Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019

15.07.2019 | Preclinical study

Breast pain and cancer: should we continue to work-up isolated breast pain?

verfasst von: Marina Mohallem Fonseca, Leslie R. Lamb, Raman Verma, Olaitan Ogunkinle, Jean M. Seely

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the cancer detection rate (CDR) in patients presenting with isolated breast pain.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients presenting to a large tertiary care academic center or an affiliated hospital with isolated breast pain from October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, pain characteristics, imaging findings, and outcome.

Results

The study cohort was comprised of 971 exams in 953 patients, with a median age of 50 years. A total of 62.5% (607/971) of the cases were assessed by mammography and ultrasound, 24.4% (237/971) by ultrasound only, and 13.1% (127/971) by mammography only. Including the abnormalities detected in the asymptomatic breast, 88.7% (861/971) of the cases were negative or had benign findings (BI-RADS 1 and 2), 6.8% (66/971) were probably benign (BI-RADS 3), 3.9% (38/971) were suspicious (BI-RADS 4), and 0.6% (6/971) were highly suggestive of malignancy (BI-RADS 5). CDR on initial work-up was 0.8% (8/953), of which 0.6% (4/690) was in average-risk patients while 1.5% (4/263) was in higher-than-average risk patients.

Conclusions

CDR in patients presenting with isolated breast pain overall was low, comparable to the expected incidence of breast cancer in asymptomatic women. Work-up for isolated breast pain may therefore be unnecessary and lead to overutilization of healthcare resources. Routine screening mammography should be encouraged and higher-than-average risk patients may benefit from additional tests.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ader DN, Browne MW (1997) Prevalence and impact of cyclic mastalgia in a United States clinic-based sample. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:126–132CrossRefPubMed Ader DN, Browne MW (1997) Prevalence and impact of cyclic mastalgia in a United States clinic-based sample. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:126–132CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ader DN, Shriver CD (1997) Cyclical mastalgia: prevalence and impact in an outpatient breast clinic sample. J Am Coll Surg 185:466–470CrossRefPubMed Ader DN, Shriver CD (1997) Cyclical mastalgia: prevalence and impact in an outpatient breast clinic sample. J Am Coll Surg 185:466–470CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kataria K, Dhar A, Srivastava A, Kumar S, Goyal A (2014) A systematic review of current understanding and management of mastalgia. Indian J Surg 76:217–222CrossRefPubMed Kataria K, Dhar A, Srivastava A, Kumar S, Goyal A (2014) A systematic review of current understanding and management of mastalgia. Indian J Surg 76:217–222CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Leinster SJ, Whitehouse GH, Walsh PV (1987) Cyclical mastalgia: clinical and mammographic observations in a screened population. Br J Surg 74:220–222CrossRefPubMed Leinster SJ, Whitehouse GH, Walsh PV (1987) Cyclical mastalgia: clinical and mammographic observations in a screened population. Br J Surg 74:220–222CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Scurr J, Hedger W, Morris P, Brown N (2014) The prevalence, severity, and impact of breast pain in the general population. Breast J 20:508–513CrossRefPubMed Scurr J, Hedger W, Morris P, Brown N (2014) The prevalence, severity, and impact of breast pain in the general population. Breast J 20:508–513CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kushwaha AC, Shin K, Kalambo M, Legha R, Gerlach KE, Kapoor MM, Yang WT (2018) Overutilization of health care resources for breast pain. Am J Roentgenol 211:217–223CrossRef Kushwaha AC, Shin K, Kalambo M, Legha R, Gerlach KE, Kapoor MM, Yang WT (2018) Overutilization of health care resources for breast pain. Am J Roentgenol 211:217–223CrossRef
7.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Barton MB, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW (1999) Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome. Ann Intern Med 130:651–657CrossRefPubMed Barton MB, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW (1999) Breast symptoms among women enrolled in a health maintenance organization: frequency, evaluation, and outcome. Ann Intern Med 130:651–657CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chetlen AL, Kapoor MM, Watts MR (2017) Mastalgia: imaging work-up appropriateness. Acad Radiol 24:345–349CrossRefPubMed Chetlen AL, Kapoor MM, Watts MR (2017) Mastalgia: imaging work-up appropriateness. Acad Radiol 24:345–349CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fariselli G, Lepera P, Viganotti G, Martelli G, Bandieramonte G, Di Pietro S (1988) Localized mastalgia as presenting symptom in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 14:213–215PubMed Fariselli G, Lepera P, Viganotti G, Martelli G, Bandieramonte G, Di Pietro S (1988) Localized mastalgia as presenting symptom in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 14:213–215PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Leddy R, Irshad A, Zerwas E et al (2013) Role of breast ultrasound and mammography in evaluating patients presenting with focal breast pain in the absence of a palpable lump. Breast J 19:582–589CrossRefPubMed Leddy R, Irshad A, Zerwas E et al (2013) Role of breast ultrasound and mammography in evaluating patients presenting with focal breast pain in the absence of a palpable lump. Breast J 19:582–589CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung JW, Kornguth PJ, Gotway MB (2002) Utility of targeted sonography in the evaluation of focal breast pain. J Ultrasound Med 21:521–526 (quiz 28–29)CrossRefPubMed Leung JW, Kornguth PJ, Gotway MB (2002) Utility of targeted sonography in the evaluation of focal breast pain. J Ultrasound Med 21:521–526 (quiz 28–29)CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Locker AP, Manhire AR, Stickland V, Caseldine J, Blamey RW (1989) Mammography in symptomatic breast disease. Lancet 1:887–889CrossRefPubMed Locker AP, Manhire AR, Stickland V, Caseldine J, Blamey RW (1989) Mammography in symptomatic breast disease. Lancet 1:887–889CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lumachi F, Ermani M, Brandes AA et al (2002) Breast complaints and risk of breast cancer. Population-based study of 2,879 self-selected women and long-term follow-up. Biomed Pharmacother 56(2):88–92CrossRefPubMed Lumachi F, Ermani M, Brandes AA et al (2002) Breast complaints and risk of breast cancer. Population-based study of 2,879 self-selected women and long-term follow-up. Biomed Pharmacother 56(2):88–92CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith RL, Pruthi S, Fitzpatrick LA (2004) Evaluation and management of breast pain. Mayo Clin Proc 79(3):353–372CrossRefPubMed Smith RL, Pruthi S, Fitzpatrick LA (2004) Evaluation and management of breast pain. Mayo Clin Proc 79(3):353–372CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Duijm LEM, Guit GL, Hendriks JHCL, Zaat JOM, Mali WPTM (1998) Value of breast imaging in women with painful breasts: observational follow up study. Br Med J317(7171):1492–1495CrossRef Duijm LEM, Guit GL, Hendriks JHCL, Zaat JOM, Mali WPTM (1998) Value of breast imaging in women with painful breasts: observational follow up study. Br Med J317(7171):1492–1495CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Masroor I, Afzal S, Sakhawat S, Khan N, Beg MA, Kawai D (2009) Negative predictive value of mammography and sonography in mastalgia with negative physical findings. J Pak Med Assoc 59:598–601PubMed Masroor I, Afzal S, Sakhawat S, Khan N, Beg MA, Kawai D (2009) Negative predictive value of mammography and sonography in mastalgia with negative physical findings. J Pak Med Assoc 59:598–601PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho MW, Grimm LJ, Johnson KS (2017) Focal breast pain: does breast density affect the need for ultrasound? Acad Radiol 24:53–59CrossRefPubMed Cho MW, Grimm LJ, Johnson KS (2017) Focal breast pain: does breast density affect the need for ultrasound? Acad Radiol 24:53–59CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Noroozian M, Stein LF, Gaetke-Udager K, Helvie MA (2015) Long-term clinical outcomes in women with breast pain in the absence of additional clinical findings: mammography remains indicated. Breast Cancer Res Treat 149:417–424CrossRefPubMed Noroozian M, Stein LF, Gaetke-Udager K, Helvie MA (2015) Long-term clinical outcomes in women with breast pain in the absence of additional clinical findings: mammography remains indicated. Breast Cancer Res Treat 149:417–424CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jokich PM, Bailey L, D’Orsi C, Green ED, Holbrook AI, Lee SJ, Lourenco AP, Mainiero MB, Moy L, Sepulveda KA, Slanetz PJ, Trikha S, Yepes MM, Newell MS (2017) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® breast pain. J Am Coll Radiol 14:S25–S33CrossRefPubMed Jokich PM, Bailey L, D’Orsi C, Green ED, Holbrook AI, Lee SJ, Lourenco AP, Mainiero MB, Moy L, Sepulveda KA, Slanetz PJ, Trikha S, Yepes MM, Newell MS (2017) ACR Appropriateness Criteria® breast pain. J Am Coll Radiol 14:S25–S33CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al (eds) ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system, 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al (eds) ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system, 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dee KE, Sickles EA (2001) Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently. Am J Roentgenol 176(3):729–733CrossRef Dee KE, Sickles EA (2001) Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently. Am J Roentgenol 176(3):729–733CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R et al (2005) Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology 235(3):775–790CrossRefPubMed Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R et al (2005) Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology 235(3):775–790CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sickles E, Wolverton D, Dee K (2002) Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 224:861–869CrossRefPubMed Sickles E, Wolverton D, Dee K (2002) Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 224:861–869CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg W, Zhang Z, Lehrer et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307(13):1394–1404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berg W, Zhang Z, Lehrer et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307(13):1394–1404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung JW, Margolin FR, Dee KE, Jacobs RP, Denny SR, Schrumpf JD (2007) Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community practice: are there differences between specialists and general radiologists? AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(1):236–241CrossRefPubMed Leung JW, Margolin FR, Dee KE, Jacobs RP, Denny SR, Schrumpf JD (2007) Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography in a community practice: are there differences between specialists and general radiologists? AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(1):236–241CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Tumyan L, Hoyt AC, Bassett LW (2005) Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain. Breast J 11:333–337CrossRefPubMed Tumyan L, Hoyt AC, Bassett LW (2005) Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain. Breast J 11:333–337CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Breast pain and cancer: should we continue to work-up isolated breast pain?
verfasst von
Marina Mohallem Fonseca
Leslie R. Lamb
Raman Verma
Olaitan Ogunkinle
Jean M. Seely
Publikationsdatum
15.07.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05354-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.