nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.05.2019 | Consensus Paper

Authorship: from credit to accountability. Reflections from the Editors’ Network

verfasst von: Fernando Alfonso, Parounak Zelveian, Jean-Jacques Monsuez, Michael Aschermann, Michael Böhm, Alfonso Buendia Hernandez, Tzung-Dau Wang, Ariel Cohen, Sebija Izetbegovic, Anton Doubell, Dario Echeverri, Nuray Enç, Ignacio Ferreira-González, Anetta Undas, Ulrike Fortmüller, Plamen Gatzov, Carmen Ginghina, Lino Goncalves, Faouzi Addad, Mahmoud Hassanein, Gerd Heusch, Kurt Huber, Robert Hatala, Mario Ivanusa, Chu-Pak Lau, Germanas Marinskis, Livio Dei Cas, Carlos Eduardo Rochitte, Kjell Nikus, Eckart Fleck, Luc Pierard, Slobodan Obradović, María del Pilar Aguilar Passano, Yangsoo Jang, Olaf Rødevand, Mikael Sander, Evgeny Shlyakhto, Çetin Erol, Dimitris Tousoulis, Dilek Ural, Jan J. Piek, Albert Varga, Andreas J. Flammer, François Mach, Alban Dibra, Faiq Guliyev, Alexander Mrochek, Mamanti Rogava, Ismael Guzman Melgar, Giuseppe Di Pasquale, Kanat Kabdrakhmanov, Laila Haddour, Zlatko Fras, Claes Held, Valentyn Shumakov, Editors’ Network, European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Task Force

Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The Editors’ Network of the European Society of Cardiology provides a dynamic forum for editorial discussions and endorses the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) to improve the scientific quality of biomedical journals. Authorship confers credit and important academic rewards. Recently, however, the ICMJE emphasized that authorship also requires responsibility and accountability. These issues are now covered by the new (fourth) criterion for authorship. Authors should agree to be accountable and ensure that questions regarding the accuracy and integrity of the entire work will be appropriately addressed. This review discusses the implications of this paradigm shift on authorship requirements with the aim of increasing awareness on good scientific and editorial practices.

The International Committee of Medical Journals Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations

Council of Science Editors (2012) White paper on publication ethics. CSE’s White paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. Update available: http://www.CouncilScienceEditors.org

World Association of Medical Editors. WAME Professionalism Code of Conduct. The new WAME Professionalism Code of Conduct for medical journal editors. http://www.wame.org

Committee On Publication Ethics. COPE. Code of conduct and best practice guidelines for journal editors. http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines

Akhabue E, Lautenbach E (2010) “Equal” contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship. Ann Epidemiol 20:868–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.08.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Alfonso F, Ambrosio G, Pinto FJ, Ector H, Vardas P, Kulakowski P, Timmis A (2010) European Society of Cardiology national cardiovascular journals: the ‘editors’ network’. Eur Heart J 31:26–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp462 CrossRefPubMed

Alfonso F, Editors’ Network European Society of Cardiology Task Force, Editors’ Network European Society of Cardiology Task Force (2017) Data sharing. Eur Heart J 38:1361–1363. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx206 CrossRefPubMed

Alfonso F, Timmis A, Pinto FJ, Ambrosio G, Ector H, Kulakowski P, Vardas P, Editors’ Network European Society of Cardiology Task Force (2012) Conflict of interest policies and disclosure requirements among European Society of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Journals. Eur Heart J 33:587–594. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr464 CrossRefPubMed

Chow DS, Ha R, Filippi CG (2015) Increased rates of authorship in radiology publications: a bibliometric analysis of 142,576 articles published worldwide by radiologists between 1991 and 2012. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W52–W57. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12852 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Clement TP (2014) Authorship matrix: a rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific articles. Sci Eng Ethics 20:345–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Dotson B (2013) Equal contributions and credit assigned to authors in pharmacy journals. Am J Pharm Educ 77:39. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe77239 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Fairbairn S KL, Mahar S, Prosée R. Authorship: an evolving concept. Editorial coordinators. Health learning, research and practice. Wolkers and Kluber. http://wkauthorservices.editage.com/resources/files/An_Evolving_Concept_in_Scientific_and_Medical_Publishing.pdf

13.

Fanelli D (2013) Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLoS Med 10:e1001563. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Flanagin A, Carey LA, Fontanarosa PB, Phillips SG, Pace BP, Lundberg GD, Rennie D (1998) Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA 280:222–224CrossRefPubMed

15.

Goodman NW (1994) Survey of fulfillment of criteria for authorship in published medical research. BMJ 309:1482CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Helgesson G, Eriksson S (2018) Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers. Med Health Care Philos 21:423–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9817-7 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Hess CW, Bruckner C, Kaiser T, Mauron A, Wahli W, Wenzel UJ, Salathe M, Scientific Integrity Committee of Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences (2015) Authorship in scientific publications: analysis and recommendations. Swiss Med Wkly 145:w14108. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2015.14108 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Hoen WP, Walvoort HC, Overbeke AJPM (1998) What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors’ names. JAMA 280:217–218CrossRefPubMed

19.

Hwang SS, Song HH, Baik JH, Jung SL, Park SH, Choi KH, Park YH (2003) Researcher contributions and fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria: analysis of author contribution lists in research articles with multiple authors published in radiology. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Radiology 226:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2261011255 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Ioannidis JP (2015) A generalized view of self-citation: direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation. J Psychosom Res 78:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.008 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Juyal D, Thawani V, Thaledi S, Prakash A (2014) The fruits of authorship. Educ Health (Abingdon) 27:217–220. https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.143777 CrossRef

22.

Laine C, Mulrow CD (2005) Exorcising ghosts and unwelcome guests. Ann Intern Med 143:611–612. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-143-8-200510180-00013 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Leonelli S (2016) Locating ethics in data science: responsibility and accountability in global and distributed knowledge production systems. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 374:2083. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0122 CrossRef

24.

Li Z, Sun YM, Wu FX, Yang LQ, Lu ZJ, Yu WF (2013) Equal contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship in major anaesthesia journals during a 10-yr period. PLoS One 8:e71430. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071430 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

No author listed (2013) Authorship and accountability. Lancet 382:744. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61815-2 CrossRef

26.

Lüscher TF (2013) The codex of science: honesty, precision, and truth-and its violations. Eur Heart J 34:1018–1023. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht063 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Mills P, Timmis A, Huber K, Ector H, Lancellotti P, Masic I, Ivanusa M, Antoniades L, Aschermann M, Laucevicius A, Mustonen P, Artigou JY, Vardas P, Stefanadis C, Chiarello M, Bolognese L, Ambrosio G, van der Wall EE, Kulakowski P, Pinto FJ, Apetrei E, Oganov RG, Kamensky G, Luscher TF, Lerch R, Haouala H, Sansoy V, Shumakov V, Tajer CD, Lau CP, Marquez M, Krittayaphong R, Arai K, Alfonso F (2009) The role of European national journals in education. Heart 95:e3. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.186338 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Nylenna M, Fagerbakk F, Kierulf P (2014) Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers. BMC Med Ethics 15:53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-53 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Rennie D, Flanagin A (1994) Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. JAMA 271:469–471CrossRefPubMed

30.

Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L (1997) When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA 278:579–585CrossRefPubMed

31.

Resnik DB, Tyler AM, Black JR, Kissling G (2016) Authorship policies of scientific journals. J Med Ethics 42:199–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103171 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Shapiro DW, Wenger NS, Shapiro MF (1994) The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. JAMA 271:438–442. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03510300044036 CrossRef

33.

Smith R (2012) Let’s simply scrap authorship and move to contributorship. BMJ 344:e157. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e157 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Stephenson J (2013) ICMJE: all authors of medical journal articles have “responsibility to stand by the integrity of the entire work”. JAMA 310:1216. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.278743 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Stocks A, Simcoe D, Toroser D, DeTora L (2018) Substantial contribution and accountability: best authorship practices for medical writers in biomedical publications. Curr Med Res Opin 34:1163–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2018.1451832 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Stretton S (2014) Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature. BMJ Open 4:e004777. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004777 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Tarkang EE, Kweku M, Zotor FB (2017) Publication practices and responsible authorship: a review article. J Public Health Afr 8:723. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2017.723 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Tilak G, Prasad V, Jena AB (2015) Authorship inflation in medical publications. Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958015598311 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Wager E (2007) Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? Med Gen Med 9:16

40.

Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Deangelis CD (2011) Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ 343:d6128. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Authorship: from credit to accountability. Reflections from the Editors’ Network
verfasst von: Fernando Alfonso
Parounak Zelveian
Jean-Jacques Monsuez
Michael Aschermann
Michael Böhm
Alfonso Buendia Hernandez
Tzung-Dau Wang
Ariel Cohen
Sebija Izetbegovic
Anton Doubell
Dario Echeverri
Nuray Enç
Ignacio Ferreira-González
Anetta Undas
Ulrike Fortmüller
Plamen Gatzov
Carmen Ginghina
Lino Goncalves
Faouzi Addad
Mahmoud Hassanein
Gerd Heusch
Kurt Huber
Robert Hatala
Mario Ivanusa
Chu-Pak Lau
Germanas Marinskis
Livio Dei Cas
Carlos Eduardo Rochitte
Kjell Nikus
Eckart Fleck
Luc Pierard
Slobodan Obradović
María del Pilar Aguilar Passano
Yangsoo Jang
Olaf Rødevand
Mikael Sander
Evgeny Shlyakhto
Çetin Erol
Dimitris Tousoulis
Dilek Ural
Jan J. Piek
Albert Varga
Andreas J. Flammer
François Mach
Alban Dibra
Faiq Guliyev
Alexander Mrochek
Mamanti Rogava
Ismael Guzman Melgar
Giuseppe Di Pasquale
Kanat Kabdrakhmanov
Laila Haddour
Zlatko Fras
Claes Held
Valentyn Shumakov
Editors’ Network, European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Task Force
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01436-8

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Authorship: from credit to accountability. Reflections from the Editors’ Network

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Update Kardiologie

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

The impact of biventricular heart failure on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve implantation utilizing a novel vascular closure device with resorbable collagen material: a feasibility study

Characteristics and outcomes of patients ≤ 75 years who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from the SOURCE 3 Registry

Atrial fibrillation ablation strategies and outcome in patients with heart failure: insights from the German ablation registry

Variations on classification of main types of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and outcome meta-analysis

Prognostic significance of changes in heart rate following uptitration of beta-blockers in patients with sub-optimally treated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm versus atrial fibrillation

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Update Kardiologie