Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2019

29.01.2019 | Hollow Organ GI

Comparative accuracy of qualitative and quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT analysis in detection of lymph node metastasis from anal cancer

verfasst von: Thitinan Chulroek, Hamed Kordbacheh, Dearada Wangcharoenrung, Kamonwon Cattapan, Pedram Heidari, Mukesh G. Harisinghani

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance of qualitative and quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of regional and distant lymph node metastasis in patients with anal cancer.

Methods

Between 2004 and 2017, 28 patients with anal cancer who had staging PET/CT and pathological assessment of suspicious lymph nodes were included. For qualitative analysis, positive lymph nodes were defined as uptake visually higher than the liver reference uptake. For quantitative study, lymph nodes were contoured to determine maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to extract the optimal cut-offs and area under the curve (AUC) of SUVmax, lesion to background (L/B) ratio, short axis diameter (SAD), and MTV of lymph nodes. Histopathologic analysis was a reference standard.

Results

A total of 28 lymph nodes (24 inguinal, 2 external iliac, 1 internal iliac, and 1 paraaortic nodes) in 28 patients on PET/CT were included. With the qualitative visual analysis, 19 patients were categorized as positive for nodal metastasis with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85%, 75%, and 82%. The optimal SUVmax and L/B ratio cut-offs were 2.6 and 1.0 with both sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 75% (AUC of SUVmax = 0.893, AUC of L/B ratio = 0.912). Using the best cut-off of 1.6 cm for SAD and 3.65 cm3 for MTV, both sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 100% (AUC of SAD = 0.950, AUC of MTV = 0.931).

Conclusions

SUVmax optimization may be helpful in enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in nodal staging patients with anal cancer.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Adams R, et al (2013) Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in anal cancer: generating hypotheses from the mature outcomes of the first United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I). Cancer 119:748–755. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27825 CrossRefPubMed Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Adams R, et al (2013) Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in anal cancer: generating hypotheses from the mature outcomes of the first United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I). Cancer 119:748–755. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​27825 CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chawla AK, Willett CG (2001) Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and anal margin. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 15:321–344, vi Chawla AK, Willett CG (2001) Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and anal margin. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 15:321–344, vi
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerard JP, Chapet O, Samiei F, et al (2001) Management of inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal: experience in a series of 270 patients treated in Lyon and review of the literature. Cancer 92:77–84CrossRefPubMed Gerard JP, Chapet O, Samiei F, et al (2001) Management of inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with carcinoma of the anal canal: experience in a series of 270 patients treated in Lyon and review of the literature. Cancer 92:77–84CrossRefPubMed
15.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lucignani G, Paganelli G, Bombardieri E (2004) The use of standardized uptake values for assessing FDG uptake with PET in oncology: a clinical perspective. Nucl Med Commun 25:651–656CrossRefPubMed Lucignani G, Paganelli G, Bombardieri E (2004) The use of standardized uptake values for assessing FDG uptake with PET in oncology: a clinical perspective. Nucl Med Commun 25:651–656CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohseni S, Shojaiefard A, Khorgami Z, et al (2014) Peripheral Lymphadenopathy: Approach and Diagnostic Tools. Iran J Med Sci 39:158–170PubMedPubMedCentral Mohseni S, Shojaiefard A, Khorgami Z, et al (2014) Peripheral Lymphadenopathy: Approach and Diagnostic Tools. Iran J Med Sci 39:158–170PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Comparative accuracy of qualitative and quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT analysis in detection of lymph node metastasis from anal cancer
verfasst von
Thitinan Chulroek
Hamed Kordbacheh
Dearada Wangcharoenrung
Kamonwon Cattapan
Pedram Heidari
Mukesh G. Harisinghani
Publikationsdatum
29.01.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01907-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Abdominal Radiology 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Radiology

Double-barrel shotgun sign

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.