Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The European Journal of Health Economics 1/2004

01.02.2004 | Invited Papers

Chained time trade-off and standard gamble methods

Applications in oesophageal cancer

verfasst von: Paul McNamee, Sharon Glendinning, Jonathan Shenfine, Nick Steen, S. Michael Griffin, John Bond

Erschienen in: The European Journal of Health Economics | Ausgabe 1/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

It may be difficult to value palliative health states using health state valuation methods such as the time trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG) where health states are traditionally valued relative to perfect/good health and death. Chained methods have been developed to help in this context. However, few studies have compared the values produced by chained TTO and SG methods. To address this issue, a study was conducted to measure the health state values associated with oesophageal cancer using chained TTO and SG techniques. The methods were found to be acceptable amongst the sample respondents, who had previously been treated for oesophageal cancer. There were no significant differences between the health state values produced by the TTO and the SG methods. Within each method, however, there were significant differences between the health states valued. It is concluded that the use of health state valuation techniques such as the TTO and SG is feasible amongst people with a history of oesophageal cancer.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Botterweck AAM, Schouten LJ, Volovics A, Dorant E, van den Brandt PA (2000) Trends in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in ten European countries. Int J Epidemiol 29:645–54CrossRefPubMed Botterweck AAM, Schouten LJ, Volovics A, Dorant E, van den Brandt PA (2000) Trends in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in ten European countries. Int J Epidemiol 29:645–54CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Torrance GW (1986) Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ 5:1–30PubMed Torrance GW (1986) Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ 5:1–30PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Llewellyn-Thomas H, Sutherland HJ, Tibshirani R, Ciampi A, Till JE, Boyd NF (1982) The measurement of patients’ values. Med Decis Making 2:449–62PubMed Llewellyn-Thomas H, Sutherland HJ, Tibshirani R, Ciampi A, Till JE, Boyd NF (1982) The measurement of patients’ values. Med Decis Making 2:449–62PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutten-van Mölken MP, Bakker CH, van Doorslaer EK, van der Linden S (1995) Methodological issues of patient utility measurement: experience from two clinical trials. Med Care 33:922–937PubMed Rutten-van Mölken MP, Bakker CH, van Doorslaer EK, van der Linden S (1995) Methodological issues of patient utility measurement: experience from two clinical trials. Med Care 33:922–937PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayman JA, Fairclough DL, Harris JR, Weeks JC (1997) Patient preferences concerning the trade-off between the risks and benefits of routine radiation therapy after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:1252–1260PubMed Hayman JA, Fairclough DL, Harris JR, Weeks JC (1997) Patient preferences concerning the trade-off between the risks and benefits of routine radiation therapy after conservative surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:1252–1260PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen SJT, Stiggelbout AM, Wakker PP, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Leer JWH, Nooy MA, Kievet J (1998) Patients utilities for cancer treatments: a study of the chained procedure for the standard gamble and time tradeoff. Med Decis Making 18:391–399PubMed Jansen SJT, Stiggelbout AM, Wakker PP, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Leer JWH, Nooy MA, Kievet J (1998) Patients utilities for cancer treatments: a study of the chained procedure for the standard gamble and time tradeoff. Med Decis Making 18:391–399PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrison GC, Neilson A, Malek M (1998) Improving the sensitivity of the time trade off method: results of an experiment using chained TTO questions. Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 98/22, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Morrison GC, Neilson A, Malek M (1998) Improving the sensitivity of the time trade off method: results of an experiment using chained TTO questions. Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 98/22, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
8.
Zurück zum Zitat de Haes JCJM, Stiggelbout AM (1996) Assessment values, utilities and preferences in cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev 22:13–26PubMed de Haes JCJM, Stiggelbout AM (1996) Assessment values, utilities and preferences in cancer patients. Cancer Treat Rev 22:13–26PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stiggelbout AM, Kiebert GM, Kievit J, Leer JWH, Habbema JDF, de Haes JCJM (1995) The “utility” of the time trade-off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional trade-off. J Clin Epidemiol 48:1207–1214CrossRefPubMed Stiggelbout AM, Kiebert GM, Kievit J, Leer JWH, Habbema JDF, de Haes JCJM (1995) The “utility” of the time trade-off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional trade-off. J Clin Epidemiol 48:1207–1214CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Donk J, Levendag PC, Kuijpers AJ, Roest FHJ, Habbema JDF, Meeuwis CA, Schmitz PIM (1995) Patient participation in clinical decision-making for treatment of T3 laryngeal cancer: a comparison of state and process utilities. J Clin Oncol 13:2369–2378PubMed Van der Donk J, Levendag PC, Kuijpers AJ, Roest FHJ, Habbema JDF, Meeuwis CA, Schmitz PIM (1995) Patient participation in clinical decision-making for treatment of T3 laryngeal cancer: a comparison of state and process utilities. J Clin Oncol 13:2369–2378PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber ER, Wellens TR (1997) Perspectives on pretesting: “cognition” in the cognitive interview. BMS Bull Methodol Sociol 55:18–39 Gerber ER, Wellens TR (1997) Perspectives on pretesting: “cognition” in the cognitive interview. BMS Bull Methodol Sociol 55:18–39
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, Barr R, Horsman J (1990) Guide to design and development of health-state utility instruments. Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper No. 90–9, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, Barr R, Horsman J (1990) Guide to design and development of health-state utility instruments. Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper No. 90–9, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Torrance GW (1987) Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chron Dis 40:593–600PubMed Torrance GW (1987) Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chron Dis 40:593–600PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gudex C (1994) Standard gamble user manual: Props and self-completion method. Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York Gudex C (1994) Standard gamble user manual: Props and self-completion method. Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gudex C (1994) Time trade-off user manual: props and self-completion method. Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York Gudex C (1994) Time trade-off user manual: props and self-completion method. Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kind P (1996) The EuroQol instrument: an index of health-related quality of life. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia Kind P (1996) The EuroQol instrument: an index of health-related quality of life. In: Spilker B (ed) Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dresner SM, Griffin SM (2000) Pattern of recurrence following radical oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg 87:1426–1433CrossRefPubMed Dresner SM, Griffin SM (2000) Pattern of recurrence following radical oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg 87:1426–1433CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A (1996) The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ 5:141–154CrossRefPubMed Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A (1996) The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ 5:141–154CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Stalmeier PFM (2002) Discrepancies between chained and classic utilities induced by anchoring with occasional adjustments. Med Decis Making 22:53–64CrossRefPubMed Stalmeier PFM (2002) Discrepancies between chained and classic utilities induced by anchoring with occasional adjustments. Med Decis Making 22:53–64CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chapman GB, Elstein AS, Kuzel TM, Sharifi R, Nadler RB, Andrews A, Bennett CL (1998) Prostate cancer patients’ utilities for health states: how it looks depends where you stand. Med Decis Making 18:278–286PubMed Chapman GB, Elstein AS, Kuzel TM, Sharifi R, Nadler RB, Andrews A, Bennett CL (1998) Prostate cancer patients’ utilities for health states: how it looks depends where you stand. Med Decis Making 18:278–286PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Sutherland HJ, Heasman KZ, Tritchler DL, Dummings BJ (1990) Whose utilities for decision analysis? Med Decis Making 10:58–67PubMed Boyd NF, Sutherland HJ, Heasman KZ, Tritchler DL, Dummings BJ (1990) Whose utilities for decision analysis? Med Decis Making 10:58–67PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sackett DL, Torrance GW (1978) The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. J Chron Dis 31:697–704PubMed Sackett DL, Torrance GW (1978) The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. J Chron Dis 31:697–704PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Sutherland HJ, Thiel EC (1993) Do patients’ evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state? Med Care 31:1002–1012PubMed Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Sutherland HJ, Thiel EC (1993) Do patients’ evaluations of a future health state change when they actually enter that state? Med Care 31:1002–1012PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen SJT, Kievet J, Nooij MA, Stiggelbout AM (2001) Stability of patients’ preferences for chemotherapy: the impact of experience. Med Decis Making 21:295–306CrossRefPubMed Jansen SJT, Kievet J, Nooij MA, Stiggelbout AM (2001) Stability of patients’ preferences for chemotherapy: the impact of experience. Med Decis Making 21:295–306CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook J, Richardson J, Street A (1994) Cost utility analysis of treatment options for gallstone disease: methodological issues and results. Health Econ 3:157–168PubMed Cook J, Richardson J, Street A (1994) Cost utility analysis of treatment options for gallstone disease: methodological issues and results. Health Econ 3:157–168PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolan P (1996) Modelling valuations for health states: the effect of duration. Health Policy 38:189–203CrossRefPubMed Dolan P (1996) Modelling valuations for health states: the effect of duration. Health Policy 38:189–203CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Chained time trade-off and standard gamble methods
Applications in oesophageal cancer
verfasst von
Paul McNamee
Sharon Glendinning
Jonathan Shenfine
Nick Steen
S. Michael Griffin
John Bond
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2004
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The European Journal of Health Economics / Ausgabe 1/2004
Print ISSN: 1618-7598
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-7601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-003-0217-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2004

The European Journal of Health Economics 1/2004 Zur Ausgabe