nach oben

Neuroradiology

Erschienen in:

08.06.2023 | Spinal Neuroradiology

Chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction and CT-guided percutaneous fixation: a 6-year experience

verfasst von: F. Jedi, R. Krysiak, J. A. Hirsch, F. Ventura, E. De Vivo, L. Manfrè

Erschienen in: Neuroradiology | Ausgabe 10/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Reporting the clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and complications following an imaging-guided percutaneous screw fixation in the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction and evaluating the safety and effectiveness of this method.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study on a prospectively gathered cohort of patients with physiotherapy-resistant pain due to sacroiliac joint incompetence that underwent percutaneous screw fixation, between 2016 and 2022 in our center. A minimum of two screws were used in all patients to obtain fixation of the sacroiliac joint, using percutaneous screw insertion under CT guidance, coupled with a C-arm fluoroscopy unit.

Results

The mean visual analog scale significantly improved at 6 months of follow-up (p < 0.05). One hundred percent of the patients reported significant improvement in pain scores at the final follow-up. None of our patients experienced intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Conclusion

The use of percutaneous sacroiliac screws provides a safe and effective technique for the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with chronic resistant pain.

Cher D, Polly D, Berven S (2014) Sacroiliac joint pain: burden of disease. Med Devices Auckl NZ 7:73–81

Sembrano JN, Polly DW (2009) How often is low back pain not coming from the back? Spine 34(1):E27-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818b8882CrossRefPubMed

Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Bogduk N (1995) The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain. Spine 20(1):31–37CrossRefPubMed

Cohen SP (2005) Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. AnesthAnalg 101(5):1440–1453

Chou LH, Slipman CW, Bhagia SM et al (2004) Inciting events initiating injection-proven sacroiliac joint syndrome. Pain Med 5(1):26–32CrossRefPubMed

Liliang P-C, Lu K, Liang C-L, Tsai Y-D, Wang K-W, Chen H-J (2011) Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar and lumbosacral fusion: findings using dual sacroiliac joint blocks. Pain Med Malden Mass 12(4):565–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01087.xCrossRef

Simopoulos TT, Manchikanti L, Singh V, Gupta S, Hameed H, Diwan S, Cohen SP (2012) A systematic evaluation of prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of sacroiliac joint interventions. Pain Physician 15(3):E305-44CrossRefPubMed

Weksler N, Velan GJ, Semionov M, Gurevitch B, Klein M, Rozentsveig V, Rudich T (2007) The role of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in the genesis of low back pain: the obvious is not always right. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:885–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0420-xCrossRefPubMed

Gupta AD (2009) Sacroiliac joint pathologies in low back pain. J Back MusculoskeletRehabil 22:91–97CrossRef

10.

Cusi M, Saunders J, Van der Wall H, Fogelman I (2013) Metabolic disturbances identified by SPECT-CT in patients with a clinical diagnosis of sacroiliac joint incompetence. Eur Spine J 22:1674–1682CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Tofuku K, Koga H, Komiya S (2015) The diagnostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for severe sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Eur Spine J 24(4):859–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3375-yCrossRefPubMed

12.

Kaye EA, Maybody M, Monette S, Salomon SB, Gulati A (2017) Ablation of the sacroiliac joint using MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: a preliminary experiment in a swine model. J Ther Ultrasound 26(5):17CrossRef

13.

Kim WM, Lee HG, Jeong CW, Kim CM, Yoon MH (2010) A randomized controlled trial of intra-articular prolotherapy versus steroid injection for sacroiliac joint pain. J Altern Complement Med N Y N 16(12):1285–1290. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2010.0031CrossRef

14.

Cohen SP, Hurley RW, Buckenmaier CC, Kurihara C, Morlando B, Dragovich A (2008) Randomized placebo-controlled study evaluating lateral branch radiofrequency denervation for sacroiliac joint pain. Anesthesiology 109(2):279–288. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817f4c7cCrossRefPubMed

15.

Patel N, Gross A, Brown L, Gekht G (2012) A randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of lateral branch neurotomy for chronic sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Med 13(3):383–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01328.xCrossRefPubMed

16.

Smith-Petersen MN (1921) Arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint: a new method of approach. J Bone Joint Surg 3:400–405

17.

Buchowski JM, Kebaish KM, Sinkov V, Cohen DB, Sieber AN, Kostuik JP (2005) Functional and radiographic outcome of sacroiliac arthrodesis for the disorders of the sacroiliac joint. Spine J 5:520–529CrossRefPubMed

18.

Lorio MP et al (2014) Utilization of minimally invasive surgical approach for sacroiliac joint fusion in surgeon population of ISASS and SMISS membership. Open Orthop J 8:1–6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Himstead AS, Brown NJ, Shahrestani S, Tran K, Davies JL, Oh M (2021) Trends in diagnosis and treatment of sacroiliac joint pathology over the past 10 years: review of scientific evidence for new devices for sacroiliac joint fusion. Cureus. 13(6):e15415. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15415CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Martin CT, Haase L, Lender PA, Polly DW (2020) Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: the current evidence. Int J Spine Surg 14(Suppl 1):20–29. Published 2020 Feb 10. https://doi.org/10.14444/6072

21.

Rappoport LH, Luna IY, Joshua G (2017) Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated screw: preliminary 1-year clinical and radiographic results of a 2-year prospective study. World Neurosurg 101:493–497CrossRefPubMed

22.

Sarkar M, Maalouly J, Ruparel S, Choi J (2022) Sacroiliac joint fusion: fusion rates and clinical improvement using minimally invasive approach and intraoperative navigation and robotic guidance. Asian Spine J. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0058

23.

Mendel T, Appelt K, Kuhn P et al (2008) Bony sacroiliac corridor. A virtual volume model for the accurate insertion of transarticular screws [in German]. Unfallchirurg 111:19–26CrossRefPubMed

24.

Shamrock AG, Patel A, Alam M, Shamrock KH, Al Maaieh M (2019) The safety profile of percutaneous minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion. Global Spine J 9(8):874–880. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218816981CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Heiney J, Capobianco R, Cher D (2015) A systematic review of minimalliinvasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique. Int J Spine Surg 9:40. https://doi.org/10.14444/2040CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Salman OH (2016) Randomized, controlled blind study comparing sacroiliac intra-articular steroid injection to radiofrequency denervation for sacroiliac joint pain. Egypt J Anaesth 32:2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egja.2015.07.005CrossRef

27.

Carbone J, Swink I, Muzzonigro T, Diehl D, Oh M, Lindsay DP, Yerby S, Cheng BC (2020) Biomechanic stability of primary and revision sacroiliac joint fusion devices: a cadaveric study. Global Spine J 1:8. 10/1177

28.

Vanaclocha-Vanaclocha V, Sáiz-Sapena N, Vanaclocha L (2019) Sacroiliac joint pain: is the medical world aware enough of its existence? Why not considering sacroiliac joint fusion in the recalcitrant cases? J Spine Surg 5. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2019.06.11

29.

Rappoport LH, Helsper K, Shirk T (2021) Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated screw: final 2-year clinical and radiographic results. J Spine Surg 7:155–161. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-627CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Mohit A, Shirk T (2020) Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated screw system improves functional outcomes in patients with sacroiliitis at two year follow-up. InterdiscipNeurosurg Adv Tech Case Manag 22:100834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inat.2020.100834CrossRef

31.

Lindsey DP, Kiapour A, Yerby SA et al (2018) Sacroiliac joint stability: finite element analysis of implant number, orientation, and superior implant length. World J Orthop 9:14–23. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.14CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Joukar A, Kiapour A, Elgafy H, Urbulut DU, Agarwal AK, Goel VK (2020) Biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint: surgical treatments. Int J Spine Surg 14(3):355–367CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Lindsey DP, Parrish R, Gundanna M et al (2018) Biomechanics of unilateral and bilateral sacroiliac joint stabilization: laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 28:326–332. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.7.SPINE17499CrossRefPubMed

34.

Lindsey DP, Kiapour A, Yerby SA, et al (2015) Sacroiliac joint fusion minimally affects adjacent lumbar segment motion: a finite element study. Int J Spine Surg 9. https://doi.org/10.14444/2064

35.

Ivanov AA, Kiapour A, Ebraheim NA, et al (2009) Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181978ea3

36.

Cidem M, Capkin E, Karkucak M, Karaca A (2012) Osteitis condensansilii in differential diagnosis of patients with chronic low back pain: a review of the literature. Mod Rheumatol 22(3):467–469CrossRefPubMed

37.

Randers EM, Gerdhem P, Dahl J et al (2021) The effect of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion compared with sham operation: study protocol of a prospective double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial. Acta Orthop Published Online First. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2021.1994185CrossRef

38.

Polly DW, Swofford J, Whang PG, et al (2016) Two-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion vs. non-surgical management for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Int J Spine Surg 10. https://doi.org/10.14444/3028

39.

Dengler J, Kools D, Pflugmacher R et al (2019) Randomized trial of sacroiliac joint arthrodesis compared with conservative management for chronic low back pain attributed to the sacroiliac joint. J Bone Jt Surg - Am 101:400–411. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00022CrossRef

40.

Lorio M, Kube R, Araghi A (2020) International society for the advancement of spine surgery policy 2020 update minimally invasive surgical sacroiliac joint fusion (for chronic sacroiliac joint pain): coverage indications, limitations, and medical necessity. Int J Spine Surg 14. https://doi.org/10.14444/7156

41.

Cross WW, Tavanaiepour K, Paschel EE, et al (2017) Percutaneous sacroiliac joint fusion: indications and technique. Oper Tech Orthop 27. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.oto.2017.09.006

42.

Chauhan G, Hehar P, Loomba V et al (2019) A randomized controlled trial of fluoroscopically-guided sacroiliac joint injections: a comparison of the posteroanterior and classical oblique techniques. Neurospine 16:317–324. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.1836122.061CrossRefPubMed

43.

Bessar AAA, Arnaout MM, Basha MAA, et al (2021) Computed tomography versus fluoroscopic guided-sacroiliac joint injection: a prospective comparative study. Insights Imaging 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-00982-y

44.

Youssef M, Meleka S (2020) The effects of CT guided sacroiliac joint injection on chronic low back pain. Neurol Neurosci Reports 3:1–5. https://doi.org/10.15761/nnr.1000127CrossRef

45.

Falzarano G, Rollo G, Bisaccia M, et al (2018) Percutaneous screws CT guided to fix sacroiliac joint in tile C pelvic injury. Outcomes at 5 years of follow-up. Sicot-J 4. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2018047

46.

Zwingmann J et al (2013) Malposition and revision rates of different imaging modalities for percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation following pelvic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:1257–1265CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction and CT-guided percutaneous fixation: a 6-year experience
verfasst von: F. Jedi
R. Krysiak
J. A. Hirsch
F. Ventura
E. De Vivo
L. Manfrè
Publikationsdatum: 08.06.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Neuroradiology / Ausgabe 10/2023
Print ISSN: 0028-3940
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1920
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-023-03171-4

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Wartezeit nicht kürzer, aber Arbeit flexibler

Psychotherapie Medizin aktuell

Fünf Jahren nach der Neugestaltung der Psychotherapie-Richtlinie wurden jetzt die Effekte der vorgenommenen Änderungen ausgewertet. Das Hauptziel der Novellierung war eine kürzere Wartezeit auf Therapieplätze. Dieses Ziel wurde nicht erreicht, es gab jedoch positive Auswirkungen auf andere Bereiche.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Chronic sacroiliac joint dysfunction and CT-guided percutaneous fixation: a 6-year experience

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Wartezeit nicht kürzer, aber Arbeit flexibler

„Restriktion auf vier Wochen Therapie bei Schlaflosigkeit ist absurd!“

Stuhltransfusion könnte Fortschreiten von Parkinson-Symptomen bremsen

Frühe Tranexamsäure-Therapie nützt wenig bei Hirnblutungen

Update Neurologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2023

The ptotic tongue—imaging appearance and pathology localization along the course of the hypoglossal nerve

Comparison of 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance angiography for detecting cerebral aneurysms using deep learning-based computer-assisted detection software

Is ischemic core volume a valid argument to withhold thrombectomy from ischemic stroke patients with major cerebral artery occlusions?

Effect of magnet strength on fetal brain biometry — a single-center retrospective MRI-based cohort study

Automated signal intensity analysis of the spinal cord for detection of degenerative cervical myelopathy — a matched-pair MRI study

Magnetic resonance imaging-derived parameters to predict response to regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Wartezeit nicht kürzer, aber Arbeit flexibler

„Restriktion auf vier Wochen Therapie bei Schlaflosigkeit ist absurd!“

Stuhltransfusion könnte Fortschreiten von Parkinson-Symptomen bremsen

Frühe Tranexamsäure-Therapie nützt wenig bei Hirnblutungen

Update Neurologie