Erschienen in:
22.08.2018 | Original Paper
Comparison of three optical biometers: IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin
verfasst von:
Alvaro Ortiz, Virgilio Galvis, Alejandro Tello, Victor Viaña, Maria Isabel Corrales, Miguel Ochoa, Carlos Julián Rodriguez
Erschienen in:
International Ophthalmology
|
Ausgabe 8/2019
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the results of optical biometry using the IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin in eyes with cataract.
Methods
In 231 eyes of 152 patients with cataract, the measurements of 3 different biometers were retrospectively compared. Paired comparisons were performed for axial length (AL), mean keratometry (mean K) and anterior chamber depth (ACD).
Results
In only 197 of the 231 eyes (85.3%), it was possible to obtain reliable measurements of AL with all the three devices. It was not possible to determine AL in 16 eyes (6.9%) with Lenstar LS 900; in 19 eyes (8.2%) with Aladdin; and in 20 eyes (8.6%) with IOLMaster 500 possibly related to the severity of lens opacification (the corneas had good transparency in the eyes included in the study). There was a statistically significant difference in AL between IOLMaster 500 and the remaining two biometers (P = 0.03). However, the amount of difference was considered clinically not significant (0.04 mm). The mean keratometry (mean K) was determined in 203 eyes (87.9%) with all the three devices. Differences in mean K were between − 0.1 and 0.06 Diopters (D), which were considered neither statistically (P > 0.05) nor clinically significant. The anterior chamber depth (ACD) was determined in 197 eyes (85.28%) with all the three biometers. The differences between the three devices (0.03 to 0.13 mm) were not statistically significant and considered also clinically not significant.
Conclusions
There were no clinically significant differences between these 3 biometers in AL, mean K and ACD.