Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2/2010

01.04.2010 | Original Article

Clinical efficacy and safety of cefepime in febrile neutropenic patients with lung cancer

verfasst von: Masaki Fujita, Hiroshi Ouchi, Yuichi Inoue, Ichiro Inoshima, Tsukasa Ohshima, Chikara Yoshimura, Hiroshi Wataya, Masayuki Kawasaki, Shoji Tokunaga, Yoichi Nakanishi, Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu (LOGIK)

Erschienen in: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy | Ausgabe 2/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Fever often occurs along with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. This condition is referred to as febrile neutropenia (FN). Excellent guidelines for FN treatment have recently been published; however, there has so far been insufficient research concerning FN associated with solid tumors, especially in Japan. A multi-institution prospective study of cefepime for the treatment of FN in lung cancer patients was conducted. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of cefepime for FN in lung cancer patients. Cefepime (2 g × 2/day) was administered to patients with FN after treatment for lung cancer. The therapeutic response rate, the effect of the drug on pathogen populations, and the incidence of adverse effects were statistically analyzed. Twenty-one patients with FN were registered for this study. One case was excluded because of protocol violation; therefore, a total of 20 cases were analyzed. Three days after the administration of cefepime, improvement was evident in 15 cases. The response rate was 75%, 95% CI: 53.1–88.8. After 7 days, 17 patients experienced improvement in their condition (85%, 95% CI: 64.0–94.8). Carbapenem was eventually substituted for cefepime in three cases, and all cases finally displayed improvement. There was no mortality. Pathogens for FN were detected in three cases and they disappeared in one case. Four patients experienced adverse side effects, including skin eruption, serum bilirubin elevation, neutrophil depletion, and anterior chest pain. There were no severe adverse events. In this study, cefepime demonstrated a high degree of clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of FN. Empiric monotherapy using cefepime is a recommended regimen for FN in patients with lung cancer in Japan.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, Bow EJ, Brown AE, Calandra T, et al. Guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:730–51.CrossRefPubMed Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, Bow EJ, Brown AE, Calandra T, et al. Guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:730–51.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Masaoka T. Evidence-based recommendations for antimicrobial use in febrile neutropenia in Japan: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:S49–52.CrossRefPubMed Masaoka T. Evidence-based recommendations for antimicrobial use in febrile neutropenia in Japan: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:S49–52.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Niho S, Ohe Y, Goto K, Ohmatsu H, Matsumoto T, Kubota K, et al. Randomized trial of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in low-risk febrile neutropenic patients with lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34:69–73.CrossRefPubMed Niho S, Ohe Y, Goto K, Ohmatsu H, Matsumoto T, Kubota K, et al. Randomized trial of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in low-risk febrile neutropenic patients with lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34:69–73.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EB, Boyer M, Elting L, Feld R, et al. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: a multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3038–51.PubMed Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EB, Boyer M, Elting L, Feld R, et al. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: a multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3038–51.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamura D, Gucalp R, Carlisle P, Cimino M, Roberts J, Rotstein C. Open randomized study of cefepime versus piperacillin-gentamicin for treatment of febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1704–8.PubMed Yamamura D, Gucalp R, Carlisle P, Cimino M, Roberts J, Rotstein C. Open randomized study of cefepime versus piperacillin-gentamicin for treatment of febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41:1704–8.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Biron P, Fuhrmann C, Cure H, Viens P, Lefebvre D, Thyss A, et al. Cefepeme versus imipenem-cilastatin as empirical monotherapy in 400 febrile patients with short duration neutropenia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998;42:511–8.CrossRefPubMed Biron P, Fuhrmann C, Cure H, Viens P, Lefebvre D, Thyss A, et al. Cefepeme versus imipenem-cilastatin as empirical monotherapy in 400 febrile patients with short duration neutropenia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998;42:511–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Raad II, Escalante C, Hachem RY, Hanna HA, Husni R, Afif C, et al. Treatment of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer who require hospitalization: a prospective randomized study comparing imipenem and cefepime. Cancer. 2003;98:1039–47.CrossRefPubMed Raad II, Escalante C, Hachem RY, Hanna HA, Husni R, Afif C, et al. Treatment of febrile neutropenic patients with cancer who require hospitalization: a prospective randomized study comparing imipenem and cefepime. Cancer. 2003;98:1039–47.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cherif H, Björkholm M, Engervall P, Johansson P, Ljungman P, Hast R, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing cefepime and imipenem-cilastatin in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients treated for haematological malignancies. Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36:593–600.CrossRefPubMed Cherif H, Björkholm M, Engervall P, Johansson P, Ljungman P, Hast R, et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing cefepime and imipenem-cilastatin in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients treated for haematological malignancies. Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36:593–600.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bow EJ, Rotstein C, Noskin GA, Laverdiere M, Schwarer AP, Segal BH, et al. A randomized, open-label, multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:447–59.CrossRefPubMed Bow EJ, Rotstein C, Noskin GA, Laverdiere M, Schwarer AP, Segal BH, et al. A randomized, open-label, multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic episodes in patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:447–59.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ariffin H, Ai CL, Lee CL, Abdullah WA. Cefepime monotherapy for treatment of febrile neutropenia in children. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006;42:781–4.CrossRefPubMed Ariffin H, Ai CL, Lee CL, Abdullah WA. Cefepime monotherapy for treatment of febrile neutropenia in children. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006;42:781–4.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, Pereira JR, de Marinis F, von Pawel J, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed vs. docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1589–97.CrossRefPubMed Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, Pereira JR, de Marinis F, von Pawel J, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed vs. docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1589–97.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wailoo A, Sutton A, Morgan A. The risk of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with docetaxel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:436–41.CrossRefPubMed Wailoo A, Sutton A, Morgan A. The risk of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with docetaxel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:436–41.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwon KT, Cheong HS, Rhee JY, Wi YM, Ryu SY, Heo ST, et al. Panipenem versus cefepime as empirical monotherapy in adult cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a prospective randomized trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:49–55.CrossRefPubMed Kwon KT, Cheong HS, Rhee JY, Wi YM, Ryu SY, Heo ST, et al. Panipenem versus cefepime as empirical monotherapy in adult cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a prospective randomized trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:49–55.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamura K, Matsuoka H, Tsukada J, Masuda M, Ikeda S, Matsuishi E, et al. Cefepime or carbapenem treatment for febrile neutropenia as a single agent is as effective as a combination of 4th-generation cephalosporin + aminoglycosides: comparative study. Am J Hematol. 2002;71:248–55.CrossRefPubMed Tamura K, Matsuoka H, Tsukada J, Masuda M, Ikeda S, Matsuishi E, et al. Cefepime or carbapenem treatment for febrile neutropenia as a single agent is as effective as a combination of 4th-generation cephalosporin + aminoglycosides: comparative study. Am J Hematol. 2002;71:248–55.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamura K, Imajo K, Akiyama N, Suzuki K, Urabe A, Ohyashiki K, et al. Randomized trial of cefepime monotherapy or cefepime in combination with amikacin as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:S15–24.CrossRefPubMed Tamura K, Imajo K, Akiyama N, Suzuki K, Urabe A, Ohyashiki K, et al. Randomized trial of cefepime monotherapy or cefepime in combination with amikacin as empirical therapy for febrile neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:S15–24.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohmagari N, Hanna H, Graviss L, Hackett B, Perego C, Gonzalez V, et al. Risk factors for infections with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cancer. Cancer. 2005;104:205–12.CrossRefPubMed Ohmagari N, Hanna H, Graviss L, Hackett B, Perego C, Gonzalez V, et al. Risk factors for infections with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with cancer. Cancer. 2005;104:205–12.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical efficacy and safety of cefepime in febrile neutropenic patients with lung cancer
verfasst von
Masaki Fujita
Hiroshi Ouchi
Yuichi Inoue
Ichiro Inoshima
Tsukasa Ohshima
Chikara Yoshimura
Hiroshi Wataya
Masayuki Kawasaki
Shoji Tokunaga
Yoichi Nakanishi
Lung Oncology Group in Kyushu (LOGIK)
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2010
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy / Ausgabe 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1341-321X
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7780
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-010-0030-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2010

Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 2/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Erhebliches Risiko für Kehlkopfkrebs bei mäßiger Dysplasie

29.05.2024 Larynxkarzinom Nachrichten

Fast ein Viertel der Personen mit mäßig dysplastischen Stimmlippenläsionen entwickelt einen Kehlkopftumor. Solche Personen benötigen daher eine besonders enge ärztliche Überwachung.

Nach Herzinfarkt mit Typ-1-Diabetes schlechtere Karten als mit Typ 2?

29.05.2024 Herzinfarkt Nachrichten

Bei Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind die Chancen, einen Myokardinfarkt zu überleben, in den letzten 15 Jahren deutlich gestiegen – nicht jedoch bei Betroffenen mit Typ 1.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.