nach oben

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie

Erschienen in:

30.05.2018 | Original Article

Automatic replanning of VMAT plans for different treatment machines: A template-based approach using constrained optimization

verfasst von: Luise A. Künzel, Oliver S. Dohm, Markus Alber, Daniel Zips, Daniela Thorwarth

Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate a new automatic template-based replanning approach combined with constrained optimization, which may be highly useful for a rapid plan transfer for planned or unplanned machine breakdowns. This approach was tested for prostate cancer (PC) and head-and-neck cancer (HNC) cases.

Methods

The constraints of a previously optimized volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan were used as a template for automatic plan reoptimization for different accelerator head models. All plans were generated using the treatment planning system (TPS) Hyperion. Automatic replanning was performed for 16 PC cases, initially planned for MLC1 (4 mm MLC) and reoptimized for MLC2 (5 mm) and MLC3 (10 mm) and for 19 HNC cases, replanned from MLC2 to MLC3. EUD, D_mean, D_2%, and D_98% were evaluated for targets; for OARs EUD and D_2% were analyzed. Replanning was considered successful if both plans fulfilled equal constraints.

Results

All prostate cases were successfully replanned. The mean relative target EUD deviation was −0.15% and −0.57% for replanning to MLC2 and MLC3, respectively. OAR sparing was successful in all cases. Replanning of HNC cases from MLC2 to MLC3 was successful in 16/19 patients with a mean decrease of −0.64% in PTV60 EUD. In three cases target doses were substantially decreased by up to −2.58% (PTV60) and −3.44% (PTV54), respectively. Nevertheless, OAR sparing was always achieved as planned.

Conclusions

Automatic replanning of VMAT plans for a different treatment machine by using pre-existing constraints as a template for a reoptimization is feasible and successful in terms of equal constraints.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Voet PWJ, Dirkx MLP, Breedveld S et al (2014) Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:1175–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.046 CrossRef

Sharfo AWM, Voet PWJ, Breedveld S et al (2015) Comparison of VMAT and IMRT strategies for cervical cancer patients using automated planning. Radiother Oncol 114:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.006 CrossRef

Della Gala G, Dirkx MLP, Hoekstra N et al (2017) Fully automated VMAT treatment planning for advanced-stage NSCLC patients. Strahlenther Onkol 193:402–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1121-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Buschmann M, Sharfo AWM, Penninkhof J et al (2017) Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1246-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gintz D, Latifi K, Caudell J et al (2016) Initial evaluation of automated treatment planning software. J Appl Clin Med Phys 17:331–346. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6167 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hansen CR, Bertelsen A, Hazell I et al (2016) Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 1:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2016.08.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Speer S, Klein A, Kober L et al (2017) Automation of radiation treatment planning. Strahlenther Onkol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1150-9 CrossRefPubMed

Kusters JMAM, Bzdusek K, Kumar P et al (2017) Automated IMRT planning in pinnacle. Strahlenther Onkol 193:1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-017-1187-9 CrossRefPubMed

Tol JP, Delaney AR, Dahele M et al (2015) Evaluation of a knowledge-based planning solution for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91:612–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.014 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Schubert C, Waletzko O, Weiss C et al (2017) Intercenter validation of a knowledge based model for automated planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. The experience of the German RapidPlan Consortium. PLoS ONE 12:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178034 CrossRef

11.

Li N, Zarepisheh M, Uribe-Sanchez A et al (2013) Automatic treatment plan re-optimization for adaptive radiotherapy guided with the initial plan DVHs. Phys Med Biol 58:8725–8738. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/24/8725 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Zarepisheh M, Long T, Li N et al (2014) A DVH-guided IMRT optimization algorithm for automatic treatment planning and adaptive radiotherapy replanning. Med Phys. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4875700 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Song T, Li N, Zarepisheh M et al (2016) An automated treatment plan quality control tool for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a voxel-weighting factor-based re-optimization algorithm. PLoS ONE 11:e149273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149273 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

McIntosh C, Welch M, McNiven A et al (2017) Fully automated treatment planning for head and neck radiotherapy using voxel-based dose prediction and dose mimicking method. Phys Med Biol 62:5926. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa71f8 CrossRefPubMed

15.

McIntosh C, Purdie TG (2017) Voxel-based dose prediction with multi-patient atlas selection for automated radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 62:415. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/62/2/415 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Breedveld S, Storchi PRM, Keijzer M et al (2007) A novel approach to multi-criteria inverse planning for IMRT. Phys Med Biol 52:6339–6353. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/016 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Breedveld S, Storchi PRM, Voet PWJ, Heijmen BJM (2012) iCycle: integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. Med Phys 39:951–963. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3676689 CrossRef

18.

Winkel D, Bol GH, van Asselen B et al (2016) Development and clinical introduction of automated radiotherapy treatment planning for prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol 61:8587–8595. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/61/24/8587 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Xhaferllari I, Wong E, Bzdusek K et al (2013) Automated IMRT planning with regional optimization using planning scripts. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14:4052. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.4052 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Alber M (2008) Normal tissue dose-effect models in biological dose optimisation. Z Med Phys 18:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2007.08.002 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Alber M, Birkner M, Nüsslin F (2002) Tools for the analysis of dose optimization: II. Sensitivity analysis. Phys Med Biol 47:N265CrossRef

22.

R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (https://www.R-project.org/)

23.

Kerkhof EM, Raaymakers BW, van der Heide UA et al (2008) Online MRI guidance for healthy tissue sparing in patients with cervical cancer: an IMRT planning study. Radiother Oncol 88:241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.04.009 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Bohoudi O, Bruynzeel AME, Senan S et al (2017) Fast and robust online adaptive planning in stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.07.028 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Ottosson RO, Engström PE, Sjöström D et al (2009) The feasibility of using Pareto fronts for comparison of treatment planning systems and delivery techniques. Acta Oncol (Madr) 48:233–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802251559 CrossRef

Titel: Automatic replanning of VMAT plans for different treatment machines: A template-based approach using constrained optimization
verfasst von: Luise A. Künzel
Oliver S. Dohm
Markus Alber
Daniel Zips
Daniela Thorwarth
Publikationsdatum: 30.05.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-018-1319-x

Springer Medizin

Automatic replanning of VMAT plans for different treatment machines: A template-based approach using constrained optimization

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Update Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

MRI-based high-precision irradiation in an orthotopic pancreatic tumor mouse model

Die Radiotherapie des Pleuramesothelioms – Klinische Praxisleitlinie der American Society of Clinical Oncology

Factors predicting intolerance to definitive conventional radiotherapy in geriatric patients

Radiotherapy, tumor mutational burden, and immune checkpoint inhibitors: time to do the math

Stereotactic radiotherapy for choroidal melanomas by means of HybridArc™

Hochrisiko-Endometriumkarzinom: Immer eine adjuvante Radiochemotherapie?

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Update Onkologie