There are several reports referred to the localization in the tubules. Brunette et al
. reported that L-, P/Q- and T-type calcium channels exist in the luminal side of the distal tubules in rabbits, because their channel antagonist, including diltiazem,
ω-conotoxin, and mibefradil, decreased Ca
2+ transport in the absence of sodium [
51]. Andreasen et al
. showed the nephron localization of Ca
2+V3.1, T-type calcium channels, in the inner medullary collecting ducts, distal collecting ducts and collecting tubules, especially in the apical sites [
26]. Sugano et al
. investigated the effect of the stereoselective T-type calcium channel blocker
R(-)-efonidipine and CKD progression in spontaneously hypertensive rats that had undergone subtotal nephrectomy [
52]. They showed that T-type calcium channel blockade has renal protective actions that depend not on hemodynamic changes and on the inhibition of Rho-kinase activity, tubulointerstitial fibrosis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Baylis et al
. reported that T-/L-type CCBs, mibefradil, resulted in superior nephroprotection including amelioration of proteinuria and glomerular injury, to traditional L-type CCBs, amlodipine, in deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt rats which are the models of high glomerular BP and rapidly developing kidney damage [
53]. In contrast, L-type CCBs, amlodipine, failed to improve renal injury. They suggest that amelioration of tubulointerstitial injury may contribute to the nonhemodynamic effect of T-type CCBs. However, the relationship between calcium channels and renal tubules is not fully investigated. Further studies are needed to address these questions.
Calcium channels in the sympathetic nerve system
Ino et al
. reported that N-type calcium channel α1 subunit knockout (Ca
v2.2
−/−) mice that lack the cytosolic portion of the N-type calcium channel are viable and have an almost normal behavior but show a very low sympathetic nerve activity in the atria [
54]. Previously, we reported that diabetic Ca
v2.2
−/− mice showed low SBP with a marked reduction in urinary catecholamine levels [
31]. Yamada et al
. showed that Ca
v2.2
−/− mice exhibited lower SBP than control mice because of vasodilatation, reduced heart contractile activity, and inhibited sympathetic nerve activity [
55]. Recently, it is shown that N-type Ca
2+ channel is upregulated in the interstitial nerve fibers of obstructed fibrotic kidneys of mouse and ablation of N-type Ca
2+ channel significantly attenuated the fibrotic changes of the kidneys after UUO partly by the reduction of renal sympathetic nerve activation [
56]. The P/Q-type calcium channels are also associated with neurons but may not be with sympathetic nerves. Mutations in P/Q-type calcium channel are involved in neurological disorders, including epilepsy and familial hemiplegic migraine [
56].
The relationship between RAAS system and CCBs
In L/T type and L/N type CCBs, they are expected to have renoprotective by acting on efferent arteriole dilatation. However, they are reported to be no more effective than RAAS inhibitors. Li et al. reported in their systematic review and meta-analysis that anti-proteinuric effects of T-type CCBs are stronger thatn L-type CCBs, and do not differ from these of RAS inhibitors [
46]. RAAS inhibitors and CCBs are often used in combination. Some reports showed that RAAS inhibitors are effective in reducing edema, a side effect of CCBs, by decreasing capillary hypertension and transcapillary fluid exudation [
57,
58]. Jamerson et al
. reported that the combination therapy of CCBs and RAAS inhibitors reduces the risk of cardiovascular events [
59].
Thuesen et al. reported that deficiency of T-type calcium channel, Ca
v3.1 or Ca
v3.2, do not alter baseline blood pressure levels and Ang II-induced hypertension [
35]. However, Ca
v3.1, but not Ca
v3.2, contributes to aldosterone secretion in mice infused Ang II [
35]. Imagawa et al
. reported that efonidipine, L/T type CCB, significantly reduces aldosterone synthesis and secretion [
60].
N-type calcium channel is expressed in the sympathetic nerve terminals and regulates catecholamines’ release [
61]. Therefore, N/L-type CCB reduces plasma catecholamine secretion rate through inhibiting N-type calcium channel [
62], and can be less active in RAAS than L-type CCB in animal models [
49,
63,
64].
There are still many unanswered questions about CCBs and RAAS inhibitors, and further studies on the effects of combination therapy are necessary.