Background
The need for effective alignment of evidence, policy and practice in contemporary healthcare
Using a Health Network approach to bridge the evidence-policy-practice gaps
Health Networks in Western Australia
Development and establishment Health Networks in Western Australia
Translation of policy into practice: a phased implementation approach
-
Establishment of a group (Network) of multidisciplinary people/organisations who share a common interest in a clinical or health service area, including consumers and carers.
-
Organisational support to coordinate the group as well as in kind support from employers of Network members, allowing them time to contribute to Network activities.
-
Support from, and formal integration with, Government.
-
Development and acceptance of contextually-appropriate policy, creating a platform from which implementation activities can be initiated.
-
Seed funding to initiate pilot projects which can subsequently be embedded into sustainable service models.
Application of a Health Network approach model for addressing service delivery in musculoskeletal health WA
Case presentation
Establishment, structure and membership of the WA musculoskeletal Health Network
Category of stakeholder | Examples |
---|---|
Allied health professionals | Physiotherapists, chiropractors, osteopaths, occupational therapists, psychologists |
Carers | Individuals who care for people with chronic health and musculoskeletal conditions |
Consumers | Individuals with chronic health conditions and chronic musculoskeletal conditions |
Corporate | Health insurance companies (profit and not-for-profit) |
Cross-jurisdictional representation | NSW Musculoskeletal Network members |
General practitioners | |
Inter-departmental representation | WorkCover WA, WorkSafe WA, Disability Services Commission |
Medical specialists | Rheumatologists, endocrinologists, orthopaedic surgeons, pain specialists, anaesthetists |
Medicare Locals | |
Non-government organisations | Arthritis and Osteoporosis WA, Injury Control Council of WA, Council of the Ageing |
Nursing | Nurses and nurse practitioners |
Pharmacists | Community and hospital pharmacists |
Policy makers and planners | Officers across the divisions of the Department, officers from the Area Health Services |
Professional Organisations | Australian Physiotherapy Association, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Australian Chiropractic Association, Australian Rheumatology Association |
Research, Education and Training Organisations | Universities, Research Institutes |
Development of the case study
Development and implementation of Models of Care
Implementation the Inflammatory Arthritis Model of Care: community-based, multidisciplinary rheumatology services
-
Development of a consumer-centred and evidence-informed Model of Care [43].
-
Development of learning modules for physiotherapists in clinical service delivery (currently in progress) and for all health professionals in delivery of self-management programs. The learning modules will complement a suite of resources being created in Australia to develop workforce capacity in musculoskeletal health, including foundation curricula in rheumatology, clinical skills in ankylosing spondylitis, a post graduate certificate for nurses in musculoskeletal health, and e-resources for the effective self-management of musculoskeletal pain.
-
Procurement of funds to support the establishment of a community-based rheumatology service.
-
Establishment of partnerships with a local hospital, community-based organisations, universities and private service providers (rheumatologists and general practitioners) to support the community-based service.
-
Delivery of self-management and exercise programs for consumers at the implementation site by community-based organisations.
Strategy | Explanation | Working example: establishment of a community-based, multidisciplinary rheumatology service |
---|---|---|
Challenge: taking ownership and responsibility to lead an initiative
| ||
Identify and support a local clinical leader to drive implementation priorities. | A local clinical leader in a specific area can be identified and encouraged to lead a piece of work which is both of interest to them and aligns with a policy recommendation. Highlighting implementation opportunities to leaders may also facilitate this process. The government officer has a key role in supporting the leader with policy intelligence, linking them with Departmental processes and personnel, and providing project support and stakeholder engagement opportunities. | A local rheumatologist was identified as a clinical leader in promoting the establishment of a community-based rheumatology service in an outer metropolitan area. |
Challenge: knowing where and how to start with a service reform project
| ||
Map opportunities, barriers and enablers to implementation. | The clinical leader, government officer and other stakeholders identify system barriers and enablers to implementing Model of Care recommendation(s). By exploring the barriers and enablers, a specific project(s) may be developed. | Barriers and enablers were mapped, including: |
Barriers: local workforce limitations (skills, knowledge, volume), establishing new clinical and clerical positions within an area health service, funding limitations especially for consultant salaries, lack of local community-based support services, lack of data to substantiate need, lack of programme evaluation expertise. | ||
Enablers: opportunity to upskill local clinicians, engage the private sector in clinical service delivery, apply for grants to procure seed funding, partner with non-government providers in community-based service delivery, partner with universities for evaluation expertise. | ||
Develop an evidence-informed and data-driven business case/project plan with longer term implementation/integration strategies identified. | The project leader, working group and government officer develop a data-driven business/project plan to demonstrate need, explicitly identify how the work aligns with policy, and the predicted risk and benefits to the local health system. Partnerships with researchers and intra-departmental agencies (e.g. Epidemiology) are important for developing a robust and mutually agreeable business case/project plan. Providing a description of how the initiative links with the broader policy directions and funding models is critical to increasing the likelihood of acceptance from decision makers and opportunities to maintain sustainability. | Project plan developed, supported by data concerning the number of referrals to tertiary hospital-based rheumatology departments according to geographic areas in the state. Geographic areas of need could then easily be identified. The plan included strategies to upskill local clinicians, engage the private sector to provide clinical services (allied health and rheumatologists), and partner with other community-based organisation to provide local services (e.g. self-management and exercise programs) in the area identified as the site for implementation. |
Challenge: attracting buy-in from other stakeholders for gaining assistance and influencing decision makers
| ||
Establish a local working group of interested people from the Network. | Individuals who express an interest in the project(s) are invited to join a working group, share ideas and lead sub-components of the project in a distributed leadership model. The government officer and an emerging group of stakeholders identify others to contribute to the project. | Invite individuals with interest and skill sets applicable to establishing a service (clinicians, consumers, policy makers, business managers, researchers). The importance of the end goal and how the proposed iterative processes aligned with individuals’ interests were emphasised. |
Maintain government officer support. | The government officer provides project management support and executive support to ensure that project activities align with policy, provide in kind resources and identify opportunities for integrating with other projects and relevant stakeholders. | Utilise knowledge of government officer to link project objectives with other opportunities within government (e.g. funding programs for community-based care) and attract buy-in from other stakeholders. |
Seek executive support. | Executive support to progress the plan is sought. This may involve approval to seek funding, identify partnership opportunities and promote the project concept to other executives. Executive support also facilitates engagement with, and support from, middle management. | Project plans presented to executives for support. Regular briefings were provided on progress of implementation. |
Engage support from broader stakeholder group (the Community of Practice). | Maximising buy-in from other stakeholders (e.g. the clinical community, area health services, policy-makers) on a particular project can be facilitated by promoting a project objective and working group to these individuals. This may achieved through Network forums or e-newsletters. A broad support base help to forge and maintain partnerships and sustain the political will to support the initiative. | Once executive support received, the project was promoted through the Network via meetings, e-newsletters and a major stakeholder forum [52]. |
Identify cross-sectoral partnerships in supporting implementation strategies. | Engage with organisations, such as universities and non-government organisations, to promote the project concept and canvass interest in partnership opportunities. Non-government organisations are critical partners for community-based and consumer-centred projects due to their various community-based programs and established relationships with both professional bodies and consumers. | Project team expanded to include partnerships with other organisations including universities for research and evaluation expertise, WA Community Physiotherapy Services for allied health services (http://www.health.wa.gov.au/cps/about/), Arthritis and Osteoporosis WA for consumer services (e.g. provision of self-management programs and consumer engagement) (http://www.arthritiswa.org.au/), and private service providers for clinical rheumatology services. |
Challenge: gaining preliminary financial support
| ||
Procure funding or in-kind support for initial establishment. | Submit funding applications for competitive grants, government grants and pooled funding initiatives between partner organisations (e.g. government, non-government organisations, universities). | Grant applications submitted for funding specific components of the implementation project. A grant was awarded for a programme designed to upskill clinicians while government funding was awarded to establish a service and appoint a project manager. |
Ensure service agreements with non-government organisations reflect contemporary policy. | Support for implementation activities may also be provided by non-government organisations (e.g. delivery of community-based self-management programmes). Aligning service agreements between government and such organisations supports the implementation of policy recommendations and projects. | A service agreement between the Department of Health and a non-government provider ensures that local community-based services are available to consumers at the implementation site and other potential replication sites. |
Challenge: securing sustainability
| ||
Pilot and evaluate a model. | Undertake the proposed project (e.g. a service model) and ensure evaluation is underpinned by sound research principles. Partnerships with research organisations are important to for achieving robust evaluation methods. | An evaluation framework has been established to monitor consumer-centred and system-centred outcomes. |
Disseminate results, e.g. through publications, reports, presentations. | Communicate the outcomes of the evaluation and opportunities and barriers for achieving programme sustainability. | |
Integrate parallel projects to build cumulative change momentum in an area and avoid duplication of efforts. | Where possible, link specific policy implementation projects through communication and project promotion. This may be achieved through forums, e-bulletins and government officers having knowledge of discrete pieces of work being developed and undertaken. | Linked projects with evaluations include the establishment of a rheumatology service at a specific site, clinical workforce upskilling in rheumatoid arthritis (state and national projects) and development of self-management programs for consumers and health professionals in disease-specific musculoskeletal health conditions. |
Integration across Network projects
-
Implementing a system inversion model in a tertiary hospital pain medicine unit, such that consumers with persistent pain attend pre-clinic group education sessions prior to an assessment by an interdisciplinary pain medicine team [56]. This model has demonstrated cost savings for the health service, reduced waiting lists, and increased active management by consumers for their pain conditions. The model is now recurrently funded and being rolled out into primary care settings.
-
Providing interdisciplinary professional development in musculoskeletal pain to health care professionals in urban and rural WA, resulting in a sustained improvement in adoption of evidence-based practices for clinical management [57].
-
Providing evidence-based self-management training and skills to consumers with musculoskeletal pain in rural WA, resulting in improved beliefs about low back pain and highlighting the need for sustained reinforcement strategies of positive self-management skills in rural WA [58].
-
Undertaking an audit of beliefs and likely clinical practice behaviours in the context of low back pain among final year allied health and medical students in WA in an effort to assess local workforce readiness to deliver health services and information in a guideline-consistent manner [59]. Findings will be used to influence university curriculum for medical and allied health students to ensure optimal alignment with evidence.
-
Trialling a novel model of post-operative follow-up after joint replacement surgery to minimise costs to health services while maintaining quality and patient satisfaction (in progress) and determining hospital discharge information needs among general practitioners [60].
-
Development and evaluation of written and e-resources for consumers with musculoskeletal pain in WA, for example in back pain [61] (in progress).
-
Development of a state-wide access algorithm for osteoporosis therapies (in progress).