Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Medical Systems 1/2022

01.01.2022 | Education & Training

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Sword of Damocles?

verfasst von: Fabrice Jotterand, Clara Bosco

Erschienen in: Journal of Medical Systems | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Will Artificial Intelligence (AI) re-humanize or de-humanize medicine? As AI becomes pervasive in clinical medicine, we argue that the ethical framework that sustains a responsible implementation of such technologies should be reconsidered. The emergence of AI in the clinical setting will challenge our traditional moral boundaries surrounding discussions of patient care since it is unclear how the implementation of AI will promote and enhance the humanistic dimensions of medical practice. There are reasons for concern regarding 1) the anthropological implications of AI in the clinical context; 2) the method(s) and framework(s) used to address ethical issues in medicine; and 3) the impact of AI on clinical practice, particularly in the nature of clinical judgment. These three concerns are examined in hopes of providing pointers for subsequent and more in-depth discussions regarding clinical practice but the training of future health professionals.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jotterand, F., and Bosco, C., Keeping the “Human in the Loop” in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 26(5):2455–60, 2020. Jotterand, F., and Bosco, C., Keeping the “Human in the Loop” in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 26(5):2455–60, 2020.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauerwas, S., Suffering Presence: Theological Reflections on Medicine, the Mentally Handicapped, and the Church. 1st edition. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press; 240, 1986. Hauerwas, S., Suffering Presence: Theological Reflections on Medicine, the Mentally Handicapped, and the Church. 1st edition. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press; 240, 1986.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Snead, O. C., What It Means to Be Human: The Case for the Body in Public Bioethics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press 336, 2020.CrossRef Snead, O. C., What It Means to Be Human: The Case for the Body in Public Bioethics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press  336, 2020.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Verghese, A., Brady, E., Kapur, C. C., and Horwitz, R. I., The Bedside Evaluation: Ritual and Reason. Ann. Intern. Med. 155(8):550–3, 2011. Verghese, A., Brady, E., Kapur, C. C., and Horwitz, R. I., The Bedside Evaluation: Ritual and Reason. Ann. Intern. Med. 155(8):550–3, 2011.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jotterand, F., Human dignity and transhumanism: do anthro-technological devices have moral status?. Am. J. Bioeth. AJOB. 10(7):45–52, 2010. Jotterand, F., Human dignity and transhumanism: do anthro-technological devices have moral status?. Am. J. Bioeth. AJOB. 10(7):45–52, 2010.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuste, R., Genser, J., and Herrmann, S., It’s Time for Neuro-Rights. 7, 2021. Yuste, R., Genser, J., and Herrmann, S., It’s Time for Neuro-Rights. 7, 2021.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Goering, S., and Yuste, R., On the Necessity of Ethical Guidelines for Novel Neurotechnologies. Cell. 167(4):882–5, 2016CrossRef Goering, S., and Yuste, R., On the Necessity of Ethical Guidelines for Novel Neurotechnologies. Cell. 167(4):882–5, 2016CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat MacIntyre, A., Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Revised edition. Chicago: Open Court 180, 2001. MacIntyre, A., Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Revised edition. Chicago: Open Court 180, 2001.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jotterand, F., “Virtue Engineering” and Moral Agency: Will Post-Humans Still Need the Virtues?. AJOB Neurosci. 2(4):3–9 2011.CrossRef Jotterand, F., “Virtue Engineering” and Moral Agency: Will Post-Humans Still Need the Virtues?. AJOB Neurosci. 2(4):3–9 2011.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pellegrino, E. D., and Thomasma, D, C., A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice: Toward a Philosophy and Ethic of the Healing Professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1981. Pellegrino, E. D., and Thomasma, D, C., A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice: Toward a Philosophy and Ethic of the Healing Professions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1981.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pellegrino, E. D., and Thomasma, D. C., Virtues in Medical Practice. 1 edition. New York: Oxford University Press 205, 1993. Pellegrino, E. D., and Thomasma, D. C., Virtues in Medical Practice. 1 edition. New York: Oxford University Press 205, 1993.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wartman, S. A., and Combs, C. D., Reimagining Medical Education in the Age of AI. AMA J. Ethics. 21(2):146–52, 2019.CrossRef Wartman, S. A., and Combs, C. D., Reimagining Medical Education in the Age of AI. AMA J. Ethics. 21(2):146–52, 2019.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: A Sword of Damocles?
verfasst von
Fabrice Jotterand
Clara Bosco
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Medical Systems / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0148-5598
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-689X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01796-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Journal of Medical Systems 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe