nach oben

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Erschienen in:

29.11.2017 | Original Article

Augmented marker tracking for peri-acetabular osteotomy surgery

verfasst von: Silvio Pflugi, Rakesh Vasireddy, Till Lerch, Timo M. Ecker, Moritz Tannast, Nane Boemke, Klaus Siebenrock, Guoyan Zheng

Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To develop a hybrid augmented marker-based navigation system for acetabular reorientation during peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO).

Methods

The system consists of a tracking unit attached to the patient’s pelvis, augmented marker attached to the acetabular fragment and a host computer to do all the computations and visualization. The augmented marker is comprised of an external planar Aruco marker facing toward the tracking unit and an internal inertial measurement unit (IMU) to measure its orientation. The orientation output from the IMU is sent to the host computer. The tracking unit streams a live video of the augmented marker to the host computer, where the planar marker is detected and its pose is estimated. A Kalman filter-based sensor fusion combines the output from marker tracking and the IMU. We validated the proposed system using a plastic bone study and a cadaver study. Every time, we compared the inclination and anteversion values measured by the proposed system to those from a previously developed optical tracking-based navigation system.

Results

Mean absolute differences for inclination and anteversion were 1.34 (\(\pm \,1.50\)) and 1.21 (\(\pm \, 1.07\))\(^\circ \), respectively, for the cadaver study. Mean absolute differences were 1.63 (\(\pm \,1.48\)) and 1.55 (\(\pm \,1.49\))\(^\circ \) for inclination and anteversion for the plastic bone study. In both validation studies, very strong correlations were observed.

Conclusion

We successfully demonstrated the feasibility of our system to measure the acetabular orientation during PAO.

Albers CE, Steppacher SD, Ganz R, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA (2013) Impingement adversely affects 10-year survivorship after periacetabular osteotomy for DDH hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(5):1602–1614CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Behrens A, Grimm J, Gross S, Aach T (2011) Inertial navigation system for bladder endoscopy. In: Proceedings of the annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, EMBS pp 5376–5379

Beller S, Eulenstein S, Lange T, Hünerbein M, Schlag PM (2009) Upgrade of an optical navigation system with a permanent electromagnetic position control: a first step towards "navigated control" for liver surgery. J Hepato Biliary Pancreat Surg 16(2):165–170CrossRef

Bugbee WD, Kermanshahi AY, Munro MM, McCauley JC, Copp SN (2014) Accuracy of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 21(6):1225–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.09.006 CrossRefPubMed

Cao Z, Su S, Chen H, Tang H, Zhou Y, Wang Z (2016) Pose measurement of Anterior Pelvic Plane based on inertial measurement unit in total hip replacement surgeries. In: Proceedings of the annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, EMBS 2016-Octob, pp. 5801–5804

Claasen GC, Martin P, Picard F (2011) High-bandwidth low-latency tracking using optical and inertial sensors. In: ICARA 2011—Proceedings of the 5th international conference on automation, robotics and applications, pp 366–371

Crockarell J, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME, Berry DJ (1999) Early experience and results with the periacetabular osteotomy.pdf. Clin Orthop Relat Res 363:45–53CrossRef

Desseaux A, Graf P, Dubrana F, Marino R, Clavé A (2016) Radiographic outcomes in the coronal plane with iASSIST versus optical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary case-control study. Orthop Traumatolo Surg Res 102(3):363–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.018 CrossRef

Freeman RM, Julier SJ, Steed AJ (2007) A method for predicting marker tracking error. In: 2007 6th IEEE and ACM international symposium on mixed and augmented reality, ISMAR, pp 157–160

10.

Garrido-Jurado S, Muñoz-Salinas R, Madrid-Cuevas FJ, Marín-Jiménez MJ (2014) Automatic generation and detection of highly reliable fiducial markers under occlusion. Pattern Recognit 47(6):2280–2292CrossRef

11.

Gharaibeh MA, Solayar GN, Solayar GN, Harris IA, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2017) Accelerometer-based, portable navigation (kneealign) vs conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized comparative trial. J Arthroplast 32(3):777–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.025 CrossRef

12.

Goh GSH, Liow MHL, Lim WSR, Tay DKJ, Yeo SJ, Tan MH (2016) Accelerometer-based navigation is as accurate as optical computer navigation in restoring the joint line and mechanical axis after total knee arthroplasty. A prospective matched study. J Arthroplast 31(1):92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.048 CrossRef

13.

Goh GSH, Liow MHL, Tay DKJ, Lo NN, Yeo SJ, Tan MH (2017) Accelerometer-based and computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a reduction in mechanical axis outliers does not lead to improvement in functional outcomes or quality of life when compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast pp. 1–7. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0883540317307891

14.

Haid M, Kamil M, Chobtrong T, Guenes E (2013) Machine-vision-based and inertial-sensor-supported navigation system for the minimal invasive surgery. In: AMA conferences—SENSOR

15.

Hipp J, Sugano N, Millis M, Murphy S (1999) Planning acetabular redirection osteotomies based on joint contact pressures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 364:134–143CrossRef

16.

Hsieh PH, Chang YH, Shih CH (2006) Image-guided periacetabular osteotomy: computer-assisted navigation compared with the conventional technique: a randomized study of 36 patients followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop 77(4):591–597CrossRefPubMed

17.

Huang EH, Copp SN, Bugbee WD (2015) Accuracy of a handheld accelerometer-based navigation system for femoral and tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 30(11):1906–1910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.055 CrossRef

18.

Jaeger M, Westhoff B, Wild A, Krauspe R (2004) Computer-assisted periacetabular triple osteotomy for treatment of dysplasia of the hip. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete 142(1):51–59CrossRef

19.

Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P (2004) Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:174–9CrossRef

20.

Jost GF, Walti J, Mariani L, Cattin P (2016) A novel approach to navigated implantation of S-2 alar iliac screws using inertial measurement units. J Neurosurg Spine 24(3), 447–53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26565762

21.

Jost GF, Walti J, Mariani L, Schaeren S, Cattin P (2017) Inertial measurement unit-assisted implantation of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral pedicle screws improves precision of a freehand technique. World Neurosurg 103:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.079 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Basic Eng 82(1):35–45CrossRef

23.

Katanacho M, De la Cadena W, Engel S (2016) Surgical navigation with QR codes. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 2(1):355–358

24.

Kim SJ, Jeong MH, Lee JJ, Lee JY, Kim KG, You BJ, Oh SR (2010) Robot head-eye calibration using the minimum variance method. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2010, pp. 1446–1451

25.

Kruecker J, Viswanathan A, Borgert J, Glossop N, Yang Y, Wood BJ (2005) An electro-magnetically tracked laparoscopic ultrasound for multi-modality minimally invasive surgery. Int Congr Ser 1281:746–751CrossRef

26.

Langlotz F, Bächler R, Berlemann U, Nolte LP, Ganz R (1998) Computer assistance for pelvic osteotomies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354(354):92–102CrossRef

27.

Langlotz F, Stucki M, Bächler R, Scheer C, Ganz R, Berlemann U, Nolte LP (1997) The first twelve cases of computer assisted periacetabular osteotomy. Comput Aided Surg 2(6):317–326CrossRefPubMed

28.

Lerch TD, Steppacher SD, Liechti EF, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M (2016) Periazetabuläre Osteotomie nach Ganz. Der Orthopäde 45(8):687–694CrossRefPubMed

29.

Lerch TD, Steppacher SD, Liechti EF, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA (2017) One-third of hips after periacetabular osteotomy survive 30 years with good clinical results, no progression of arthritis, or conversion to THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(4):1154–1168CrossRefPubMed

30.

Liu L, Ecker T, Schumann S, Siebenrock K, Nolte P, Zheng G, Periacetabular I, The M (2013) Cadaveric validation of a novel planning and navigation system for peri-acetabular osteotomy ( PAO ). In: CURAC pp 26–29

31.

Liu L, Ecker T, Schumann S, Siebenrock K, Nolte L, Zheng G (2014) Computer assisted planning and navigation of periacetabular osteotomy with range of motion optimization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 8674 LNCS(PART 2), pp 643–650

32.

Mahfouz MR, Kuhn MJ, To G, Fathy AE (2009) Integration of UWB and wireless pressure mapping in surgical navigation. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 57(10):2550–2564CrossRef

33.

Murphy R, Armiger R, Lepistö J, Armand M (2016) Clinical evaluation of a biomechanical guidance system for periacetabular osteotomy. J Orthop Surg Res (36). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0372-3

34.

Murphy RJ, Armiger RS, Lepistö J, Mears SC, Taylor RH, Armand M (2015) Development of a biomechanical guidance system for periacetabular osteotomy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(4):497–508CrossRefPubMed

35.

Myers SR, Eijer H, Ganz R (1999) Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 363:93–9CrossRef

36.

Nam D, Jerabek SA, Haughom B, Cross MB, Reinhardt KR, Mayman DJ (2011) Radiographic analysis of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 26(8):1527–1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.01.012 CrossRef

37.

Nam D, Nawabi DH, Cross MB, Heyse TJ, Mayman DJ (2012) Accelerometer-based computer navigation for performing the distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 27(9):1717–1722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.007 CrossRef

38.

Nam D, Weeks KD, Reinhardt KR, Nawabi DH, Cross MB, Mayman DJ (2013) Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs imageless, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of radiographic results. J Arthroplast 28(2):255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.023 CrossRef

39.

Nogler M, Kessler O, Prassl A, Donnelly B, Streicher R, Sledge JB, Krismer M (2004) Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:159–163CrossRef

40.

O’Donovan KJ, Kamnik R, O’Keeffe DT, Lyons GM (2007) An inertial and magnetic sensor based technique for joint angle measurement. J Biomech 40(12):2604–2611CrossRefPubMed

41.

Park FC, Martin BJ (1994) Robot sensor calibration: solving AX=XB on the Euclidean group. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 10(5):717–721CrossRef

42.

Pflugi S, Liu L, Ecker TM, Schumann S, Larissa Cullmann J, Siebenrock K, Zheng G (2016) A cost-effective surgical navigation solution for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) surgery. Int J Comput ssist Radiol Surg 11(2):271–280CrossRef

43.

Pflugi S, Vasireddy R, Liu L, Ecker TM, Lerch T, Siebenrock K, Zheng G (2016) A cost-effective navigation system for peri-acetabular osteotomy surgery. Int Conf Med Imaging Virtual Real 9805:84–95

44.

Rambach JR (2016) Learning to fuse : a deep learning approach to visual-inertial camera pose estimation. In: IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR), pp. 71–76

45.

Rebello KJ (2004) Applications of MEMS in surgery. Proc IEEE 92(1):43–55CrossRef

46.

Ren H, Kazanzides P (2014) Attitude tracking using an integrated inertial and optical navigation system for hand-held surgical instruments. In: International conference on control, automation and systems, pp. 290–293

47.

Ryan JA, Jamali AA, Bargar WL (2010) Accuracy of computer navigation for acetabular component placement in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):169–177CrossRefPubMed

48.

Schweighofer G, Pinz A (2006) Robust pose estimation from a planar target. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28(12):2024–2030CrossRefPubMed

49.

Steppacher SD, Lerch TD, Gharanizadeh K, Liechti EF, Werlen SF, Puls M, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA (2014) Size and shape of the lunate surface in different types of pincer impingement: theoretical implications for surgical therapy. Osteoarthr Cartil 22(7):951–958CrossRefPubMed

50.

Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Ganz R, Siebenrock KA (2008) Mean 20-year followup of bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(7):1633–1644

51.

Su S, Zhou Y, Wang Z, Chen H (2017) Monocular vision–and IMU-based system for prosthesis pose estimation during total hip replacement surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 11(3):1–10

52.

Tibor LM, Sink EL (2012) Periacetabular osteotomy for hip preservation. Orthop Clin North Am 43(3):343–357CrossRefPubMed

53.

Walti J, Jost GF, Cattin PC (2014) A new cost-effective approach to pedicular screw placement. MICCAI AE-CAI - Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8678 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), pp 90–97

54.

Zhang H, Banovac F, Glossop N, Wood BJ, Lindisch D (2006) Electromagnetic tracking for abdominal interventions in computer aided surgery. Comput Aided Surg 11(3):127–136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Augmented marker tracking for peri-acetabular osteotomy surgery
verfasst von: Silvio Pflugi
Rakesh Vasireddy
Till Lerch
Timo M. Ecker
Moritz Tannast
Nane Boemke
Klaus Siebenrock
Guoyan Zheng
Publikationsdatum: 29.11.2017
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1690-6

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Augmented marker tracking for peri-acetabular osteotomy surgery