Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The characteristics of the flows of boluses with different consistencies, i.e. different rheological properties, through the pharynx have not been fully elucidated. The results obtained using a novel in vitro device, the Gothenburg Throat, which allows simultaneous bolus flow visualisation and manometry assessments in the pharynx geometry, are presented, to explain the dependence of bolus flow on bolus consistency. Four different bolus consistencies of a commercial food thickener, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 Pa s (at a shear rate of 50 s−1)—corresponding to a range from low honey-thick to pudding-thick consistencies on the National Dysphagia Diet (NDD) scale—were examined in the in vitro pharynx. The bolus velocities recorded in the simulator pharynx were in the range of 0.046–0.48 m/s, which is within the range reported in clinical studies. The corresponding wall shear rates associated with these velocities ranged from 13 s−1 (pudding consistency) to 209 s−1 (honey-thick consistency). The results of the in vitro manometry tests using different consistencies and bolus volumes were rather similar to those obtained in clinical studies. The in vitro device used in this study appears to be a valuable tool for pre-clinical analyses of thickened fluids. Furthermore, the results show that it is desirable to consider a broad range of shear rates when assessing the suitability of a certain consistency for swallowing.
Clavé P, De Kraa M, Arreola V, Girvent M, Farre R, Palomera E, Serra-Prat M. The effect of bolus viscosity on swallowing function in neurogenic dysphagia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24(9):1385–94. CrossRef
Tashiro A, Hasegawa A, Kohyama K, Kumagai H, Kumagai H. Relationship between the rheological properties of thickener solutions and their velocity through the pharynx as measured by the ultrasonic pulse Doppler method. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2010;74(8):1598–605. CrossRef
Steele C, Alsanei W, Ayanikalath S, Barbon CA, Chen J, Cichero JY, Coutts K, Dantas R, Duivestein J, Giosa L, Hanson B, Lam P, Lecko C, Leigh C, Nagy A, Namasivayam A, Nascimento W, Odendaal I, Smith C, Wang H. The influence of food texture and liquid consistency modification on swallowing physiology and function: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2015;30(1):2–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9578-x. CrossRefPubMed
Burbidge AS, Cichero JAY, Engmann J, Steele CM. A day in the life of the fluid bolus: An introduction to fluid mechanics of the oropharyngeal phase of swallowing with particular focus on dysphagia. Appl Rheol. 2016;5(26):10.
Zhu J, Mizunuma H, Michiwaki Y. Determination of characteristic shear rate of a liquid bolus through the pharynx during swallowing. J Texture Stud. 2014;45(6):430–9. CrossRef
Newman R, Vilardell N, Clavé P, Speyer R. Effect of bolus viscosity on the safety and efficacy of swallowing and the kinematics of the swallow response in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: White Paper by the European Society for Swallowing Disorders (ESSD). Dysphagia. 2016;31(2):232–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9696-8. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Waqas MQ, Wiklund J, Altskar A, Ekberg O, Stading M. Shear and extensional rheology of commercial thickeners used for dysphagia management. J Texture Stud. 2017;48:507–17. CrossRef
Moret-Tatay Rodríguez-García, Martí-Bonmatí J, Hernando I, Hernández MJ. Commercial thickeners used by patients with dysphagia: rheological and structural behaviour in different food matrices. Food Hydrocoll. 2015;51:318–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.05.019. CrossRef
Leonard RJ, White C, McKenzie S, Belafsky PC. Effects of bolus rheology on aspiration in patients with dysphagia. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(4):590–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2013.07.037. CrossRefPubMed
Meng Y, Rao MA, Datta AK. Computer simulation of the pharyngeal bolus transport of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. Food Bioprod Process. 2005;83(4):297–305. CrossRef
Wiklund J, Shahram I, Stading M. Methodology for in-line rheology by ultrasound Doppler velocity profiling and pressure difference techniques. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62(16):4277–93. CrossRef
Al-Toubi AK, Doeltgen SH, Daniels SK, Corey DM, Huckabee M-L. Pharyngeal pressure differences between four types of swallowing in healthy participants. Physiol Behav. 2015;140:132–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.029. CrossRefPubMed
Cisonni J, Lucey AD, Walsh JH, King AJC, Elliott NSJ, Sampson DD, Eastwood PR, Hillman DR. Effect of the velopharynx on intraluminal pressures in reconstructed pharynges derived from individuals with and without sleep apnea. J Biomech. 2013;46(14):2504–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.07.007. CrossRefPubMed
Butler SG, Stuart A, Castell D, Russell GB, Koch K, Kemp S. Effects of age, gender, bolus condition, viscosity, and volume on pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter pressure and temporal measurements during swallowing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;52(1):240–53. CrossRef
Chen FJ, Dirven S, Xu WL, Bronlund J, Li XN, Pullan A. Review of the swallowing system and process for a biologically mimicking swallowing robot. Mechatronics. 2012;22(5):556–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2012.02.005. CrossRef
Morinière S, Hammoudi K, Marmouset F, Bakhos D, Beutter P, Patat F. Ultrasound analysis of the upper esophageal sphincter during swallowing in the healthy subject. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2013;130(6):321–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2012.01.008. CrossRefPubMed
Nystrom M, Qazi WM, Bülow M, Ekberg O, Stading M. Effects of rheological factors on perceived ease of swallowing. Applied rheology. 2015;25(6):40–8.
Force NDDT, Association AD. National Dysphagia Diet: Standardization for Optimal Care. 2002: American Dietetic Association.
Wiklund J, Johansson M, Shaik J, Fischer P, Windhab E, Stading M, Hermansson A-M. In- line ultrasound based rheometry of industrial and model suspensions flowing through pipes. Paper presented at the trans. third international symposium on ultrasonic Doppler methods for fluid engineering, EFPL, Lausanne, Switzerland. 2002.
Wiklund J, Stading M, Trägårdh C. Monitoring liquid displacement of model and industrial fluids in pipes by in-line ultrasonic rheometry. J Food Eng. 2010;99(3):330–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.03.011. CrossRef
Kotzé R, Wiklund J, Haldenwang R, Fester V. Measurement and analysis of flow behaviour in complex geometries using the Ultrasonic Velocity Profiling (UVP) technique. Flow Meas Instrum. 2011;22(2):110–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2010.12.010. CrossRef
Hasegawa A, Nakazawa F, Kumagai H. Velocity of swallowed food for dysphagic patients through the pharynx by ultrasonic method. Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi. 2008;55(11):541–8. CrossRef
Lin T, Xu G, Dou Z, Lan Y, Yu F, Jiang L. Effect of bolus volume on pharyngeal swallowing assessed by high-resolution manometry. Physiol Behav. 2014;128:46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.01.030. CrossRefPubMed
Dodds W, Man K, Cook I, Kahrilas P, Stewart E, Kern M. Influence of bolus volume on swallow-induced hyoid movement in normal subjects. Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150(6):1307–9. CrossRef
Bhatia SJ, Shah C. How to perform and interpret upper esophageal sphincter manometry. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19(1):99–103. CrossRef
- Assessment of the Food-Swallowing Process Using Bolus Visualisation and Manometry Simultaneously in a Device that Models Human Swallowing
Waqas M. Qazi
- Springer US
Neu im Fachgebiet HNO
Mail Icon II