Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology 4/2021

27.01.2021 | Original Paper

Comparison of the effect of teicoplanin and vancomycin on experimental methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus keratitis

verfasst von: Ahmet Yucel Ucgul, Mustafa Behcet

Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the early efficacy and safety of intrastromal injection of teicoplanin as the alternative treatment for the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis by comparing it with vancomycin.

Materials and methods

Twenty-four eyes of 24 New Zealand white rabbits were included in the study. MRSA keratitis was induced in the right eye of each rabbit by injecting 0.1 mL MRSA suspension containing 1000 colony-forming units (CFU) intrastromally to the central cornea. The rabbits were divided into three treatment groups 24 h after the inoculation of MRSA. Eight rabbits received intrastromal teicoplanin therapy, eight received intrastromal vancomycin therapy, and eight received balanced salt solution and served as the control group. Nine hours after the treatment, all rabbits were sacrificed and corneal tissues were collected for microbiological analysis. We also examined and scored all the rabbits clinically before and after the treatment.

Results

The control group scored higher with regard to conjunctival injection, iritis, fibrin, hypopyon, epithelial erosion, and corneal infiltrate than the vancomycin and teicoplanin groups (p = 0.031, 0.010, < 0.001, 0.029, 0.009, and < 0.001, respectively). Chemosis and corneal oedema were similar in all groups (p = 0.731 and 0.075, respectively). The severity of all clinical parameters was similar in both the vancomycin and teicoplanin groups after the treatment. The bacterial load was the highest (7.83 ± 0.71 log10 CFU/g) in the control group. The eyes treated with vancomycin and teicoplanin had similar bacterial loads (6.40 ± 0.69 vs. 6.31 ± 0.75 log10 CFU/g, p = 0.809).

Conclusion

The efficiency of teicoplanin seems to be comparable to that of vancomycin when administered intrastromally in the early treatment of MRSA keratitis. The former may be preferred in the treatment of selected cases with vancomycin hypersensitivity or resistance.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Egrilmez S, Yildirim-Theveny S (2020) Treatment-resistant bacterial keratitis: challenges and solutions. Clin Ophthalmol 14:287–297CrossRef Egrilmez S, Yildirim-Theveny S (2020) Treatment-resistant bacterial keratitis: challenges and solutions. Clin Ophthalmol 14:287–297CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Durrani AF, Atta S, Bhat A et al (2020) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal aureus keratitis: initial treatment, risk factors, clinical features, and treatment outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 214:119–126CrossRef Durrani AF, Atta S, Bhat A et al (2020) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcal aureus keratitis: initial treatment, risk factors, clinical features, and treatment outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 214:119–126CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Robaei D, Carnt N, Watson S (2016) Established and emerging ancillary techniques in management of microbial keratitis: a review. Br J Ophthalmol 100(9):1163–1170CrossRef Robaei D, Carnt N, Watson S (2016) Established and emerging ancillary techniques in management of microbial keratitis: a review. Br J Ophthalmol 100(9):1163–1170CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Romanowski EG, Romanowski JE, Shanks RMQ et al (2020) Topical vancomycin 5% is more efficacious than 2.5% and 1.25% for reducing viable methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus in infectious keratitis. Cornea 39(2):250–253CrossRef Romanowski EG, Romanowski JE, Shanks RMQ et al (2020) Topical vancomycin 5% is more efficacious than 2.5% and 1.25% for reducing viable methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus in infectious keratitis. Cornea 39(2):250–253CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Flynn HW, Batra NR, Schwartz SG, Grzybowski A. (2018) Antimicrobial treatment: routes/dosages/preparation/adverse effects, antimicrobial resistance, and alternatives. Endophthalmitis in clinical practice, Springer, pp 123–139 Flynn HW, Batra NR, Schwartz SG, Grzybowski A. (2018) Antimicrobial treatment: routes/dosages/preparation/adverse effects, antimicrobial resistance, and alternatives. Endophthalmitis in clinical practice, Springer, pp 123–139
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ong SJ, Huang YC, Tan HY et al (2013) Staphylococcus aureus keratitis: a review of hospital cases. PLoS ONE 8(11):e80119CrossRef Ong SJ, Huang YC, Tan HY et al (2013) Staphylococcus aureus keratitis: a review of hospital cases. PLoS ONE 8(11):e80119CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cong Y, Yang S, Rao X (2020) Vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a review of case updating and clinical features. J Adv Res 21:169–176CrossRef Cong Y, Yang S, Rao X (2020) Vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a review of case updating and clinical features. J Adv Res 21:169–176CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu CY, Lee WS, Fung CP et al (1996) Comparative study of teicoplanin vs vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Clin Drug Investig 12(2):80–87CrossRef Liu CY, Lee WS, Fung CP et al (1996) Comparative study of teicoplanin vs vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Clin Drug Investig 12(2):80–87CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Svetitsky S, Leibovici L, Paul M (2009) Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(10):4069–4079CrossRef Svetitsky S, Leibovici L, Paul M (2009) Comparative efficacy and safety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin: systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(10):4069–4079CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Torumkuney D, Tunger A, Sancak B et al (2020) Results from the Survey of antibiotic resistance (SOAR) 2015–17 in Turkey: data based on CLSI, EUCAST (dose-specific) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) breakpoints. J Antimicrob Chemother 75(Supplement_1):i88–i99CrossRef Torumkuney D, Tunger A, Sancak B et al (2020) Results from the Survey of antibiotic resistance (SOAR) 2015–17 in Turkey: data based on CLSI, EUCAST (dose-specific) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) breakpoints. J Antimicrob Chemother 75(Supplement_1):i88–i99CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Parks RW, Clements WD, Smye MG, Pope C, Rowlands BJ, Diamond T (1996) Intestinal barrier dysfunction in clinical and experimental obstructive jaundice and its reversal by internal biliary drainage. Br J Surg 83(10):1345–1349CrossRef Parks RW, Clements WD, Smye MG, Pope C, Rowlands BJ, Diamond T (1996) Intestinal barrier dysfunction in clinical and experimental obstructive jaundice and its reversal by internal biliary drainage. Br J Surg 83(10):1345–1349CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mengeloglu FZ, Kucukbayrak A, Bucak YY et al (2013) Efficacy of daptomycin on experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis in rabbits. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 29(10):893–899CrossRef Mengeloglu FZ, Kucukbayrak A, Bucak YY et al (2013) Efficacy of daptomycin on experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis in rabbits. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 29(10):893–899CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Akova Budak B, Baykara M, Kivanc SA, Yilmaz H, Cicek S (2016) Comparing the ocular surface effects of topical vancomycin and linezolid for treating bacterial keratitis. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 35(2):126–130PubMed Akova Budak B, Baykara M, Kivanc SA, Yilmaz H, Cicek S (2016) Comparing the ocular surface effects of topical vancomycin and linezolid for treating bacterial keratitis. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 35(2):126–130PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Goktas S, Kurtoglu MG, Sakarya Y et al (2015) New therapy option for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis: tigecycline. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 31(2):122–127CrossRef Goktas S, Kurtoglu MG, Sakarya Y et al (2015) New therapy option for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis: tigecycline. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 31(2):122–127CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sueke H, Kaye SB, Neal T, Hall A, Tuft S, Parry CM (2010) An in vitro investigation of synergy or antagonism between antimicrobial combinations against isolates from bacterial keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(8):4151–4155CrossRef Sueke H, Kaye SB, Neal T, Hall A, Tuft S, Parry CM (2010) An in vitro investigation of synergy or antagonism between antimicrobial combinations against isolates from bacterial keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(8):4151–4155CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaye SB, Neal T, Nicholson S et al (2009) Concentration and bioavailability of ciprofloxacin and teicoplanin in the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(7):3176–3184CrossRef Kaye SB, Neal T, Nicholson S et al (2009) Concentration and bioavailability of ciprofloxacin and teicoplanin in the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(7):3176–3184CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Briggs MC, McDonald P, Bourke R, Smith G, McGalliard JN, Wong D (1998) Intravitreal penetration of teicoplanin. Eye (Lond) 12(Pt 2):252–255CrossRef Briggs MC, McDonald P, Bourke R, Smith G, McGalliard JN, Wong D (1998) Intravitreal penetration of teicoplanin. Eye (Lond) 12(Pt 2):252–255CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Irigoyen C, Ziahosseini K, Morphis G, Stappler T, Heimann H (2012) Endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250(4):499–505CrossRef Irigoyen C, Ziahosseini K, Morphis G, Stappler T, Heimann H (2012) Endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250(4):499–505CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta AA, Mammo DA, Page MA (2020) Intrastromal bevacizumab in the management of corneal neovascularization: a retrospective review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258(1):167–173CrossRef Gupta AA, Mammo DA, Page MA (2020) Intrastromal bevacizumab in the management of corneal neovascularization: a retrospective review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258(1):167–173CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nada WM, Al Aswad MA, El-Haig WM (2017) Combined intrastromal injection of amphotericin B and topical fluconazole in the treatment of resistant cases of keratomycosis: a retrospective study. Clin Ophthalmol 11:871–874CrossRef Nada WM, Al Aswad MA, El-Haig WM (2017) Combined intrastromal injection of amphotericin B and topical fluconazole in the treatment of resistant cases of keratomycosis: a retrospective study. Clin Ophthalmol 11:871–874CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang SY, Lee GA (2011) Intrastromal injection of antibiotic agent in the management of recalcitrant bacterial keratitis. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(5):960–962CrossRef Liang SY, Lee GA (2011) Intrastromal injection of antibiotic agent in the management of recalcitrant bacterial keratitis. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(5):960–962CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng HL, Robbins CB, Fekrat S (2020) A nine-year analysis of practice patterns, microbiologic yield, and clinical outcomes in cases of presumed infectious endophthalmitis. Ophthalmol Retina 4(6):555–559CrossRef Feng HL, Robbins CB, Fekrat S (2020) A nine-year analysis of practice patterns, microbiologic yield, and clinical outcomes in cases of presumed infectious endophthalmitis. Ophthalmol Retina 4(6):555–559CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Citron DM, Merriam CV, Tyrrell KL, Warren YA, Fernandez H, Goldstein EJ (2003) In vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, bacitracin, and four other antimicrobials against intestinal anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47(7):2334–2338CrossRef Citron DM, Merriam CV, Tyrrell KL, Warren YA, Fernandez H, Goldstein EJ (2003) In vitro activities of ramoplanin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, bacitracin, and four other antimicrobials against intestinal anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47(7):2334–2338CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleischer AB, Hoover DL, Khan JA, Parisi JT, Burns RP (1986) Topical vancomycin formulation for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis blepharoconjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol 101(3):283–287CrossRef Fleischer AB, Hoover DL, Khan JA, Parisi JT, Burns RP (1986) Topical vancomycin formulation for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis blepharoconjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol 101(3):283–287CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of the effect of teicoplanin and vancomycin on experimental methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus keratitis
verfasst von
Ahmet Yucel Ucgul
Mustafa Behcet
Publikationsdatum
27.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-01696-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

International Ophthalmology 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Die Verwendung von Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit stellt immer eine Off-label-Anwendung dar. Ein Einsatz von Arzneimitteln muss daher besonders sorgfältig auf sein Risiko-Nutzen-Verhältnis bewertet werden. In der vorliegenden …

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Vitrektomie Originalie

Die endogene Endophthalmitis ist eine hämatogen fortgeleitete, bakterielle oder fungale Infektion, die über choroidale oder retinale Gefäße in den Augapfel eingeschwemmt wird [ 1 – 3 ]. Von dort infiltrieren die Keime in die Netzhaut, den …

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

Vitrektomie Leitthema

Eine endogene Endophthalmitis stellt einen ophthalmologischen Notfall dar, der umgehender Diagnostik und Therapie bedarf. Es sollte mit geeigneten Methoden, wie beispielsweise dem Freiburger Endophthalmitis-Set, ein Keimnachweis erfolgen. Bei der …

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Die bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea, insbesondere ohne die Ausbildung von lichtstreuenden Narben, ist oberstes Gebot, um einer dauerhaften Schädigung der Hornhaut frühzeitig entgegenzuwirken und die Funktion des Auges zu erhalten.   

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.