Skip to main content
main-content
Erschienen in: Herz 1/2020

16.05.2018 | Original articles

Comparison of procedural success between two radial sheaths

Comparison of the 6-Fr Glidesheath Slender to 6-Fr standard sheath

verfasst von: MD B. Gul, PhD M. Stolar, MD B. Stair, MD P. Hermany, MD S. Willis, MD C. Mena-Hurtado, MBBS Dr. R. Attaran

Erschienen in: Herz | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The most common cause of procedural failure in cardiac catheterization using the transradial approach is radial artery spasm. The aim of this study was to compare the procedural success rate of the 6‑Fr Glidesheath Slender with the 6‑Fr standard sheath in transradial coronary angiography and intervention.

Methods

Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary angiography via the transradial approach through placement of a 6-Fr Glidesheath Slender or a 6-Fr standard sheath for primary radial access were prospectively enrolled in the study.

Results

The study included 200 cases: 76 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary angiography with the Glidesheath Slender and 124 patients with the standard sheath. Failed procedures were recorded for 19 patients (9.5%), defined as inability to complete the procedure via the primary access. There was no difference in the percentage of failed cases between the Glidesheath Slender and standard sheath groups (10.5% vs. 8.9%, OR = 1.21, p = 0.8). More cases of spasm were observed in the Glidesheath Slender group compared with the standard sheath group, which was not statistically significant (7.9% vs. 5.7%, OR = 1.43, p = 0.56). Smoking, hyperlipidemia, and age influenced the procedural outcome in the Glidesheath Slender group, while body mass index, sex, and smoking impacted the procedural outcome in the standard sheath group.

Conclusion

There is no difference in procedural success rates, as defined by the ability to complete the procedure via primary radial access, between the 6‑Fr Glidesheath Slender and the 6‑Fr standard sheath. Our study suggests that the patient characteristics that elevate the risk of procedural failure for Glidesheath Slender may differ from those for the standard sheath.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J et al (2011) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 377(9775):1409–1420 CrossRefPubMed Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J et al (2011) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 377(9775):1409–1420 CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell MD, Hong JA, Lee BY et al (2012) Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 5(4):454–462 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mitchell MD, Hong JA, Lee BY et al (2012) Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 5(4):454–462 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P et al (2015) Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 385(9986):2465–2476 CrossRefPubMed Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P et al (2015) Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 385(9986):2465–2476 CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S et al (2018) 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 39(2):119–177. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehx393 CrossRefPubMed Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S et al (2018) 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 39(2):119–177. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​eurheartj/​ehx393 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC et al (2016) 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for Percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 67(10):1235–1250. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2015.​10.​005 CrossRefPubMed Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC et al (2016) 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for Percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 67(10):1235–1250. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2015.​10.​005 CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA et al (2013) Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007–2012). Circulation 127(23):2295–2306 CrossRefPubMed Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA et al (2013) Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007–2012). Circulation 127(23):2295–2306 CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ball WT, Sharieff W, Jolly SS et al (2011) Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4(4):336–341 CrossRefPubMed Ball WT, Sharieff W, Jolly SS et al (2011) Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4(4):336–341 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz-Salmeron RJ, Mora R, Velez-Gimon M et al (2005) Radial artery spasm in transradial cardiac catheterization. Assessment of factors related to its occurrence, and of its consequences during follow-up. Rev Esp Cardiol 58(5):504–511 CrossRef Ruiz-Salmeron RJ, Mora R, Velez-Gimon M et al (2005) Radial artery spasm in transradial cardiac catheterization. Assessment of factors related to its occurrence, and of its consequences during follow-up. Rev Esp Cardiol 58(5):504–511 CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Caputo RP, Tremmel JA, Rao S et al (2011) Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: executive summary by the Transradial Committee of the SCAI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 78(6):823–839 CrossRefPubMed Caputo RP, Tremmel JA, Rao S et al (2011) Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: executive summary by the Transradial Committee of the SCAI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 78(6):823–839 CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A et al (2002) A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57(2):172–176 CrossRefPubMed Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A et al (2002) A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57(2):172–176 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberg SL, Renslo R, Sinow R, French WJ (1998) Learning curve in the use of the radial artery as vascular access in the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 44(2):147–152 CrossRef Goldberg SL, Renslo R, Sinow R, French WJ (1998) Learning curve in the use of the radial artery as vascular access in the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 44(2):147–152 CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo SFM (2010) Propensity score analysis. Statistical methods and applications. SAGE, Thousand Oaks Guo SFM (2010) Propensity score analysis. Statistical methods and applications. SAGE, Thousand Oaks
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbaum PRR et al (1984) Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc 79(387):516–524 CrossRef Rosenbaum PRR et al (1984) Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc 79(387):516–524 CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Touw WG, Bayjanov JR, Overmars L et al (2013) Data mining in the life sciences with random forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? Brief Bioinformatics 14(3):315–326 CrossRefPubMed Touw WG, Bayjanov JR, Overmars L et al (2013) Data mining in the life sciences with random forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle? Brief Bioinformatics 14(3):315–326 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kristic I, Lukenda J (2011) Radial artery spasm during transradial coronary procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 23(12):527 PubMed Kristic I, Lukenda J (2011) Radial artery spasm during transradial coronary procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 23(12):527 PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Musumeci G et al (2006) Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67(6):870–878 CrossRefPubMed Valsecchi O, Vassileva A, Musumeci G et al (2006) Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67(6):870–878 CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Aminian A, Saito S, Takahashi A et al (2017) Comparison of a new slender 6 french sheath with a standard 5 french sheath for transradial coronary angiography and intervention: a randomized multicenter trial the RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT) Trial. EuroIntervention. 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00816 CrossRefPubMed Aminian A, Saito S, Takahashi A et al (2017) Comparison of a new slender 6 french sheath with a standard 5 french sheath for transradial coronary angiography and intervention: a randomized multicenter trial the RAP and BEAT (Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT) Trial. EuroIntervention. 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00816 CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C et al (2013) Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention 8(11):1242–1251 CrossRef Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C et al (2013) Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention 8(11):1242–1251 CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Carvalho MS, Cale R, Goncalves Pde A et al (2015) Predictors of conversion from radial into femoral access in cardiac catheterization. Arq Bras Cardiol 104(5):401–408 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carvalho MS, Cale R, Goncalves Pde A et al (2015) Predictors of conversion from radial into femoral access in cardiac catheterization. Arq Bras Cardiol 104(5):401–408 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Varenne O, Jegou A, Cohen R et al (2006) Prevention of arterial spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions through radial artery: the SPASM study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68(2):231–235 CrossRefPubMed Varenne O, Jegou A, Cohen R et al (2006) Prevention of arterial spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions through radial artery: the SPASM study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68(2):231–235 CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldsmit A, Kiemeneij F, Gilchrist IC et al (2014) Radial artery spasm associated with transradial cardiovascular procedures: results from the RAS registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 83(1):E32–E36 CrossRefPubMed Goldsmit A, Kiemeneij F, Gilchrist IC et al (2014) Radial artery spasm associated with transradial cardiovascular procedures: results from the RAS registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 83(1):E32–E36 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of procedural success between two radial sheaths
Comparison of the 6-Fr Glidesheath Slender to 6-Fr standard sheath
verfasst von
MD B. Gul
PhD M. Stolar
MD B. Stair
MD P. Hermany
MD S. Willis
MD C. Mena-Hurtado
MBBS Dr. R. Attaran
Publikationsdatum
16.05.2018
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Herz / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-9937
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-018-4707-1