Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 4/2019

01.04.2019 | Original Research Article

Close-Person Spill-Overs in End-of-Life Care: Using Hierarchical Mapping to Identify Whose Outcomes to Include in Economic Evaluations

verfasst von: Alastair Canaway, Hareth Al-Janabi, Philip Kinghorn, Cara Bailey, Joanna Coast

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Guidelines for economic evaluations often request that costs and outcomes beyond the patient are captured; this can include carers and also other affected parties. End-of-life care is one context where impacts of care spill over onto those other than patients, but there is little evidence about who should be included within economic evaluations.

Objective

The purpose of this article was to examine (1) how many people are close to those at the end of life (2); their characteristics; and (3) what influences the network size at the end of life.

Methods

In-depth interviews were conducted with 23 participants who were either recently bereaved or had somebody close to them currently receiving end-of-life care. Interviews were used in conjunction with hierarchical mapping to explore the network size and composition and influences upon these networks. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the hierarchical maps and this information was combined with a constant comparative analysis of the qualitative data.

Results

On average, close-person networks at the end of life contained eight individuals, three of whom were rated as being ‘closest’. These were typically family members, although in a small number of cases non-family members were included amongst the closest individuals. There was variation in terms of network composition. Qualitative analyses revealed two key influences on network size: death trajectory (those with cognitive problems/diseases towards the end of life had smaller networks) and family size (larger families had larger networks).

Conclusions

The findings of this article have important implications for researchers wishing to include those affected by end-of-life care in an economic evaluation. Focussing on the three closest individuals would be a key starting point for economists seeking to capture spill-overs, whilst a truly societal perspective would require looking beyond proximal family members. This article further discusses the implications of including close persons in economic evaluations for decision makers.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, O’Brien B, Stoddart G. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Drummond M, Sculpher M, Torrance G, O’Brien B, Stoddart G. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE; 2013. NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE; 2013.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE; 2004. NICE. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE; 2004.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat National Healthcare Institute. Guideline for economic evaluations in healthcare. Zorginstituut Nederland 2016. National Healthcare Institute. Guideline for economic evaluations in healthcare. Zorginstituut Nederland 2016.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Coast J, Bailey C, Canaway AG. Measuring and valuing outcomes for care at the end of life: the capability approach. In: Round J, editor. Care at the end of life. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 89–101.CrossRef Coast J, Bailey C, Canaway AG. Measuring and valuing outcomes for care at the end of life: the capability approach. In: Round J, editor. Care at the end of life. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 89–101.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Haycox A. Optimizing decision making and resource allocation in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38:45–53.CrossRefPubMed Haycox A. Optimizing decision making and resource allocation in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38:45–53.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron J, Parkes CM. Terminal care: evaluation of effects on surviving family of care before and after bereavement. Postgrad Med J. 1983;59:73–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cameron J, Parkes CM. Terminal care: evaluation of effects on surviving family of care before and after bereavement. Postgrad Med J. 1983;59:73–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ransford HE, Smith ML. Grief resolution among the bereaved in hospice and hospital wards. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:295–304.CrossRefPubMed Ransford HE, Smith ML. Grief resolution among the bereaved in hospice and hospital wards. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:295–304.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulz R, Mendelsohn AB, Haley WE, Mahoney D, Allen RS, Zhang S, et al. End-of-life care and the effects of bereavement on family caregivers of persons with dementia. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1936–42.CrossRefPubMed Schulz R, Mendelsohn AB, Haley WE, Mahoney D, Allen RS, Zhang S, et al. End-of-life care and the effects of bereavement on family caregivers of persons with dementia. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1936–42.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Christakis NA, Iwashyna TJ. The health impact of health care on families: a matched cohort study of hospice use by decedents and mortality outcomes in surviving, widowed spouses. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:465–75.CrossRefPubMed Christakis NA, Iwashyna TJ. The health impact of health care on families: a matched cohort study of hospice use by decedents and mortality outcomes in surviving, widowed spouses. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:465–75.CrossRefPubMed
21.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Petróczi A, Nepusz T, Bazsó F. Measuring tie-strength in virtual social networks. Connection. 2007;27(2):39–52. Petróczi A, Nepusz T, Bazsó F. Measuring tie-strength in virtual social networks. Connection. 2007;27(2):39–52.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Aron A, Mashek D, Aron E, editors. Handbook of closeness and intimacy. London: Psychology Press; 2004. pp. 27–30. Aron A, Mashek D, Aron E, editors. Handbook of closeness and intimacy. London: Psychology Press; 2004. pp. 27–30.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Antonucci TC. Hierarchical mapping technique. Gen J Am Soc. 1986;10:10–2. Antonucci TC. Hierarchical mapping technique. Gen J Am Soc. 1986;10:10–2.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreno J. Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Beacon House, Beacon, New York; 1934.CrossRef Moreno J. Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Beacon House, Beacon, New York; 1934.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Antonucci TC, Akiyama H, Lansford J. Negative effects of close social relations. Fam Relat. 1998;47:379–84.CrossRef Antonucci TC, Akiyama H, Lansford J. Negative effects of close social relations. Fam Relat. 1998;47:379–84.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Hlebec V, Mrzel M, Kogovšek T. Social support network and received support at stressful events. Metodološki Zv. 2009;6:155–71. Hlebec V, Mrzel M, Kogovšek T. Social support network and received support at stressful events. Metodološki Zv. 2009;6:155–71.
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Canaway A, Al-Janabi H, Kinghorn P, Bailey C, Coast J. Incorporating novel qualitative methods within health economics: the use of pictorial tools. In: Coast J, editor. Qualitative Methods for Health Economics. London: Rowman & Littlefield; 2017. pp. 205–16. Canaway A, Al-Janabi H, Kinghorn P, Bailey C, Coast J. Incorporating novel qualitative methods within health economics: the use of pictorial tools. In: Coast J, editor. Qualitative Methods for Health Economics. London: Rowman & Littlefield; 2017. pp. 205–16.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers, 2nd edn, vol. 1. London: SAGE Publications; 2013. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers, 2nd edn, vol. 1. London: SAGE Publications; 2013.
50.
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Age UK. Loneliness: the state we’re in. 2012. Available from: http://www.ageuk.org.uk/brandpartnerglobal/oxfordshirevpp/documents/loneliness the state we are inreport 2013.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2019. Age UK. Loneliness: the state we’re in. 2012. Available from: http://​www.​ageuk.​org.​uk/​brandpartnerglob​al/​oxfordshirevpp/​documents/​loneliness the state we are inreport 2013.pdf. Accessed 3 Mar 2019.
Metadaten
Titel
Close-Person Spill-Overs in End-of-Life Care: Using Hierarchical Mapping to Identify Whose Outcomes to Include in Economic Evaluations
verfasst von
Alastair Canaway
Hareth Al-Janabi
Philip Kinghorn
Cara Bailey
Joanna Coast
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00786-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

PharmacoEconomics 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe