Background
Methods
Study protocol and selection
Search strategy
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Data extraction
Quality assessment
Statistical analysis
Results
Search results
Study characteristics
Authors | Study design | Location | Sample | Year | Bacteriuria in general | ASBa | UTIb | PYELOc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moran et al. [26] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Bogotá | 1238 | 1990 | 3% (37) | |||
Pacheco et al. [27] | cross sectional | Lima | 123 | 1996 | 15,4% (19) | |||
Ginestre et al. [28] | cross sectional | Zulia | 101 | 2001 | 13,86% (14) | |||
Cárdenas et al. [29] | cross sectional | Bucaramanga | 114 | 2005 | 7,9% (9) | |||
Teppa et al. [30] | cross sectional | Caracas | 150 | 2005 | 18,7% (28) | |||
Blas et al. [31] | cross sectional | Ciudad de México | 874 | 2007 | 8,4% (73) | |||
Quiroga et al. [23] | cross sectional | Ciudad Obregón | 72 | 2007 | 20,83 (15) | 16,7% (12) | ||
Villasante et al. [32] | cross sectional | Lima | 300 | 2007 | 17,7% (53) | |||
Feitosa et al. [33] | cross sectional | Botucatu | 230 | 2009 | 4,3% (10) | 5,7% (13) | ||
Neciosup et al. [34] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Trujillo | 870 | 2009 | 11,8% (103) | |||
Pagnonceli et al. [19] | cross sectional | Paraná | 34 | 2010 | 56% (19) | |||
Pereira et al. [35] | cross sectional | Campo Grande | 864 | 2010 | 5,2% (45) | 7,5% (65) | 1,2% (10) | |
Medic et al. [1] | cross sectional | Puebla | 4657 | 2010 | 1,78% (83) | |||
Mera et al. [36] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Chimborazo | 140 | 2010 | 24% (33) | |||
Darzé et al. [37] | cross sectional | Brotas | 260 | 2011 | 12,3% (32) | |||
David et al. [38] | cross sectional | Quito | 218 | 2011 | 22% (48) | 12,4% (27) | 9,6% (21) | |
Giraldo et al. [39] | cross sectional | Natal | 94 | 2012 | 29,79% (28) | |||
Guerra et al. [40] | cross sectional | Rio de Janeiro | 164 | 2012 | 19,5% (32) | |||
Mendieta et al. [41] | cross sectional | Cuenca | 595 | 2012 | 19,2% (114) | |||
Vettore et al. [42] | cross sectional (Phd) | Rio de Janeiro | 1091 | 2013 | 45,9% (501) | |||
Almeida et al. [43] | cross sectional (MSc) | São Luis | 5064 | 2013 | 26,12% (1323) | |||
Barros et al. [44] | cross sectional | Recife | 124 | 2013 | 37,1% (46) | |||
Anduaga et al. [45] | cross sectional | Huatabampo | 520 | 2013 | 27,5% (143) | |||
Llerena et al. [46] | cross sectional | Ambato | 80 | 2013 | 42,5% (34) | |||
Vargas et al. [47] | cross sectional | Paucarpata | 88 | 2013 | 12,5% (11) | |||
Alves et al. [48] | cross sectional | Santa Maria | 88 | 2014 | 38,63% (34) | |||
Salazar et al. [49] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Toluca | 73 | 2014 | 26,02% (19) | 16,43% (12) | 9,58% (7) | |
Castillo et al. [50] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Piura | 19667 | 2015 | 2,48% (488) | |||
Fernandez et al. [51] | cross sectional | Lambayeque | 47 | 2015 | 21,28% (10) | |||
Vega et al. [52] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Ambato | 36 | 2015 | 17% (6) | |||
Ramos et al. [53] | cross sectional | Caxias do Sul | 432 | 2016 | 12,89% (56) | |||
Oliveira et al. [54] | cross sectional | Pará | 86 | 2016 | 38,4% (33) | |||
Rosado et al. [55] | cross sectional | Tlalnepantla | 47 | 2016 | 19,1% (9) | |||
Alvarado et al. [56] | cross sectional | Juaréz | 145 | 2016 | 13,8% (20) | |||
Soloman et al. [57] | cross sectional | Guatemala | 210 | 2016 | 9% (19) | |||
Mantilla et al. [58] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Guayaquil | 97 | 2016 | 34,02% (33) | |||
Macias et al. [22] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Guayaquil | 2041 | 2016 | 7% (150) | 1,57% (32) | 4,9% (101) | 0,8% (17) |
Soria et al. [59] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Bolivar | 729 | 2016 | 24,83% (181) | |||
Santos et al. [60] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Brasília | 167 | 2017 | 20,9% (35) | |||
Urbina et al. [61] | cross sectional | Barranquilha | 226 | 2017 | 10,6% (24) | |||
Maquera et al. [62] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Tacna | 164 | 2017 | 9,15% (15) | |||
Yaneth et al. [63] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Trujillo | 181 | 2017 | 40,3% (73) | |||
Gonzalez et al. [25] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Abancay | 110 | 2017 | 45% (50) | 15,45% (17) | 20,9% (23) | 9,1% (10) |
Melendres et al. [64] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Ferrenafe | 93 | 2017 | 20,4% (19) | |||
Santos et al. [65] | cross sectional | Cascavel | 798 | 2018 | 15,66% (125) | |||
Santos et al. [2] | cross sectional | Maranhão | 60 | 2018 | 48,3% (29) | |||
Castillo et al. [66] | cross sectional | Lima | 1455 | 2018 | 7,4% (108) | |||
Sanchez et al. [67] | cross sectional | Huanta | 652 | 2018 | 37,1% (242) | |||
Fernandez et al. [68] | cross sectional | Las Tunas | 1057 | 2018 | 22,51% (238) | |||
Pancotto et al. [69] | cross sectional | Veranópolis | 538 | 2019 | 25,5% (137) | |||
Gonzalez et al. [24] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Veracruz | 954 | 2019 | 13% (124) | 3,1% (30) | ||
Cconisla et al. [70] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Cusco | 239 | 2019 | 14,64% (35) | |||
Diaz et al. [71] | cross sectional | Cajamarca | 3301 | 2019 | 3,06% (101) | |||
Chamoly et al. [72] | cross sectional | Huanchaco | 271 | 2019 | 14% (38) | |||
Zapana et al. [20] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Tacna | 32641 | 2019 | 29,63% (9673) | |||
Placencia et al. [73] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Cuenca | 302 | 2019 | 30,8% (93) | |||
Mandujan et al. [74] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Morelos | 525 | 2020 | 13% (70) | |||
Fretes et al. [75] | cross sectional | Assunção | 202 | 2020 | 2% (5) | |||
Cabús et al. [76] | cross sectional (MSc) | Manaus | 5925 | 2021 | 22,3% (1322) | |||
Rhode et al. [77] | cross sectional | Santa Catarina | 164 | 2021 | 14,63% (24) | |||
Filho et al. [78] | cross sectional | Distrito Federal | 63 | 2021 | 6,3% (4) | |||
Macias et al. [79] | cross sectional (undergraduate thesis) | Puebla | 10798 | 2021 | 13,28% (1434) | |||
Rodriguez et al. [80] | cross sectional | Bucaramanga | 838 | 2021 | 14,5% (94) | |||
Hoz et al. [81] | cross sectional | Eje cafetero | 1131 | 2021 | 14,94% (169) | 7,69% (87) | 4,42% (50) | 2,8% (32) |
Guerra et al. [82] | cross sectional | Villa Clara | 3567 | 2021 | 15,9% (568) | |||
Planchez et al. [83] | cross sectional | Guanabacoa | 129 | 2021 | 40,31% (52) | |||
Souza et al. [84] | cross sectional | São Paulo | 2935 | 2021 | 11,04% (324) |
The overall prevalence of ASB, lower UTI, and pyelonephritis
Subgroup analysis of the prevalence of ASB in articles comprising more than 500 participants
Subgroup analysis of the prevalence of ASB in published Latin American articles, except Brazilian articles
Subgroup analysis of the prevalence of ASB in Latin American articles (published or unpublished) with a sample of at least 200 participants, except for Brazilian articles
Subgroup analysis of the prevalence of ASB considering only Brazilian articles (published or unpublished)
Subgroup analysis of the prevalence of ASB considering only Brazilian articles (published or unpublished) with a sample of at least 200 participants
Isolated bacteria
Bacteria | Sample | Events | Pooled prevalence (95%CI) | I2 (p-value) | Egger (p) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
8840 | 5974 | 70.0 (65.3–74.6) | 96% (< 0.01) | 0.907 | |
8709 | 694 | 6.4 (4.3–8.7) | 92% (< 0.01) | 0.181 | |
7352 | 288 | 3.0 (1.7–4.5) | 87% (< 0.01) | 0.008 | |
8586 | 315 | 2.8 (1.9–3.9) | 77% (< 0.01) | 0.024 | |
7383 | 380 | 1.6 (0.7–2.7) | 90% (< 0.01) | 0.120 | |
7554 | 395 | 1.4 (0.5–2.5) | 89% (< 0.01) | 0.015 | |
6351 | 233 | 1.3 (0.5–2.4) | 84% (< 0.01) | 0.625 | |
5728 | 100 | 0.4 (0.1–1.0) | 63% (< 0.01) | 0.471 | |
6735 | 41 | 0.0 (0.0–0.1) | 26% (0.04) | 0.017 | |
5940 | 21 | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | 0% (0.68) | < 0.001 |