Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2013

01.11.2013

Comparison of single-port laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy

verfasst von: Delphine Hudry, Francesco Cannone, Gilles Houvenaeghel, Max Buttarelli, Camille Jauffret, Elisabeth Chéreau, Eric Lambaudie

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL) is used to treat gynecological cancers. This laparoscopic approach was first described using a multiport technique, and more recently, a single-port technique was developed. Our aim was to experimentally compare both approaches—conventional laparoscopy (CL) and single-port laparoscopy (SPL)—via the extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach.

Methods

From November 2006 to July 2012, extraperitoneal PAL was performed by CL or SPL using the GelPOINT device (Applied Medical). The surgical outcomes of the 2 groups were statistically analyzed.

Results

The study involved 69 patients; 36 underwent PAL with CL, and 33 patients underwent PAL with SPL. The mean operative times were 211.2 (range, 132–390) min and 159.6 (range, 120–255) min for the CL and SPL groups, respectively. The mean blood loss was not significantly different between the CL (52.5 mL; range, 0–100 mL) and SPL (40.5 mL; range, 0–100 mL, p = 0.62) groups. The average lymph node count was lower in the CL group (11.1; range, 4–29) compared to the SPL group (15; range, 3–19) (p = 0.03). However, this difference was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.16). The mean hospital stay was lower for the SPL group (2.2 days; range, 1–8 days) than the CL group (3.1 days; range, 1–5 days). In this case, the significant difference found in the univariate analysis (p = 0.02) was confirmed by the multivariate analysis (p = 0.0003). There were no conversions to open technique and no major complications.

Conclusions

The SPL method appears to be a feasible approach, with surgical outcomes that are not statistically different from the CL method. The cosmetic aspect, the role of SPL in decreasing postoperative pain, and its impact on hospital stay must be confirmed prospectively in larger series.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasilev SA, McGonigle KF (1996) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node dissection. Gynecol Oncol 61:315–320PubMedCrossRef Vasilev SA, McGonigle KF (1996) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node dissection. Gynecol Oncol 61:315–320PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dargent D, Ansquer Y, Mathevet P (2000) Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 77:87–92PubMedCrossRef Dargent D, Ansquer Y, Mathevet P (2000) Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 77:87–92PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Querleu D, Dargent D, Ansquer Y, Leblanc E, Narducci F (2000) Extraperitoneal endosurgical aortic and common iliac dissection in the staging of bulky or advanced cervical carcinomas. Cancer 88:1883–1891PubMedCrossRef Querleu D, Dargent D, Ansquer Y, Leblanc E, Narducci F (2000) Extraperitoneal endosurgical aortic and common iliac dissection in the staging of bulky or advanced cervical carcinomas. Cancer 88:1883–1891PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat LeBlanc E, Caty A, Dargent D, Querleu D, Mazeman E (2001) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node dissection for early stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis with introduction of a nerve sparing technique: description and results. J Urol 165:89–92PubMedCrossRef LeBlanc E, Caty A, Dargent D, Querleu D, Mazeman E (2001) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymph node dissection for early stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumors of the testis with introduction of a nerve sparing technique: description and results. J Urol 165:89–92PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergote I, Amant F, Berteloot P, Van Gramberen M (2002) Laparoscopic lower para-aortic staging lymphadenectomy in stage IB2, II, and III cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 12:22–26PubMedCrossRef Vergote I, Amant F, Berteloot P, Van Gramberen M (2002) Laparoscopic lower para-aortic staging lymphadenectomy in stage IB2, II, and III cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 12:22–26PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Beck C, Eakin J, Dettorre R, Renton D (2013) Analysis of perioperative factors and cost comparison of single-incision and traditional multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:104–108PubMedCrossRef Beck C, Eakin J, Dettorre R, Renton D (2013) Analysis of perioperative factors and cost comparison of single-incision and traditional multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:104–108PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Arch Surg 147:657–666PubMedCrossRef Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, Metcalfe MS, Garcea G (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Arch Surg 147:657–666PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gouy S, Kane A, Uzan C, Gauthier T, Gilmore J, Morice P (2011) Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy: about fourteen consecutive cases. Gynecol Oncol 123:329–332PubMedCrossRef Gouy S, Kane A, Uzan C, Gauthier T, Gilmore J, Morice P (2011) Single-port laparoscopy and extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy: about fourteen consecutive cases. Gynecol Oncol 123:329–332PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambaudie E, Cannone F, Bannier M, Buttarelli M, Houvenaeghel G (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection: does single-port surgery offer the same possibilities as conventional laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 26:1920–1923PubMedCrossRef Lambaudie E, Cannone F, Bannier M, Buttarelli M, Houvenaeghel G (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic dissection: does single-port surgery offer the same possibilities as conventional laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 26:1920–1923PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Brockbank E, Kokka F, Bryant A, Pomel C, Reynolds K (2011) Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD008217 Brockbank E, Kokka F, Bryant A, Pomel C, Reynolds K (2011) Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD008217
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Occelli B, Narducci F, Lanvin D, Querleu D, Coste E, Castelain B, Gibon D, LeBlanc E (2000) De novo adhesions with extraperitoneal endosurgical para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus transperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: a randomized experimental study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:529–533PubMedCrossRef Occelli B, Narducci F, Lanvin D, Querleu D, Coste E, Castelain B, Gibon D, LeBlanc E (2000) De novo adhesions with extraperitoneal endosurgical para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus transperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: a randomized experimental study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:529–533PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai CH, Huang KG, Hong JH, Lee CL, Chou HH, Chang TC, Hsueh S, Huang HJ, Ng KK, Tsai CS (2003) Randomized trial of surgical staging (extraperitoneal or laparoscopic) versus clinical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 89:160–167PubMedCrossRef Lai CH, Huang KG, Hong JH, Lee CL, Chou HH, Chang TC, Hsueh S, Huang HJ, Ng KK, Tsai CS (2003) Randomized trial of surgical staging (extraperitoneal or laparoscopic) versus clinical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 89:160–167PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlaerth JB, Spirtos NM, Carson LF, Boike G, Adamec T, Stonebraker B (2002) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy followed by immediate laparotomy in women with cervical cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 85:81–88PubMedCrossRef Schlaerth JB, Spirtos NM, Carson LF, Boike G, Adamec T, Stonebraker B (2002) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy followed by immediate laparotomy in women with cervical cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 85:81–88PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonoda Y, Leblanc E, Querleu D, Castelain B, Papageorgiou TH, Lambaudie E, Narducci F (2003) Prospective evaluation of surgical staging of advanced cervical cancer via a laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach. Gynecol Oncol 91:326–331PubMedCrossRef Sonoda Y, Leblanc E, Querleu D, Castelain B, Papageorgiou TH, Lambaudie E, Narducci F (2003) Prospective evaluation of surgical staging of advanced cervical cancer via a laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach. Gynecol Oncol 91:326–331PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Burnett AF, O’Meara AT, Bahador A, Roman LD, Morrow CP (2004) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic lymph node staging: the University of Southern California experience. Gynecol Oncol 95:189–192PubMedCrossRef Burnett AF, O’Meara AT, Bahador A, Roman LD, Morrow CP (2004) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic lymph node staging: the University of Southern California experience. Gynecol Oncol 95:189–192PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehra G, Weekes ARL, Jacobs IJ, Visvanathan D, Menon U, Jeyarajah AR (2004) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy: a study of its applications in gynecological malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 93:189–193PubMedCrossRef Mehra G, Weekes ARL, Jacobs IJ, Visvanathan D, Menon U, Jeyarajah AR (2004) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy: a study of its applications in gynecological malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 93:189–193PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cartron G, Leblanc E, Ferron G, Martel P, Narducci F, Querleu D (2005) Complications of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in gynaecologic oncology. A series of 1102 procedures in 915 patients. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 33:304–314PubMedCrossRef Cartron G, Leblanc E, Ferron G, Martel P, Narducci F, Querleu D (2005) Complications of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in gynaecologic oncology. A series of 1102 procedures in 915 patients. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 33:304–314PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagao S, Fujiwara K, Kagawa R, Kozuka Y, Oda T, Maehata K, Ishikawa H, Koike H, Kohno I (2006) Feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 103:732–735PubMedCrossRef Nagao S, Fujiwara K, Kagawa R, Kozuka Y, Oda T, Maehata K, Ishikawa H, Koike H, Kohno I (2006) Feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 103:732–735PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tillmanns T, Lowe MP (2007) Safety, feasibility, and costs of outpatient laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic nodal dissection for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 106:370–374PubMedCrossRef Tillmanns T, Lowe MP (2007) Safety, feasibility, and costs of outpatient laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic nodal dissection for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 106:370–374PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fichez A, Lamblin G, Mathevet P (2007) Left extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: morbidity and learning curve of the technique. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 35:990–996PubMedCrossRef Fichez A, Lamblin G, Mathevet P (2007) Left extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: morbidity and learning curve of the technique. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 35:990–996PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gil-Moreno A, Díaz-Feijoo B, Pérez-Benavente A, Del Campo JM, Xercavins J, Martínez-Palones JM (2008) Impact of extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy on treatment and survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 110:S33–S35PubMedCrossRef Gil-Moreno A, Díaz-Feijoo B, Pérez-Benavente A, Del Campo JM, Xercavins J, Martínez-Palones JM (2008) Impact of extraperitoneal lymphadenectomy on treatment and survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 110:S33–S35PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowdy SC, Aletti G, Cliby WA, Podratz KC, Mariani A (2008) Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy—a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111:418–424PubMedCrossRef Dowdy SC, Aletti G, Cliby WA, Podratz KC, Mariani A (2008) Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy—a prospective cohort study of 293 patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111:418–424PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Estrade JP, Lazard A, Gurriet B, Agostini A, Blanc B (2010) Laparoscopic ways of para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 38:135–141PubMedCrossRef Estrade JP, Lazard A, Gurriet B, Agostini A, Blanc B (2010) Laparoscopic ways of para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 38:135–141PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez PT, Jhingran A, Macapinlac HA, Euscher ED, Munsell MF, Coleman R, Soliman P, Schmeler K, Frumovitz M, Ramondetta L (2011) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings. Cancer 117:1928–1934PubMedCrossRef Ramirez PT, Jhingran A, Macapinlac HA, Euscher ED, Munsell MF, Coleman R, Soliman P, Schmeler K, Frumovitz M, Ramondetta L (2011) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings. Cancer 117:1928–1934PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Uzan C, Souadka A, Gouy S, Debaere T, Duclos J, Lumbroso J, Haie-Meder C, Morice P (2011) Analysis of morbidity and clinical implications of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in a continuous series of 98 patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer and negative PET-CT imaging in the para-aortic area. Oncologist 16:1021–1027PubMedCrossRef Uzan C, Souadka A, Gouy S, Debaere T, Duclos J, Lumbroso J, Haie-Meder C, Morice P (2011) Analysis of morbidity and clinical implications of laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in a continuous series of 98 patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer and negative PET-CT imaging in the para-aortic area. Oncologist 16:1021–1027PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gil-Moreno A, Magrina JF, Pérez-Benavente A, Díaz-Feijoo B, Sánchez-Iglesias JL, García A, Cabrera-Díaz S, Puig O, Martínez-Gómez X, Xercavins J (2012) Location of aortic node metastases in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 125:312–314PubMedCrossRef Gil-Moreno A, Magrina JF, Pérez-Benavente A, Díaz-Feijoo B, Sánchez-Iglesias JL, García A, Cabrera-Díaz S, Puig O, Martínez-Gómez X, Xercavins J (2012) Location of aortic node metastases in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 125:312–314PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Benito V, Lubrano A, Arencibia O, Andújar M, Pinar B, Medina N, Falcón JM, Falcón O (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the staging of locally advanced cervical cancer: is it a feasible procedure at a peripheral center? Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:332–336PubMedCrossRef Benito V, Lubrano A, Arencibia O, Andújar M, Pinar B, Medina N, Falcón JM, Falcón O (2012) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the staging of locally advanced cervical cancer: is it a feasible procedure at a peripheral center? Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:332–336PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Gouy S, Uzan C, Kane A, Scherier S, Gauthier T, Bentivegna E, Morice P (2012) A new single-port approach to perform a transperitoneal step and an extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy with a single incision. J Am Coll Surg 214:e25–e30PubMedCrossRef Gouy S, Uzan C, Kane A, Scherier S, Gauthier T, Bentivegna E, Morice P (2012) A new single-port approach to perform a transperitoneal step and an extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy with a single incision. J Am Coll Surg 214:e25–e30PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagotti A, Boruta DM 2nd, Scambia G, Fanfani F, Paglia A, Escobar P (2012) First 100 early endometrial cancer cases treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a multicentric retrospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:353PubMedCrossRef Fagotti A, Boruta DM 2nd, Scambia G, Fanfani F, Paglia A, Escobar P (2012) First 100 early endometrial cancer cases treated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a multicentric retrospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:353PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Chern BSM, Lakhotia S, Khoo CK, Siow AYM (2012) Single incision laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: evolution, current trends, and future perspectives. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 1:9–18CrossRef Chern BSM, Lakhotia S, Khoo CK, Siow AYM (2012) Single incision laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: evolution, current trends, and future perspectives. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 1:9–18CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of single-port laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy
verfasst von
Delphine Hudry
Francesco Cannone
Gilles Houvenaeghel
Max Buttarelli
Camille Jauffret
Elisabeth Chéreau
Eric Lambaudie
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3051-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.