Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine 1/2016

Open Access 01.12.2016 | Original research article

Bibliometric analysis of worldwide publications on multi-, extensively, and totally drug – resistant tuberculosis (2006–2015)

verfasst von: Waleed M. Sweileh, Adham S. AbuTaha, Ansam F. Sawalha, Suleiman Al-Khalil, Samah W. Al-Jabi, Sa’ed H. Zyoud

Erschienen in: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2016

Abstract

Background

The year 2015 marked the end of United Nations Millennium Development Goals which was aimed at halting and reversing worldwide tuberculosis (TB). The emergence of drug resistance is a major challenge for worldwide TB control. The aim of this study was to give a bibliometric overview of publications on multi-, extensively, and totally drug-resistant TB.

Methods

Scopus database was used to retrieve articles on multidrug resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and totally drug-resistant (TDR) tuberculosis for the study period (2006–2015). The number of publications, top productive countries and institutions, citation analysis, co-authorships, international collaboration, active authors, and active journals were retrieved and analyzed.

Results

A total of 2260 journal articles were retrieved. The mean ± SD citations per article was 7.04 ± 16.0. The h-index of retrieved data was 76. The number of publications showed a three – fold increase over the study period compared with less than two – fold increase in tuberculosis research during the same study period. Stratified by number of publications, the United States of America ranked first while Switzerland ranked first in productivity per 100 million people, and South Africa ranked first in productivity stratified per one trillion Gross Domestic Product. Three of the High Burden Countries (HBC) MDR-TB (India, China, and South Africa) were present in top productive countries. High percentage of international collaboration was seen among most HBC MDR-TB. Except for Plos One journal, most active journals in publishing articles on MDR, XDR, TDR-TB were in infection – related fields and in general medicine. Top 20 cited articles were published in prestigious journal such as Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine. The themes in top 20 cited articles were diverse, ranging from molecular biology, diagnostic tools, co-infection with HIV, and results of new anti-TB drugs.

Conclusion

Publications on MDR, XDR and TDR – TB are increasing in the past decade. International collaboration was common. Many low resourced African and Asian countries will benefit from research leading to new diagnostic and screening technology of TB. The exchange of expertise, ideas and technology is of paramount importance in this field.
Abkürzungen
WHO
World Health Organization
CDC
Centers for Disease Prevention and Control
TB
Tuberculosis
MDR
Multidrug resistant
XDR
Extensively resistant or extremely resistant
TDR
Totally resistant
HBC
High burden countries
HBC-TB
High burden courtiers – tuberculosis
HBC MDR-TB
High burden countries with multidrug resistant tuberculosis

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is considered a top infectious disease killer worldwide making it a major public health problem [1, 2]. Global Tuberculosis Report, published by World Health Organization (WHO), stated that in 2014, TB killed 1.5 million people [3]. The year 2015 marked the end of United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) which was aimed at halting and reversing worldwide TB, malaria and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Despite the continuous and slow decline in TB, there are still few challenges confronting the control of TB. Association of TB with poverty, co-infection with HIV, and emergence of TB drug resistance are major challenges for worldwide TB control [2]. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), in general, is a global challenge that threatens the clinical benefit of many important antimicrobial agents and requires an immediate action for containment and reversal [4]. In case of TB, three serious types of drug resistant TB have been identified: (1) multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) which is a TB with resistance to at least isoniazid and rifampicin; (2) extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB), which is a form of MDR-TB that is resistant to isoniazid and rifampin, plus any fluoroquinolone and at least one of three injectable second-line drugs (i.e., amikacin, kanamycin, or capreomycin) [5, 6]; and finally, total drug-resistant TB (TDR) in which Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains are resistant to all first and second line anti-TB agents [710].
In 2014, MDR-TB was responsible for the death of 190,000 people and it is predicted that if all TB cases identified in 2014 were tested for drug resistance, a total of 300,000 patients would carry MDR-TB. More than half (54%) of these patients are living in India, China and Russian Federation [3]. Treatment and control of TB requires the availability of effective drug therapy which in turn requires understanding the pattern of growth and development of resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first line drug therapy. The WHO has developed the concept of “High Burden Country” (HBC) to emphasize the health burden and to facilitate the understanding of global TB burden post 2015 era. The HBC MDR -TB list includes 20 HBC countries in terms of absolute numbers of cases and an additional 10 countries with the most severe burden in terms of case rates per capita that do not already appear in the “top 20” [3, 11].
Research on drug resistance is a key element for future planning to eliminate TB since the progress made on halting TB in the past two decades could be undermined by the development of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis [12]. This requires evaluation and analysis of published research on resistant TB and where we will stand on this issue in the future. Publications on TB and the contribution of various countries to these publications have been studied through bibliometric studies [1317]. However, no such studies, that the author is aware of, have described the bibliometrics of drug resistant TB in general and MDR, XDR, and TDR-Tb in specific. In fact, one of the components of Stop TB Strategy and End TB Strategy is intensified research and innovation [3].
Bibliometrics is a statistical method used to analyze and assess various aspects related to the topic of interest [18]. Such aspects include contribution of countries, core journals, most active researchers, international collaboration, annual growth of publications, and top cited articles in the field [19]. This study was carried out as an effort to shed light on a challenging worldwide problem facing the future target to end TB. The objective of this study was to retrieve and analyze worldwide publications on MDR, XDR and TDR-TB for the past decade (2006 – 2015). In this study, bibliometric indicators for data extracted from Scopus database will be presented and gaps pertaining to knowledge about research activity on MDR, XDR and TDR-TB will be filled.

Methods

The methodology used in this study has been described in previously published bibliometric studies [2028]. Several electronic databases can be used to carry out bibliometric studies. Scopus database has been selected to perform this study because it has several advantages over other databases [29]. Scopus includes larger number of journals than either Pubmed or Web of Science. Furthermore, Scopus allows a wide range and more accurate data analysis than either Pubmed or Google scholar [30].
In this study, data were retrieved using keywords in article title to maximize accuracy of the results. The keywords used in this study were obtained partially from previous review articles on MDR-TB [31]. The use of keywords in title-abstract search will yield a high percentage of false positive results. However, the use of keywords in title search only will minimize false positive results. Figure 1 shows a scheme that includes search queries used and the number of retrieved articles in each step.
In search query shown in Fig. 1, the asterisk was used after some keywords as a wild card to retrieve all words relevant to the keyword of interest. The duration of study was set from 2006 to 2015. The study period represents one decade. During this period reports of MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB has emerged strongly. The retrieved documents were limited to journal articles while books and book chapters were excluded. No exclusion was made based on language of the document.
The validity of search strategy was tested by manually reviewing a random sample of 20% of retrieved articles. Validity was confirmed when all randomly tested articles were related to MDR, XDR or TDR-TB. The validation test confirmed that there were minimum false positive results in retrieved documents. Three articles that were false positive were excluded using the function “AND NOT” as appeared in the search query (Fig. 1). However, false negative results remain a possibility especially when the search query was based on title search only. The author, with the help of experts in data management, tried at least five different scenarios of search queries using different search strategies, and the ultimate results in all scenarios had large numbers of false positive results with no significant addition of true articles on MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB. Therefore, the use of the current search query will avoid large numbers of false positive articles but will miss very few true articles.
The growth of research on MDR, XDR, and TDR - TB was presented graphically using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The contribution of countries and institutions/organizations was limited to top ten or those with a minimum productivity of 20 articles. Productivity of HBC TDR-TB was also presented. The standard competition ranking (SCR) was used to rank top ten productive countries, institutions, and authors. Data pertaining to productivity by countries was also stratified with population size and Gross Domestic Product (GDP). For each country, the total number of population and GDP were obtained from World Bank website. To calculate the productivity of each country stratified by population size, we divided the number of publications by the population size of that country. Similarly, to calculate the productivity stratified by GDP, we divided the number of publications by GDP of that country. For population size, productivity was calculated per 100 million inhabitants while for GDP, productivity was calculated per one trillion GDP.
Scopus can be used to provide analysis on international collaboration by counting number of articles published by authors from the same country and articles with authors from different countries. In other words, there are two types of articles: single country publications (SCP) in which all authors belong to the same country and such publications represent intra-country collaboration; and multiple country publications (MCP) in which authors belong to different countries and such publications represent inter-country collaboration i.e. international collaboration.
Quality of publications is difficult to measure or assess directly. However, total number of citations received, average number of citations per article, Hirsch-index (h-index), percentage of highly cited articles, and impact factor (IF) of journals can be used as an indirect measure of publication impact or quality. H-index has been developed to assess productivity and citation impact of researchers. However, the use of h-index has been extended to measure the productivity and citation impact of countries and academic institutions [32]. In this study, h-indexes for countries and institutions were obtained directly from Scopus database while IF was obtained from Journal Citation Report 2015 published by Thomson Reuters. To visualize country collaboration and co-authorships, VOSviewer was used [33]. VOSviewer can present information either as density visualizations or network visualizations maps.
Ethical approval of this study was not required by IRB since no human subjects or data were involved. All data analysis was carried out on November 13th, 2016 to avoid the dynamics of citations from 1 day to another.

Results

General information

Two thousand two hundred sixty journal articles were retrieved. The majority of retrieved documents were research articles (1612; 71.3%). Other types of retrieved documents are shown in Table 1. English (2047; 90.57%) was the most commonly encountered language followed by Spanish (49; 2.17%) and Chinese (45; 2.0%). The total number of citations received was 35,661 (mean ± SD = 7.04 ± 16.0; median (Q1-Q3) = 3(0–7)) while h-index was 76. The highest number of publications was recorded in 2015 with a total of 342, while the lowest number of publications was recorded in 2006 with a total number of 116. This represents a threefold increase in number of publications. Figure 2 shows the growth of publications on the past four decades while Fig. 3 shows the growth of publications on tuberculosis in general and on MDR, XDR, and TDR resistance in particular in the past decade. The growth of publications on TB showed less than two- fold increase in the past decade while the growth of publications on MDR, XDR, and TDR – TB showed approximately three – fold increase.
Table 1
Types of retreived documents (2006 – 2015)
Type of document
Frequency
%
N = 2260
Article
1612
71.33
Review
216
9.56
Letter
215
9.51
Editorial
85
3.76
Note
65
2.88
Article in Press
27
1.19
Short Survey
22
0.97
Conference Paper
18
0.80

Country analysis

Authors from 124 different countries contributed to retrieved documents. The United States of America (USA) ranked first in the number of publications followed by India, South Africa, and the United Kingdom (UK). Table 2 shows the list of all countries that contributed to publications. There was a total of 243 (10.7%) articles with undefined affiliation. These articles include one or more authors with missing country affiliation or country affiliation of certain authors is not being updated by Scopus system at the date of data analysis. Table 3 shows the list of top 10 productive countries. The top 10 list included five European countries plus the USA, India, China, South Korea, and South Africa. Netherlands ranked 11th and was outside the top 10 active list.
Table 2
List of all countries contributing to retreived data (2006 – 2015)
Country
Frequency
%
N = 2260
Country
Frequency
%
N = 2260
Country
Frequency
%
N = 2260
Country
Frequency
%
N = 2260
USA
517
22.88
Argentina
29
1.28
Zambia
7
0.31
Azerbaijan
2
0.09
India
269
11.90
Belarus
19
0.84
Austria
6
0.27
Central African Republic
2
0.09
South Africa
229
10.13
Denmark
19
0.84
Burkina Faso
6
0.27
Cuba
2
0.09
UK
186
8.23
Viet Nam
18
0.80
Cote d’Ivoire
6
0.27
Ecuador
2
0.09
China
158
6.99
Georgia
15
0.66
Lesotho
6
0.27
Jamaica
2
0.09
France
122
5.40
Poland
15
0.66
Botswana
5
0.22
Mozambique
2
0.09
Switzerland
117
5.18
Colombia
14
0.62
Bulgaria
5
0.22
Palestine
2
0.09
South Korea
102
4.51
Czech Republic
13
0.58
Cambodia
5
0.22
Sudan
2
0.09
Italy
100
4.42
Ethiopia
13
0.58
Chile
5
0.22
Swaziland
2
0.09
Germany
91
4.03
Romania
13
0.58
Egypt
5
0.22
Tunisia
2
0.09
Netherlands
85
3.76
Bangladesh
12
0.53
Guadeloupe
5
0.22
Venezuela
2
0.09
Spain
73
3.23
Singapore
12
0.53
Haiti
5
0.22
Albania
1
0.04
Peru
69
3.05
Malaysia
11
0.49
Lithuania
5
0.22
Croatia
1
0.04
Iran
64
2.83
Gambia
10
0.44
Mongolia
5
0.22
Djibouti
1
0.04
Belgium
62
2.74
Hungary
10
0.44
Congo
4
0.18
Dominican Republic
1
0.04
Japan
61
2.70
Namibia
10
0.44
Iceland
4
0.18
Micronesia
1
0.04
Sweden
56
2.48
Uganda
10
0.44
Ireland
4
0.18
French Guiana
1
0.04
Brazil
51
2.26
Ukraine
10
0.44
Kazakhstan
4
0.18
Ghana
1
0.04
Russian Federation
51
2.26
Kuwait
9
0.40
New Zealand
4
0.18
Guinea-Bissau
1
0.04
Portugal
48
2.12
Moldova
9
0.40
Algeria
3
0.13
Jordan
1
0.04
Australia
44
1.95
Nigeria
9
0.40
Armenia
3
0.13
Laos
1
0.04
Pakistan
43
1.90
Saudi Arabia
9
0.40
Benin
3
0.13
Lebanon
1
0.04
Taiwan
42
1.86
Greece
8
0.35
Cameroon
3
0.13
Oman
1
0.04
Thailand
40
1.77
Nepal
8
0.35
Finland
3
0.13
Puerto Rico
1
0.04
Mexico
36
1.59
Norway
8
0.35
Gabon
3
0.13
Rwanda
1
0.04
Canada
35
1.55
Tanzania
8
0.35
Honduras
3
0.13
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
0.04
Estonia
32
1.42
Indonesia
7
0.31
Iraq
3
0.13
Slovenia
1
0.04
Latvia
32
1.42
Israel
7
0.31
Madagascar
3
0.13
Somalia
1
0.04
Turkey
32
1.42
Kenya
7
0.31
Malawi
3
0.13
Togo
1
0.04
Philippines
31
1.37
Luxembourg
7
0.31
Morocco
3
0.13
UAE
1
0.04
Hong Kong
30
1.33
Uzbekistan
7
0.31
Panama
3
0.13
Undefined
243
10.75
Table 3
Top ten productive countries along with their international collaboration and citation analysis (2006–2015)
SCR
Country
Frequency
%
N = 2260
TC
C/A
h-index
NCC
SCP
%
TC
C/A
h-index
MCP
%
TC
C/A
h-index
1st
USA
517
22.88
15,483
29.95
61
75
147
28.43
3153
21.45
30
370
71.57
12,330
33.32
52
2nd
India
269
11.90
3341
12.42
29
39
216
80.30
1805
8.36
21
53
19.70
1536
28.98
18
3rd
S. Africa
229
10.13
8380
36.59
40
50
45
19.65
555
12.33
12
184
80.35
7825
42.53
39
4th
UK
186
8.23
4608
24.77
33
69
38
20.43
336
8.84
11
148
79.57
4272
28.86
33
5th
China
158
6.99
1460
9.24
19
30
110
69.62
713
6.48
16
48
30.38
747
15.56
13
6th
France
122
5.40
3116
25.54
25
74
33
27.05
327
9.91
9
89
72.95
2789
31.34
24
7th
Switzerland
117
5.18
5766
49.28
37
63
22
18.80
1015
46.14
10
95
81.20
4751
50.01
33
8th
S. Korea
102
4.51
3004
29.45
25
37
73
71.57
1161
15.90
19
29
28.43
1843
63.55
15
9th
Italy
100
4.42
3515
35.15
32
52
25
25.00
199
7.96
9
75
75.00
3316
44.21
31
10th
Germany
91
4.03
2837
31.18
28
55
21
23.08
132
6.29
5
70
76.92
2705
38.64
22
SCR standard competition rank
TC total citations
C/A number of citations per article. It is calculated by dividing the total number of citations by total number of publications retrieved for the assigned country
NCC number of collaborating countries
SCP single country publications (intra country collaboration)
MCP multiple country publications (inter country collaboration)
h-index Hirsh index
USA United States of America
UK United Kingdom
S. Africa South Africa
S. Korea South Korea
When top productive countries were stratified by number of citations per article, Switzerland ranked first followed by South Africa and Italy. Publications from India and China had the lowest number of citations per article. Articles produced by international collaboration (MCP) had higher number of citations per article compared with articles produced without international collaboration (SCP). This indicates that international collaboration is important in increasing number of citations. Interestingly, countries with the lowest percentage of international collaboration, such as China and India, had the lowest number of citations per article. When data for top ten countries were stratified by population size, Switzerland ranked first followed by South Africa and the UK (Table 4). When data were stratified based on GDP, South Africa ranked first followed by Switzerland and India.
Table 4
Productivity of top ten active countries stratified by population size and GDP
SCR
Country
Frequency
%
N = 2260
Number of population in millions
Number of articles per 100 million populationa(R)
GDP in trillions
Number of articles per one trillion GDPb (R)
1st
USA
517
22.88
321.4
160.86 (7)
17.95
28.80 (9)
2nd
India
269
11.90
1311
20.52 (9)
2.074
131.41 (3)
3rd
S. Africa
229
10.13
54.96
416.67 (2)
0.3128
731.63 (1)
4th
UK
186
8.23
65.14
285.54 (3)
2.849
65.29 (4)
5th
China
158
6.99
1371
11.52 (10)
10.87
14.54 (10)
6th
France
122
5.40
66.81
182.61 (5)
2.422
50.37 (7)
7th
Switzerland
117
5.18
8.287
1411.85 (1)
0.6647
175.94 (2)
8th
S. Korea
102
4.51
50.81
200.79 (4)
1.929
55.19 (5)
9th
Italy
100
4.42
60.80
164.47 (6)
1.815
55.10 (6)
10th
Germany
91
4.03
81.41
111.78 (8)
3.356
27.12 (8)
SCR Standard competition rank
USA United States of America
UK United Kingdom
S. Africa South Africa
S. Korea South Korea
R rank
GDP Gross Domestic Product
MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB multi-, extensively, and totally drug resistant tuberculosis
acalculated by dividing number of publications for a particular country by its population size then multiplying by 100
bcalculated by dividing the number of publications of a particular country by its GDP in trillions
Visualization of international collaboration among countries with a minimum productivity of twenty documents is shown in Fig. 4. Visualization map shows the extent and strength of international collaboration between any two countries. The extent of international collaboration for any country is assessed by the size of circle assigned for that country while the strength of collaboration between any two countries is assessed by the thickness of the line connecting the two countries. Strong collaborations were found between the following pairs of countries: USA – South Africa (link strength = 109), USA – Peru (link strength = 47), South Africa – UK (link strength = 42), USA – Switzerland (link strength = 42), USA – UK (link strength = 36), USA – Russian Federation (link strength = 30). USA – South Korea (link strength = 26), USA – China (link strength = 24), USA – Latvia (link strength = 25), and UK – Germany (link strength = 23).

Productivity from HBC MDR-TB

Three of HBC (India, China, and South Africa) were in the top ten list. On the other hand, seven HBC (N. Korea, Myanmar, Angola, Kyrgyzstan, Papua New Guinea, Tajikistan, and Zimbabwe) had no contribution at all. The remaining HBC (20 countries) were shown in Table 5. The majority of contributing HBC MDR-TB had more than 40% of their publications produced through international collaboration. The exception was Indonesia. The total number of publications produced by HBC MDR-TB, including China, India, and South Africa, was 914 articles. The growth of publications from HBC MDR-TB was almost parallel to worldwide productivity (Fig. 5). However, the gap between the two curves get narrower with time and the growth rate of publications from HBC MDR-TB exceeded that of the worldwide productivity in the last few years. This is due to research productivity from China, India, and South Africa which are considered within the HBC MDR-TB. In 2006, productivity from HBC MDR-TB was almost one forth that of worldwide while in 2015 the productivity of HBC MDR-TB became half that of worldwide. Poisson regression model showed that productivity from HBC MDR-TB was a significant predictor (p < 0.001) of worldwide productivity. The model indicated that for each article produced from HBC MDR-TB, the worldwide productivity increased by 1.01.
Table 5
Productivity of HBC MDR-TB along with their citation analysis and international collaboration
Countrya
Frequency
(%)
N = 2260
TC
C/A
h-index
NCC
SCP
% of SCP
MCP
% of MCP
  
Top HBC MDR-TB countries by estimated absolute number (in alphabetical order)
 
Bangladesh
12
0.53
294
24.50
6
7
5
41.67
7
58.33
DR Congo
4
0.18
9
2.25
2
5
0
0.00
4
100.00
Ethiopia
13
0.58
172
13.23
6
6
7
53.85
6
46.15
Indonesia
7
0.31
14
2.00
2
5
5
71.43
2
28.57
Kazakhstan
4
0.18
9
2.25
1
1
0
0.00
4
100.00
Kenya
7
0.31
309
44.14
4
14
2
28.57
5
71.43
Mozambique
2
0.09
295
147.50
2
5
0
0.00
2
100.00
Nigeria
9
0.40
32
3.56
3
9
4
44.44
5
55.56
Pakistan
43
1.90
283
6.58
11
29
25
58.14
18
41.86
Philippines
31
1.37
1705
55.00
14
33
5
16.13
26
83.87
Russian F.
51
2.26
1983
38.88
23
36
8
15.69
43
84.31
Thailand
40
1.77
815
20.38
12
29
18
45.00
22
55.00
Ukraine
10
0.44
61
6.10
6
18
3
30.00
7
70.00
Uzbekistan
7
0.31
189
27.00
5
11
0
0.00
7
100.00
Viet Nam
18
0.80
514
28.56
8
28
3
16.67
15
83.33
  
Countries with the highest number of TB case rates per capita
 
Azerbaijan
2
0.09
443
221.50
1
9
0
0.00
2
100.00
Belarus
19
0.84
469
24.68
9
33
0
0.00
19
100.00
Peru
69
3.05
2501
36.25
21
28
9
13.04
60
86.96
Moldova
9
0.40
108
12.00
7
22
0
0.00
9
100.00
Somalia
1
0.04
8
8.00
1
3
0
0.00
1
100.00
HBC MDR-TB High Burden Countries with Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis
TC total citations
C/A average number of citations per article. It is calculated by dividing the total number of citations by total number of publications retrieved for the assigned country
NCC number of collaborating countries
SCP single country publications (intra country collaboration)
MCP multiple country publications (inter country collaboration)
h-index Hirsh index
aCountries were listed alphabetically. Countries that were listed in top ten list were not listed in this table: China, India, and South Africa. The following countries have zero contribution: N. Korea, Myanmar, Angola, Kyrgyzstan, Papua New Guinea, Tajikistan, Zimbabwe

Institutions/ Organizations

Top ten productive institutions/ organizations are shown in Table 6. The WHO ranked first followed by Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) and Harvard Medical School. The total productivity from Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health was 98 articles which is greater than that of CDC and lower than that of WHO. The top list included five American institutions/ organizations, three South African, two Italian, and one international organization (WHO). The impact of publications from top ten productive institutions/ organizations was assessed indirectly by the percentage of highly cited articles for each institutions/ organization. Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University (USA) ranked first in the percentage of highly cited articles followed equally by the two Italian institutions, Università degli Studi di Sassari, and IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri.
Table 6
Top ten active institutions/ organizations in MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB publications (2006–2015)
SCRa
Institution/ Organization
Country
Frequency
%
N = 2260
HCA
% of HCAb
1st
Organisation Mondiale de la Sante
WHO
104
4.60
35
33.65
2nd
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CDC (USA)
89
3.94
31
34.83
3rd
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
USA
74
3.27
18
24.32
4th
Harvard Medical School
USA
73
3.23
20
27.40
5th
Universiteit Stellenbosch
S. Africa
61
2.70
23
37.70
6th
University of Cape Town
S. Africa
54
2.39
16
29.63
7th
Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University
USA
44
1.95
25
56.82
8th
South African Medical Research Council
S. Africa
43
1.90
17
39.53
9th
Universita degli Studi di Sassari
Italy
42
1.86
18
42.86
9th
IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri
Italy
42
1.86
18
42.86
9th
Partners in Health
USA
42
1.86
12
28.57
aSCR: standard competition rank. Equal countries were given the same ranking number, and then a gap is left in the ranking numbers
bHCA: number of highly cited articles. Articles with ≥ 30 citations were considered HCA. Percentage of HCA was calculated by dividing total number of HCA by total number of publications for each institution/ organization assigned

Journals

Journals publishing at least 20 articles on MDR, XDR, TDR-TB are shown in Table 7. The total number of publications produced by journals in the list was 975 (43.14%) with a total IF of 7494.27 which gives an average of 7.68 per article. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases ranked first followed by PloS One. Most journals in the list have IF. PloS One journal was the only multidisciplinary journal present in the list. The other ones in the list were within the scope of infection and general medicine. Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) had the highest IF and both are in general medicine. The top list included one Chinese and one Japanese journal while the remaining journals are Europeans or American ones.
Table 7
Journals publishing at least 20 articles on MDR, XDR, and TDR – TB (2006–2015)
Journal
Country
Frequency
%
IF
TIF
International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
France
212
9.38
2.315
490.78
Plos One
USA
123
5.44
3.54
435.42
European Respiratory Journal
Switzerland
81
3.58
8.332
674.892
Emerging Infectious Diseases
USA
61
2.70
6.99
426.39
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
USA
54
2.39
3.993
215.622
Clinical Infectious Diseases
USA
50
2.21
8.736
436.8
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
USA
41
1.81
3.34
136.94
Lancet
UK
41
1.81
44.002
1804.082
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
UK
38
1.68
4.919
186.922
BMC Infectious Diseases
UK
37
1.64
2.690
99.53
International Journal of Mycobacteriology
USA
37
1.64
N/A
0
Indian Journal of Tuberculosis
India
30
1.33
N/A
0
Lancet Infectious Diseases
UK
27
1.19
21.371
577.017
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
USA
26
1.15
13.118
341.068
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Netherlands
26
1.15
4.079
106.054
New England Journal of Medicine
USA
25
1.11
59.558
1488.95
Tuberculosis
USA
25
1.11
2.952
73.8
Kekkaku
Japan
21
0.93
N/A
0
Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
China
20
0.88
N/A
0
  
975 (43.14%)
  
7494.267
IF impact factor
TIF total impact factor obtained by multiplying the impact factor of the journal by the number of articles published by that journal = 7494.267
Citation analysis of most productive journals is depicted as a network visualization map (Fig. 6). International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease had the highest number of citations followed by PloS One and European Respiratory Journal. The number of citations is correlated with the circle size assigned for the journal. Co-citation analysis for most productive journals is shown in Fig. 7. Journals with a minimum of 200 citations were included. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease is commonly co-cited with Lancet (link strength = 6842), Journal of Clinical Microbiology (link strength = 5767), Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (link strength = 5052), NEJM (link strength = 5161), Clinical Infectious Disease (link strength = 4882), and American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (link strength = 4515).

Authors

A total of 8246 authors contributed to the publications, giving an average of 3.65 authors per article. Authors who had published at least 20 articles are shown in Table 8. The list included five authors from the USA, three authors from Italy, three authors from Iran, two authors from South Africa, two from WHO, one from China, one from Latvia, one from Germany, one from Switzerland, one from Sweden, and one with two affiliations, USA/ UAE. Author collaboration among top active authors is depicted in Fig. 8. Examples of strong collaboration were seen among the following authors: Migliori, G.B. - Sotgiu, G. (link strength = 37), Migliori, G.B. - Centis, R. (link strength = 37), Mitnick, C.D. - Becerra, M.C. (link strength = 22), Migliori, G.B. - Lange, C. (link strength = 22), Sotgiu, G. - Centis, R. (link strength = 25), Mitnick, C.D. - Bayona, J. (link strength = 16), and Masjedi, M.R. - Farnia, P. (link strength = 17). The strength of collaboration is relative to the thickness of connection between any two researchers. Authors with similar circle color are considered a cluster, i.e. have close collaboration.
Table 8
Top active authors with a minimum contribution of 20 articles (2006 – 2015)
Author
Frequency
%
N = 2260
Affiliation as appeared in Scopus profile
Migliori, G.B.
63
2.79
IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
Mitnick, C.D.
36
1.59
Partners in Health, Boston, United States
Sotgiu, G.
42
1.86
Universita degli Studi di Sassari, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Sassari, Italy
Becerra, M.C.
29
1.28
Harvard Medical School, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Boston, United States
Keshavjee, S.
31
1.37
Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Centis, R.
39
1.73
IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
Bayona, J.
25
1.11
Harvard Medical School, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Boston, United States
Farnia, P.
25
1.11
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Gandhi, N.R.
27
1.19
Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, United States
Leimane, V.
26
1.15
Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
Masjedi, M.R.
25
1.11
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center, Tehran, Iran
Yew, W.W.
26
1.15
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Stanley Ho Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Hong Kong, China
Zignol, M.
24
1.06
Organisation Mondiale de la Sante, Global TB Programme, Geneve, Switzerland
Lange, C.
27
1.19
Forschungszentrum Borstel - Zentrum fur Medizin und Biowissenschaften, Borstel, Germany
Padayatchi, N.
25
1.11
Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa, Congella, South Africa
Tabarsi, P.
23
1.02
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Victor, T.C.
20
0.88
Universiteit Stellenbosch, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Koh, W.J.
22
0.97
SungKyunKwan University, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
D’Ambrosio, L.
20
0.88
Public Health Consulting Group, Lugano, Switzerland
Falzon, D.
20
0.88
Organisation Mondiale de la Sante, Global TB Programme, Geneve, Switzerland
Hoffner, S.
20
0.88
Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Stockholm, Sweden
Shah, N.S.
20
0.88
Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Department of Medicine, New York, United States

Highly cited articles

Table 9 shows the top 20 highly cites articles. The highest number of citations obtained was 1069. The article titled “Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa” received the highest number of citations. Four articles from the top 20 cited articles were published in NEJM, three articles were published in Lancet, and two were published in Lancet Infectious Diseases. The topics covered in highly cited articles range from general public health impact of MDR, XDR, TDR-TB to results of newly approved drugs for treatment of MDR-TB. The top 20 cited articles included five review articles, one conference paper, one letter, one short survey, and the remaining were research articles.
Table 9
Top highly cited articles on MDR, XDR, TDR-TB (2006–2015)
Reference
Number of citations
Document Type
Reference
Number of citations
Document Type
[53]
1069
Article
[54]
264
Article
[55]
587
Review
[56]
262
Article
[57]
443
Article
[58]
261
Article
[59]
435
Review
[60]
257
Short Survey
[61]
424
Article
[62]
253
Letter
[63]
374
Article
[64]
246
Review
[65]
340
Article
[66]
236
Article
[67]
297
Review
[68]
226
Article
[7]
290
Article
[69]
219
Article
[70]
284
Conference Paper
[71]
214
Review

Discussion

In this study, a bibliometric overview of publications on MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB was presented. Our study showed a steady increase on worldwide publications on MDR, XDR and TDR-TB suggesting that this problem is a global health problem and can be a public health burden if the current situation continues as is [34, 35]. The value of h-index of retrieved articles in the past decade supports the fact that this problem is spreading and is being cited heavily in the literature. Analysis of Scopus database for articles with keywords pertaining to infectious diseases showed six fold increase in the number of publications from 2006 to 2015. Therefore, it is possible that part of the increase in MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB publications is due to the overall growth of publications with time in the field of infections and infectious diseases. However, analysis of Scopus database for publications in the past decade showed that the number of publications on TB was less than doubled in the past decade while the number of publications on TB resistance had increased by more than three folds in the past decade suggesting that resistance is increasing at a rate higher than that of TB in general.
According to Global Tuberculosis Report 2015, a total of approximately 10 million incident cases of TB were recorded in 2014, mostly in Asia and Africa [3, 36]. This explains the presence of China, India, South Korea and South Africa in the top ten productive countries. A study in China found that 25% of surveyed TB patients had TB that was resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, or both, and 1 out of 10 had MDR tuberculosis [37]. Reports from India about MDR, XDR and TDR –TB have been published that raises calls of immediate response by Indian medical community [38]. South Africa has also reported many cases of MDR, XDR and TDR-TB [39, 40]. The Global Tuberculosis Report further explains that 11–13% of new incident tuberculosis cases in 2014 were among HIV positive people. This might explain the presence of two articles in the most cited list that discuss tuberculosis and MDR in HIV patients. Actually, a study has reported that tuberculosis, drug abuse, HIV, and MDR-TB are devastating epidemics in some countries in Asia and urgent action is needed [41]. Our study showed that three countries of HBC MDR-TB ranked among the top ten active countries. In general, the publication from HBC MDR-TB was parallel to that of worldwide productivity suggesting that there is a real interest and concern regarding this subject. Out of the twenty HBC MDR-TB, Russian Federation and Peru had noticeable contribution. Russian Federation is considered by the WHO as one of 30 countries described as HBC TB [42].
International collaboration was common among most countries in the top productive countries. Despite that initiation of successful collaboration between Western rich countries and some poor countries with high TB prevalence has been reported [43], countries like China, India and South Korea where TB and TB-resistant cases are found showed lower international collaboration in TB drug resistance research. It could be the language barrier particularly for Chinese and Korean scientists. Other possible explanations include lack of collaboration between these countries and European and American countries in most other medical research fields. Collaboration among authors in different countries is important in advancing science and in combating TB through exchange of expertise and knowledge. A study indicated that public – private collaboration can produce successful detection and therapy of TB cases [44]. Another study indicated that governmental – NGOs collaboration in poor countries like Bangladesh is an effective strategy in detection and eradication of TB [45]. Antimicrobial resistance is a true challenge for international efforts to stop and reverse TB worldwide [46]. Preparing for this challenge requires collaboration, use of advanced molecular biology techniques, development of new pharmaceuticals, and worldwide research activity on TB.
Exploration of the top ten cited articles on MDR, EDR and TDR-TB reveals much to be planned for in this regard. It is true that TB is a major single killer among all infectious diseases, but co-infection of TB with HIV makes the prognosis even worse which requires the availability of potent anti-TB drugs and combating development of resistance to these drugs to promote better prognosis for patients co-infected with HIV and TB. Some authors described the presence of HIV and MDR-TB as a perfect storm with disastrous consequences [47]. Effective diagnostic tools for screening and early detection of TB and MDR-TB is an important strategy in combating drug resistant TB [48, 49]. The development of such cost-effective diagnostic techniques is urgent given that the majority of TB patients have no access to drug-resistance screening to optimize their therapy [49]. No wonder that an article about the feasibility and efficacy of a diagnostic techniques was among top ten cited articles [48]. One more important of concern in drug – resistant TB global public health challenge is the search for new drugs to overcome reported MDR-TB. One such drug is diarylquinoline TMC207 which is still under clinical investigation for MDR-TB cases [50].
No doubt that drug resistance TB deserves a lot of research and the scientific community needs to be aware where worldwide research on this topic is standing. Our study is being strong in the fact that it is the first to give a bibliometric overview on MDR, XDR and TDR – TB publications. However, missing some articles is a possibility due to unindexed journal publication or accuracy of search strategy despite that the authors have done their best to avoid false negative and false positive results as described in the methodology. Furthermore, the use of title search strategy instead of title/abstract strategy created some pros and cons. Title search strategy created minimum false positive results, but might create some false negative results that need to be taken into consideration. No bibliometric study is 100% accurate and perfect and it is always a snapshot of the current situation based on certain keywords used in data collection. In addition, no electronic database is considered perfect for data collection. System updates, different affiliations, different name spelling, and sometimes missing data can be found in electronic databases commonly used in bibliometric studies. Finally, it should be emphasized that definitions pertaining to resistance terminology are not standardized. However, the definitions presented in this study are the most common ones. Limitations in this study are similar in nature to those present and listed in most bibliometric studies [2128]. Despite all these limitations, this study was meant to fill gap in literature and knowledge on MDR, XDR, and TDR –TB in general hoping that this study will be of value to those in the field. Furthermore, this is the first bibliometric study on MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB despite that several bibliometric studies on TB were carried out [51, 52].

Conclusions

Our study showed that publications on MDR, XDR and TDR – TB have increased in the past decade. The majority of articles on MDR, XDR and TDR-TB were published in journals with high IF, suggestive of importance of the topic to clinicians and researchers. Search for feasible, accurate, cost effective diagnostic tests, and new anti TB drugs are hot topics in this field. International collaboration in this field was evident for most countries. The exchange of expertise, ideas and technology is of paramount importance in this field especially that TB is common in poor countries that lack these expertise.

Acknowledgement

None.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

All data present in this article can be retrieved from Scopus using keywords listed in the methodology.

Authors’ contributions

All authors were involved in drafting the article, and all authors approved the final version to be submitted for publication. WMS conceptualized, designed the study, and performed the statistical analyses.

Authors’ information

Professor Waleed M. Sweileh is a distinguished Professor of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences at An-Najah National University.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaziou P, Sismanidis C, Floyd K, Raviglione M. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;5(2):a017798.CrossRefPubMed Glaziou P, Sismanidis C, Floyd K, Raviglione M. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;5(2):a017798.CrossRefPubMed
2.
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Velayati AA, Masjedi MR, Farnia P, Tabarsi P, Ghanavi J, Ziazarifi AH, et al. Emergence of new forms of totally drug-resistant tuberculosis bacilli: Super extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis or totally drug-resistant strains in Iran. Chest. 2009;136(2):420–5.CrossRefPubMed Velayati AA, Masjedi MR, Farnia P, Tabarsi P, Ghanavi J, Ziazarifi AH, et al. Emergence of new forms of totally drug-resistant tuberculosis bacilli: Super extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis or totally drug-resistant strains in Iran. Chest. 2009;136(2):420–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Velayati AA, Farnia P, Masjedi MR. The totally drug resistant tuberculosis (TDR-TB). Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6(4):307–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Velayati AA, Farnia P, Masjedi MR. The totally drug resistant tuberculosis (TDR-TB). Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6(4):307–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Migliori G, De Iaco G, Besozzi G, Centis R, Cirillo DM. First tuberculosis cases in Italy resistant to all tested drugs. Euro Surveill. 2007;12(5):E070517.PubMed Migliori G, De Iaco G, Besozzi G, Centis R, Cirillo DM. First tuberculosis cases in Italy resistant to all tested drugs. Euro Surveill. 2007;12(5):E070517.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Organization, W.H. Use of high burden country lists for TB by WHO in the post-2015 era. Geneva: WHO; 2015. Organization, W.H. Use of high burden country lists for TB by WHO in the post-2015 era. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Matteelli A, Migliori GB, Cirillo D, Centis R, Girard E, Raviglion M. Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: epidemiology and control. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2007;5(5):857–71.CrossRefPubMed Matteelli A, Migliori GB, Cirillo D, Centis R, Girard E, Raviglion M. Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: epidemiology and control. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2007;5(5):857–71.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos JM, Padilla S, Masiá M, Gutiérrez F. A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research indexed in PubMed, 1997–2006. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12(12):1461–8.PubMed Ramos JM, Padilla S, Masiá M, Gutiérrez F. A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research indexed in PubMed, 1997–2006. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12(12):1461–8.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Arunachalam S, Gunasekaran S. Tuberculosis research in India and China: From bibliometrics to research policy. Curr Sci. 2002;82(8):933–47. Arunachalam S, Gunasekaran S. Tuberculosis research in India and China: From bibliometrics to research policy. Curr Sci. 2002;82(8):933–47.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta B, Bala A. Mapping of tuberculosis research in India: a scientometric analysis of publications output during 1998–2009. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information management. 2011;5(1):33–51.CrossRef Gupta B, Bala A. Mapping of tuberculosis research in India: a scientometric analysis of publications output during 1998–2009. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information management. 2011;5(1):33–51.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeyshankar, R. and P. Ganesan, Research Output of Scientist of Tuberculosis Research Centre (TRC), Chennai, Tamil Nadu: A Scientometric Study. Indian J Inf Sources Serv (IJISS). 2011;1(2). Jeyshankar, R. and P. Ganesan, Research Output of Scientist of Tuberculosis Research Centre (TRC), Chennai, Tamil Nadu: A Scientometric Study. Indian J Inf Sources Serv (IJISS). 2011;1(2).
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mori T. Trends of tuberculosis researches in Japan and the roles of Kekkaku. Kekkaku. 2009;84(7):519–22.PubMed Mori T. Trends of tuberculosis researches in Japan and the roles of Kekkaku. Kekkaku. 2009;84(7):519–22.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson DF, Walker CK. A descriptive and historical review of bibliometrics with applications to medical sciences. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35(6):551–9.CrossRefPubMed Thompson DF, Walker CK. A descriptive and historical review of bibliometrics with applications to medical sciences. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35(6):551–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF. Assessing urology and nephrology research activity in Arab countries using ISI web of science bibliometric database. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF. Assessing urology and nephrology research activity in Arab countries using ISI web of science bibliometric database. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Waring WS. Scientific research related to calcium channel blockers poisoning: Bibliometric analysis in Scopus, 1968–2012. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2015;34(11):1162–70.CrossRefPubMed Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Waring WS. Scientific research related to calcium channel blockers poisoning: Bibliometric analysis in Scopus, 1968–2012. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2015;34(11):1162–70.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sweileh WM, Shraim NY, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF, Rahhal B, Khayyat RA, et al. Assessing worldwide research activity on probiotics in pediatrics using Scopus database: 1994–2014. World Allergy Organ J. 2016;9:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sweileh WM, Shraim NY, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF, Rahhal B, Khayyat RA, et al. Assessing worldwide research activity on probiotics in pediatrics using Scopus database: 1994–2014. World Allergy Organ J. 2016;9:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF. Contribution of Arab countries to breast cancer research: comparison with non-Arab Middle Eastern countries. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF. Contribution of Arab countries to breast cancer research: comparison with non-Arab Middle Eastern countries. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM. Scientific publications from Arab world in leading journals of Integrative and Complementary Medicine: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:308.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM. Scientific publications from Arab world in leading journals of Integrative and Complementary Medicine: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:308.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Al-Khalil S, Alqub M, Awang R. Global methaemoglobinaemia research output (1940–2013): a bibliometric analysis. Springerplus. 2015;4:626.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Al-Khalil S, Alqub M, Awang R. Global methaemoglobinaemia research output (1940–2013): a bibliometric analysis. Springerplus. 2015;4:626.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Al-Khalil S, Zyoud SH, Sawalha AF, et al. The Arab world’s contribution to solid waste literature: a bibliometric analysis. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Al-Khalil S, Zyoud SH, Sawalha AF, et al. The Arab world’s contribution to solid waste literature: a bibliometric analysis. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R, Waring WS. Bibliometric profile of the global scientific research on methanol poisoning (1902–2012). J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R, Waring WS. Bibliometric profile of the global scientific research on methanol poisoning (1902–2012). J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Zyoud SH, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R. Contribution of Arab countries to pharmaceutical wastewater literature: a bibliometric and comparative analysis of research output. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2016;28:28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zyoud SH, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R. Contribution of Arab countries to pharmaceutical wastewater literature: a bibliometric and comparative analysis of research output. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2016;28:28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr. 2006;29(3):7. Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr. 2006;29(3):7.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42.CrossRefPubMed Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston JC, Shahidi NC, Sadatsafavi M, Fitzgerald JM. Treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e6914.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Johnston JC, Shahidi NC, Sadatsafavi M, Fitzgerald JM. Treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e6914.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38.CrossRefPubMed van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zemlyanaya N, et al. Estimating costs for treating patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) under the regional tuberculosis control program, Tomsk (Russia). Eur Respir J. 2015;46 Suppl 59:PA2703.CrossRef Zemlyanaya N, et al. Estimating costs for treating patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) under the regional tuberculosis control program, Tomsk (Russia). Eur Respir J. 2015;46 Suppl 59:PA2703.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung-Delgado K, Guillen-Bravo S, Revilla-Montag A, Bernabe-Ortiz A. Mortality among MDR-TB cases: comparison with drug-susceptible tuberculosis and associated factors. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119332.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chung-Delgado K, Guillen-Bravo S, Revilla-Montag A, Bernabe-Ortiz A. Mortality among MDR-TB cases: comparison with drug-susceptible tuberculosis and associated factors. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119332.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Calver AD, Falmer AA, Murray M, Strauss OJ, Streicher EM, et al. Emergence of increased resistance and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis despite treatment adherence, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(2):264–71.CrossRefPubMed Calver AD, Falmer AA, Murray M, Strauss OJ, Streicher EM, et al. Emergence of increased resistance and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis despite treatment adherence, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(2):264–71.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao Y, Xu S, Wang L, Chin DP, Wang S, Jiang G, et al. National survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(23):2161–70.CrossRefPubMed Zhao Y, Xu S, Wang L, Chin DP, Wang S, Jiang G, et al. National survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(23):2161–70.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas A, Joseph P, Nair D, Rao DV, Rekha VV, Selvakumar N, et al. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: experience at the Tuberculosis Research Centre, Chennai, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(10):1323–5. Thomas A, Joseph P, Nair D, Rao DV, Rekha VV, Selvakumar N, et al. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: experience at the Tuberculosis Research Centre, Chennai, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(10):1323–5.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Streicher EM, Müller B, Chihota V, Mlambo C, Tait M, Pillay M, et al. Emergence and treatment of multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis in South Africa. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12(4):686–94.CrossRefPubMed Streicher EM, Müller B, Chihota V, Mlambo C, Tait M, Pillay M, et al. Emergence and treatment of multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis in South Africa. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12(4):686–94.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Chihota VN, Müller B, Mlambo CK, Pillay M, Tait M, Streicher EM, et al. Population structure of multi- and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in South Africa. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(3):995–1002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chihota VN, Müller B, Mlambo CK, Pillay M, Tait M, Streicher EM, et al. Population structure of multi- and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in South Africa. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(3):995–1002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Schluger NW, El-Bassel N, Hermosilla S, Terlikbayeva A, Darisheva M, Aifah A, et al. Tuberculosis, drug use and HIV infection in Central Asia: an urgent need for attention. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;132:S32–6.CrossRefPubMed Schluger NW, El-Bassel N, Hermosilla S, Terlikbayeva A, Darisheva M, Aifah A, et al. Tuberculosis, drug use and HIV infection in Central Asia: an urgent need for attention. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;132:S32–6.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Enarson DA. Tuberculosis: 12. Global disease and the role of international collaboration. CMAJ. 2000;162(1):57–61.PubMedPubMedCentral Enarson DA. Tuberculosis: 12. Global disease and the role of international collaboration. CMAJ. 2000;162(1):57–61.PubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Malmborg R, Mann G, Thomson R, Squire SB. Can public-private collaboration promote tuberculosis case detection among the poor and vulnerable? Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(9):752–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Malmborg R, Mann G, Thomson R, Squire SB. Can public-private collaboration promote tuberculosis case detection among the poor and vulnerable? Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(9):752–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Zafar Ullah AN, Newell JN, Ahmed JU, Hyder MK, Islam A. Government-NGO collaboration: the case of tuberculosis control in Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21(2):143–55.CrossRefPubMed Zafar Ullah AN, Newell JN, Ahmed JU, Hyder MK, Islam A. Government-NGO collaboration: the case of tuberculosis control in Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21(2):143–55.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Schito M, Maeurer M, Kim P, Hanna D, Zumla A. Translating the Tuberculosis Research Agenda: Much Accomplished, but Much More to Be Done. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61 Suppl 3:S95–101.CrossRefPubMedCentral Schito M, Maeurer M, Kim P, Hanna D, Zumla A. Translating the Tuberculosis Research Agenda: Much Accomplished, but Much More to Be Done. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61 Suppl 3:S95–101.CrossRefPubMedCentral
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells CD, Cegielski JP, Nelson LJ, Laserson KF, Holtz TH, Finlay A, et al. HIV infection and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: the perfect storm. J Infect Dis. 2007;196 Suppl 1:S86–107.CrossRefPubMed Wells CD, Cegielski JP, Nelson LJ, Laserson KF, Holtz TH, Finlay A, et al. HIV infection and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: the perfect storm. J Infect Dis. 2007;196 Suppl 1:S86–107.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, Pai M, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;21(1):CD009593. Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, Pai M, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;21(1):CD009593.
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Vassall A, van Kampen S, Sohn H, Michael JS, John KR, den Boon S, et al. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in high burden countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS Med. 2011;8(11):e1001120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vassall A, van Kampen S, Sohn H, Michael JS, John KR, den Boon S, et al. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in high burden countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS Med. 2011;8(11):e1001120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Palomino JC, Martin A. TMC207 becomes bedaquiline, a new anti-TB drug. Future Microbiol. 2013;8(9):1071–80. Palomino JC, Martin A. TMC207 becomes bedaquiline, a new anti-TB drug. Future Microbiol. 2013;8(9):1071–80.
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Maharana RK, AK Das, JK Sahu. Tuberculosis (TB) research in India during 2004–2013: a bibliometric analysis. Libr Philos Pract (e-journal). 2014. Maharana RK, AK Das, JK Sahu. Tuberculosis (TB) research in India during 2004–2013: a bibliometric analysis. Libr Philos Pract (e-journal). 2014.
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen LM, Liu YQ, Shen JN, Peng YL, Xiong TY, Tong X, et al. The 100 top-cited tuberculosis research studies. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(6):717–22.CrossRefPubMed Chen LM, Liu YQ, Shen JN, Peng YL, Xiong TY, Tong X, et al. The 100 top-cited tuberculosis research studies. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(6):717–22.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandhi NR, Moll A, Sturm AW, Pawinski R, Govender T, Lalloo U, et al. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa. Lancet. 2006;368(9547):1575–80.CrossRefPubMed Gandhi NR, Moll A, Sturm AW, Pawinski R, Govender T, Lalloo U, et al. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa. Lancet. 2006;368(9547):1575–80.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnard M, Albert H, Coetzee G, O'Brien R, Bosman ME. Rapid molecular screening for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a high-volume public health laboratory in South Africa. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(7):787–92.CrossRefPubMed Barnard M, Albert H, Coetzee G, O'Brien R, Bosman ME. Rapid molecular screening for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a high-volume public health laboratory in South Africa. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(7):787–92.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Contr\ol and Prevention (CDC). Emergence of mycobacterium tuberculosis with extensive resistance to second-line drugs - Worldwide, 2000–2004. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55(11):301–5. Centers for Disease Contr\ol and Prevention (CDC). Emergence of mycobacterium tuberculosis with extensive resistance to second-line drugs - Worldwide, 2000–2004. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55(11):301–5.
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Gler MT, Skripconoka V, Sanchez-Garavito E, Xiao H, Cabrera-Rivero JL, Vargas-Vasquez DE, et al. Delamanid for multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(23):2151–60.CrossRefPubMed Gler MT, Skripconoka V, Sanchez-Garavito E, Xiao H, Cabrera-Rivero JL, Vargas-Vasquez DE, et al. Delamanid for multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(23):2151–60.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Boehme CC, Nicol MP, Nabeta P, Michael JS, Gotuzzo E, Tahirli R, et al. Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: A multicentre implementation study. Lancet. 2011;377(9776):1495–505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boehme CC, Nicol MP, Nabeta P, Michael JS, Gotuzzo E, Tahirli R, et al. Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: A multicentre implementation study. Lancet. 2011;377(9776):1495–505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitnick CD, Shin SS, Seung KJ, Rich ML, Atwood SS, Furin JJ, et al. Comprehensive treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(6):563–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mitnick CD, Shin SS, Seung KJ, Rich ML, Atwood SS, Furin JJ, et al. Comprehensive treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(6):563–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandhi NR, Nunn P, Dheda K, Schaaf HS, Zignol M, van Soolingen D, et al. Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a threat to global control of tuberculosis. Lancet. 2010;375(9728):1830–43.CrossRefPubMed Gandhi NR, Nunn P, Dheda K, Schaaf HS, Zignol M, van Soolingen D, et al. Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a threat to global control of tuberculosis. Lancet. 2010;375(9728):1830–43.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Raviglione MC, Smith IM. XDR tuberculosis - Implications for Global Public Health. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(7):656–9.CrossRefPubMed Raviglione MC, Smith IM. XDR tuberculosis - Implications for Global Public Health. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(7):656–9.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Diacon AH, Pym A, Grobusch M, Patientia R, Rustomjee R, Page-Shipp L, et al. The diarylquinoline TMC207 for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(23):2397–405.CrossRefPubMed Diacon AH, Pym A, Grobusch M, Patientia R, Rustomjee R, Page-Shipp L, et al. The diarylquinoline TMC207 for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(23):2397–405.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Udwadia ZF, Amale RA, Ajbani KK, Rodrigues C. Totally drug-resistant tuberculosis in India. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(4):579–81.CrossRefPubMed Udwadia ZF, Amale RA, Ajbani KK, Rodrigues C. Totally drug-resistant tuberculosis in India. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(4):579–81.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Zignol M, Hosseini MS, Wright A, Weezenbeek CL, Nunn P, Watt CJ, et al. Global incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2006;194(4):479–85.CrossRefPubMed Zignol M, Hosseini MS, Wright A, Weezenbeek CL, Nunn P, Watt CJ, et al. Global incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2006;194(4):479–85.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Caminero JA, Sotgiu G, Zumla A, Migliori GB. Best drug treatment for multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(9):621–9.CrossRefPubMed Caminero JA, Sotgiu G, Zumla A, Migliori GB. Best drug treatment for multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(9):621–9.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah NS, Wright A, Bai GH, Barrera L, Boulahbal F, Martín-Casabona N, et al. Worldwide emergence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(3):380–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shah NS, Wright A, Bai GH, Barrera L, Boulahbal F, Martín-Casabona N, et al. Worldwide emergence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(3):380–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Hugonnet JE, Tremblay LW, Boshoff HI, Barry CE 3rd, Blanchard JS. Meropenem-clavulanate is effective against extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 2009;323(5918):1215–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hugonnet JE, Tremblay LW, Boshoff HI, Barry CE 3rd, Blanchard JS. Meropenem-clavulanate is effective against extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 2009;323(5918):1215–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Orenstein EW, Basu S, Shah NS, Andrews JR, Friedland GH, Moll AP, et al. Treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(3):153–61.CrossRefPubMed Orenstein EW, Basu S, Shah NS, Andrews JR, Friedland GH, Moll AP, et al. Treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(3):153–61.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Ling DI, Zwerling AA, Pai M. GenoType MTBDR assays for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(5):1165–74.CrossRefPubMed Ling DI, Zwerling AA, Pai M. GenoType MTBDR assays for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(5):1165–74.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Deun A, Maug AK, Salim MA, Das PK, Sarker MR, Daru P, et al. Short, highly effective, and inexpensive standardized treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(5):684–92.CrossRefPubMed Van Deun A, Maug AK, Salim MA, Das PK, Sarker MR, Daru P, et al. Short, highly effective, and inexpensive standardized treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(5):684–92.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells CD, Cegielski JP, Nelson LJ, Laserson KF, Holtz TH, Finlay A, et al. HIV infection and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - The perfect storm. J Infect Dis. 2007;196 Suppl 1:S86–107. Wells CD, Cegielski JP, Nelson LJ, Laserson KF, Holtz TH, Finlay A, et al. HIV infection and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - The perfect storm. J Infect Dis. 2007;196 Suppl 1:S86–107.
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston JC, Shahidi NC, Sadatsafavi M, Fitzgerald JM. Treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e6914. Johnston JC, Shahidi NC, Sadatsafavi M, Fitzgerald JM. Treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e6914.
Metadaten
Titel
Bibliometric analysis of worldwide publications on multi-, extensively, and totally drug – resistant tuberculosis (2006–2015)
verfasst von
Waleed M. Sweileh
Adham S. AbuTaha
Ansam F. Sawalha
Suleiman Al-Khalil
Samah W. Al-Jabi
Sa’ed H. Zyoud
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2016
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2016
Elektronische ISSN: 2049-6958
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40248-016-0081-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Reviewer acknowledgement

Reviewer acknowledgement 2015

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.