Comparison of general maternal and neonatal conditions and clinical outcomes between embryo transfer and natural conception

Increasingly, couples are turning to assisted reproductive technology (ART) for help with conceiving and ultimately giving birth to a healthy live baby of their own [1]. In recent years, there has been increasing concern regarding the safety of ART, due to the potential health impact on these infants. At present, multiple studies have suggested that in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies may be at increased risk for preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital anomalies, perinatal mortality and several other pregnancy-related complications compared to unassisted pregnancies [2]. Concerns have been raised over an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes like gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia in ART populations as compared with the natural conception group [3].

In this study, we conducted a questionnaire survey of eligible subjects to determine the differences in clinical outcomes of mothers and their newborns between embryo transfer (ET) and natural conception (NC) and to provide data information for the embryo transfer information database of Shunde and reference information for the mother who is about to undergo embryo transfer.

The general information of the 321 women who underwent ET in the hospital and their babies was subjected to a retrospective analysis. Each ET case was randomly matched with three NC cases born on the same day as the ET case, and a total of 963 NC cases were used as controls. Simple random sampling was used. We determine the time of delivery for the mother of the embryo transfer and then look for the mother of the naturally born fetus on the same day. These mothers included both vaginal and cesarean deliveries. We number the mothers who gave birth naturally on the same day, and randomly select the corresponding mothers through computer software. This proportion could achieve satisfactory research results and the workload was more appropriate. The general conditions and clinical outcomes of the women during their pregnancy and their babies were compared between the ET and NC groups.

In this study, we found that the proportion of geriatric pregnancies was higher in the ET group than in the NC group, as well as the overall age of pregnant women (33.23 ± 4.59 vs 30.16 ± 5.19 years). Geriatric IVF pregnancy was previously reported as having poorer outcomes than IVF pregnancy in younger women. One study found that among women of childbearing age, those aged 20–30 years had the best IVF outcomes and women aged 40 years and older had poor IVF outcomes and a higher rate of miscarriage [4]. As women age, a decline in oocyte production and quality (known as ovarian aging) becomes the primary cause of poorer IVF outcome [5]. We observed that the percentage of women with one pregnancy only was higher in the ET group (48.0%) than in the NC group (31.0%), which was consistent with the findings of Egbe et al. [6] This difference may be attributable to the various causes of infertility in the ET group, meaning women in the ET group were more likely to be having their first pregnancy than those in the NC group. Ectopic pregnancy is the primary cause of early maternal morbidity and mortality, accounting for 1–2% of all pregnancies and ectopic pregnancy incidence has drastically increased with the advancement of ART [7] . The fallopian tube is the most common site of ectopic implantation [8], and about 1.5–2.1% of patients with ectopic pregnancy have undergone IVF [7]. Our findings showed that the percentage of women with a history of ectopic pregnancy was higher in the ET group (15.3%) than in the NC group (2.7%), which may be associated with previous ectopic pregnancy, history of infertility, history of surgery or the use of intrauterine contraceptive device [9].

For gestational comorbidity, the study by Kouhkan et al. [10] showed that women who underwent ET needed more insulin than those in the NC group. Insulin resistance and glucose intolerance during pregnancy can lead to the development of GDM, which explains the higher incidence of GDM in the ET group (42.1%) relative to the NC group (26.4%) in our study.

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific disease with a global prevalence of 5–8%. It is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, causing 50,000 to 60,000 deaths every year [11]. In our study, preeclampsia incidence was higher in the ET group. Preeclampsia is a multisystemic syndrome, and its pathogenesis and pathophysiology involve both genetic and environmental factors [12]. If preeclampsia is not effectively treated in a timely manner, it may endanger the life of the mother and infant or cause sequelae in the short term, and subsequently affect the health of the mother in the long term. Therefore, pregnant women are recommended to complete all prenatal examinations and adhere to a healthy routine and lifestyle. We also found that the incidence of gestational anemia and the number of days of treatment to prevent miscarriage were higher in the ET group (26.0% and 8.45 ± 7.408, respectively) than in the NC group (4.1% and 4.80 ± 4.026, respectively). Most pregnant women who required treatment for miscarriage prevention had threatened labor. The pathogenesis of gestational anemia has been shown to be associated with the age and educational background of pregnant women, as well as a history of ectopic pregnancy [13]. This was consistent with our results, which found that age and incidence of ectopic pregnancy were both higher in the ET group than in the NC group. In addition, ET itself may be a factor associated with gestational anemia. A previous study has demonstrated that severe anemia in pregnant women can lead to premature labor, spontaneous abortion, low birth weight and fetal death [14]. Therefore, implementation of measures to prevent anemia is recommended for women who plan to undergo ET, to ensure maternal and neonatal health.

Analysis of the delivery records revealed that the proportion of women with a high-risk (class III) pregnancy was significantly higher in the ET group (81.3%) than in the NC group (44.9%). Pregnancy risk is primarily classified based on the general conditions of the pregnant woman (age, history of miscarriage, and history of adverse pregnancy), gestational comorbidities (hypertension, anemia, and respiratory infection), and gestational complications (threatened premature labor, GDM, and fetal macrosomia). Age, ART, and twin pregnancy may be the causes for the higher pregnancy risk in the ET group compared with the NC group. The dominant mode of delivery was cesarean section in the ET group (78.2%) and vaginal delivery in the NC group (81.0%). The rate of twin birth was higher in the ET group (39.6%) than in the NC group (1.8%); twin birth is known to be associated with ET. Twin pregnancy imposes certain risks to both maternal and neonatal health, so this issue needs to be carefully considered in the application of ET.

A study by Zhu et al. [15] demonstrated that embryo transfer was associated with higher incidence of premature birth, low birth weight and small-for-gestational age infants. Here, we found that premature birth and low birth weight were observed in 38.8 and 36.5% of women with ET, respectively. The risk of premature birth is higher among women undergoing IVF, but such risk is mostly believed to be a secondary consequence of the significant increase in multiple pregnancies [16]. Our study also showed that the ET group had a higher incidence of twin pregnancy. Furthermore, Qin et al. [17] demonstrated that low birth weight was positively correlated with ART, which was consistent with our findings that the proportions of premature and low birth weight babies were higher in the ET group (24.9 and 18.7%, respectively) than in the NC group (14.1 and 11.2%, respectively) when we compared neonatal clinical outcomes. After the correction of confounding factors, compared with NC group, ET group had no statistical significance in umbilical cord condition, but the abnormal condition of umbilical cord should be paid attention to. The umbilical cord is a conduit between the fetus and the placenta that mediates substance exchange between the fetus and mother. Umbilical cord complications are generally considered to be the root cause for chronic intrauterine hypoxia, reduced fetal movement, growth retardation and oligohydramnios [18]. Therefore, regular prenatal examinations are recommended for pregnant women, especially ultrasound examination during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, to ensure early identification of umbilical cord abnormality.

In summary, the ET group had poorer maternal clinical outcomes than the NC group and higher incidences of premature birth and low birth weight. These differences may be associated with maternal physical fitness, nutritional status, financial status, past health status, ET, and higher rates of reported adverse outcomes due to closer monitoring of pregnant women with ET. Women who plan to have ET are recommended to undergo the procedure at an appropriate reproductive age, maintain physical fitness and good nutrition, and take good prenatal care.

The clinical outcomes of mothers and the birth status of infants were better in the NC group than in the ET group. Maternal health must be closely monitored and improved in the ET group to reduce the incidence of gestational comorbidity and enhance the quality of fetal life.