Disord Soc. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26895 CrossRef

Carter MJ, Maslovat D, Carlsen AN (2015) Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied over the supplementary motor area delays spontaneous antiphase-to-in-phase transitions. J Neurophysiol 113:780–785. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00662.2014 CrossRefPubMed

Cavanagh JF, Frank MJ (2014) Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci 18:414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cavanagh JF, Zambrano-Vazquez L, Allen JJB (2012) Theta lingua franca: a common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes. Psychophysiology 49:220–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01293.x CrossRefPubMed

Chamberlain SR, del Campo N, Dowson J et al (2007) Atomoxetine improved response inhibition in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 62:977–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.003 CrossRefPubMed

Chamberlain SR, Hampshire A, Müller U et al (2009) Atomoxetine modulates right inferior frontal activation during inhibitory control: a pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry 65:550–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.014 CrossRefPubMed

Chance FS, Abbott LF, Reyes AD (2002) Gain modulation from background synaptic input. Neuron 35:773–782CrossRefPubMed

Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Ziemssen T, Beste C (2017) The norepinephrine system affects specific neurophysiological subprocesses in the modulation of inhibitory control by working memory demands. Hum Brain Mapp 38:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23344 CrossRefPubMed

Cohen MX (2014) A neural microcircuit for cognitive conflict detection and signaling. Trends Neurosci 37:480–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.06.004 CrossRefPubMed

Costa VD, Rudebeck PH (2016) More than meets the eye: the relationship between pupil size and locus coeruleus activity. Neuron 89:8–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.031 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

De Blasio FM, Barry RJ (2013) Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task. Int J Psychophysiol Off J Int Organ Psychophysiol 87:279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.09.016 CrossRef

Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 CrossRefPubMed

Dimigen O, Sommer W, Hohlfeld A et al (2011) Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review. J Exp Psychol Gen 140:552–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023885 CrossRefPubMed

Dippel G, Chmielewski W, Mückschel M, Beste C (2015) Response mode-dependent differences in neurofunctional networks during response inhibition: an EEG-beamforming study. Brain Struct Funct. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1148-y CrossRefPubMed

Dippel G, Mückschel M, Ziemssen T, Beste C (2017) Demands on response inhibition processes determine modulations of theta band activity in superior frontal areas and correlations with pupillometry—implications for the norepinephrine system during inhibitory control. NeuroImage 157:575–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.037 CrossRefPubMed

Eagle DM, Bari A, Robbins TW (2008) The neuropsychopharmacology of action inhibition: cross-species translation of the stop-signal and go/no-go tasks. Psychopharmacology 199:439–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1127-6 CrossRefPubMed

Eckstein MK, Guerra-Carrillo B, Miller Singley AT, Bunge SA (2016) Beyond eye gaze: what else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? Dev Cogn Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ettinger U, Faiola E, Kasparbauer A-M et al (2017) Effects of nicotine on response inhibition and interference control. Psychopharmacology 234:1093–1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4542-8 CrossRefPubMed

Evans JD (1996) Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191CrossRefPubMed

Filmer HL, Dux PE, Mattingley JB (2014) Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function. Trends Neurosci 37:742–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.003 CrossRefPubMed

Fotiou DF, Stergiou V, Tsiptsios D et al (2009) Cholinergic deficiency in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease: evaluation with pupillometry. Int J Psychophysiol 73:143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.01.011 CrossRefPubMed

Friedrich J, Beste C (2018) Paradoxical, causal effects of sensory gain modulation on motor inhibitory control—a tDCS, EEG-source localization study. Sci Rep 8:17486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35879-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Greenhouse I, Sias A, Labruna L, Ivry RB (2015) Nonspecific inhibition of the motor system during response preparation. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 35:10675–10684. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1436-15.2015 CrossRef

Gross J, Kujala J, Hamalainen M et al (2001) Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:694–699. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.694 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Harper J, Malone SM, Bernat EM (2014) Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 125:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.06.025 CrossRef

Hay E, Segev I (2015) Dendritic excitability and gain control in recurrent cortical microcircuits. Cereb Cortex N Y N 1991 25:3561–3571. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu200 CrossRef

Hayduk-Costa G, Drummond NM, Carlsen AN (2013) Anodal tDCS over SMA decreases the probability of withholding an anticipated action. Behav Brain Res 257:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.030 CrossRefPubMed

Helton WS (2009) Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390801978856 CrossRefPubMed

Helton WS, Hollander TD, Warm JS et al (2005) Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance. Br J Psychol Lond Engl 1953 96:249–261. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712605X38369 CrossRef

Horvath JC, Forte JD, Carter O (2015) Quantitative review finds no evidence of cognitive effects in healthy populations from single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimulat 8:535–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.400 CrossRef

Hou RH, Freeman C, Langley RW et al (2005) Does modafinil activate the locus coeruleus in man? Comparison of modafinil and clonidine on arousal and autonomic functions in human volunteers. Psychopharmacology 181:537–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0013-8 CrossRefPubMed

Huster RJ, Enriquez-Geppert S, Lavallee CF et al (2013) Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. Int J Psychophysiol Off J Int Organ Psychophysiol 87:217–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.001 CrossRef

Jacobson L, Javitt DC, Lavidor M (2011) Activation of inhibition: diminishing impulsive behavior by direct current stimulation over the inferior frontal gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci 23:3380–3387. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00020 CrossRefPubMed

Joshi S, Li Y, Kalwani RM, Gold JI (2016) Relationships between pupil diameter and neuronal activity in the locus coeruleus, colliculi, and cingulate cortex. Neuron 89:221–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.028 CrossRefPubMed

Kamp S-M, Donchin E (2015) ERP and pupil responses to deviance in an oddball paradigm. Psychophysiology 52:460–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12378 CrossRefPubMed

Lafon B, Rahman A, Bikson M, Parra LC (2017) Direct current stimulation alters neuronal input/output function. Brain Stimulat 10:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.08.014 CrossRef

Lavallee CF, Herrmann CS, Weerda R, Huster RJ (2014) Stimulus-response mappings shape inhibition processes: a combined EEG-fMRI study of contextual stopping. PloS One 9:e96159. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096159 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lee C, Jung Y-J, Lee SJ, Im C-H (2017) COMETS2: An advanced MATLAB toolbox for the numerical analysis of electric fields generated by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 277:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.12.008 CrossRefPubMed

Li S-C, Rieckmann A (2014) Neuromodulation and aging: implications of aging neuronal gain control on cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 29:148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.009 CrossRefPubMed

Li S-C, Lindenberger U, Sikström S (2001) Aging cognition: from neuromodulation to representation. Trends Cogn Sci 5:479–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01769-1 CrossRefPubMed

Maris E, Oostenveld R (2007) Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods 164:177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 CrossRefPubMed

McVay JC, Kane MJ (2009) Conducting the train of thought: working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 35:196–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014104 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Molaee-Ardekani B, Márquez-Ruiz J, Merlet I et al (2013) Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cortical activity: a computational modeling study. Brain Stimulat 6:25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.006 CrossRef

Mückschel M, Gohil K, Ziemssen T, Beste C (2016) The norepinephrine system and its relevance for multi-component behavior. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.007 CrossRefPubMed

Mückschel M, Chmielewski W, Ziemssen T, Beste C (2017) The norepinephrine system shows information-content specific properties during cognitive control—evidence from EEG and pupillary responses. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.036 CrossRefPubMed

Naicker P, Anoopkumar-Dukie S, Grant GD et al (2016) Central cholinergic pathway involvement in the regulation of pupil diameter, blink rate and cognitive function. Neuroscience 334:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.08.009 CrossRefPubMed

Nieuwenhuis S, Aston-Jones G, Cohen JD (2005) Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus–norepinephrine system. Psychol Bull 131:510–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510 CrossRefPubMed

Nieuwenhuis S, De Geus EJ, Aston-Jones G (2011) The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology 48:162–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01057.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2000) Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 527 Pt 3:633–639CrossRef

Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM et al (2008) Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimulat 1:206–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004 CrossRef

Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J-M (2011) FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/156869 CrossRef

Phillips MA, Szabadi E, Bradshaw CM (2000) Comparison of the effects of clonidine and yohimbine on spontaneous pupillary fluctuations in healthy human volunteers. Psychopharmacology 150:85–89CrossRefPubMed

Quetscher C, Yildiz A, Dharmadhikari S et al (2015) Striatal GABA-MRS predicts response inhibition performance and its cortical electrophysiological correlates. Brain Struct Funct 220:3555–3564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0873-y CrossRefPubMed

Rahman A, Lafon B, Parra LC, Bikson M (2017) Direct current stimulation boosts synaptic gain and cooperativity in vitro. J Physiol 595:3535–3547. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP273005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Reinhart RMG, Cosman JD, Fukuda K, Woodman GF (2017) Using transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) to understand cognitive processing. Atten Percept Psychophys 79:3–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1224-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J et al (1997) `Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 35:747–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8 CrossRefPubMed

Salinas E, Thier P (2000) Gain modulation: a major computational principle of the central nervous system. Neuron 27:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00004-0 CrossRefPubMed

Servan-Schreiber D, Printz H, Cohen JD (1990) A network model of catecholamine effects: gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and behavior. Science 249:892–895CrossRefPubMed

Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA (2011) Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 17:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858410386614 CrossRefPubMed

Stevenson H, Russell PN, Helton WS (2011) Search asymmetry, sustained attention, and response inhibition. Brain Cogn 77:215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.007 CrossRefPubMed

Swick D, Ashley V, Turken AU (2008) Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition. BMC Neurosci 9:102. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-102 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Szabadi E, Bradshaw CM (1993) Pupillary measures as markers of drug response. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 3:317–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-977X(93)90095-4 CrossRef

Thura D, Cisek P (2016) Modulation of premotor and primary motor cortical activity during volitional adjustments of speed-accuracy trade-offs. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 36:938–956. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2230-15.2016 CrossRef

Van Veen BD, van Drongelen W, Yuchtman M, Suzuki A (1997) Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44:867–880. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.623056 CrossRefPubMed

Varazzani C, San-Galli A, Gilardeau S, Bouret S (2015) Noradrenaline and dopamine neurons in the reward/effort trade-off: a direct electrophysiological comparison in behaving monkeys. J Neurosci 35:7866–7877. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0454-15.2015 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wolff N, Mückschel M, Ziemssen T, Beste C (2018) The role of phasic norepinephrine modulations during task switching: evidence for specific effects in parietal areas. Brain Struct Funct 223:925–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1531-y CrossRefPubMed

Woods AJ, Antal A, Bikson M et al (2016) A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol 127:1031–1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Anodal tDCS affects neuromodulatory effects of the norepinephrine system on superior frontal theta activity during response inhibition
verfasst von: Nico Adelhöfer
Moritz Mückschel
Benjamin Teufert
Tjalf Ziemssen
Christian Beste
Publikationsdatum: 30.01.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Brain Structure and Function / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1863-2653
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2661
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01839-3

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

25.04.2024 AAN-Jahrestagung 2024 Nachrichten

Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

25.04.2024 Parkinson-Krankheit Nachrichten

Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

23.04.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Thalamic connectivity measured with fMRI is associated with a polygenic index predicting thalamo-prefrontal gene co-expression

Microglia contribute to the glia limitans around arteries, capillaries and veins under physiological conditions, in a model of neuroinflammation and in human brain tissue

The Structural Model: a theory linking connections, plasticity, pathology, development and evolution of the cerebral cortex

The dark matter of the brain

Basal forebrain subcortical projections