Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: a case report

Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO), also known as chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis, is a rare, noninfectious inflammatory disorder that causes multifocal lytic bone lesions characterized by periodic exacerbations and remissions [1, 2]. This condition affects children and adolescents with a female: male ratio of 4:1. CRMO is still considered a rare disease with a prevalence of 1–2/10⁶. CRMO prevalence is probably underestimated [3]. This condition was described by Giedion for the first time in1972 [4]. The differential diagnosis includes infectious osteomyelitis, malignancy (osteosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, leukemia, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma), benign bone lesion (as osteoid osteoma), Langerhans cells histiocytosis (LCH). The diagnosis is of exclusion, based on the clinical and radiological data, in fact blood tests show a modest elevation of inflammations parameters and leukocytosis in the majority of cases. Biopsy is needed to exclude infectious osteomyelitis or malignant bone tumor [5‐7].CRMO is characterized by bone pain with insidious onset. Skeletal manifestations are unifocal or multifocal, any bone can be envolved. Typical localizations are metaphyses of the long bones (74%), pelvis (38%), vertebral column (46%), clavicle (25%), jaw (18%), sternum (8%), ribs (8%) [8]. The involvement of clavicle, sternum or jaw suggests a CRMO diagnosis [9, 10]. The overhead skin can be erythematous and swollen. Arthritis of adjacent and distal joints could manifest up to 80% of patients [11]. CRMO could be associated with peripheral arthritis, sacroileitis, inflammatory bowel diseases (in particular with Crohn’s disease), psoriasis, pyoderma gangrenosum, Sweet syndrome, Wegener’s granulomatosis, Takayatsu’s arteritis [12‐15]. Some authors consider CRMO the pediatric equivalent of SAPHO syndrome (Synovitis, Acne, Pustulosis, Hyperostosis, Osteitis), characterized by association of osteoarticular and skin disorders [16].

We could find only a slight leukocytosis and a modest increase of inflammation parameters on blood tests [17]. CRMO pathogenesis is still unclear. It has been suggested that the imbalance between pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1, TNF α) and anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) could be responsible of CRMO pathogenesis, because these cytokines are involved in bone reabsorption and remodeling through the activation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts [17‐22]. Peripheral bloods mononuclear cells from patients with CRMO stimulated in vitro with lipopolisysaccharide (LPS) compared with healthy control cells showed an important increase in IL-1 release [23]. Data from mice with chronic multifocal osteomyelitis and humans with Majeed syndrome (CRMO with dyserythropoietic anemia) suggest that CRMO could belong to the family of autoinflammatory disorders, a group of different conditions characterized by attacks of inflammation that are unprovoked (or triggered by a minor event) and primarily are related to dysregulation of the innate immune system. Many of these syndromes are monogenically inherited. Unlike autoimmune diseases, there is a relative deficiency of both autoantibodies and autoreactive T lymphocytes. The inflammatory response is usually mediated by proinflammatory cytokines, especially Interleukin 1 secreted by granulocytes and monocytes [24]. Mutations in LPIN2, Pstpip2, IL1RN, and FBLIM1 have been found in patients suffered from CRMO and murine models of CRMO [25].

We describe a case of a 10 years old girl presenting with pain in her right shoulder and having the final diagnosis of CRMO with the aim to give to the general pediatrics the key elements to early suspect CRMO and avoid misdiagnoses or late diagnoses.

A 10 years old girl, suffering from pain in her right shoulder since the age of 9 years, presented to our Department. She did not recall a precipitating event or a trauma, reported no fever or weakness. There was no relevant personal or family history. Because to persistence of symptoms before coming to our observation an X-ray of her right shoulder revealing an osteolytic lesion was performed (Fig. 1). In order to exclude an infectious osteomyelitis or a malignant tumor, the patient also underwent to a PET-CT showing the presence of a pathological high-uptake of the lesion. Patient’s right shoulder biopsy showed bone infiltration by lymphocytes and neutrophils. No neoplastic cells were identified. All cultures were negative. LCH was excluded since immunohistochemical evaluation of bone marrow for CD1a and S100 expression was negative. This histopathological pattern suggested an inflammatory process, so she assumed steroidal treatment for a week with improvement of symptomatology, but when patient suspended her therapy pain came back again. When she was admitted to our Department she had pain in her right arm and shoulder. Laboratory results showed a discrete increase of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR 34 mm/h, normal value < 20 mm/h) and C-reactive protein (CRP 0,88 mg/dL, normal value < 0,5 mg/dL) with normal complete blood count, liver and renal function as such as abdominal ultrasound and chest X-ray. At MRI, the lesion of the shoulder was hypointense in T1 and hyperintense in T2 and STIR, suggesting an inflammatory process. Suspecting a CRMO we prescribed anti-inflammatory treatment with naproxen. The symptomatology disappeared and the inflammation parameters returned to a normal range 2 months later. Anti-inflammatory treatment was suspended after 3 months of therapy. Five months later, the patient came back to our Department because of pain and swelling in her right clavicle (Fig. 2). The physical examination showed a painful swelling of the sternal end of the right clavicle. Laboratory results indicated a modest increase of inflammation parameters: ESR 29 mm/h (normal value < 20 mm/h), CRP 0.98 mg/dL (normal value < 0.5 mg/dL). Clavicle X-ray showed an osteolytic lesion, ultrasound of sternoclavicular joint revealed articular effusion. On MRI this lesion was hyperintense in T2 and STIR (Fig. 3), so anti-inflammatory treatment with naproxen was started again and the symptoms disappeared after 2 months. Clinical history, physical examination, histopathological pattern were highly suggestive of CRMO. Six months later a STIR MRI to evaluate patient’s bone lesions was performed. The MRI did not show new lesions and previous bone lesions disappeared, so anti-inflammatory treatment has been suspended.

CRMO diagnosis is based on clinical, laboratory and radiologic findings. Laboratory tests are not specific, an increase of inflammatory index can be found, sometimes in association with leukocytosis [9, 10]. The first radiological approach in a child with bone pain is a conventional X-ray that may be normal in the early stage of disease. The first radiological findings are modifications of bone metaphyses close to growth plates, while osteolytic and sclerotic lesions usually appear in the late stages of the disease [21]. STIR MRI is very useful to identify bone lesions and tissue oedema and it is more accurate than bone scintigraphy. CRMO inflammatory lesions appear hypointense in T1-weighted and hyperintense in T2-weighted images [22]. How effective biopsy could be is a still debated topic, in fact histologic features are not specific but it is very important to exclude any other causes of bone pain such as infectious osteomyelitis, a malignant bone tumor or a LCH. Some authors suggest that biopsy could be avoided if a child has classical radiological findings of CRMO or comorbidities, such as Crohn [10, 26, 27]. Some authors have suggested both diagnostic criteria and clinical score to facilitate CRMO diagnosis and to reduce the numbers of bone biopsies (Table 1) [8, 9, 23].

We presented the case of a girl with a 1 year shoulder pain. Shoulder involvement is not very frequent in CRMO, so bone lesion biopsy was very important in the differential diagnosis. The development of a second lesion at the medial portion of right clavicle (considered a typical site of CRMO) together with previously performed investigation confirmed CRMO diagnosis [8, 9, 23]. To treat CRMO do not exist guidelines, so the treatment is still empiric. Non- Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the first choice for CRMO treatment not only to keep pain under control but also to prevent bone damage [1]. Oral corticosteroids are used in patients with CRMO that does not respond to NSAIDs [28]. Methotrexate is a well-known treatment in rheumatologic conditions, it represents a second line treatment in CRMO, but further studies are needed [29]. Sulfasalazina is usually used in patients with associated inflammatory bowel disease [30]. Bisphosphonates are indicated in patients with multifocal or spinal involvement [31]. TNF-alfa inhibitors are indicated in patients who do not respond to previous treatments [32]. Also anti-Interleukin1 beta could be a treatment option, but further studies are needed [33]. Our patient is in treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs, and she is well responding to them. The last STIR MRI did not show new lesions and the previous ones disappeared.

CRMO has an insidious onset of symptoms, with an average diagnosis delay up to 12 months as per some reports. In a child with recurrent bone pain, modest increase of inflammatory indices, lytic or sclerotic lesion on X-ray, bone marrow oedema on STIR MRI, CRMO should always be suspected. Even if typical CRMO localizations are metaphyses of long bones, pelvis, clavicle, vertebral column, sternum, ribs, and jaw, it is important to remember that any bone can be involved to avoid diagnostic delay and to prescribe an adequate treatment. In a child with bone pain also rare condition as CRMO should be considered to perform a correct diagnosis and start an adequate treatment to prevent complications such as bone damage.