Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2019

Open Access 01.12.2019 | Research article

Comparison of postoperative complications between segmentectomy and lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery: a multicenter study

verfasst von: Benoît Bédat, Etienne Abdelnour-Berchtold, Thomas Perneger, Marc-Joseph Licker, Alexandra Stefani, Matthieu Krull, Jean Yannis Perentes, Thorsten Krueger, Frédéric Triponez, Wolfram Karenovics, Michel Gonzalez

Erschienen in: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2019

Abstract

Background

Compared to lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), segmentectomy by VATS has a potential higher risk of postoperative atelectasis and air leakage. We compared postoperative complications between these two procedures, and analyzed their risk factors.

Methods

We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent anatomical pulmonary resections by VATS from January 2014 to March 2018 in two Swiss university hospitals. All complications were reported. A logistic regression model was used to compare the risks of complications for the two interventions. Adjustment for patient characteristics was performed using a propensity score, and by including risk factors separately.

Results

Among 690 patients reviewed, the major indication for lung resection was primary lung cancer (86.4%) followed by metastasis resection (5.8%), benign lesion (3.9%), infection (3.2%) and emphysema (0.7%). Postoperatively, there were 80 instances (33.3%) of complications in 240 segmentectomies, and 171 instances (38.0%) of complications in 450 lobectomies (P = 0.73). After adjustment for the patient’s propensity to be treated by segmentectomy rather than lobectomy, the risks of a complication remained comparable for the two techniques (odds ratio for segmentectomy 0.91 (0.61–1.30), p = 0.59). Length of hospital stay and drainage duration were shorter after segmentectomy. On multivariate analysis, an American Society of Anesthesiologists score above 2 and a forced expiratory volume in one second below 80% of predicted value were significantly associated with the occurrence of complications.

Conclusions

The rate of complications and their grade were similar between segmentectomy and lobectomy by VATS.
Hinweise

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13019-019-1021-9.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
ARDS
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
ASA
American Society of Anesthesiologists
BPN
Bronchopneumonia
COPD
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
DLCO
Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide
FEV1
Forced expiratory volume in one second
LOS
Length of hospital stay
NSCLC
non-small cell lung lancer
PAL
Prolonged air leak
PY
pack-year
TMM
Thoracic morbidity and mortality score
VATS
video-assisted thoracic surgery

Background

Currently, pulmonary lobectomy is routinely performed by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for several indications. In patients with lung cancer, VATS lobectomy is considered safe and effective in early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [13]. Furthermore, compared to open lobectomy, the VATS approach is associated with less postoperative pain and better quality of life [4]. In parallel, VATS segmentectomy is increasingly proposed as an alternative to lobectomy to spare pulmonary parenchyma for benign and malignant lesions. In patients with NSCLC, segmentectomy seems to ensure equivalent oncological outcomes for tumor sizes smaller than 2 cm without nodal involvement [5, 6].
Evidence of functional benefit of segmentectomy over lobectomy remains low with debatable results, but the former seems to better preserve lung function via an increased function of the ipsilateral non-operated lobe [7, 8]. However, the segmentectomy procedure requires more extensive and deeper dissection into the hilum and division of the intersegmental plane, which may lead to an higher rate of prolonged air leaks [9]. Furthermore, the use of staplers to divide the intersegmental plane can induce compression of the adjacent lung and may cause atelectasis and pneumonia of the remnant lobe. Few studies that reported incidence and severity of postoperative complications following segmentectomy and lobectomy by VATS, and other retrospective studies that have yielded contradictory results and had study limitations (e.g., small sample or single-center cohort; incomplete data about complications; analysis of patients with early-stage cancer; lack of analysis of predictive factors for complications) [913].
The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of post-operative complications between VATS segmentectomy and VATS lobectomy and to identify their predictive factors.

Methods

Patients

We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent anatomical pulmonary resections by VATS from January 2014 to March 2018 at the University Hospitals of Lausanne and Geneva in Switzerland. The local ethics committee approved this study (referral number: 2018–00179) and waived the need to obtain informed patient consent. All indications were included. All patients with NSCLC were presented at an interdisciplinary tumour board. The indication for VATS lobectomy for lung cancer was proposed in patients with tumors resectable by a minimally invasive approach. The indication for VATS segmentectomy for lung cancer was proposed in patients with a nodule smaller than 2 cm without nodal involvement. VATS segmentectomy have been performed “intentionally”, unrelated to the fitness of the patient.

Surgical technique

Four surgeons who had each performed > 100 cases of VATS lobectomy included in this study carried out all segmentectomies. Surgical resections were undertaken using an anterior three-port approach. All vascular structures were transected using endoscopic staplers or an energy device and complete dissection of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes was carried out in patients with NSCLC. All bronchial structures were transected using endoscopic staplers. In segmentectomy, the intersegmental plane was divided using staplers. In lobectomy, a fissure-less technique was performed preferentially.

Classification of postoperative complications

Patient records were extracted from the hospital data management system. The following data were obtained: patient demographics and comorbidities; preoperative lung function; indication for surgery; type of pulmonary resection; duration of surgery; histologic findings; duration of drainage; length of hospital stay (LOS); postoperative complications and mortality.
The primary endpoint was the occurrence of the following cardiopulmonary complications: atrial fibrillation; acute myocardial ischemia; pneumothorax; hemothorax; prolonged air leak (PAL), defined as an air leak lasting beyond postoperative day 7; acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), defined using the Berlin classification [14]; pneumonia, defined by the need for antibiotics according to the appearance of new lung infiltrate at chest-X rays, fever, or an elevated white blood cell count > 12,000 per ml; acute pulmonary edema; massive subcutaneous emphysema; atelectasis; pulmonary embolism; chylothorax; cardiac infarction; empyema; bronchopulmonary fistula.
The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of any other complication, such as recurrent and phrenic nerve injury, gastrointestinal ileus, colitis, gastroparesis, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, septic shock and acute renal failure.
The complications were then classified in 3 groups according to the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system: [15] Minor complications (grade I and II), major complications (grade III and IV) and mortality (grade V). For patients experiencing more than one complication, the most severe grade was assigned.

Statistical analysis

For patient characteristics, chi-squared or Fischer’s exact tests were used to analyze categorical variables. A T-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze continuous variables.
Since patients were assigned to lobectomy or segmentectomy based on their clinical characteristics (and not at random), the comparison of complication rates required adjustment for potential confounders. A propensity score was calculated from a logistic regression model, including following variables: gender, the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), indication for surgery (primary lung cancer, metastasis, benign lesion, emphysema, infection), and location of the lesion (lobe). This model represented the probability of being assigned to VATS segmentectomy as opposed to VATS lobectomy. A Nagelkerke R [2] test was used to measure the goodness-of-fit and the area under the curve was used to measure propensity-score performance. A logistic regression analysis was used with the propensity-score model and the type of intervention to assess the occurrence of complications. We compared the distributions of propensity scores in patients treated with segmentectomy and lobectomy, and excluded tail distributions that received only one treatment modality (49 patients with propensity < 0.10 were all treated with lobectomy, and 6 patients with propensity > 0.85 were all treated with segmentectomy). We then obtained a classic logistic regression model where the occurrence of any complication was a function of treatment modality and of the continuous propensity score (Model 1). To verify the robustness of the result we also performed a conditional logistic regression analysis, using 15 matched sets of patients (propensity 0.100–0.149, 0.150–0.199, 0.200–0.249, etc) (Model 2). These analyses were repeated for cardio-pulmonary complications only.
For the occurrence of any complication, the predictive factors for complications were also analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression models. The cutoffs of the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) predictive values were chosen according to established recommendations [16].

Results

Patients and surgery

Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Overall, 690 patients were reviewed, including 240 who had VATS segmentectomies and 450 who had VATS lobectomies. The conversion rate to thoracotomy was 5.8% for both procedures. Most interventions were performed in center 1 (62.6%). As shown in Table 1, preoperative patient characteristics were not significatively different regardless the type of surgery for age, comorbidities and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. The major indication for lung resection was primary lung cancer (86.4%) followed by metastasis resection (5.8%), benign lesion (3.9%), infection (3.2%) and emphysema (0.7%). The type of surgery differed among indications (Table 1). Patients with primary lung cancer were more likely to have VATS lobectomy than VATS segmentectomy (91.1% versus 77.5%, respectively). On the other hand, resection of metastasis and benign lesions was likely performed by VATS segmentectomy. The location of the lung resection differed significantly between the procedures, with an upper right location predominantly found in the lobectomy group and a left location in the segmentectomy group. Overall, a systematic lymph node dissection was significantly more often performed during VATS lobectomy (Table 1). The FEV1 and DLCO did not differ between procedures.
Table 1
Correlations of patient characteristics with type of intervention by VATS
Characteristics
N (%)
Segmentectomy N = 240
Lobectomy
N = 450
P
Center
 1
432 (62.6)
143 (59.6)
289 (64.2)
0.23
 2
258 (37.4)
97 (40.4)
161 (35.8)
Gender, man
375 (54.3)
116 (48.3)
259 (57.6)
0.02
Age
 21–59
168 (24.3)
59 (24.6)
109 (24.2)
0.96
 60–69
248 (35.9)
89 (37.1)
159 (35.3)
 70–79
215 (31.2)
72 (30.0)
143 (31.8)
 80–90
59 (8.6)
20 (8.3)
39 (8.7)
ASA score
 1
6 (0.9)
2 (0.8)
4 (0.9)
0.77
 2
377 (54.6)
134 (56.1)
243 (54.4)
 3
295 (42.8)
99 (41.4)
196 (43.8)
 4
8 (1.2)
4 (1.7)
4 (0.9)
BMI (mg/kg2)
 14.5–18.4
46 (6.7)
17 (7.1)
29 (6.5)
0.46
 18.5–24.9
305 (44.2)
101 (42.2)
204 (45.7)
 25–29.9
223 (32.3)
86 (36.1)
137 (30.7)
 30.0–57.0
110 (15.9)
34 (14.3)
76 (17.0)
Active smoker
293 (42.5)
91 (37.9)
202 (45.0)
0.07
PY, mean (SD)
35.4 (30)
34.2 (29.6)
36.1 (30.2)
0.46
Arterial hypertension
345 (48.6)
121 (50.4)
214 (47.6)
0.47
Cardiopathy
88 (12.8)
26 (10.8)
62 (13.8)
0.27
Diabetes
102 (14.8)
31 (12.9)
71 (15.8)
0.30
COPD
259 (37.5)
99 (41.3)
160 (35.6)
0.14
History of cancer
229 (33.2)
93 (38.8)
136 (30.2)
0.02
FEV1 (%), 28 missing
 24–59
53 (8.0)
21 (9.1)
32 (7.4)
0.42
 60–79
169 (25.5)
64 (27.7)
105 (24.4)
 80–170
440 (66.5)
146 (63.2)
294 (68.2)
DLCO (%), 54 missing
 26–60
125 (19.7)
49 (22.3)
76 (18.3)
0.48
 61–80
238 (37.4)
79 (35.9)
159 (38.2)
 81–154
273 (42.9)
92 (41.8)
181 (43.5)
Indication
 Lung cancer (primary)
596 (86.4)
186 (77.5)
410 (91.1)
< 0.001
 Metastasis
40 (5.8)
27 (11.3)
13 (2.9)
 Benign lesion
27 (3.9)
18 (7.5)
9 (2.0)
 Emphysema
5 (0.7)
0 (0)
5 (1.1)
 Infection
22 (3.2)
9 (3.8)
13 (2.9)
Side, right
375 (54.3)
89 (37.1)
286 (63.6)
< 0.001
Location (lobe)
 Upper right
198 (28.7)
41 (17.1)
157 (34.9)
< 0.001
 Middle right
38 (5.5)
2 (0.8)
36 (8.0)
 Lower right
128 (18.6)
46 (19.2)
82 (18.2)
 2 right lobes
11 (1.6)
0 (0)
11 (2.4)
 Upper left
180 (26.1)
76 (31.7)
104 (23.1)
 Lower left
135 (19.6)
75 (31.3)
60 (13.3)
SLND
614 (89.0)
203 (84.6)
411 (91.3)
0.01
VATS Video-assisted thoracic surgery, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists score, BMI Body mass index, PY pack-year, COPD Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, FEV1 Forced expiratory volume in one second, DLCO Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, SLND systematic lymph node dissection
As shown in Table 2, in patients with primary lung cancer, larger tumor and nodal involvement were strongly associated with VATS lobectomy. The duration of operation and the rate of conversion to thoracotomy were similar between both groups.
Table 2
Procedures and postoperative outcomes
Outcomes
Segmentectomy N = 240
Lobectomy N = 450
P
Patients with cardiopulmonary complication, N (%)
75 (31.3)
160 (35.6)
0.26
Patients with any complication, N (%)
80 (33.3)
171 (38.0)
0.22
Complication per patient if occurs, mean (SD)
1.65 (1.04)
1.67 (1.03)
0.87
TMM, N (%)
 Grade 1–2
61 (25.4)
131 (29.1)
0.73
 Grade 3–4
17 (7.1)
38 (8.4)
 Grade 5
2 (0.8)
2 (0.4)
Type of complications, N (%)
 BPN
30 (12.5)
67 (14.9)
0.42
 PAL
21 (8.8)
51 (11.3)
0.36
 FA
13 (5.4)
39 (8.7)
0.13
 Pneumothorax
16 (6.7)
21 (4.7)
0.29
 Hemothorax
3 (1.2)
9 (2)
0.56
 ARDS
4 (1.7)
4 (0.9)
0.46
 Atelectasia
5 (2.1)
14 (3.1)
0.63
 Acute pulmonary edema
1 (0.4)
1 (0.2)
1.0
 Massive subcutaneous emphysema
11 (4.6)
21 (4.7)
1.0
 Chylothorax
0 (0)
1 (0.2)
1.0
 Pulmonary embolism
2 (0.8)
1 (0.2)
0.28
 BPF
0 (0)
1 (0.2)
1.0
 Empyema
4 (1.7)
2 (0.4)
0.19
 Cardiac infarction
0 (0)
3 (0.7)
0.55
 Recurrent nerve paralysis
0 (0)
5 (1.1)
0.17
 Acute renal failure
5 (2.1)
17 (3.8)
0.26
 Septic shock
3 (1.2)
6 (1.3)
1.0
 Cardiorespiratory arrest
2 (0.8)
0 (0)
0.12
 Ileus
3 (1.2)
2 (0.4)
0.35
 Upper GI bleeding
2 (0.8)
0 (0)
0.12
 Gastroparesis
1 (0.4)
0 (0)
0.35
Reoperation
6 (2.5)
21 (4.7)
0.22
Duration of surgery, mean (SD)
147.1 (55.2)
150.3 (50.6)
0.44
Conversion
14 (5.8)
26 (5.8)
0.98
Oncological histology, N (%)
 NSCLC
170 (90.9)
359 (87.1)
0.055
 SCLC
2 (1.1)
7 (1.7)
 NET (AC, TC, LNEC)
15 (8)
33 (8)
 Other
0 (0)
13 (3.2)
Tumor size (mm), mean (SD)
17.5 (8.1)
30.7 (17.1)
< 0.001
Lymph node involvement
N = 183
N = 406
0.001
 pN1
6 (3.3)
39 (9.6)
 
 pN2
10 (5.5)
47 (11.6)
Drainage duration, median [IQR]
2 [1–3]
3 [1–5]
0.012
LOS, median [IQR]
6 [4–9]
7 [5–11]
0.045
SD Standard deviation, NSCLC Non-small cell lung cancer, SCLC Small-cell lung cancer, NET Neuroendocrine tumor, TC Typical carcinoid, AC Atypical carcinoid, LNEC Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, LOS Length of hospital stay, TMM Thoracic morbidity and mortality score, BPN Bronchopneumonia, PAL Prolonged air leak, AF Atrial fibrillation, ARDS Acute respiratory distress syndrome, BPF Bronchopulmonary fistula, GI gastrointestinal

Complications

As shown in Table 2, overall, 33.3% of patients experienced postoperative complications after VATS segmentectomies and 38% after VATS lobectomies. Most patients had only one complication and the average number of complications per patient was not significantly different between segmentectomy and lobectomy. The reoperation rate was not significantly different for the two procedures. VATS sleeve lobectomy was performed in 14 patients, 50% of whom had cardiopulmonary complications. Upper bilobectomy was performed in 11 patients, 54% of whom had cardiopulmonary complications. According to the TMM system, the grade of complications was comparable between both procedures (Table 2). After VATS segmentectomy and VATS lobectomy, minor complications occurred in 25.4 and 29.1% of patients, respectively, major complications in 7.1 and 8.4% of patients, and death in 0.8 and 0.4% of patients. Furthermore, the type of procedure was not associated with any specific complication, especially prolonged air leak, atelectasis or bronchopneumonia (Table 2). The results were similar when we analyzed complications in patients with lung cancer (data not shown).
The logistic regression model to construct the propensity score is shown in Additional file 1 and included gender, presence of COPD, histology, and location of the resection. The comparison of propensity score between interventions is shown in Additional file 2, with a favorable AUC of 0.744 (CI 95% 0.706–0.782). According to this propensity score, we demonstrated that the occurrence of any complication or cardiopulmonary complication was similar between VATS segmentectomy and VATS lobectomy (Table 3).
Table 3
Logistic regression models for the occurrence of any complication, and of a cardiopulmonary complication
Models
Any complication
Cardiopulmonary complication
OR (95% CI)
P
OR (95% CI)
P
1
VATS segmentectomya
0.91 (0.61–1.30)
0.58
0.93 (0.65–1.34)
0.71
Propensity scoreb
0.42 (0.16–1.17)
0.10
0.46 (0.19–1.13)
0.049
2
VATS segmentectomya
0.93 (0.70–1.24)
0.62
0.86 (0.60–1.24)
0.41
Model 1: standard logistic regression, where the propensity score was left as a continuous probability between 0 and 1. Model 2: Conditional logistic regression, with 15 sets matched for propensity (0.100–0.149, 0.150–0.199, 0.200–0.249, etc). Fifty-five patients with a propensity for segmentectomy < 0.10 and > 0.85 were excluded, as all were treated with the same intervention. a vs lobectomy
b probability of 1 vs 0
VATS Video-assisted thoracic surgery, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval

Risk factors

The associations between patient characteristics and complications are shown in Additional file 3. The risk of complications increased significantly with age and then decreased in the oldest patients (41.4% in patients between 70 and 79 years old and 25.4% in patients between 80 and 90 years old). Compared to those with a normal body mass index, underweight patients had an almost 10% increased risk of complication. However, overweight or obesity did not seem to impact the risk of complications. The occurrence of complications was significantly associated with ASA score > 2, an increased number of pack years, presence of COPD, a decreased FEV1, and a decreased DLCO. The risk of complication also depended on the surgical indication, with a lower risk in patients with metastasis or benign lesion resection and a higher risk in patients with lung volume reduction surgery. However, while the size of the lesion differed between the two groups, size was unrelated to the occurrence of complications (mean 26.1 ± 17.2 without complication, 26.9 ± 16.8 with complication, p = 0.55).
In the multivariate analysis, an ASA score above 2, and a FEV1 below 80% were significantly associated with the occurrence of complications (Table 4). However, benign nodule and metastasis resection, as well as middle lobe resection were significantly associated with a better postoperative outcome (Table 4). The ASA score and the FEV1 were not correlated with TMM grade.
Table 4
Multivariate model of risk factors for complications (intervention type was forced into the model)
Risk factors
OR (95% CI)
P
Segmentectomy (vs lobectomy) by VATS
0.89 (0.62–1.28)
0.74
Center 2 (vs Center 1)
0.71 (0.50–1.01)
0.051
ASA 3–4 (vs 1–2)
1.55 (1.10–2.19)
0.011
FEV1 < 80% (vs 80%)
1.61 (1.11–2.30)
0.009
Indication
0.042
 Lung cancer (primary)
1 (reference)
 Metastasis
0.32 (0.13–0.80)
0.015
 Benign lesion
0.27 (0.08–0.95)
0.042
 Emphysema
1.33 (0.21–8.31)
0.76
 Infection
0.74 (0.22–2.44)
0.64
Location (lobe)
0.066
 Upper (right or left)
1 (reference)
 Middle right
0.32 (0.13–0.82)
0.018
 Lower (right or left)
0.96 (0.68–1.36)
0.82
 2 right lobes
2.15 (0.58–8.01)
0.25
OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval, VATS Video-assisted thoracic surgery, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists score, FEV1 Forced expiratory volume in one second

Length of hospital stay

Segmentectomy by VATS was associated with a shorter duration of drainage than lobectomy by VATS (3 days, IQR [15] versus 2 days, IQR [13], respectively, P = 0.011) and a shorter length of hospital stay (7 days, IQR [511] versus 6 days, IQR [49], respectively, P = 0.045). The length of hospital stay (LOS) increased with the presence of complication (6.1 ± 3.5 days versus 13.4 ± 11 days, P < 0.001). The LOS was also affected by TMM degree of complication, with an average of 12.3 ± 8.4 days for patients with minor complications and 17.2 ± 16.3 days for patients with major complications (P = 0.0034).

Discussion

Although complications after lobectomy have been characterized extensively, remarkably little is known about complications after anatomical resections by VATS. In this multicenter study, which compared complications between intentional segmentectomy and lobectomy by VATS, we have shown that: (i) the risk of complication after VATS segmentectomy was not significantly different than that after VATS lobectomy; (ii) the TMM scores were comparable between the two procedures; (iii) a FEV1 below 80% and an ASA score of 3–4 were associated with an increased risk of complications (regardless of the procedure); (iv) benign nodule and metastasis resection, as well as middle lobe resection were associated with a better postoperative outcome; and (v) the drainage duration and the LOS were shorter in the VATS segmentectomy group.
In our study, we have shown that the rate, the type and the grade of complication were not different between segmentectomy and lobectomy by VATS. Neither the dissection of the intersegmental plane nor the parenchymal compression during segmentectomy seem to increase the risk of pulmonary complications. A few retrospective studies compared postoperative complication rate after VATS anatomical resections and found contradictory results [913]. Our finding of no difference between segmentectomy and lobectomy in incidence of cardiopulmonary complications contrasts with the findings of Deng et al. [9] This study shown a higher incidence of PAL and pulmonary complications after VATS segmentectomy. Because of their small sample size in the segmentectomy group (N = 35), the authors suggested that a learning curve could explain this result. In their comparison of postoperative complications between segmentectomy (N = 39) and lobectomy (N = 81), Zhong et al. [12] found that despite the small sample size, postoperative complication rates were low and similar (12.8% vs. 12.3%, P = 0.94) and the most frequent complication was atrial fibrillation (2.6% vs. 3.7%). However, the patients had few comorbidities and only 18.9% of patients suffered from COPD. A study by Whang et al. [11] that included only pulmonary complications in a match-paired study of 94 segmentectomies and 94 lobectomies reported comparable postoperative pulmonary complication rates of 10.6% for segmentectomies and 17.2% for lobectomies (P = 0.1); 18% of patients suffered from COPD. Recently, Song et al. reported similar rates of postoperative pulmonary complications (15.3%) between segmentectomy (N = 41) and lobectomy (N = 122) [10]. Finally, Lin et al. compared segmentectomy (N = 32) and lobectomy (N = 47) by a single-port approach, finding no difference in the postoperative complication rate (P = 0.19) [13].
Although these studies showed similar results to our findings, their complication rates appeared lower. However, they included only patients with early-stage NSCLC and reported only cardio-pulmonary complications. One explanation for the higher rate of complications in our study is that we included all types of complications. We report postoperative complications routinely and extensively, which could increase the number of complications [17, 18]. In addition, the higher rate of patient comorbidities in our study, as compared to some other studies, could increase the rate of complication, as established in the European risk models for morbidity (Eurolung1) score [19]. In this sense, Deng et al. reported a higher rate of complications after VATS segmentectomy and lobectomy (68.6% vs. 74.1%), with a comorbidity rate comparable to our findings. Finally, our higher incidence of pneumonia in particular could be explained by the higher rate of comorbidities and patients with COPD.
In our study, predictive factors for complications include an ASA score > 2 and a FEV1 < 80% of the predicted value, regardless of the procedure. However, the ASA score and the FEV1 were not associated with the TMM grade. The ASA score as a predictive factor for complication was previously established in the Eurolung 1 score [19]. In thoracotomy patients, FEV1 < 60% has been associated with a higher rate of pulmonary complications [20, 21]. We also found that FEV1 < 60% was a predictive factor of post-operative complications in anatomical resection by VATS. As compared to an FEV1 above 80%, the risk of complication increased by 60% in patients with an FEV1 under 60% of the predicted value. Contrary to FEV1, a lower DLCO is not associated with an increased risk of complication. Similarly to our findings, Benattia et al. showed that the FEV1, but not DLCO, independently predicted postoperative outcome in VATS anatomical resection [22]. However, another study did not report FEV1 and DLCO as independent predictor factors for pulmonary complications after lobectomy by VATS [23]. According to our results, probably that preoperative risk assessment recommended by the ERS/ESTS task force to predict postoperative morbidity after resection by thoracotomy could be used for all anatomical resections by VATS. However, further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
The postoperative complications after anatomical resection for other indications than NSCLC have not been studied yet. In our study, resection of metastasis and benign lesion are associated with a lower risk of postoperative complication, regardless of the type of resection. A less extensive dissection during intervention in these indications could explain our results.
Interestingly, the drainage duration and the LOS was shorter in VATS segmentectomy than in VATS lobectomy. Furthermore, VATS segmentectomy showed a similar rate of conversion as VATS lobectomy and could be considered safe. Further studies are needed to compare the global costs between the two procedures.
Our study had several limitations. First, it was a retrospective analysis of two centers experience in VATS segmentectomy and lobectomy and may introduce selection and information bias. Second, the low granularity of data regarding the management of complications allowed only a rough classification of the TMM grade. Third, post-operative management was based on local practice, which differed between the two centers, although both had similar proportions of VATS segmentectomies and VATS lobectomies. Fourth, data about VATS segmentectomies included the learning phase of the technique, which could have influenced the postoperative outcomes during the initial phase. We have not analyzed the difference in complication rates among the study periods. Fifth, as expected with registered data, several factors were missing from our data sets, including the 90-day mortality and comorbidity scores. For these reasons, the EuroLung1 EuroLung2 scores could not be used [19]. Sixth, perioperative data was lacking regarding the complexity of the procedure and perioperative complications. However, the large number of patients with VATS segmentectomy available for analysis, and the high granularity of data collected regarding complications are major strengths of this study. Finally, another limitation is that if the choice of treatment modality (segmentectomy vs lobectomy) was driven by unmeasured patient characteristics that are associated with the risk of complication, substantial residual confounding would presist (confounding by indication). Only a randomized trial comparing the two techniques would eliminate this potential problem.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we did not observe significant differences in terms of postoperative complications between intentional VATS segmentectomies and lobectomies, even after adjustment for differences in patient characteristics. Both approaches seem to yield similar rates of complications and the occurrence of complications depends on the ASA score and the percentage of the predicted FEV1.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13019-019-1021-9.

Acknowledgements

We especially thank Pamela Derish for her review of the article and her help.
The local ethics committee approved this study (referral number: 2018–00179) and waived the need to obtain informed patient consent.
Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Feng H, Yao Z, Teng J, Wei D, et al. Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better than thoracotomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44. Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Feng H, Yao Z, Teng J, Wei D, et al. Is video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy better than thoracotomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ameri M, Bergman P, Franco-Cereceda A, Sartipy U. Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy: a Swedish nationwide cohort study. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(6):3499.CrossRef Al-Ameri M, Bergman P, Franco-Cereceda A, Sartipy U. Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy: a Swedish nationwide cohort study. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(6):3499.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27. Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bendixen M, Jørgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C, Licht PB. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):836.CrossRef Bendixen M, Jørgensen OD, Kronborg C, Andersen C, Licht PB. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):836.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cao C, Chandrakumar D, Gupta S, Yan TD, Tian DH. Could less be more?-a systematic review and meta-analysis of sublobar resections versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer according to patient selection. Lung Cancer. 2015;89:121.CrossRef Cao C, Chandrakumar D, Gupta S, Yan TD, Tian DH. Could less be more?-a systematic review and meta-analysis of sublobar resections versus lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer according to patient selection. Lung Cancer. 2015;89:121.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Q, Wang H, Zhou D, Deng X, Min J, Dai J. Comparison of clinical outcomes after thoracoscopic sublobectomy versus lobectomy for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Ther. 2016;12. Liu Q, Wang H, Zhou D, Deng X, Min J, Dai J. Comparison of clinical outcomes after thoracoscopic sublobectomy versus lobectomy for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Ther. 2016;12.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nomori H, Shiraishi A, Cong Y, Sugimura H, Mishima S. Differences in postoperative changes in pulmonary functions following segmentectomy compared with lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018 1;53(3):640. Nomori H, Shiraishi A, Cong Y, Sugimura H, Mishima S. Differences in postoperative changes in pulmonary functions following segmentectomy compared with lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018 1;53(3):640.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Deng B, Cassivi SD, de Andrade M, Nichols FC, Trastek VF, Wang Y, et al. Clinical outcomes and changes in lung function after segmentectomy versus lobectomy for lung cancer cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:1186.CrossRef Deng B, Cassivi SD, de Andrade M, Nichols FC, Trastek VF, Wang Y, et al. Clinical outcomes and changes in lung function after segmentectomy versus lobectomy for lung cancer cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:1186.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Song CY, Sakai T, Kimura D, Tsushima T, Fukuda I. Comparison of perioperative and oncological outcomes between video-assisted segmentectomy and lobectomy for patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching study. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(8):4891.CrossRef Song CY, Sakai T, Kimura D, Tsushima T, Fukuda I. Comparison of perioperative and oncological outcomes between video-assisted segmentectomy and lobectomy for patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching study. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(8):4891.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang Y, Kang CH, Kim HS, Jeon JH, Park IK, Kim YT. Comparison of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy on the patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Aug;48(2):273. Hwang Y, Kang CH, Kim HS, Jeon JH, Park IK, Kim YT. Comparison of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy on the patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Aug;48(2):273.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhong C, Fang W, Mao T, Yao F, Chen W, Hu D. Comparison of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy for small-sized stage IA lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(2):362.CrossRef Zhong C, Fang W, Mao T, Yao F, Chen W, Hu D. Comparison of thoracoscopic segmentectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy for small-sized stage IA lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(2):362.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin Y, Zheng W, Zhu Y, Guo Z, Zheng B, Chen C. Comparison of treatment outcomes between single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy and lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer of early-stage: a retrospective observational study. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jun;8(6):1290.CrossRef Lin Y, Zheng W, Zhu Y, Guo Z, Zheng B, Chen C. Comparison of treatment outcomes between single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy and lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer of early-stage: a retrospective observational study. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jun;8(6):1290.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526. ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Seely AJE, Ivanovic J, Threader J, Al-Hussaini A, Al-Shehab D, Ramsay T, et al. Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:936.CrossRef Seely AJE, Ivanovic J, Threader J, Al-Hussaini A, Al-Shehab D, Ramsay T, et al. Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:936.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, Rocco G, Sculier JP, Varela G, et al. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). Eur Respir J. 2009 Jul;34(1):17.CrossRef Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, Rocco G, Sculier JP, Varela G, et al. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). Eur Respir J. 2009 Jul;34(1):17.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Licker M, Karenovics W, Diaper J, Frésard I, Triponez F, Ellenberger C, et al. Short-Term Preoperative High-Intensity Interval Training in Patients Awaiting Lung Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):323.CrossRef Licker M, Karenovics W, Diaper J, Frésard I, Triponez F, Ellenberger C, et al. Short-Term Preoperative High-Intensity Interval Training in Patients Awaiting Lung Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):323.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellenberger C, Garofano N, Reynaud T, Triponez F, Diaper J, Bridevaux PO, et al. Patient and procedural features predicting early and mid-term outcome after radical surgery for non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(11):6020–9.CrossRef Ellenberger C, Garofano N, Reynaud T, Triponez F, Diaper J, Bridevaux PO, et al. Patient and procedural features predicting early and mid-term outcome after radical surgery for non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(11):6020–9.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunelli A, Salati M, Rocco G, Varela G, Van Raemdonck D, Decaluwe H, et al. European risk models for morbidity (EuroLung1) and mortality (EuroLung2) to predict outcome following anatomic lung resections: an analysis from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017 1;51(3):490. Brunelli A, Salati M, Rocco G, Varela G, Van Raemdonck D, Decaluwe H, et al. European risk models for morbidity (EuroLung1) and mortality (EuroLung2) to predict outcome following anatomic lung resections: an analysis from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017 1;51(3):490.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Salati M, Brunelli A. Risk Stratification in Lung Resection. Curr Surg Rep. 2016;4(11):37.CrossRef Salati M, Brunelli A. Risk Stratification in Lung Resection. Curr Surg Rep. 2016;4(11):37.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Benattia A, Debeaumont D, Guyader V, Tardif C, Peillon C, Cuvelier A, et al. Physiologic assessment before video thoracoscopic resection for lung cancer in patients with abnormal pulmonary function. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(6):1170-8. Benattia A, Debeaumont D, Guyader V, Tardif C, Peillon C, Cuvelier A, et al. Physiologic assessment before video thoracoscopic resection for lung cancer in patients with abnormal pulmonary function. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(6):1170-8.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry MF, Villamizar-Ortiz NR, Tong BC, Burfeind WR Jr, Harpole DH, D'Amico TA, et al. Pulmonary function tests do not predict pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89. Berry MF, Villamizar-Ortiz NR, Tong BC, Burfeind WR Jr, Harpole DH, D'Amico TA, et al. Pulmonary function tests do not predict pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89.
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of postoperative complications between segmentectomy and lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery: a multicenter study
verfasst von
Benoît Bédat
Etienne Abdelnour-Berchtold
Thomas Perneger
Marc-Joseph Licker
Alexandra Stefani
Matthieu Krull
Jean Yannis Perentes
Thorsten Krueger
Frédéric Triponez
Wolfram Karenovics
Michel Gonzalez
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2019
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 1749-8090
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-1021-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.