Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology 8/2019

22.08.2018 | Original Paper

Comparison of three optical biometers: IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin

verfasst von: Alvaro Ortiz, Virgilio Galvis, Alejandro Tello, Victor Viaña, Maria Isabel Corrales, Miguel Ochoa, Carlos Julián Rodriguez

Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the results of optical biometry using the IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin in eyes with cataract.

Methods

In 231 eyes of 152 patients with cataract, the measurements of 3 different biometers were retrospectively compared. Paired comparisons were performed for axial length (AL), mean keratometry (mean K) and anterior chamber depth (ACD).

Results

In only 197 of the 231 eyes (85.3%), it was possible to obtain reliable measurements of AL with all the three devices. It was not possible to determine AL in 16 eyes (6.9%) with Lenstar LS 900; in 19 eyes (8.2%) with Aladdin; and in 20 eyes (8.6%) with IOLMaster 500 possibly related to the severity of lens opacification (the corneas had good transparency in the eyes included in the study). There was a statistically significant difference in AL between IOLMaster 500 and the remaining two biometers (P = 0.03). However, the amount of difference was considered clinically not significant (0.04 mm). The mean keratometry (mean K) was determined in 203 eyes (87.9%) with all the three devices. Differences in mean K were between − 0.1 and 0.06 Diopters (D), which were considered neither statistically (P > 0.05) nor clinically significant. The anterior chamber depth (ACD) was determined in 197 eyes (85.28%) with all the three biometers. The differences between the three devices (0.03 to 0.13 mm) were not statistically significant and considered also clinically not significant.

Conclusions

There were no clinically significant differences between these 3 biometers in AL, mean K and ACD.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B (2000) Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:765–773CrossRefPubMed Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B (2000) Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:765–773CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, Wirtitsch M, Drexler W, Hitzenberger CK et al (2002) Biometry of cataractous eyes using partial coherence interferometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype I. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:224–229CrossRefPubMed Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, Wirtitsch M, Drexler W, Hitzenberger CK et al (2002) Biometry of cataractous eyes using partial coherence interferometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype I. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:224–229CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nazm N, Chakrabarti A (2017) Update on optical biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. TNOA J Ophthalmic Sci Res 55:196–210CrossRef Nazm N, Chakrabarti A (2017) Update on optical biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. TNOA J Ophthalmic Sci Res 55:196–210CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzer MP, Mamusa M, Auffarth GU (2009) Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements. Br J Ophthalmol 93:807–810CrossRefPubMed Holzer MP, Mamusa M, Auffarth GU (2009) Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements. Br J Ophthalmol 93:807–810CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ (2009) A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol 93:949–953CrossRefPubMed Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ (2009) A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol 93:949–953CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandal P, Berrow EJ, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS, Uthoff D, Holland D et al (2014) Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometer. Br J Ophthalmol 98:256–258CrossRefPubMed Mandal P, Berrow EJ, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS, Uthoff D, Holland D et al (2014) Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometer. Br J Ophthalmol 98:256–258CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Salouti R, Nowroozzadeh MH, Zamani M, Ghoreyshi M, Salouti R (2011) Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation. Optometry 82:140–147CrossRefPubMed Salouti R, Nowroozzadeh MH, Zamani M, Ghoreyshi M, Salouti R (2011) Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation. Optometry 82:140–147CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shajari M, Lehmann UC, Kohnen T (2016) Comparison of corneal diameter and anterior chamber depth measurements using 4 different devices. Cornea 35:838–842CrossRefPubMed Shajari M, Lehmann UC, Kohnen T (2016) Comparison of corneal diameter and anterior chamber depth measurements using 4 different devices. Cornea 35:838–842CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill W, Angeles R, Otani T (2008) Evaluation of a new IOLMaster algorithm to measure axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:920–924CrossRefPubMed Hill W, Angeles R, Otani T (2008) Evaluation of a new IOLMaster algorithm to measure axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:920–924CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman G, Pesudovs K (2005) The impact of cataract severity on measurement acquisition with the IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:439–442CrossRefPubMed Freeman G, Pesudovs K (2005) The impact of cataract severity on measurement acquisition with the IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:439–442CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA (2002) Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye (Lond) 16:552–556CrossRef Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA (2002) Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye (Lond) 16:552–556CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Németh J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N (2003) Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:85–88CrossRefPubMed Németh J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N (2003) Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:85–88CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat McAlinden C, Wang Q, Pesudovs K, Yang X, Bao F, Yu A et al (2015) Axial Length Measurement Failure Rates with the IOLMaster and Lenstar LS 900 in Eyes with Cataract. PLoS ONE 10:e0128929CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McAlinden C, Wang Q, Pesudovs K, Yang X, Bao F, Yu A et al (2015) Axial Length Measurement Failure Rates with the IOLMaster and Lenstar LS 900 in Eyes with Cataract. PLoS ONE 10:e0128929CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mylonas G, Sacu S, Buehl W, Ritter M, Georgopoulos M, Schmidt-Erfurth U (2011) Performance of three biometry devices in patients with different grades of age-related cataract. Acta Ophthalmol 89:e237CrossRefPubMed Mylonas G, Sacu S, Buehl W, Ritter M, Georgopoulos M, Schmidt-Erfurth U (2011) Performance of three biometry devices in patients with different grades of age-related cataract. Acta Ophthalmol 89:e237CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Stattin M, Zehetner C, Bechrakis NE, Speicher L (2015) Comparison of IOL-Master 500 vs. Lenstar LS900 concerning the calculation of target refraction: a retrospective analysis. Ophthalmologe 112:444–450CrossRefPubMed Stattin M, Zehetner C, Bechrakis NE, Speicher L (2015) Comparison of IOL-Master 500 vs. Lenstar LS900 concerning the calculation of target refraction: a retrospective analysis. Ophthalmologe 112:444–450CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shammas HJ, Ortiz S, Shammas MC, Kim SH, Chong C (2016) Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:50–61CrossRefPubMed Shammas HJ, Ortiz S, Shammas MC, Kim SH, Chong C (2016) Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:50–61CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Akman A, Asena L, Güngör SG (2016) Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500. Br J Ophthalmol 100:1201–1205CrossRefPubMed Akman A, Asena L, Güngör SG (2016) Evaluation and comparison of the new swept source OCT-based IOLMaster 700 with the IOLMaster 500. Br J Ophthalmol 100:1201–1205CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Goebels S, Pattmöller M, Eppig T, Cayless A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A (2015) Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:2387–2393CrossRefPubMed Goebels S, Pattmöller M, Eppig T, Cayless A, Seitz B, Langenbucher A (2015) Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:2387–2393CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao R, Chen H, Savini G, Miao Y, Wang X, Yang J et al (2017) Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry. Sci Rep 7:2484CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gao R, Chen H, Savini G, Miao Y, Wang X, Yang J et al (2017) Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry. Sci Rep 7:2484CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G (2010) Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:644–648CrossRefPubMed Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G (2010) Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:644–648CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hua Y, Qiu W, Xiao Q, Wu Q (2018) Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes. PLoS ONE 13:e0193023CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hua Y, Qiu W, Xiao Q, Wu Q (2018) Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes. PLoS ONE 13:e0193023CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunert KS, Peter M, Blum M, Haigis W, Sekundo W, Schütze J et al (2016) Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:76–83CrossRefPubMed Kunert KS, Peter M, Blum M, Haigis W, Sekundo W, Schütze J et al (2016) Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:76–83CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Turczynowska M, Koźlik-Nowakowska K, Gaca-Wysocka M, Grzybowski A (2016) Effective ocular biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. European Ophthalmic Review 10:94–100CrossRef Turczynowska M, Koźlik-Nowakowska K, Gaca-Wysocka M, Grzybowski A (2016) Effective ocular biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. European Ophthalmic Review 10:94–100CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G, Huang J (2016) Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:62–67CrossRefPubMed Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G, Huang J (2016) Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:62–67CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat McAlinden C, Wang Q, Gao R, Zhao W, Yu A, Li Y, Guo Y, Huang J (2017) Axial length measurement failure rates with biometers using swept-source optical coherence tomography compared to partial-coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence interferometry. Am J Ophthalmol 173:64–69CrossRefPubMed McAlinden C, Wang Q, Gao R, Zhao W, Yu A, Li Y, Guo Y, Huang J (2017) Axial length measurement failure rates with biometers using swept-source optical coherence tomography compared to partial-coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence interferometry. Am J Ophthalmol 173:64–69CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Higashiyama T, Mori H, Nakajima F, Ohji M (2018) Comparison of a new biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a conventional biometer using partial coherence interferometry. PLoS ONE 13:e0196401CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Higashiyama T, Mori H, Nakajima F, Ohji M (2018) Comparison of a new biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a conventional biometer using partial coherence interferometry. PLoS ONE 13:e0196401CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Aramberri J, Huang J, Barboni P (2017) Accuracy of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer for IOL power calculation and comparison to IOLMaster. J Refract Surg 33:690–695CrossRefPubMed Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Aramberri J, Huang J, Barboni P (2017) Accuracy of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer for IOL power calculation and comparison to IOLMaster. J Refract Surg 33:690–695CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 32:307–317CrossRef Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 32:307–317CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Giavarina D (2015) Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 25:141–151CrossRef Giavarina D (2015) Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 25:141–151CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of three optical biometers: IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin
verfasst von
Alvaro Ortiz
Virgilio Galvis
Alejandro Tello
Victor Viaña
Maria Isabel Corrales
Miguel Ochoa
Carlos Julián Rodriguez
Publikationsdatum
22.08.2018
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-1006-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

International Ophthalmology 8/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Die Verwendung von Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit stellt immer eine Off-label-Anwendung dar. Ein Einsatz von Arzneimitteln muss daher besonders sorgfältig auf sein Risiko-Nutzen-Verhältnis bewertet werden. In der vorliegenden …

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Vitrektomie Originalie

Die endogene Endophthalmitis ist eine hämatogen fortgeleitete, bakterielle oder fungale Infektion, die über choroidale oder retinale Gefäße in den Augapfel eingeschwemmt wird [ 1 – 3 ]. Von dort infiltrieren die Keime in die Netzhaut, den …

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

Vitrektomie Leitthema

Eine endogene Endophthalmitis stellt einen ophthalmologischen Notfall dar, der umgehender Diagnostik und Therapie bedarf. Es sollte mit geeigneten Methoden, wie beispielsweise dem Freiburger Endophthalmitis-Set, ein Keimnachweis erfolgen. Bei der …

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Die bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea, insbesondere ohne die Ausbildung von lichtstreuenden Narben, ist oberstes Gebot, um einer dauerhaften Schädigung der Hornhaut frühzeitig entgegenzuwirken und die Funktion des Auges zu erhalten.   

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.