Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Neurology 12/2020

04.07.2020 | Original Communication

Cell-based assays for the detection of MOG antibodies: a comparative study

verfasst von: Matteo Gastaldi, Silvia Scaranzin, Sven Jarius, Brigitte Wildeman, Elisabetta Zardini, Giulia Mallucci, Eleonora Rigoni, Elisa Vegezzi, Thomas Foiadelli, Salvatore Savasta, Paola Banfi, Maurizio Versino, Luana Benedetti, Giovanni Novi, Margherita Maria Mancardi, Thea Giacomini, Pietro Annovazzi, Damiano Baroncini, Diana Ferraro, Vito Lampasona, Markus Reindl, Patrick Waters, Diego Franciotta

Erschienen in: Journal of Neurology | Ausgabe 12/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The detection of antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is fundamental for the identification of MOG antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD), and the differential diagnosis of acquired demyelinating syndromes of the CNS, among which multiple sclerosis (MS). We compared the diagnostic performance of four cell-based assays (CBAs) for their detection.

Methods

Consecutive sera from 204 patients with ‘possible MOGAD’ (55), MS (112), and other neurological disorders (OND, 37) were tested for MOG-IgG with a live-CBA with anti-heavy-and-light chain secondary-antibody (LCBA-IgGH+L), and a live-CBA for IgG1 (LCBA-IgG1). A subgroup of 71 patients was additionally tested with a live-CBA with anti-Fcγ secondary-antibody (LCBA-IgGFcγ), and a commercial fixed-CBA with anti-Fcγ secondary-antibody (FCBA-IgGFcγ).

Results

Fifty-seven/204 patients (27.9%) were MOG-IgG-positive. Sensitivity was 89.1% (CI:77.8–95.9) and specificity 93.3% (CI:88.0–96.7) for LCBA-IgGH+L, and 74.6% (CI:61.0–85.3) and 100% (CI:97.6–100) for LCBA-IgG1. Eighteen of 57 (31%) samples showed discrepant results (all negative on LCBA-IgG1); of these, three with ‘possible MOGAD’ showed high-titer MOG-IgG (≥ 1:640), and positivity for MOG-IgG2, whereas 15/18 had low-titer MOG-IgG (1:160/1:320) and mixed diagnoses (5 ‘possible MOGAD’, 6 MS, 4 OND). In the subgroup analysis, sensitivity was 92.3% (CI:79.1–98.4) and specificity 97.0% (CI:83.8–99.9) for LCBA-IgGFcγ, and 87.2% (CI:72.6–95.7) and 97.0% (CI:83.8–99.9) for FCBA-IgGFcγ.

Conclusions

LCBA-IgG1 showed the highest specificity but can miss MOG-IgG2 reactivities, whose meaning warrants further investigations. Titration of samples tested with LCBA-IgGH+L/ IgGFcγ is important for meaningful interpretation of the results. In the subgroup analysis, LCBA-IgGFcγ yielded the highest accuracy, and FCBA-IgGFcγ good specificity, but it was at risk of false-negative results.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Linington C, Bradl M, Lassmann H et al (1988) Augmentation of demyelination in rat acute allergic encephalomyelitis by circulating mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against a myelin/oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. Am J Pathol 130:443–454PubMedPubMedCentral Linington C, Bradl M, Lassmann H et al (1988) Augmentation of demyelination in rat acute allergic encephalomyelitis by circulating mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against a myelin/oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. Am J Pathol 130:443–454PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat von Büdingen HC, Hauser SL, Ouallet JC et al (2004) Frontline: Epitope recognition on the myelin/oligodendrocyte glycoprotein differentially influences disease phenotype and antibody effector functions in autoimmune demyelination. Eur J Immunol 34:2072–2083. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200425050CrossRef von Büdingen HC, Hauser SL, Ouallet JC et al (2004) Frontline: Epitope recognition on the myelin/oligodendrocyte glycoprotein differentially influences disease phenotype and antibody effector functions in autoimmune demyelination. Eur J Immunol 34:2072–2083. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​eji.​200425050CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Kleiter I et al (2016) MOG-IgG in NMO and related disorders: a multicenter study of 50 patients Part 1: frequency, syndrome specificity, influence of disease activity, long-term course, association with AQP4-IgG, and origin. J Neuroinflamm 13:279. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-016-0717-1CrossRef Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Kleiter I et al (2016) MOG-IgG in NMO and related disorders: a multicenter study of 50 patients Part 1: frequency, syndrome specificity, influence of disease activity, long-term course, association with AQP4-IgG, and origin. J Neuroinflamm 13:279. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12974-016-0717-1CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Kleiter I et al (2016) MOG-IgG in NMO and related disorders: a multicenter study of 50 patients. Part 2: epidemiology, clinical presentation, radiological and laboratory features, treatment responses, and long-term outcome. J Neuroinflamm 13:280. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-016-0718-0CrossRef Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Kleiter I et al (2016) MOG-IgG in NMO and related disorders: a multicenter study of 50 patients. Part 2: epidemiology, clinical presentation, radiological and laboratory features, treatment responses, and long-term outcome. J Neuroinflamm 13:280. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12974-016-0718-0CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cell-based assays for the detection of MOG antibodies: a comparative study
verfasst von
Matteo Gastaldi
Silvia Scaranzin
Sven Jarius
Brigitte Wildeman
Elisabetta Zardini
Giulia Mallucci
Eleonora Rigoni
Elisa Vegezzi
Thomas Foiadelli
Salvatore Savasta
Paola Banfi
Maurizio Versino
Luana Benedetti
Giovanni Novi
Margherita Maria Mancardi
Thea Giacomini
Pietro Annovazzi
Damiano Baroncini
Diana Ferraro
Vito Lampasona
Markus Reindl
Patrick Waters
Diego Franciotta
Publikationsdatum
04.07.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Neurology / Ausgabe 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10024-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2020

Journal of Neurology 12/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.