Introduction
Pseudorabies virus (PRV) of the family
Herpesviridae, subfamily
Alphaherpesvirinae [
1], is the causative agent of Aujeszky’s disease, a major viral disease in pigs, the virus natural reservoir. It causes severe neurological disease and high mortality in newborn piglets, and reproductive failure in sows [
2], resulting in significant economic losses to the pig industry worldwide. Besides pigs, PRV can infect numerous mammals causing neurological disease and acute death [
3].
Effective vaccines have long been available for PRV [
4]. Among the various vaccines used, the attenuated Bartha vaccine strain, a derivative of a virulent strain generated by extensive passage, has been the most commonly used [
5]. Thus far, large-scale vaccination combined with the implementation of effective diagnostic tests to differentiate infected from vaccinated animals has allowed eradicating circulating PRVs from domestic pigs in many countries [
6]. However, since 2011, a reemergence of pseudorabies has occurred in vaccinated pigs in China. Genomic analysis of PRV variants isolated from these outbreaks has shown that they are evolutionarily divergent from European-American strains [
7], and lack of complete protection by the Bartha-K61 vaccine has been experimentally confirmed [
8,
9]. This has prompted the need to fully comprehend virus attenuation for the development of new vaccine candidates.
Since the 1980s, a number of studies have been undertaken to identify the genome-wide mutations in Bartha and other vaccine strains, thereby elucidating the genetic basis of their attenuation. And a large deletion containing two nonessential glycoproteins (gI and gE) within the unique short (US) portion of the viral genome was identified and proven to contribute to virus attenuation [
10‐
12]. Subsequent studies further showed that defects in other genes of live vaccine strain Bartha also contributed to its attenuated phenotype [
13,
14]. More recently, Illumina high-throughput sequencing (HTS) was applied to determine the genomic diversity in this vaccine strain, resulting in the discovery of many previously unknown coding differences between Bartha and PRV virulent strains [
15]. These studies have provided very important clues to understand attenuation and variation in PRV. However, if inclusion of viruses from the intermediate passages of the attenuation process in this type of studies might allow connecting more genetic variation information with specific phenotypic differences, thereby gaining clear insights into attenuation at the genetic level.
In our previous work we developed an attenuated PRV by serial passage of the variant JS-2012 in Vero cells at 40 °C for 120 generations [
16]. Pathogenicity in piglets of the resulting strains F50, F91, and F120 (named according to passage number) showed that pathogenicity gradually declined as the number of passages increased, with JS-2012-F120 being avirulent in 2-week-old piglets [
16]. But the relationship between virus attenuation and genetic variation during the process of serial passaging is still not clear.
To better understand the relationship between genetic variation and virus attenuation, in the present work we have further characterized these JS-2012 passaged PRV strains in vitro and in vivo. Compared to the parental virus, strains from passages 50 to 120 produced higher titers but relatively smaller plaques. Lethality of the viruses in a mouse model gradually decreased as the passage number increased. Genome-wide sequencing showed the presence of a large deletion, including genes US8, US9, and US2, in all the passaged strains analyzed. In addition, a variable number of single nucleotide variations were detected in many genes, mostly in the UL region of the genome. In addition, small in-frame and frameshift indels were identified in some genes. In particular, frameshift mutations were observed in genes UL16 and UL46, the latter producing a truncated but overexpressed pUL46, which might contribute to the enhanced virus replication in vitro and attenuation in animals. These data provide important clues to better understand attenuation and variation in PRV, and offer further insights into the evolution of the virus.
Materials and methods
Viruses and cells
PRV JS-2012 is a PRV variant isolated from a diseased newborn piglet. Strains JS-2012-F50, -F91, and -F120, named according to their respective passage, were purified from the corresponding virus stocks by three rounds of single-plaque cloning at 37 °C. Vero and PK-15 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA).
Infection of mice
A total of 50 SPF BALB/c mice from six- to eight-week-old were divided into 5 groups (10 mice per group). Groups 1 to 4 were inoculated intramuscularly with a 100-μL inoculum containing 10
4 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID
50) of JS-2012, F50, F91, and F120, respectively. Mice in group 5 were inoculated with 100 μL of DMEM and constituted the control group. Neurological symptoms and survival status of mice were observed every 12 h for the first 2 days after challenge, because during this period the mice generally did not show significant symptoms. During the remaining time of the monitoring period, mice gradually developed neurological symptoms and therefore were observed every 6 h for the rest 8 days in order to capture the changes of survival status of each mice. Meanwhile the neurological symptoms score level was determined for each mice in experimental groups. Specifically, mice with the absence of neurological symptoms were scored as 0, mild neurological symptoms such as unrest, excitation and occasional itching were scored as 1, and severe neurological symptoms (severe pruritus and self-mutilation) were scored as 2. Mice with a score of 2 were considered “dead”, and euthanized for animal welfare reasons [
17]. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the institute and under the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Illumina library preparation and sequencing
The complete genome sequence of the JS-2012 strain (GenBank Accession no. KP257591) has been previously described [
7]. The genomic DNA of the other strains was prepared as previously described [
15]. Genomic library was prepared using Nextera XT DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA) and sequencing was performed on an Illumina Miseq platform, at the Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The number of sequence reads generated for each strain is listed in Additional file
1: Table S1.
PCR amplification and sanger sequencing
PCRs of several open reading frame (ORF) regions that could not be defined by HTS or of genes needing further validation were performed in 50 μL reactions containing 2 μL of template DNA (50 ng), 25 μL of 2 × GC buffer II (Takara), 0.5 μL of Ex Taq polymerase (Takara), 0.5 mM primers, deoxynucleoside triphosphates and distilled water. PCR products of the expected sizes were cloned into the pMD-18 T vector (Takara), and three randomly selected clones per PCR product were sequenced by Sanger sequencing.
Annotation of genes and analysis of protein-coding sequences
The raw Illumina reads of F50, F91, and F120 were firstly deadaptered and merged into single longer reads by SeqPrep program, then the quality-controlled sequencing fragments were aligned with the reference genome (GenBank Accession no. KP257591) by BWA software and then assembled by geneious 8, respectively. PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing were used to determine the gaps. The genomes of F50, F91, and F120 were annotated by BLAST analysis of each viral ORF, with manual adjustment to the JS-2012 reference sequence. The annotated genomic sequences were deposited into the GenBank sequence database with accession numbers MG551316 (F50), MG551317 (F91), and MG589642 (F120). For single nucleotide variations analysis, the nucleotide sequence of each ORF of the three passaged strains and JS-2012 were aligned to identify the number and frequency of single nucleotide variations in each passaged strain using the algorithm Muscle (Codons) implemented in MEGA v.5.0 [
18]. Meanwhile, all the variations identified in F50, F91, and F120 compared to JS-2012 at both the amino acid and nucleotide levels are summarized in Table
1 and Additional file
2: Table S2, respectively, and the in-frame and frameshift indels are described in Table
2.
Table 1
Amino acid variations identified in the F50, F91 and F120 passages of PRV JS-2012
UL6 | P542S, P553S | P542S, P553S | P542S, P553S |
UL8 | S542A | S542A | S542A |
UL10 (gM) | V256A | V256A | V256A |
UL15 | G169E, P669D | G169E, P669D | G169E, P669D |
UL16 | ND | 317(+LPRH), S322P, 325–327(IPE > NKR), 329–330(IN>LK), 331–332(DY>△) | 317(+LPRH), S322P, 325–327(IPE > NKR), 329–330(IN>LK), 331–332(DY>△) |
UL17 | G237D, A241S, T249A, P253△, A255P, D258A, 259(+GGG), N263D, P273L, P374L | G237D, A241S, T249A, P253△, A255P, D258A, 259(+GGG), N263D, P273L, P374L | G237D, A241S, T249A, P253△, A255P, D258A, 259(+GGG), N263D, P273L, P374L |
UL18 (VP23) | H47Y, P60A, H69Q, S79G, A142V, T270 M | H47D, P60A, S79G, A142G, T270 M | H47D, P60A, S79G, A142G, T270 M |
UL19 (VP5) | I178M, I1315T | I178M | I178M |
UL22 (gH) | P433L, A618V | P433L, A618V | P433L, A618V |
UL25 | L23P | L23P | L23P |
UL26 (VP24) | M124 T, I125L, R131L, S132C, Q136R, S137R, R139G, L143 V, T146A, V153A, Q161R | M124 T, I125L, R131L, S132C, Q136R, S137 V, R139G, L143 V, T146A, V153A, Q161R, A455△ | M124 T, I125L, R131L, S132C, Q136R, S137R, R139G, L143 V, T146A, V153A, Q161R |
UL26.5 | ND | A216△ | ND |
UL28 (ICP18.5) | A413P, D414E, D425G, 425(+GA), V430G, D432G, A522V | A413P, D414E, D425G, V430G, D432G, A522V | A413P, D414E, D425G, 425(+GA), V430G, D432G, A522V |
UL33 | P39A | P39A | P39A |
UL34 | A177V, T178S | A177V, T178S | A177V, T178S |
UL36 (VP1/2) | T2832A | T2832A | T2832A |
UL37 | E240D, F629 L, G762R | E240D, F629 L, G762R | E240D, F629 L, G762R |
UL38 (VP19c) | A218V | A218V | A218V |
UL40 (RR2) | A176T | A176T | A176T |
UL44 (gC) | R107H | G90D, R107H | G90D, R107H |
UL46 (VP11/12) | ND | ND | 599–626(PLTRHGSMRTSFRRGVRAAQRFVRRRLS>△), 629–631(SAE > TTT), A633P, 635–674(RASGDSASAAAPAAASARGETDHVYQHPRPRTRADDGLYQ>△), Q675G, 678–695(PVIDLTGHRASRRKSWRV>△) |
UL48 (VP16) | R39Q,P89A | R39Q,P89A | R39Q,P89A |
UL49 (VP22) | R168H, N198D | R168H | R168H |
UL49.5 (gN) | T87A | T87A | T87A |
UL50 (dUTPase) | S209A | S209A | G191R,S209A |
UL53 (gK) | P164L, P171L | P164L, P171L | P164L, P171L |
UL54 (ICP27) | W20R, C48R, S156F,Q182R | W20R, C48R, S156F,Q182R | W20R, C48R,S156F,Q182R |
US8 (gE), US9, US2 | Deletion | Deletion | Deletion |
IE180 (ICP4) | P468S, G1385R | S187 L, P468S, G1385R | L76P, P468S, G1385R |
Table 2
Indels identified in passaged strains compared to the parental virus (JS-2012)
3′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE)
The total RNA of PK-15 cells infected with the indicated virus was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) and treated with RNase-free DNase I (Ambion) followed by reverse transcription with the primer QT 5’-CCAGTGAGCAGAGTGACGAGGACTCGA(T16)-3′. The PCR reactions for obtaining the mRNA 3′ ends of UL16 and UL46 were performed with the resulting cDNA product and the following primers: UL16 F597/Q0 (5’-CGAGTGCCGCGTGGACCAC-3′ and 5’-CCAGTGAGCAGAGTGACG-3′) and UL46 F453/Q0 (5’-GCACCCGTTCAAGCACAAG-3′ and 5’-CCAGTGAGCAGAGTGACG-3′). UL16 F597 and UL46 F453 are the oligos annealing with the UL16 and UL46 genes, while Q0 is the anchor primer of QT. The PCR fragments were sub-cloned into the TA cloning vector pMD-18 T (Dalian, China) and subjected to DNA sequencing.
Western blot analysis
At 24 h post infection, cells were collected into ice-cold PBS, centrifuged, and lysed with RIPA buffer for 30 min followed by centrifugation at 4 °C for 3 min. The supernatants were collected, boiled for 10 min, separated by SDS-PAGE on a 10% polyacrylamide gel, and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using a Bio-Rad semi-dry transfer cell. The membranes were blocked using 5% non-fat milk in TBS-T buffer, incubated with mice polyclonal antibodies for VP5 (UL19) (1:1000), UL16 (1:500), and UL46 (1:500), and mice monoclonal antibodies for gE (1:1000) and β-actin (1,6000), diluted in 2% non-fat milk in TBS-T buffer, followed by incubation with goat horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted in TBS-T buffer. Protein band intensities were measured using the ImageJ (NIH) Gel Analyzer module.
ORF analysis of UL46 and UL16 containing frameshift mutations
The ORFs of UL46 and UL16 containing frameshift mutations were analyzed using ORF Finder at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/) with the default setup, and EditSeq (DNASTAR) was used to manually calculate the molecular weights of the corresponding proteins of each virus strain.
Discussion
Viruses can acquire mutations as they replicate in cell culture, while only mutations favorable to viral replication in vitro are rapidly selected and enriched in the population. This is particularly significant during extensive passage in culture, resulting in viruses with novel acquired genetic alleles and evolved phenotypes that usually less pathogenic in the natural host but better adapted for replication in cells [
19,
20].
In our previous study, the PRV JS-2012 strain was serially passaged at high temperature for 120 generations. As the passage number increased, viruses showed a progressive attenuation in the piglet infection model, up to the point of completely losing its ability to cause death in piglets by passage 120 [
16]. To characterize the evolution and variation of the viral population during passaging, in this study, several representative strains at various steps of the serial passage were characterized in vitro and in vivo, and the genome of F50, F91, and F120 was sequenced and further analyzed. The growth curves and plaque assays showed that, during passaging the viruses were better adapted for replication and release in the cell line, but seem that the ability to spread were a little weakened (Fig.
1). In addition, the lethality of the passaged strains in mice decreased progressively as the passage number increased, which is consistent with our previous results in piglets (Fig.
1). Therefore, during in vitro passaging the virus gained better replication capacity in cells while becoming largely attenuated in animals, probably as a result of genetic variation and rapid evolution of the virus.
To gain insights into the evolution of JS-2012 during continuous in vitro passage, three representative strains (F50, F91, and F120) were sequenced and analyzed. Notably, a deletion of large DNA fragment including US8 (gE), US9, and US2 was identified in the genomes of all three strains. Absence of gE expression in the three passaged strains was further confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig.
3d). Several studies have shown that deletion of gE from the PRV genome causes attenuation of the virus [
21,
22]. Therefore, attenuation of JS-2012 during passaging is likely to be related to deletion of the fragment containing gE. The presence of large deletions or deletion of some genes is very common in other herpesviruses and in large DNA viruses extensively passaged in culture [
23], suggesting that this might be a unique feature of large DNA viruses evolving in cell culture. Besides the large deletion, single nucleotide variation was a dominant variation pattern in many genes, particularly in the UL region of the virus genome. In addition, small in-frame indels identified in genes UL17, UL26, UL26.5, and UL28 contributed to evolution of the virus. Some of these indels seemed to have occurred by contraction of specific short sequence repeats, most likely through recombination or polymerase slippage mechanisms [
15]. But the remaining indels were not related to short sequence repeats, suggesting other mechanisms might be involved in the generation of indels during the evolution of PRV.
Previously frameshift mutations have been observed in the genome of PRV by serial passaging in rabbit kidney cells [
24], and also in the TK gene of Acyclovir-resistant HSV-1 strains and the RL5A, RL13, UL131A and UL130 genes of human cytomegalovirus [
25,
26]. And it was confirmed that the frameshift mutations might be relevant for the adaptation of PRV in cell culture [
24]. Here frameshift mutations also occurred during serial passaging of PRV JS-2012 in Vero cells. The presence of the frameshift mutations was confirmed at both the DNA and mRNA levels for the UL16 and UL46 genes in the corresponding passaged strains. An insertion of a cytosine within one homopolymer nucleotide stretch (CCCCCCC) generated a frameshift in the UL16 gene of F91 and F120, and the frameshift in the UL46 gene of F120 was generated by an insertion of a 29-nt short sequence repeat (GGACGACGACGACGGCGCCCCCTGGGCCC). Therefore, both mutations were related to alterations in short sequence repeats. Specific 3’ RACE further revealed that the two frameshift mutations had no effect on transcription termination of any of the two genes, suggesting that the transcriptional stop signal of the viral gene had been conserved. Further analysis suggested that the mutations resulted in a premature termination codon in the UL46 of F120, and a delayed termination codon in the UL16 of F91 and F120 (Fig.
3c). Accordingly, the predicted 65.9-kDa truncated UL46 product was detected by Western blot analysis in F120-infected cell extracts (Fig.
3d). Moreover, the truncated UL46 product expressed by F120 was expressed at higher level than the full-length protein produced by the lower passage viruses. The effect of these changes on virus growth and attenuation deserves further investigation.
In conclusion, extensive passaging of PRV in vitro can result in a great deal of variation, dramatically changing the biological characteristics of the virus. In this study, we showed that during attenuation of PRV by serial passaging in Vero cells, dynamic variation patterns including a large deletion, single nucleotide variations, small in-frame indels, and frameshifts mutations successively emerged contributing to evolution of the viral population and enabling the gradual attenuation of the virus. In particular, the frameshift mutation in UL46 affected the size and expression level of the corresponding proteins and could have a potentially important effect on the virus characteristics. All these data provide important clues to better understand attenuation and variation in PRV, and further offer insights into the evolution of the virus.
Conclusions
During attenuation of PRV by serial passaging in Vero cells, dynamic variation patterns including a large deletion, single nucleotide variations, small in-frame indels, and frameshifts mutations successively emerged contributing to evolution of the viral population and enabling the gradual attenuation of the virus. In particular, the frameshift mutation in UL46 affected the size and expression level of the corresponding proteins and could have a potentially important effect on the virus characteristics. All these data provide important clues to better understand attenuation and variation in PRV, and further offer insights into the evolution of the virus.