Introduction
Notes | Symbol | |
---|---|---|
Grading of evidence | ||
High quality | Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect | A |
Moderate quality | Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate | B |
Low or very low quality | Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate. Any estimate of effect is uncertain | C |
Grading of recommendation | ||
Strong recommendation warranted | Factors influencing the strength of the recommendation included the quality of the evidence, presumed important patient outcomes, and cost | 1 |
Weaker recommendation | Variability in preferences and values, or more uncertainty: more likely a weak recommendation is warranted. Recommendation is made with less certainty; higher cost or resource consumption | 2 |
Epidemiology and risk factors
Risk factors for HCC
HBV
HCV
HBV/HCV coinfection
Alcohol
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
Budd–Chiari syndrome
HCC in other liver diseases
Host genetics
Aflatoxin
Tobacco
Coffee and tea
HCC in children
Epidemiology of HCC in Asia–Pacific countries
Japan
India
Australia
China
Hong Kong
Korea
New Zealand
Taiwan
Iran
Pakistan
Vietnam
Mongolia
Other countries
Summary
Prevention
Prevention of HBV-related HCC
Recommendations
Primary prophylaxis of HBV-related HCC: vaccination to decrease the rate of HBV infection
Secondary prophylaxis of HBV-related HCC: antiviral treatment to reduce incidence of HCC in chronic HBV infection
Prevention of HCV-related HCC
Recommendations
Prevention of metabolic-related HCC
Recommendations
Tertiary prevention
Recommendations
Tertiary prevention for HBV-related HCC
Interferon
Nucleos(t)ide analogs
Tertiary prevention of HCV-related HCC
Interferon
DAA therapy
Other tertiary preventions of HCC
Chemotherapy
Refs. | Study design | Drug | Patients | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Takami et al. [213] | RCT | Meloxicam | Meloxicam (n = 111) versus control (n = 113) | Negative. 3-year RFS 53.9% in meloxicam group versus 57.0% in controls |
Habu et al. [214] | RCT | Menaquinone | Menaquinone (n = 21) versus control (n = 19) | Positive. Assessing only recurrence event: 9.5% in menaquinone group versus 47.4% in controls |
Mizuta et al. [215] | RCT | Menatetrenone | Menatetrenone (n = 32) versus control (n = 29) | Positive. 24-month recurrence rate 39.0% in menatetrenone group versus 83.2% in controls and also assessing overall survival |
Hotta et al. [216] | RCT | Menatetrenone | Menatetrenone (n = 21) versus control (n = 24) | Positive on recurrence event: 33.3% in menatetrenone group versus 50.0% in controls, but negative on cumulative recurrence rate |
Yoshida et al. [217] | RCT | Menatetrenone | Menatetrenone (n = 367) versus controls (n = 181) | Second interim analysis indicated that vitamin K2 did not prevent disease occurrence or death, with HR of 1.150 (95% CI 0.843–1.570, p = 0.811) |
Diagnosis and surveillance
Ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)
Recommendations
CT and MRI
Recommendations
Tumor markers
Recommendations
AFP
Des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP)
Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of AFP (AFP-L3)
Glypican-3 (GPC3)
Other tumor markers
Combination of tumor markers
Diagnostic algorithm
Recommendations
Surveillance
Recommendations
HCC risk (per year) | |
---|---|
Cirrhotic hepatitis patients | |
HBV | 3–5% |
HCV | 2–7% |
NASH | 2–4% |
Genetic hemochromatosis | Unknown, but probably >1.5% |
Primary biliary cirrhosis | 2–3% |
Alpha 1 antitrypsin (A1AT) deficiency | Unknown, but probably >1.5% |
Autoimmune hepatitis | |
Other etiologies | Unknown |
Chronic HBV carriers | |
Noncirrhotic (HBsAg positive) | |
Asian females >50 years | 0.3–0.6% |
Asian males >40 years | 0.4–0.6% |
Africans aged >20 years | NA |
History of HCC in the family | NA |
Which modality is to be used for surveillance?
US
CT
MRI
AFP and other serum markers
Combination of imaging and serum markers
Surveillance interval
Who should be screened and who should not be screened?
Cirrhotic patients
Noncirrhotic patients
Patient group | HCC risk (per year) |
---|---|
Chronic hepatitis C-induced advanced fibrosis | <1.5% |
Chronic hepatitis B carriers younger than 50 years (females) or 40 years (males) | <0.2% |
NAFLD, noncirrhotic stage | <1.5% |
Treated chronic viral hepatitis
Treatments
Liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT)
Recommendations
LR
LT
LR versus LT
Decisions on resectability of HCC
The perspective of surgeons
The perspective of hepatologists
Local ablation
Recommendations
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)
Recommendations
Radiation therapy
Recommendations
Indications
Contraindications
Efficacy
3D-CRT
SBRT
Charged-particle radiation therapy
Complications
Response assessment
Systemic therapy
Recommendations
Sorafenib
Regorafenib
Treatment algorithm
Clinical trials for new compounds on the horizon
Molecular targeted agents
Immunotherapy
Drug | Phase | Design | Study number |
---|---|---|---|
First-line
| |||
Nivolumab versus sorafenib | III | Randomized, open label | NCT02576509 |
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) versus nivolumab versus sorafenib | II | Randomized, open label | NCT01658878 |
Second-line
| |||
Nivolumab | Ib | Open label | NCT01658878 |
Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) | II | Open label | NCT02702414 |
Pembrolizumab versus placebo | III | Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled | NCT02702401 |
Nivolumab plus galunisertib (GSK-β inhibitor) | II | Open label | NCT02423343 |
Durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) plus tremelimumab versus durvalumab versus tremelimumab | II | Randomized, open label | NCT02519348 |
Durvalumab plus ramucirumab (anti-VEGFR) | I | Open label | NCT02572687 |
PDR001 (anti-PD-1) plus capmatinib (cMet inhibitor) versus PDR001 | Ib/II | Open label | NCT02795429 |